{"id":319562,"date":"2025-12-07T08:33:21","date_gmt":"2025-12-07T08:33:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=319562"},"modified":"2025-12-08T08:30:48","modified_gmt":"2025-12-08T08:30:48","slug":"the-trump-administrations-new-us-national-security-strategy-signals-a-divorce-from-nato-over-ukraine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=319562","title":{"rendered":"The Trump Administrations New US National Security Strategy Signals a Divorce from NATO Over Ukraine"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Larry C. Johnson \u2013 SONAR21.com Dec 5, 2025<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>It is one thing to produce a written national security strategy, but the real test is whether or not Donald Trump is serious about implementing it. The key takeaways are the rhetorical deescalation with China and putting the onus on Europe to keep Ukraine alive.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>2025 National Security Strategy<\/em> (<em>NSS<\/em>) of the United States, released by the White House on December 4, 2025, marks a potentially profound shift in US foreign policy under President Donald Trump\u2019s second administration as compared to his first term as president. This 33-page document explicitly embraces an \u201cAmerica First\u201d doctrine, rejecting global hegemony and ideological crusades in favor of pragmatic, transactional realism focused on protecting core national interests: homeland security, economic prosperity, and regional dominance in the Western Hemisphere.<\/p>\n<p>It critiques past US overreach as a failure that weakened America, positioning Trump\u2019s approach as a \u201cnecessary correction\u201d to usher in a \u201cnew golden age.\u201d The strategy prioritizes reindustrialization (aiming to grow the US economy from $30 trillion to $40 trillion by the 2030s), border security, and dealmaking over multilateralism or democracy promotion. It accepts a multipolar world, downgrading China from a \u201cpacing threat\u201d to an \u201ceconomic competitor\u201d and calling for selective engagement with adversaries. Yet, Donald Trump\u2019s actions during the first 11 months of his Presidency, have been inconsistent, even contradictory, of the written strategy.<\/p>\n<p>The is unapologetically partisan, crediting Trump personally for brokering peace in eight conflicts (e.g., India-Pakistan ceasefire, Gaza hostage return, Rwanda-DRC agreement) and securing a verbal commitment at the 2025 Hague Summit for NATO members to boost their defense spending to 5% of GDP. It elevates immigration as a top security threat, advocating lethal force against cartels if needed, and dismisses climate change and \u201cNet Zero\u201d policies as harmful to US interests.<\/p>\n<p>The document organizes US strategy around three pillars: homeland defense, the Western Hemisphere, and economic renewal. Secondary focuses include selective partnerships in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Screenshot-2025-12-06-at-18-51-47-The-Trump-Administrations-New-US-National-Security-Strategy-Signals-a-Divorce-from-NATO-Over-Ukraine.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt aligncenter size-full wp-image-319563\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Screenshot-2025-12-06-at-18-51-47-The-Trump-Administrations-New-US-National-Security-Strategy-Signals-a-Divorce-from-NATO-Over-Ukraine.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"765\" height=\"619\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Screenshot-2025-12-06-at-18-51-47-The-Trump-Administrations-New-US-National-Security-Strategy-Signals-a-Divorce-from-NATO-Over-Ukraine.png 765w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Screenshot-2025-12-06-at-18-51-47-The-Trump-Administrations-New-US-National-Security-Strategy-Signals-a-Divorce-from-NATO-Over-Ukraine-480x388.png 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 765px, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>Here are the major rhetorical shifts in strategy compared to the previous strategies released during the respective presidencies of Trump (2017) and Biden (2022):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>From Global Cop to Regional Hegemon<\/strong>: Unlike Biden\u2019s 2022 NSS (which emphasized alliances and great-power competition) or Trump\u2019s 2017 version (which named China\/Russia as revisionists), this document ends US \u201cforever burdens\u201d abroad. It prioritizes the Americas over Eurasia, framing Europe and the Middle East as deprioritized theaters.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ideological Retreat<\/strong>: Democracy promotion is explicitly abandoned\u2014\u201dwe seek peaceful commercial relations without imposing democratic change\u201d (tell that to the Venezuelans). Authoritarians are not judged, and the EU is called \u201canti-democratic.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Confrontational Ally Relations<\/strong>: Europe faces scathing criticism for migration, free speech curbs, and \u201ccivilizational erasure\u201d risks (e.g., demographic shifts making nations \u201cunrecognizable in 20 years\u201d). The US vows to support \u201cpatriotic\u201d European parties resisting this, drawing Kremlin-like rhetoric accusations from EU leaders.<\/li>\n<li><strong>China Policy<\/strong>: Acknowledges failed engagement; seeks \u201cmutually advantageous\u201d ties but with deterrence (e.g., Taiwan as a \u201cpriority\u201d). No full decoupling, but restrictions on tech\/dependencies.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Multipolar Acceptance<\/strong>: Invites regional powers to manage their spheres (e.g., Japan in East Asia, Arab-Israeli bloc in Gulf), signaling U.S. restraint to avoid direct confrontations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The <em>NSS <\/em>represents a seismic shift in America\u2019s approach to NATO, emphasizing \u201cburden-shifting\u201d over unconditional alliance leadership. It frames NATO not as a values-based community but as a transactional partnership where US commitments\u2014troops, funding, and nuclear guarantees\u2014are tied to European allies meeting steep new demands. This \u201cAmerica First\u201d recalibration prioritizes US resources for the Indo-Pacific and Western Hemisphere, de-escalating in Europe to avoid \u201cforever burdens.\u201d Key changes include halting NATO expansion, demanding 5% GDP defense spending by 2035, and restoring \u201cstrategic stability\u201d with Russia via a Ukraine ceasefire. While the US reaffirms Article 5 and its nuclear umbrella, it signals potential partial withdrawals by 2027 if Europe fails to step up, risking alliance cohesion amid demographic and ideological critiques of Europe. When Russia completes the defeat of Ukraine the continued existence of NATO will be a genuine concern.<\/p>\n<p>The strategy credits Trump\u2019s diplomacy for NATO\u2019s 5% pledge at the 2025 Hague Summit but warns of \u201ccivilizational erasure\u201d in Europe due to migration and low birth rates, speculating that some members could become \u201cmajority non-European\u201d within decades, potentially eroding their alignment with US interests.<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u2019s <em>NSS<\/em> signals a dramatic change in US policy towards the war in Ukraine by essentially dumping the responsibility for keeping Ukraine afloat on the Europeans. The portion of the NSS dealing with Ukraine is delusional with respect to the military capabilities of the European states:<\/p>\n<p>We want Europe to remain European, to regain its civilizational self-confidence, and to abandon its failed focus on regulatory suffocation. . . This lack of self-confidence is most evident in Europe\u2019s relationship with Russia. European allies enjoy a significant hard power advantage over Russia by almost every measure, save nuclear weapons.<\/p>\n<p>As a result of Russia\u2019s war in Ukraine, European relations with Russia are now deeply attenuated, and many Europeans regard Russia as an existential threat. Managing European relations with Russia will require significant US diplomatic engagement, both to reestablish conditions of strategic stability across the Eurasian landmass, and to mitigate the risk of conflict between Russia and European states.<\/p>\n<p>It is a core interest of the United States to negotiate an expeditious cessation of hostilities in Ukraine, in order to stabilize European economies, prevent unintended escalation or expansion of the war, and reestablish strategic stability with Russia, as well as to enable the post-hostilities reconstruction of Ukraine to enable its survival as a viable state.<\/p>\n<p>The Ukraine War has had the perverse effect of increasing Europe\u2019s, especially Germany\u2019s, external dependencies. Today, German chemical companies are building some of the world\u2019s largest processing plants in China, using Russian gas that they cannot obtain at home. The Trump Administration finds itself at odds with European officials who hold unrealistic expectations for the war perched in unstable minority governments, many of which trample on basic principles of democracy to suppress opposition. A large European majority wants peace, yet that desire is not translated into policy, in large measure because of those governments\u2019 subversion of democratic processes. This is strategically important to the United States precisely because European states cannot reform themselves if they are trapped in political crisis.<\/p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, this section of Trump\u2019s <em>NSS<\/em> has sparked a panicked outcry in Europe. European leaders, including former Swedish PM Carl Bildt, called it \u201cto the right of the extreme right,\u201d warning of alliance erosion. Analysts at the <em>Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) <\/em>praise its pragmatism, but flag short-sightedness, predicting a \u201clonelier, weaker\u201d US. China views reassurances on sovereignty positively, but remains wary of economic pressures. In the US, Democrats, such as Rep. Jason Crow, deem it \u201ccatastrophic\u201d for alliances, i.e. NATO.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the strategy signals a US pivot inward, forcing NATO allies to self-fund security while risking fractured partnerships with Europe. It positions America as a wealthy hemispheric power in a multipolar order, betting on dealmaking and industrial revival to sustain global influence without overextension. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The full document is available on the White House website<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I discussed Venezuela and Ukraine with Nima and Colonel Wilkerson in the morning, and with the Judge and Ray in the afternoon:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/FTdUfTBNzaU?si=qHDcu_NqNNotuvoR\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><br \/>\n&#8212;<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">.<em>I thank you for your invaluable support by taking time to read or comment. I do not charge a subscription fee nor do I accept advertising. I want the content to be accessible to everyone interested in the issues I am discussing. However, if you wish to make a donation, please <a href=\"https:\/\/sonar21.com\/the-trump-administrations-new-us-national-security-strategy-signals-a-divorce-from-nato-over-ukraine\/#support\">see this link<\/a>.<\/em><br \/>\n&#8212;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sonar21.com\/the-trump-administrations-new-us-national-security-strategy-signals-a-divorce-from-nato-over-ukraine\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Trump administration\u2019s new US National Security Strategy marks a distinct break with the past, writes Larry C. Johnson. But whether Trump will follow through on the proposals remains to be see<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":319566,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-319562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Commentary","category-Current_Affairs"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=319562"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319562\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":319600,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319562\/revisions\/319600"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/319566"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=319562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=319562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=319562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}