{"id":312859,"date":"2025-07-30T07:16:33","date_gmt":"2025-07-30T07:16:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=312859"},"modified":"2025-08-01T07:42:29","modified_gmt":"2025-08-01T07:42:29","slug":"voices-from-the-terror-list-palestine-action-members-speak-out-after-uk-ban","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=312859","title":{"rendered":"Voices from the Terror List: Palestine Action Members Speak Out After UK Ban"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\">A Palestinian solidarity protester in Downing Street<\/p>\n<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Kit Klarenberg \u2013 The Unz Review July 26, 2025<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>On <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/three-groups-to-be-proscribed\">July 1<\/a>, British Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced that Palestine Action (PA), a crusading campaign effort, would be proscribed as a terrorist group. Describing the movement as \u201cdangerous,\u201d she charged that its \u201corchestration and enaction of aggressive and intimidatory attacks against businesses, institutions and the public\u201d had \u201ccrossed the thresholds established in the Terrorism Act 2000.\u201d As a result, PA is now the country\u2019s first protest group to be formally branded a terrorist entity, placing it in the same league as al-Qaida and ISIS.<\/p>\n<p>Based on Cooper\u2019s characterization, a typical consumer of mainstream media might conclude PA posed a grave threat to Britain\u2019s public safety and national security. However, other comments by Cooper appeared to undermine her incendiary headline charges. In justifying PA\u2019s proscription, the Home Secretary cited recent actions conducted by the movement. These included \u201cattacks\u201d on factories owned by defense contractors Thales in 2022 and <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20250519171304\/https:\/\/palestineaction.org\/case-dismissed-instro\/\">Instro Precision<\/a> in 2024, each causing more than \u00a31 million in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/articles\/c9wj144zd7po\">damages<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>As hundreds of lawyers and multiple U.N. experts <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2025\/jul\/01\/yvette-cooper-plan-ban-palestine-action-un-experts-lawyers\">argued<\/a> in the week before the proscription took effect, the move set an extremely dangerous precedent not only in Britain but for Palestine solidarity efforts worldwide. The group did not engage in activities that could plausibly be categorized as \u201cterrorism\u201d\u2014a highly <a href=\"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.1525\/9780520967397-003\/html?lang=en&amp;srsltid=AfmBOorygZxQm0wGAdySynHJc-L7T0YndxHMYZMNzrIqLONz3vpIf5tI\">contentious <\/a>concept, popularized by Israel for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mintpressnews.com\/team-b-jerusalem-conference-israel-helped-craft-modern-terrorism\/286295\/\">political reasons<\/a>\u2014in other Western jurisdictions. Average citizens were not in Palestine Action\u2019s crosshairs, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/opinions\/2025\/6\/25\/palestine-action-are-not-terrorists-israel-is\">not once<\/a> did the group\u2019s activism harm a human being.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, PA engaged in multifaceted civil disobedience, targeting firms closely tied to Israel\u2019s slaughter of Palestinians, most prominently the Israeli-owned defense giant <a href=\"https:\/\/bdsmovement.net\/news\/elbit-systems-war-criminals-and-genocidaires-face-financial-woes\">Elbit Systems<\/a>. Entities providing services to those targets\u2014such as companies leasing commercial space to Elbit\u2014were also in the group\u2019s crosshairs. These actions proved devastatingly effective, hitting Elbit\u2019s bottom line at home and abroad. PA\u2019s disruption also brought unwelcome mainstream attention to Elbit\u2019s operations, spotlighting the firm in ways it clearly sought to avoid.<\/p>\n<p>In proscribing Palestine Action, the British government may have been motivated, in part, by a desire to avoid awkward questions and inconvenient disclosures. In one of the group\u2019s final actions, on June 19, several members broke into Royal Air Force base Brize Norton and <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20250620103112\/https:\/\/palestineaction.org\/brize-norton\/\">defaced<\/a> two military planes parked there. The site is a key hub for refueling and repairing British jets that have conducted hundreds of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.declassifieduk.org\/britain-sent-over-500-spy-flights-to-gaza\/\">reconnaissance flights<\/a> over Gaza since the genocide began in October 2023.<\/p>\n<p>These routine surveillance flights are just one component of London\u2019s active involvement in the genocide, which authorities systematically seek to conceal from public view. Another is the presence of the SAS conducting \u201ccounterterrorism\u201d operations in Gaza, which has been <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kitklarenberg.com\/p\/britains-sas-abetting-gaza-genocide\">covered up<\/a> via direct state decree. However, the origins of Palestine Action\u2019s proscription stretch back much further. The story behind the ban is a sordid and largely hidden one marked by long-running, opaque collusion between British and Israeli authorities and the global arms industry.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>The Legal and Political Fallout<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>As a result of PA\u2019s proscription, it is now a criminal offense to be a member of, or to express \u201csupport\u201d for, the group, punishable by up to 14 years in prison. However, an Actionist who wishes to remain anonymous predicts many will deliberately breach the proscription order, knowing they\u2019ll face legal consequences, to increase pressure on authorities. Already, dozens of British citizens \u2014 including an 83-year-old priest \u2014 have been <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-14899509\/Police-arrest-protesters-supporting-banned-Palestine-Action-seizing-29-people-including-83-year-old-priest-week.html\">arrested<\/a> for peacefully displaying signs declaring, \u201cI oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.\u201d<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">This is like something from an Alan Moore comic. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/uVoqIGJlrA\">https:\/\/t.co\/uVoqIGJlrA<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Asa Winstanley (@AsaWinstanley) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AsaWinstanley\/status\/1946687547377098871?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 19, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\u201cThings are going to happen, without doubt. The group may be proscribed, but you can\u2019t proscribe ideas, whether that\u2019s opposition to the Holocaust in Gaza, sympathy with Israel\u2019s innocent victims, or a desire to disrupt the network of genocide in Britain to which Elbit and its subsidiaries and suppliers are so central,\u201d the Actionist tells MintPress News. \u201cStill, the chilling effect on Palestine solidarity is obvious, and no doubt deliberate.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The mass arrest of peaceful demonstrators for simply expressing sympathy for Palestine Action highlights a deeply troubling aspect of British \u201ccounterterror\u201d legislation. The term \u201csupport\u201d isn\u2019t even clearly defined, and according to legal precedents, can extend far beyond practical or tangible assistance, to \u201cintellectual\u201d support, including \u201cagreement with and approval\u201d or \u201cspeaking in favor\u201d of a proscribed group. In December 2024, UN experts expressed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.craigmurray.org.uk\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/AL-GBR-15-2024-Craig-Murray-et-al-UN-comm-to-UK-with-cover.pdf\">immense disquiet<\/a> over this \u201cvague and overbroad\u201d interpretation, warning that it could \u201cunjustifiably criminalize legitimate expression.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe proscription of Palestine Action is unprecedented. It\u2019s the first time Britain has banned as \u2018terrorist\u2019 a protest group which has never used guns or bombs,\u201d Asa Winstanley of <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/\">Electronic Intifada<\/a> tells MintPress News. \u201cIt seems like a massive overreach, and therefore it\u2019s not surprising there\u2019s been lots of civil disobedience in response.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Surprisingly, even The Times, typically a reliable megaphone for Britain\u2019s intelligence, military and security apparatus, published an <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.is\/kJX9W\">editorial <\/a>on July 7 intensely critical of \u201cthe heavy-handed branding of Palestine Action as terrorists,\u201d dubbing the proscription \u201cabsurd.\u201d While describing the group as \u201ca malign force\u201d and \u201cantisocial menace,\u201d the outlet argued that activists\u2019 damage to commercial and private property could be \u201cprosecuted into submission\u201d under existing criminal law and the use of \u201clighter-touch measures\u201d given the level of threat posed by Palestine Action.<\/p>\n<p>Notably absent from The Times editorial was any consideration of the fact that criminal proceedings against Palestine Action frequently ended in failure. In several cases, Actionists who caused mass disruption or damage to Elbit sites <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/content\/palestine-action-activists-walk-free-after-another-case-bites-dust\/36521\">walked free<\/a> even on relatively minor charges, because the company declined to provide police or prosecutors with witnesses or other evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Elbit is extremely wary of advertising the central role its arsenal plays in the killing of Palestinians. The company\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/content\/israel-promotes-iron-fist-weapons-london\/37046\">marketing brochures<\/a> typically omit mention of its Israeli ownership, instead emphasizing the supposed economic and social benefits its operations deliver to British communities. A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.birminghammail.co.uk\/black-country\/inside-midlands-factory-scared-workers-25795269\">January 2023<\/a> puff piece on UAV Systems, an Elbit subsidiary repeatedly targeted by Palestine Action, even referred to the company as a \u201clittle company making repurposed Norton motorbike engines.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In cases where Elbit did provide evidence, Actionists used the opportunity to turn the tables and place the company and the Israeli state on trial. In <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/content\/palestine-action-puts-israels-war-industry-trial\/36736\">November 2022<\/a>, five of the group\u2019s activists who vandalized Elbit\u2019s London HQ were acquitted. In defending their actions, several of the accused testified to witnessing first-hand atrocities committed by Israeli occupation forces in Gaza and the West Bank. While Elbit argued Palestine Action\u2019s buckets of red paint were \u201cimprovised weapons,\u201d the jury was not persuaded.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Judicial Battles and Public Defiance<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Fast forward to today, and the anonymous Actionist is under no illusions that the British legal system alone will be enough to reverse Palestine Action\u2019s proscription. \u201cIt has to be fought amongst the public, on the streets and in the courts,\u201d they tell MintPress News. The group <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/HudaAmmori\/status\/1944359707138789400\">has applied<\/a> for a judicial review in an effort to overturn its ban. This follows an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/jul\/04\/ban-on-palestine-action-to-take-effect-after-legal-challenge-fails\">application<\/a> for interim relief to delay the proscription, which was denied after Yvette Cooper\u2019s announcement.<\/p>\n<p>Despite submitting an extensive witness statement outlining the serious implications that Actionists\u2014and ordinary British citizens\u2014could face if the ban took immediate effect, a panel of three judges took less than 90 minutes to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judiciary.uk\/judgments\/ammori-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department\/\">reject the request<\/a>. The justices acknowledged that there would be \u201cserious consequences\u201d from the government\u2019s ban, including the risk that individuals could \u201cunwittingly commit\u201d criminal offenses and that those associated with the group might face \u201csocial stigma and other more serious consequences at university or at work.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Palestine Action had warned the ban would create confusion and chaos. Police responses to pro-PA protests across Britain have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.middleeasteye.net\/news\/uk-divided-police-response-palestine-action-protests-exposes-chaos-unleashed-proscription\">varied wildly<\/a>. Some resulted in no arrests, while in Wales, protesters were not only arrested under terror legislation but also had their homes raided. Videos of <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/MintPressNews\/status\/1945185555559424342\">interactions between<\/a> Palestine solidarity protesters and police suggest officers themselves are unsure about what is now lawful. In Scotland, four people were <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ScotNational\/status\/1947303443581841691\">arrested<\/a> for wearing T-shirts that didn\u2019t even mention the group.<\/p>\n<p>&lt;blockquote class=&#8221;twitter-tweet&#8221;&gt;&lt;p lang=&#8221;en&#8221; dir=&#8221;ltr&#8221;&gt;British Police Officers Say Holding A &amp;quot;Free Gaza&amp;quot; Poster Is A Terrorism Offence&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Advocating against genocide in the UK is now being considered support for Palestine Action, just proscribed a terrorist group. A real time consequence of the ban.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Free Speech=Terrorism in Kent, UK. &lt;a href=&#8221;https:\/\/t.co\/IQdFKhx5s6&#8243;&gt;pic.twitter.com\/IQdFKhx5s6&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/p&gt;&amp;mdash; MintPress News (@MintPressNews) &lt;a href=&#8221;https:\/\/twitter.com\/MintPressNews\/status\/1945185555559424342?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&#8221;&gt;July 15, 2025&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/blockquote&gt; &lt;script async src=&#8221;https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js&#8221; charset=&#8221;utf-8&#8243;&gt;&lt;\/script&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Speaking to MintPress News, the anonymous Actionist expressed frustration over the court\u2019s decision. \u201cA UN Special Rapporteur supported us, warning the proscription breached international standards, but apparently British judges know better. It just shows how corrupt the entire system is. Every part of it is rotten,\u201d they lament. \u201cThe government, <a href=\"https:\/\/hansard.parliament.uk\/Commons\/2025-07-02\/division\/E7940BC9-6BA6-462D-AF11-FE02A85AAA50\/PreventionAndSuppressionOfTerrorism?outputType=Names\">almost unanimously<\/a> supported by parliament, rammed through the conscription without warning or any public debate whatsoever, after falsely briefing the media we might be funded by Iran. Who will they target like this next?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As <a href=\"https:\/\/www.declassifieduk.org\/how-government-used-media-to-claim-iran-link-to-palestine-action\/\">Declassified UK has documented<\/a>, nearly every major British outlet ran with the Home Office\u2019s Iran narrative, without offering PA a rebuttal. In a particularly revealing twist, the pro-Israel lobby group <a href=\"https:\/\/www.webelieveinisrael.org.uk\/time_to_proscribe_palestine_action\">We Believe In Israel<\/a>\u2014which does not disclose its funding sources\u2014openly took credit for the government\u2019s decision. In an <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/WeBelieveIsrael\/status\/1937593831186161792\">X post<\/a>, the organization called the proscription its \u201cvictory,\u201d claiming it was the direct result of months of \u201csustained research, strategic advocacy, and evidence-based reporting\u201d contained in a <a href=\"https:\/\/assets.nationbuilder.com\/webelieveinisrael\/pages\/1835\/attachments\/original\/1731484961\/Report_on_Palestine_Action__A_Case_for_Proscription_under_the_Terrorism_Act_2000.pdf?1731484961\">report<\/a> it had published earlier in the year.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Collusion and Israeli Influence<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Again, the anonymous Actionist is unsurprised that British policy\u2014if not legislation\u2014is effectively being written by Israeli lobby groups. Yvette Cooper, Foreign Secretary David Lammy, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Prime Minister Keir Starmer were all <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/blogs\/asa-winstanley\/labour-friends-israel-hides-supporters-list-ahead-election\">named<\/a> as supporters of Labour Friends of Israel, before the list was scrubbed from the internet ahead of the 2024 general election. LFI, which <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/_LFI\/status\/1936119689698021633\">praised the proscription<\/a>, maintains a close relationship with Tel Aviv\u2019s London embassy, which is widely believed to be infested with Mossad agents\u2014a connection the group <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/blogs\/asa-winstanley\/labour-friends-israel-israeli-embassy-front\">works to obscure<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In recent months, PA and independent journalists have uncovered <a href=\"https:\/\/thegrayzone.com\/2025\/05\/27\/israeli-interference-uk-protests\/\">compelling evidence<\/a> that the Home Office has been in secret contact with Elbit representatives and Israel\u2019s London embassy almost since the group\u2019s founding in 2020. The full scope of this collusion is still unknown and may never come to light. However, documents released under Freedom of Information laws raise serious concerns about whether this concealed relationship influenced both the prosecution of Actionists and the decision to proscribe the group.<\/p>\n<p>For example, in March 2022, then-Home Secretary Priti Patel <a href=\"https:\/\/thegrayzone.com\/2025\/05\/27\/israeli-interference-uk-protests\/\">met privately<\/a> with Elbit UK CEO Martin Fausset to reassure the firm\u2014and, by extension, its Israeli handlers\u2014that the British government was taking \u201ccriminal protest acts against Elbit Systems UK\u201d seriously. At the time, officials acknowledged that Palestine Action\u2019s activities did \u201cnot meet the threshold for proscription\u201d under British law. Before that meeting, no PA members had been successfully prosecuted. In the months that followed, legal actions against the group escalated dramatically.<\/p>\n<p>Still, many Actionists continued to walk free. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thecanary.co\/uk\/2023\/12\/23\/palestine-action-acquitted-elbit\/\">December 2023<\/a>, six members\u2014including co-founders Huda Ammori and Richard Barnard\u2014were acquitted of nine charges by a jury. The following month,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.declassifieduk.org\/israeli-arms-firm-lobbied-home-office-on-palestine-action-court-case\/\"> internal correspondence<\/a> revealed Elbit UK\u2019s security director wrote to British officials expressing concern that \u201ca re-trial is not a certainty\u201d and suggesting it was \u201cvery much in the public interest\u201d for the trial to be reheard.<\/p>\n<p>Mere days later, a retrial was announced\u2014for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lbc.co.uk\/crime\/palestine-action-aircraft-damage\/\">2027<\/a>. That would mark six years since the alleged offenses took place. One Actionist <a href=\"https:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/en\/palestine-action-protest-trial-elbit-six-retrial-court-snaresbrook-retrial\/\">called<\/a> the drawn-out process a \u201cform of psychological warfare on defendants,\u201d saying it prevents them from making long-term plans or securing employment. Meanwhile, other PA members are imprisoned awaiting trial, some already incarcerated for extended periods. There are disturbing signs that their detention and prosecution are being coordinated with Israeli authorities.<\/p>\n<p>Among the most alarming revelations are <a href=\"https:\/\/thegrayzone.com\/2025\/05\/27\/israeli-interference-uk-protests\/\">heavily redacted emails<\/a> showing that, in September 2024, the British Attorney General\u2019s Office shared contact details for the Crown Prosecution Service and counterterrorism units with the Israeli embassy. The timing raises suspicions of Israeli interference in the prosecution of PA members who, earlier that month, broke into Elbit\u2019s Filton factory and destroyed quadcopters\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/english.almayadeen.net\/articles\/analysis\/israeli-quadcopters--ongoing-crimes-against-humanity\">weapons<\/a> routinely used to maim and kill Palestinians in Gaza.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Crown-Prosecution-Service-sharing-contact-details-with-Israeli-Embassy.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt aligncenter size-full wp-image-312861\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Crown-Prosecution-Service-sharing-contact-details-with-Israeli-Embassy.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"700\" height=\"425\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Crown-Prosecution-Service-sharing-contact-details-with-Israeli-Embassy.png 700w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Crown-Prosecution-Service-sharing-contact-details-with-Israeli-Embassy-480x291.png 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 700px, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>In all, 18 Actionists involved are <a href=\"https:\/\/tmj.news\/filton-10\/\">currently remanded<\/a> in prison, their pre-trial detention period running to 182 days, well <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legislation.gov.uk\/uksi\/2020\/759\/part\/14\/crossheading\/3\/made#:~:text=(c)in%20the%20Crown%20Court,custody%20in%20the%20magistrates'%20court.&amp;text=(b)that%20the%20prosecution%20has,all%20due%20diligence%20and%20expedition.%5D\">in excess<\/a> of standard limits for non-terror-related cases. Their contact with the outside world has also been severely restricted, in violation of international legal norms. On <u>July 15<\/u>, another five PA members were arrested and charged in connection with Filton.<\/p>\n<p>If the Israeli government played any role in these prosecutions, it would represent a flagrant breach of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cps.gov.uk\/publication\/code-crown-prosecutors\">Crown Prosecution Service guidelines<\/a>, which prohibit \u201cundue pressure or influence from any source.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In May, British prosecutors <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cage.ngo\/articles\/prosecutors-use-terror-powers-against-palestine-action-activists-amidst-zionist-interference\">announced<\/a> they would consider \u201cterrorism connections\u201d in the case of 10 Actionists who <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Lowkey0nline\/status\/1802587000802877554?t=FGtZNATVuCB_VIuoW1JeBw&amp;s=19\">targeted Instro Precision<\/a>, an Elbit supplier, in June 2024. While the charges\u2014aggravated burglary, criminal damage and violent disorder\u2014do not qualify as terrorism under British law, prosecutors say those connections may factor into sentencing. If upheld, that designation could lead to significantly harsher penalties than standard criminal charges would normally carry.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Legal Challenges Mount<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>On July 21, London\u2019s High Court <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/declassifiedUK\/status\/1947231174922842372\">heard arguments<\/a> from lawyers representing Huda Ammori, seeking permission to challenge Palestine Action\u2019s proscription. In addition to citing <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/declassifiedUK\/status\/1947237912505950595\">devastating figures<\/a> related to the genocide in Gaza and Elbit\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/declassifiedUK\/status\/1947240143250772386\">direct involvement<\/a>, the legal team also emphasized the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/declassifiedUK\/status\/1947242068297892245\">legal uncertainty<\/a> now faced by activists and <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/declassifiedUK\/status\/1947242903606038866\">journalists<\/a> as a result of the ban.<\/p>\n<p>In response, government lawyers argued that the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission\u2014not a judicial review\u2014was the appropriate forum to challenge the designation. At the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/declassifiedUK\/status\/1947319592696545314\">hearing\u2019s conclusion<\/a>, the judge stated a full ruling would be issued on July 30.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier, on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jewishnews.co.uk\/opinion-palestine-action-non-violent-dont-make-us-laugh\/\">June 24<\/a>, Jewish News revealed that British authorities had hesitated to proscribe PA out of concern that a judicial review \u201ccould overturn\u201d the decision. That concern reportedly contributed to initial \u201creticence\u201d from the Home Office. Even if the review is authorized, it could take months for a ruling to be reached.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, journalist and legal scholar Leila Hatoum offered a stark assessment of the situation. She told MintPress News that the British state\u2019s targeting of the group \u201cfor standing against genocide and oppression\u201d was \u201cnothing short of tyranny.\u201d She added that the ban not only threatens basic rights\u2014particularly freedom of speech and freedom of the press\u2014but also violates international law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which was adopted by the UN in 1948, notes it is the duty of all nations and peoples to act to stop a genocide. By legally pursuing those who are seeking to prevent Israel\u2019s ongoing apartheid, occupation and genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza, especially members and supporters of Palestine Action, the UK has positioned itself against the international law, and alongside the forces of darkness. The country has failed humanity.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>A Legacy of Resistance<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Despite this bleak outlook\u2014and the possibility that the group could remain proscribed regardless of any court challenge\u2014Palestine Action\u2019s example remains an inspiration to people across Britain and beyond. A volunteer group of ordinary citizens, spanning every age, ethnicity, faith and gender, without financial or institutional backing, posed such a threat to entrenched power that the British government, for the first time in history, resorted to a legal \u201cnuclear option\u201d to neutralize them.<\/p>\n<p>Civil disobedience aimed at disrupting military operations has a long and established history. Since the early 1980s, the Christian pacifist <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20120807153857\/http:\/\/newsweek.washingtonpost.com\/onfaith\/guestvoices\/2010\/07\/nuclear_swords_to_faithful_plowshares.html\">Plowshares movement<\/a> has carried out sabotage against U.S. military bases and nuclear installations. In 2003, five activists were prosecuted for damaging American bombers at a British base to prevent their use in the Iraq War. One of the defendants was represented by none other than Keir Starmer, who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/2025\/06\/20\/starmer-defended-protester-who-sabotaged-military-aircraft\/\">argued successfully<\/a> that although their actions were technically illegal, they were justified as an effort to prevent war crimes.<\/p>\n<p>Palestine Action represents the first group to maintain this legacy during an active, ongoing genocide, but ever since its launch, it has achieved major victories. In January 2022, Elbit sold off one of its component factories, and a British government prosecutor <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/blogs\/asa-winstanley\/uk-admits-activists-forced-elbit-sell-factory\">acknowledged<\/a> that PA\u2019s sustained actions against the site \u201cforced the closure.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/blogs\/asa-winstanley\/uk-admits-activists-forced-elbit-sell-factory\">Two additional<\/a> Elbit sites targeted by the group have since been shut down. Governments around the world, including <a href=\"https:\/\/thedefensepost.com\/2024\/10\/10\/brazil-contract-suspension-israel\/\">Brazil<\/a> and even <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/blogs\/asa-winstanley\/britain-ditches-israeli-drones\">Britain<\/a>, have canceled lucrative contracts with the company.<\/p>\n<p>Had the British state not acted so forcefully, it is likely that Palestine Action\u2019s momentum would have continued building, possibly forcing Elbit out of the UK entirely. Yet despite the risk of arrest or prison, solidarity with Palestine and overt support for Palestine Action show no sign of fading. As Israel\u2019s favorability plummets to <a href=\"https:\/\/yougov.co.uk\/international\/articles\/52279-net-favourability-towards-israel-reaches-new-lows-in-key-western-european-countries\">historic lows<\/a> across the West, there are countless individuals around the world ready to follow PA\u2019s example, risking their liberty to stop the ongoing genocide.<\/p>\n<p>After all, it is not just a moral duty. It is a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mintpressnews.com\/top-us-law-schools-present-israel-gaza-genocide-report\/287642\/\">legal one<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unz.com\/article\/voices-from-the-terror-list-palestine-action-members-speak-out-after-uk-ban\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It has been said that the day will come when we will all been seen as Palestinians. Well, this is certainly true in the UK where the Palestine Action campaign group has been proscribed as a \u201cterrorist group\u201d. Raising the question: was this done at Israel\u2019s request? <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":312860,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[118,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-312859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-7-10-gaza-war","category-Israel_Anti-Semitism_Zionism_and_US-UK_allies"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=312859"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312859\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":312897,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312859\/revisions\/312897"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/312860"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=312859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=312859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=312859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}