POTSDAM, Germany \u2013 The Allied occupation of Germany began 58 years ago this month and in the eyes of many Germans has not yet ended. Foreign armies are still based on German soil and Europe\u2019s largest and most prosperous \u201cdemocracy\u201d still lacks a constitution and a peace treaty putting a formal end to the Second World War. <\/p>\n
For Germany, World War II, like the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, lacks formal legal closure because a peace treaty has never been signed between the Allies and Germany. <\/p>\n
The stated goal of the Anglo-American forces in Iraq is to liberate the Iraqi people and establish democracy. However, if the U.S. and British occupation of Iraq follows the pattern set by the Allied occupation of Germany, a sovereign democracy in Iraq is not likely to appear in the near future. <\/p>\n
Although President George W. Bush\u2019s much ballyhooed victory speech from the deck of an aircraft carrier was meant to look like the end of the Iraq conflict, it was not, and if the German model is repeated in Iraq, there may never be a formal end to the war in Iraq. <\/p>\n
While the partly reunified German nation is considered a modern European democracy, it has no constitution other than the temporary Basic Law (Grundgesetz) originally written in 1948 under the guidance of the U.S. military occupation forces and originally meant only to apply to the western parts of Germany under U.S. control. One of the Basic Law\u2019s final articles says it is to be replaced when Germany obtains a constitution. <\/p>\n
Article 23 defining the legal jurisdiction of the Basic Law was removed at the request of former Secretary of State James Baker at a Paris conference of the Allied powers and the two former German states on July 17, 1990. The two German states were legally abolished at this conference and their foreign ministers were only informed of the changes after it had been done. As a result of these changes, the Basic Law does not legally apply to the reunified German state, according to some legal experts. <\/p>\n
In any case, the Basic Law is incomplete and contradictory and, therefore, cannot serve as a proper constitution. For example, Article 139 states that \u201clegal provisions\u201d concerning Nazism and German militarism are \u201cnot affected\u201d by the Basic Law. This article indicates that the numerous Allied occupation laws and proclamations remain in effect in spite of the Basic Law. <\/p>\n
\u201cArticle 139 is a little contradictory,\u201d Christian Tomuschat, professor of German constitutional law at Berlin\u2019s Humboldt University, told American Free Press. Despite the obvious problems with the temporary Basic Law, which has never been ratified by a vote of the people, Tomuschat says it is a valid German constitution in his opinion. \u201cThe Grundgesetz is the constitution \u2013 it just has a different name,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n
There is no movement in Germany towards creating a constitution, according to Tomuschat, who says a proper constitution is not as important as the unemployment problem: \u201cJobs are now more important than a constitution,\u201d Tomuschat told AFP. <\/p>\n
The fact that the flawed and temporary Basic Law serves as Germany\u2019s de facto constitution is unacceptable to Wolfgang Gerhard G\u00fcnter Ebel, Germany\u2019s provisional Reichskanzler. Ebel heads the provisional government that claims to be the legal successor to the Second German Reich, which was replaced by Adolf Hitler\u2019s illegal Third Reich (1933-45). <\/p>\n
\u201cGermany rests on the 2nd Reich\u201d and on the constitution of the Weimar Republic created on August 11, 1919, Ebel told AFP.
\nIn 1987, the Allies requested that Ebel submit a copy of the 1919 original Weimar constitution of the German Reich, which he did. This is the only legal constitution for Germany, according to Ebel, until a peace treaty is signed. <\/p>\n
The Allies recognized the legal boundaries of the German Reich from December 31, 1937. These borders include the occupied German lands of East Prussia, Pomerania, and Silesia, the final status of which was meant to be determined in a peace settlement. <\/p>\n
This peace settlement never happened. The so-called Final Settlement of Sept. 12, 1990 called for the existing border between Poland and Germany to be confirmed and for Germany to relinquish any territorial claims in the future. The status of East Prussia and the capital city of K\u00f6nigsberg, which was occupied and renamed by the Soviet Union in 1945, is not mentioned in the Final Settlement. <\/p>\n
According to the provisional government, the Final Settlement is not valid because it was negotiated and signed by the foreign ministers of the two German states, the BRD and the DDR, both of which legally ceased to exist after the Paris conference of July 17, 1990. <\/p>\n
\u201cThe German government is illegal,\u201d Ebel told AFP, \u201cand what they do has no basis in law.\u201d Asked how it could be that the German people are unaware of this situation, Ebel said: \u201cThe German media is still under the control of the Allies. The entire media is controlled. <\/p>\n
\u201cThe Second World War has not ended, because a peace treaty has not been signed between Germany and the Allies,\u201d \u201d Ebel says, \u201cThe peace contract is the most important thing that we need and want.\u201d <\/p>\n
Because there is no formal peace treaty between Germany and the Allies, headed by the United States, German sovereignty is compromised. \u201cUntil we have a peace treaty, Germany is a colony of the United States,\u201d John Kornblum of the U.S. State Dept. told Ebel on Oct. 20, 1985. Kornblum is now employed by Lazar Bank in Berlin, according to Ebel. <\/p>\n
Some 80,000 U.S. military personnel are permanently based in Germany and Britain also continues to base troops and military equipment in the western German zone they formerly occupied. It is not uncommon to see British tanks on the streets of the area near M\u00fcnster in Westphalia. <\/p>\n
U.S. occupation laws handed down by the Supreme Headquarter Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) are still in effect, Ebel said. The first law, Proclamation No. 1, making General Dwight D. Eisenhower supreme authority in the areas under U.S. control was signed on Feb. 13, 1944. Allied authorities have informed Ebel that these SHAEF laws will remain in effect for 60 years from the date of signing and apply to all of Europe. <\/p>\n
Calls to the U.S. State Department in Washington and the U.S. Embassy in Berlin concerning the validity of SHAEF laws and U.S. occupation proclamations in Germany were not returned. <\/p>\n
\u201cWhen there is a peace treaty \u2013 when the wound is healed \u2013 many things will change,\u201d Ebel says, \u201cnot only for Germany, but for the whole world. <\/p>\n
\u201cThe United Nations is also provisional \u2013 if there is a peace treaty between Germany and the Allies [primarily the United States] \u2013 the UN will cease to exist as we know it,\u201d Ebel said. The UN organization was founded in 1945 and originated with the 26 nations that had joined the anti-Nazi coalition in 1942. By 1944 the coalition had grown to include 47 nations. <\/p>\n
The UN Charter contains \u201cenemy state clauses\u201d [Articles 53 and 107], which were established because of Germany and name it as the \u201cenemy state.\u201d <\/p>\n
\u201cThe Bundesrepublik Deutschland (the former West German state) is not the legal successor or inheritor of the Second German Reich,\u201d according to Ebel. For this reason a legal peace treaty cannot be signed by the current German government in Berlin, he said. <\/p>\n
\u201cUntil the real government is established and voted by the people,\u201d Ebel said, the provisional government is necessary to \u201cfulfill the role of the legal German government.\u201d <\/p>\n
The Allies have authorized Ebel to serve as head of the provisional government, he says. A civil servant with the German railroad, Ebel was born in Berlin in 1939 and is a citizen of the German Reich, having never held citizenship of either German state that resulted from the Second World War. Berlin was a separate zone and \u201chas never been part of the BRD or DDR,\u201d Ebel said. <\/p>\n
Ebel was first appointed by the U.S. Military Court in Berlin to serve as Rechtskonsulent for Prussia on Sept. 23, 1980. <\/p>\n
On Jan. 9, 1984, the U.S. State Department in Berlin appointed Ebel to serve as the head of the German railroad (Reichsbahn) in West Berlin. Exactly forty years after the German military (Wehrmacht) surrendered, on May 8, 1985, Ebel was appointed as Transportation Minister for the German Reich by the U.S. High Commissioner in Germany, who he says was then U.S. Ambassador to West Germany (BRD) Richard Burt. <\/p>\n
Finally, on Sept. 27, 2000, Ebel was appointed chancellor of the German Reich (Reichskanzler) by Ernst Matscheko, a representative of the U.S. Dept. of Justice. Matscheko reportedly asked Ebel to name a Reichspr\u00e4sident and a special ambassador to the United Nations. <\/p>\n
The U.S. Embassy in Berlin will neither confirm nor deny the claims made by Ebel, for which he presents documents as evidence. A spokesman at the U.S. Embassy told AFP: \u201cWe are not responsible for what they [the Reich\u2019s government] claim.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Fifty-eight years after the end of World War II, the German state still lacks a constitution and a peace treaty. In effect it is a US colony. Is Iraq heading the same way?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":106,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Miscellaneous"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/106"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/869\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}