{"id":316247,"date":"2025-10-04T05:55:31","date_gmt":"2025-10-04T05:55:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=316247"},"modified":"2025-10-06T07:22:28","modified_gmt":"2025-10-06T07:22:28","slug":"so-the-digtal-id-narrative-is-falling-apart-and-yet-i-have-doubts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=316247","title":{"rendered":"So, the Digtal ID narrative is falling apart\u2026.and yet I have doubts."},"content":{"rendered":"

Kit Knightly \u2013 Off-Guardian Oct 2, 2025<\/strong><\/h1>\n

And so the UK\u2019s Digital ID is official. Not legal, no laws have been passed, not even real in the sense it exists at all. But it is official<\/em>, with the full backing of the Labour Government.<\/p>\n

I have talked and written extensively and at length about the planned rollout of Digital ID, the many and varied uses of Digital ID and the pervasive danger to liberty posed by Digital ID. They have pitched it as a solution to every problem, it has been on the agenda for twenty years.<\/p>\n

The official announcement is, possibly, the least surprising news there has ever been.<\/p>\n

And yet, suddenly, I find myself doubting the sincerity.<\/p>\n

Let me explain.<\/p>\n

Imagine you\u2019re watching a movie \u2014 a mystery thriller or whodunit \u2014 and as the story progresses you\u2019re assessing clues and forming your theories. You have a suspect, you think you know who the bad guy is going to be.<\/p>\n

Then, about halfway through, you start doubting yourself. There\u2019s too much evidence. The movie seems to be making it too obvious, the main characters are openly accusing your chosen suspect and there\u2019s still an hour left. You start asking\u2026is he the fake-out villain? Will the twist be he was wrongly accused?<\/p>\n

After an odd two weeks, that\u2019s where I find myself with digital ID. I\u2019m genuinely beginning to think they might just\u2026not.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m seeing resistance from quarters I wouldn\u2019t expect, and I\u2019m suddenly questioning the narrative.<\/p>\n

I remember Covid, I remember that Covid sceptics could barely get likes on Twitter, let alone get to go on Question Time or write columns for the Telegraph or Guardian.<\/p>\n

I know what it looks like when an agenda is being sold hard and no opposition is brooked.<\/p>\n

It doesn\u2019t look like this\u2026<\/p>\n

Members of Parliament are opposing it, from every<\/a> single<\/a> party including Labour. Labour mayors are likewise against it<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Every single party in Northern Ireland<\/a> is against it as well, with the First Minister calling it \u201cill-thought out and ludicrous\u201d.<\/p>\n

Articles and letters critical of the scheme are appearing in papers across the spectrum from the Telegraph<\/a> to the Guardian<\/a> to The Sun<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Labour Ministers, and Keir Starmer himself, are being challenged in TV interviews \u2013 with pertinent, reasonable questions<\/em>. That never happens unless someone powerful wants it to happen. It CAN\u2019T happen by accident, because interviews are discussed and questions vetted beforehand.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

\uf6a8KEIR STARMER COLLAPSES UNDER QUESTIONING ON DIGITAL I.D<\/p>\n

“Bosses who want to hire illegal workers aren’t going to check for their Digital I.D”<\/p>\n

“Well we have to be really clear they must check”<\/p>\n

“But they’re not going to are they”<\/p>\n

He’s a clown \uf921 pic.twitter.com\/FpZtKjJ5Of<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Basil the Great (@Basil_TGMD) September 28, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n