{"id":327392,"date":"2026-05-27T07:28:50","date_gmt":"2026-05-27T07:28:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=327392"},"modified":"2026-05-29T06:57:49","modified_gmt":"2026-05-29T06:57:49","slug":"its-all-so-tiresome-uks-social-media-ban-trudges-ever-onward","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=327392","title":{"rendered":"\u201cIt\u2019s all so tiresome\u201d: UK\u2019s Social Media Ban Trudges Ever Onward"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Kit Knightly \u2013 Off-Guardian May 26, 2026<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>The UK government\u2019s \u201cconsultation\u201d on social media harm is over, and \u2013 brace yourselves \u2013 it turns out they\u2019re going to have to do something about it.<\/p>\n<p>I know, I was shocked too.<\/p>\n<p>The main talking point is that \u201csocial media is like cigarettes\u201d. Everyone is saying that, it\u2019s the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/politics\/2026\/05\/26\/wes-streeting-social-media-is-the-new-smoking\/\">meme of the day<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a sentiment originally taken from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aomrc.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Academy_Submission_DSIT_Growing_up_in_the_online_world_0526.pdf\">a new report<\/a> submitted to the consultation by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges.<\/p>\n<p>Titled <em>\u201cGrowing up in an online world\u201d<\/em>, it contains this hilarious line in the foreword:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\u2026there is, I think, an overwhelming consensus that excessive screen time can harm children and young people and we need to call this out unflinchingly rather than passively wait for someone else to prove causation\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Which is a pretty neat summary of how our political system works in general, and certainly in this case: <em>We don\u2019t know if there\u2019s even a problem yet, but by God we\u2019re gonna do something about it.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>That the something they end up doing makes them rich and powerful is just one of the curious coincidences tyrants can always rely on.<\/p>\n<p>{<strong>Sidenote:<\/strong> This morning the BBC had \u201cOverwhelimg consensus\u201d in their <a href=\"https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/wp-content\/medialibrary\/bbc-overwhelming-consensus-changed-geadline.png?x46205\">headline on this story<\/a>, but at some point the absurdity of that quote was realised, and the headline changed. Now there\u2019s this disclaimer <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/articles\/c5y7r9gqp6jo?xtor=AL-71-%5Bpartner%5D-%5Bbbc.news.twitter%5D-%5Bheadline%5D-%5Bnews%5D-%5Bbizdev%5D-%5Bisapi%5D&amp;at_format=link&amp;at_bbc_team=editorial\">near the end<\/a>: <em>\u201cThere is no consensus among the wider scientific community that screen time overall is harmful to children.\u201d<\/em> Funny stuff.}<\/p>\n<p>Elsewhere, the report wails about <em>\u201ca wave of radicalized children\u201d<\/em> who pose <em>\u201ca real risk to society\u201d<\/em>, and calls social media<em> \u201can incredibly powerful and uncontrolled commercial detriment to health\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In a similar vein, The Guardian is warning of a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/uk-news\/2026\/may\/26\/views-on-tackling-online-safety-under-16s-social-media-consultation\">\u201ctsunami of harm\u201d<\/a>, and has assembled an all-star cast of interested parties to talk up the scariness of social media meanness.<\/p>\n<p>After meeting with \u201cbereaved parents\u201d earlier today, Keir Starmer has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/articles\/c5y7r9gqp6jo\">\u201cvowed to take action\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>His potential rival for the leadership has been even more vocal. Political eunuch and leadership hopeful Wes Streeting is all over this, campaigning hard to be the next disposable suit full of bugger all to \u201clead the country\u201d:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Big tech&#8217;s behaviour has been akin to big tobacco, introducing an addictive and harmful product whilst avoiding regulation.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ve got to give our children their childhood back, and that starts with a social media ban for under-16s. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/soRbjbHIsG\">pic.twitter.com\/soRbjbHIsG<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Wes Streeting (@wesstreeting) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/wesstreeting\/status\/2059270729749635202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">May 26, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>He thinks a ban should be \u201cjust the start\u201d:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Social media should be treated like tobacco \u2013 it\u2019s extremely addictive, bad for our health, and big tech is borrowing the big tobacco playbook to avoid regulation. We\u2019ve got to give our children their childhood back [\u2026] A ban for under-16s must be the start, not the end [\u2026]We have given the pen to tech moguls to write our future for us. It\u2019s time to take the pen back.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Streeting is an idiot whose ambition outweighs his intellect by a factor of ten, and who clearly doesn\u2019t understand the rules of the game he\u2019s playing.<\/p>\n<p>Some political handler behind the scenes probably told him to go hard on this issue because it will make him look tough and assertive, but the likely truth is he\u2019s being wheeled out as the extreme option so a \u201csensible middle ground\u201d option \u2013 probably Andy Burnham \u2013 can enforce \u201ccommon sense policies\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>What will those policies be? It doesn\u2019t really matter, but we\u2019ll get to that.<\/p>\n<p>Technology Secretary Liz Kendall, notable only for garnering less than 5% of the vote in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2015_Labour_Party_leadership_election_(UK)\">2015 leadership election<\/a>, is out there promising \u201caction\u201d:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">&#8216;The question isn&#8217;t whether we are going to act, we will&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>As a consultation on social media use for under-16s comes to an end Technology Secretary Liz Kendall told <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/BBCBreakfast?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#BBCBreakfast<\/a> the Government plans to take action<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/jJ6RakraWV\">https:\/\/t.co\/jJ6RakraWV<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/6lLD8yVoY9\">pic.twitter.com\/6lLD8yVoY9<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 BBC Breakfast (@BBCBreakfast) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/BBCBreakfast\/status\/2059143932261339583?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">May 26, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u2026they haven\u2019t decided what \u201caction\u201d yet, exactly but it\u2019s definitely going to happen.<\/p>\n<p>The Guardian has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/uk-news\/2026\/may\/05\/how-uk-may-restrict-social-media-under-16s-time-limits-curfews-ban\">a handy list to choose from<\/a>, including but not limited to:<\/p>\n<p>\u2013 social media bans<br \/>\n\u2013 \u201cdigital curfews\u201d<br \/>\n\u2013 \u201cfunction limitations\u201d<br \/>\n\u2013 age gating \u201caddictive features\u201d<br \/>\n\u2013 protecting children from personalised algorithms<br \/>\n\u2013 enforcing screen time limits.<\/p>\n<p>Which one will it be?<\/p>\n<p>Well let me answer that question with another question \u2013 <em>Who cares?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The powers that be certainly don\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p>This is very much an <em>\u201cany colour you want so long as it\u2019s black\u201d<\/em> situation.<\/p>\n<p>Choose an outright ban \u2013 <em>\u201cGreat, please submit your ID to prove you\u2019re over 16 and exempt from the social media ban.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Choose screen time limits \u2013 <em>\u201cGreat, please submit your ID to prove you\u2019re over 16 and exempt from screen time limitations.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Choose digital curfews \u2013 <em>\u201cGreat, please submit your ID to prove you\u2019re over 16 and exempt from the digital curfew.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Since all the proposed measures rely on age verification for enforcement, they all achieve the end goal: No more online anonymity, for kids or adults alike.<\/p>\n<p>Debating the list is pointless, and making a choice counterproductive. It\u2019s like choosing the colour of your electric chair: It makes no difference to the end result, but your entirely cosmetic choice lends tacit approval of the whole process.<\/p>\n<p>We all know where this is going: Age gating everything, everywhere and then \u2013 eventually \u2013 digital ID.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s just\u2026<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/its-all-so-tiresome.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt aligncenter size-full wp-image-327393\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/its-all-so-tiresome.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"474\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>\u2026and you\u2019re left wondering, who is this even for?<\/p>\n<p>What is the point of this worn-out, unenthusiastic propaganda?<\/p>\n<p>We know what they\u2019re going to do, they have said they\u2019re going to do it, and still they feel the need to play out this performative umming and erring.<\/p>\n<p>Just get on with it.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/monty-python-get-on-with-it.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt aligncenter size-full wp-image-327394\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/monty-python-get-on-with-it.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"280\" height=\"200\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>All the people who don\u2019t believe them will NEVER believe them, and all the poor fools who do believe them will <em>always<\/em> believe them.<\/p>\n<p>So why carry on this absurd pretense?<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s like when you\u2019re watching a really dull movie \u2013 one that has telegraphed its \u201cclever twist\u201d in the first ten minutes \u2013 but is still insisting on dragging out the run time for two more hours of what the writers evidently consider skillful foreshadowing.<\/p>\n<p>Or when you get a call from an unknown number, and some eager breathless voice announces \u201cthis is not a sales call\u201d, before launching into a fifteen minute speech about double glazing or solar panels, and you\u2019re just waiting for a pause long enough to say \u201cno thanks\u201d, and hang up.<\/p>\n<p>It <em>is<\/em> a sales call, and you\u2019ve known that from the beginning, and they know you know, but they can\u2019t stop talking because then you\u2019ll leave. They have to keep talking because they know you\u2019re not listening.<\/p>\n<p>So maybe that\u2019s the answer. Maybe they can\u2019t take a breath because people will hang up.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Support Off-Guardian:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ko-fi.com\/offguardian\">Ko-fi<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.subscribestar.com\/offguardian\">Subscribestar<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/donate\/?hosted_button_id=CKFB3MH8CGB9U\">Paypal<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/2026\/05\/26\/its-all-so-tiresome-uks-social-media-ban-trudges-ever-onward\/\">Source\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kit Knightly on how the UK government is leading its citizens down the road toward mandatory digital ID <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":294401,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[42,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-327392","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-controlling-the-news-andor-the-free-exchange-of-ideas-and-information","category-The_Media"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327392","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=327392"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327392\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":327397,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327392\/revisions\/327397"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/294401"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=327392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=327392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=327392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}