{"id":329886,"date":"2026-08-11T05:47:28","date_gmt":"2026-08-11T05:47:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=329886"},"modified":"2026-08-12T07:14:01","modified_gmt":"2026-08-12T07:14:01","slug":"lockerbie-case-reveals-wests-corrupt-judiciary-on-a-level-hollywood-couldnt-make-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=329886","title":{"rendered":"Lockerbie case reveals West’s corrupt judiciary on a level Hollywood couldn\u2019t make up"},"content":{"rendered":"

Martin Jay \u2013 Strategic Review Aug 10, 2026<\/strong><\/h1>\n

When Western governments used to do highly illegal operations, one of the biggest worries from the outset would always be: what if the press gets hold of this? Scrutiny from journalists for a long time was always the chief worry of the architects of dirty wars, cooperating with terror groups and paying the bad guys.<\/p>\n

But since 9\/11, the deep state has shifted its views towards media, no longer fearful of its opprobrium. The Twin Towers attack showed us all how the American government could create a so-called independent enquiry and present a narrative so fanciful and absurd that, if it weren\u2019t for the thousands who died that day, would be comical. 9\/11 was a turning point. It allowed the powers that be to rush through new laws which stripped away people\u2019s rights while pushing the new relationship with media to the limit.<\/p>\n

What is the new relationship? It is simply that as the internet took off around 2000, media giants realised that their business model of selling newspapers, based on independent journalism which held the state to account, was doomed. The new model to replace it would be to disinvest in journalism as we know it and replace it with a poorer cousin which not only moved it closer to the deep state \u2013 in particular the security services \u2013 but made it a content junkie for what the CIA, MI5 and Mossad could feed it. The result today is that if you really want to understand a subject and want to do deep research on it, it is highly unlikely you would go to mainstream media. And yet media giants continue to play an important role in shaping our lives and manufacturing a consent which still has the desired effect: keeping the elites in power. We have never seen a period since the invention of newspapers in the 17th century where there is a greater divide between the truth and the perceived truth \u2013 and whereby the latter is winning hands down.<\/p>\n

Just observe how Western journalists report on Ukraine, for example, or don\u2019t report on it. Invariably, there is a heavy Western slant, of course, as they all fall over themselves to win brownie points from the security services themselves, but it is more often than not what is left out which is just as important as the biased narrative itself. A number of Russian victories on the battlefield recently have simply not even made it to the pages of serious highbrow British newspapers. In particular, it\u2019s worth noting that the Russian forces\u2019 blockade of Odessa, making Ukraine now landlocked, seems to be not even newsworthy. This comes about when the political elite allow the security services and journalists to together create an entirely false narrative which works because everyone wants it to be real. People start believing their own BS, and so a blinkered vision takes over which simply refuses to process the news that Odessa port is now no longer functioning and no ships are getting in or leaving. Fake news!<\/p>\n

But when those same storytellers get together and re-write history by presenting to the public new documentation which has arrived under extremely dubious circumstances, then those countries can hardly call themselves democracies any more. Under such a farcical arrangement, justice can never be served \u2013 or even seen to be served.<\/p>\n

The Lockerbie case, where a U.S. airliner fell from the sky over a sleepy Scottish town, killing all on board and 11 on the ground due to a bomb being placed on board, is a good example of how far the deep state can twist and corrupt judicial process as a means to an end. Bluntly, the Americans, after almost 40 years, want to frame the Libyans for the act of terrorism, as it helps them cover up a darker, more macabre role that they themselves played in the bombing. And yet, despite initially planting evidence in the original case in the Netherlands which neatly framed two Libyan intelligence officers, there has been no hue and cry about their tawdry handling of the case, which should be a scandal. Now it\u2019s much worse. In recent days we have heard reports of new evidence which the Americans claimed to have found \u2013 such as accounts of the chief culprit\u2019s own activities in Malta at that time, Semtex explosives believed to be in his office, and fanciful accounts of timers having an eleven-hour duration. All of this so far has come from new documentation which readers should be very cynical about.<\/p>\n

But just very recently, an account from a former Mossad agent who was employed by Pan Am\u2019s insurance company to investigate what really happened has thrown a light on why the Americans are so determined, after all this time, to keep the Libyan case alive. In a recent podcast interview, former Mossad assassin Juval Aviv explains how the CIA, from 1987, were allowing Hezbollah in Beirut to use Pan Am to send their own narcotics to the U.S. and collect revenue from them. Reagan allowed this in exchange for keeping seven U.S.\/UK hostages alive. These weekly flights, usually from Beirut to Cyprus, then to London, then to the U.S., were run by CIA officers and were very lucrative for the Lebanese group.<\/p>\n

To this day, media hardly touch on the point of these so-called \u2018controlled flights\u2019. Aviv\u2019s three-month investigation in 1989 uncovered all the details, and because Pan Am was a client of his as an investigator, he came to the conclusion quite quickly that the Damascus-based Palestinian group which specialised in downing planes was the culprit, via its chief drug supplier from the Beqaa Valley in Lebanon.<\/p>\n

What might have been in his initial report which caused him and his work to be marginalised was the bombshell revelation, also made in the podcast, that it was the Americans themselves who brought down the plane \u2013 which explains why, to this day, the Americans are going to extraordinary lengths to feed media with disinformation.<\/p>\n

Aviv claims that the CIA knew about the bomb and allowed it to get on the plane so that it would kill three rogue officers who were also on the plane, planning to blow the whistle on the drug-running operation to Congress when they got back. Perhaps even more shocking is his claim that over 40 U.S. government workers were ordered off the flight shortly before it departed, and that the drug money made in the U.S. actually went towards buying arms for the Contras. In short, the CIA discovered the bomb plot and allowed it to go ahead so that their operations could not face the embarrassing ignominy which eventually happened to Reagan through the Contra scandal that followed. But besides all this, we have the most recent \u201cevidence\u201d which is being passed off as legitimate: a Libyan security agent\u2019s testimony \u2013 secured through torture \u2013 being given the green light by a U.S. judge. Nearly 40 years later, the statute of limitations against those accused is not replicated towards U.S. prosecutors, it would seem, who are able to produce fake documents and blood-soaked sworn testimonies which put the Libyans in the frame. If you\u2019ve ever wondered why Hollywood won\u2019t make the movie of Lockerbie, it\u2019s because Americans wouldn\u2019t believe the real story.<\/p>\n

Source\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Along with compromised politicians and the media, a corrupt judiciary is another vital means of control in the West.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":329882,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-329886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Hidden_and_Revisionist_History"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=329886"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329886\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":329887,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329886\/revisions\/329887"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/329882"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=329886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=329886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=329886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}