{"id":329883,"date":"2026-08-11T05:49:51","date_gmt":"2026-08-11T05:49:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=329883"},"modified":"2026-08-12T07:13:23","modified_gmt":"2026-08-12T07:13:23","slug":"is-donald-trump-serious-about-declaring-victory-over-iran","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=329883","title":{"rendered":"Is Donald Trump Serious About Declaring Victory Over Iran?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Larry C. Johnson \u2013 SONAR21 Aug 10, 2026<\/strong><\/h1>\n

According to a Wall Street Journal<\/em> report citing US officials, President Trump has been privately weighing the possibility of declaring victory against Iran and ending the war without securing a nuclear deal<\/strong>, .<\/p>\n

Trump reportedly has floated to senior aides that if the US can keep Iran\u2019s nuclear program in check and traffic resumes through the Strait of Hormuz, he would be willing to extend the ceasefire \u201cindefinitely\u201d and effectively declare the conflict over.<\/p>\n

In recent meetings, Trump has expressed confidence that Iran is \u201clikely unable to revive its nuclear work\u201d after Operation Midnight Hammer caused heavy damage to Iran\u2019s nuclear infrastructure in June 2025. He believes US intelligence capabilities would catch any Iranian attempts to rebuild, and that the threat of further American strikes would \u201cserve as an enduring deterrent.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s key condition for ending the war is that Iran agrees to fully reopening the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping. In exchange, officials expect Trump would lift the US naval blockade on Iranian ports.<\/p>\n

According to the Wall Street Journal<\/em>, a White House official said that the U.S. has \u201ccompleted all of its military objectives against Iran,\u201d and the president\u2019s focus is now on \u201csecuring the flow of the world\u2019s energy through the Strait of Hormuz.\u201d The reporting suggests Trump is patient and expected to ride out the latest diplomatic snarl, especially so long as gas prices remain where they are.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s assume that this WSJ<\/em> report is accurate (a big assumption). President Trump is still living in a fantasy world. Despite his recent outbursts about bombing Iran\u2019s nuclear sites, he now seems content to revert to his original declaration from June 2025 that Iran\u2019s nuclear program has been obliterated. Count me skeptical. However, if Trump is willing to make that assumption then it removes one item from the negotiation list\u2026 Until recently the US, via Pakistani mediators, was pressing Iran to discuss the Iranian nuclear program before addressing the lifting of the blockade and sanctions, and the unfreezing of assets. Iran, for its part, has insisted on the reverse position: i.e., lift the blockade and sanctions, unfreeze the assets and accept Iran\u2019s sovereignty over the Persian Gulf.<\/p>\n

If Trump\u2019s decision to declare victory and end the war hinges on Iran, \u201cfully reopening the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping<\/em>,\u201d then prospects for a deal are slim. Iran will only agree to allowing ships to transit the Strait of Hormuz in accordance with the Persian Gulf Strait Authority guidelines it issued on April 22nd. In early May, the Supreme National Security Council and other Iranian bodies publicly confirmed the PGSA\u2019s formation and role. It began administering a permit-based system requiring vessels to submit a detailed \u201cVessel Information Declaration\u201d (covering ownership, insurance, crew, cargo, etc.) before receiving clearance. Fees for \u201cspecialized services\u201d were part of the planned mechanism. Iran is not going to backdown on this point.<\/p>\n

The WSJ article hints at the major focus of concern for Trump: the domestic price of gas. I have repeatedly pointed out on several recent podcasts that there is a global shortage of diesel and aviation fuel and that the price effects of this shortage will become more profound with each passing week. Also, as I discussed in a recent article, the damage to the oil and gas infrastructure in the Persian Gulf and the departure of maintenance\/repair personnel from the Persian Gulf arab nations, along with the destruction of warehouses that held replacement parts needed to repair damage to the oil and gas terminals, the shortage of diesel and aviation fuel will persist for several months, if not longer.<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s attention at present appears to be focused more on the November mid-term elections than on pursuing a new missile and bombing campaign on Iran. Although Iran has fired on at least five ships trying to transit the Omani channel in the Strait of Hormuz without submitting to the PGSA protocol, Donald Trump has not ordered any new strikes on Iranian targets despite his previous vow to attack Iran for each such incident.<\/p>\n

I think that there is growing concern within the Trump administration about the potential for a global economic crisis if the Persian Gulf remains shuttered, especially if this continues as is into September. And this is likely the main factor pushing Trump to do a repeat of the end of Operation Rough Rider\u2026 i.e., Declare victory and leave.<\/p>\n

—<\/p>\n

Nima and I discussed the crazy rantings of Bibi Netanyahu about attacking Iran on its own:<\/p>\n