{"id":332606,"date":"2026-10-31T06:10:44","date_gmt":"2026-10-31T06:10:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=332606"},"modified":"2026-10-31T06:40:54","modified_gmt":"2026-10-31T06:40:54","slug":"ofcom-says-facial-scans-not-accurate-enough-digital-id-here-we-come","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=332606","title":{"rendered":"OfCom Says \u201cFacial Scans Not Accurate Enough\u201d \u2013 Digital ID, here we come"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Kit Knightly \u2013 Off-Guardian Oct 30, 2026<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>The UK\u2019s much-anticipated \u201csocial media ban\u201d isn\u2019t even actually law yet, and it\u2019s already proving itself an obvious front for pushing digital ID on the whole country.<\/p>\n<p>The so-called \u201csocial media ban for under-16s\u201d \u2013 more accurately an \u201conline anonymity ban\u201d for <em>everyone<\/em> \u2013 is due to come into force in March 2027, and the build up to that happy day has already seen regulators clamouring for stricter measures.<\/p>\n<p>OfCom \u2013 the body empowered to enforce the ban, and other dystopian internet controls in the UK \u2013 has issued a warning that facial scans, put forward as one way over 16s can prove they should be allowed to use social media, are not accurate enough.<\/p>\n<p>According to the wannabe tyrants \u2013 sorry, \u201cregulatory agency\u201d \u2013 results from Australia\u2019s social media ban show that kids are getting around the new law too easily, and that\u2019s because the facial scans can make mistakes, and even be fooled by relatively simple tricks.<\/p>\n<p>What does this mean?<\/p>\n<p>Well, it means we\u2019re going to need to use identification documents instead, obviously.<\/p>\n<p>As the <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.is\/8IYWP#selection-4619.0-4623.185\">Telegraph<\/a> puts it:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Everyone over 16 may need ID to use social media, Ofcom says<\/p>\n<p>Get used to playing \u201cOfcom says\u201d, because it\u2019s very much going to be the national hobby from 2027 onwards. Like \u201cSimon says\u201d, only there\u2019s no prize for the winner and hefty fines or prison time for the losers.<\/p>\n<p>This has been the predictable play since the ban was announced, made doubly obvious by the suspect enthusiasm with which the press reported the alleged permeability of Australia\u2019s ban.<\/p>\n<p>The only reason the press ever has to report authoritarian isn\u2019t working, is justifying stricter authoritarianism.<\/p>\n<p>And, just in case you can\u2019t see the digital ID train barrelling down the tracks towards us, Ofcom had this to say as well [emphasis added]:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">[OfCom said] digital ID services enabled people to digitally prove who they were or information about themselves, such as their age [\u2026] they could <em>use a photo ID to verify their age with a digital ID service once, then use the digital ID services thereafter, reducing the need to access their photo ID repeatedly<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Golly, doesn\u2019t that sound convenient?<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not even slightly hard to see where this is going.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Facial scans are too easy to fool, we have to scan our passports or drivers\u2019 licenses instead.<\/li>\n<li>Scanning your physical ID every time you want to sign up to a digital service takes too long, maybe we should have an app instead.<\/li>\n<li>Signing in to different platforms with different passwords is so confusing, why not use the ID app to log in to everything?<\/li>\n<li>To save time, you can use it to store your tax information, employment and medical records too.<\/li>\n<li>Did you know processing digital ID checks are instant, but processing hard-copy ID checks takes 24-48 hours?<\/li>\n<li>Unfortunately, using an old fashioned paper passport is not as sustainable as the digital ID app, and moving forward its use will incur a \u00a35 carbon off-set fee.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\u2026and there you have it.<\/p>\n<p>Digital ID for all, because it\u2019s cheaper and faster and \u201cOfcom says\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>And, as ever, this is not just a UK thing. Dozens of countries <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/tech\/social-media-ban-children-countries-list\">all over the world<\/a> are pulling the same manoeuvre with only the tiniest variation in measures or age.<\/p>\n<p>Just this week, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/litigation\/greece-passes-social-media-ban-children-under-15-2026-10-23\/?taid=6adb1fbc440aec0001fbded5&amp;utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&amp;utm_medium=trueAnthem&amp;utm_source=twitter\">Greece joined the procession<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>As we observed on Twitter, and have said many times before:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cIf all the nations of the world have near-identical laws, how is that functionally different from a global government?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not.<\/p>\n<p>And when all the countries have their bans, and their ID apps, and all those systems are all \u201cinteroperable\u201d to promote \u201chassle-free travel\u201d, we\u2019ll all know it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/support-us\/\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Support Off-Guardian<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/2026\/10\/30\/ofcom-says-facial-scans-not-accurate-enough-digital-id-here-we-come\/\">Source\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The only reason the press has to report authoritarian isn\u2019t working, like facial scans being fooled by relatively simple tricks, is to justify the introduction of even stricter authoritarian controls.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":326587,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[77],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-332606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-feature-posts"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=332606"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":332607,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332606\/revisions\/332607"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/326587"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=332606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=332606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=332606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}