) with additional incitement to murder.\u00a0Klein wrote: \u201cThe infamous Norwegian Vidkun Quisling, who assisted Nazi Germany as it conquered his own country, must be applauding in his grave\u2026 Norway is effectively under the occupation of anti-Semitic leftists and radical Muslims, and appears willing to help enable the destruction of the Jewish state of Israel.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThese are fighting words, and Breitvik heeded them while loading his guns. 2083 proves these sources. Quotes from Frontpage<\/em> of David Horowitz and its authors take hundreds of pages. Bernard Lewis has a place of honour. The notorious Bat Yeor, an Egyptian Jewish woman living in Switzerland, who coined the term \u201cEurabia\u201d (an alleged conspiracy to subjugate Europe to Arabs) and did much to promote fear of Islam, corresponded with the killer, and she \u201ckindly\u201d advised him and sent him her unpublished texts. She is the only person named in his Declaration of European Independence, and her advice the newly independent Europeans should follow, according to Bat Yeor.<\/span><\/p>\nRobert Spenser, a sidekick of David Horowitz of Jihad Watch is another great love of the killer, and so is an American Zionist, Andrew G. Bostom, self-proclaimed expert on \u201cIslamic anti-Semitism\u201d. Daniel Pipes is presented with his thesis that \u201cThe Palestinian phenomenon was created with the intention to justify Jihad\u201d. Melanie Phillips, the British far-right Zionist and a friend of the BNP leader, and other pro-fascist Islam-haters are also present. (Funnily, these guys repeatedly condemned me for my \u201canti-Semitism\u201d)<\/span><\/p>\nPolitically, the killer\u2019s sympathies lie with \u201cthe United States and Israel. The creators of Eurabia have conducted a successful propaganda campaign against these two countries in the European media. This fabrication was made easier by pre-existing currents of anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism in parts of Europe.\u201d Economically, he preferred Milton Friedman, disliked taxes, was against welfare system.<\/span><\/p>\nHe hated Palestinians, and speaks of \u201cPalestinian terrorist jihad\u201d.\u00a0 Like every good Zionist he ranted: \u201cMuhammad Amin al-Husayni, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Arab nationalist leader, a leading force behind the establishment of the Arab League and a spiritual father of the PLO, was a close collaborator with Nazi Germany and personally met with Adolf Hitler. In a radio broadcast from Berlin he called upon Muslims to kill Jews wherever they could find them\u2026 he had visited incognito the gas chambers of Auschwitz.\u201d Among the first things the independent Europeans should do is to stop any assistance to the Palestinians.<\/span><\/p>\nFor Breivik, like for his Jewish teachers, Adolf Hitler is ultimate evil. He accepted and upheld antiracism, at least for tactical reasons. His dislike of multiculturalism is culture, nor race-based. He was not a racist: he killed blue-eyed Norwegians as well as their brown guests. He even hated David Duke \u2013 for being anti-Jewish. His hatred to Islam is not limited to borders of Norway, or Europe \u2013 like Neocons, he hated Muslims wherever they are to be found.<\/span><\/p>\nHe spends many pages on describing evils of Turkey including massacres of Armenians, Greeks and Kurds. There is a long chapter on modern history of Lebanon, where curiously Israeli wars are missing, and the troubles of the country are presented via Christian\/Muslim division. His favourite historical hero is Vlad the Impaler, Romanian prince better known as Count Dracula.<\/span><\/p>\nHis logic is primitive and faulty: \u201cIf all ethnical groups and all cultures are equal, why is it black Africans, Afro-Caribbean blacks, Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese, and Eastern Europeans want to abandon their own lands en masse to live in the lands of the West?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nA simple explanation, \u201cbecause the West constantly robbed and robs their countries\u201d does not occur to Breivik.<\/span><\/p>\nHe asks: \u201cif we’re all truly equal, why does the rest of the world want to live the Western lifestyle, a lifestyle created in the main by white people? Just why exactly, do they want to be part of capitalism, run businesses, work for the white man’s industries, claim the white man’s welfare and buy and use goods created by the creativity and ingenuity of Western – white – people?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThe correct answer: \u201cno, they do not. But they are bombed or besieged if they want to follow their own way of life, like in socialist Cuba, North Korea or Libya\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\nBreivik can\u2019t be characterised a Christian fundamentalist, not even as a Christian nor Christian Zionist. His feelings towards Christianity are lukewarm at the best. He can\u2019t even decide whether he is a Christian, he is still \u201cstruggling with this myself. Some of the criticism of Christianity\u2026is legitimate.\u201d As Jewish activists, he approves of \u201cthe Second Vatican Council from the 1960s \u2026for reaching out to Jews\u201d, which is usually detested by the conservative right.<\/span><\/p>\nBreivik is livid against Muslim immigration \u2013 though his arguments are valid for immigration in general, he always stresses \u201cMuslim\u201d element. But he does not call upon his country to stop tormenting Muslim states, though this is the main reason for Muslim immigration.<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0However, the immigration dispute is practically over in Europe. Understanding that immigration carries huge social costs penetrated into all strata of European society. Immigration presents a big problem to Europe on the background of low native birthrate. It is universally disliked, but by the wealthy people of privilege. If years ago immigration could be seen as a magic wand saving citizens from boring chores, something similar to slaves of ancient Greece or to machines, people do not see it this way anymore, as immigrants become enfranchised though not integrated. They certainly cause more unemployment and drop of salaries, if they choose to work; otherwise, they overload welfare budgets. Perhaps rather late, but now this debate is over in Europe. Today, a Norwegian does not have to shoot one\u2019s fellow citizens in order to express disagreement with immigration: this became a commonplace.<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0A Counterpunch <\/span>writer<\/span><\/strong><\/a> Vijay Prashad wrote: \u201cthe [killed] Labour youth had among them children of migrants from Sri Lanka and North Africa. Their Norway was not Breivik’s Norway.\u201d Well, that is why, probably, Breivik did not like them: he did not want their Norway to displace his Norway. Prashad condemned European conservatives who \u201ccannot fathom that human beings are able to live convivial lives with those who are different\u201d but history of Sri Lanka is not the best recommendation for peaceful conviviality. If however people of Sri Lanka want \u201cto live convivial lives with those who are different\u201d, they will have to practice that at home, not in Norway. Prashad may call Merkel and Sarkozy \u201cNazis\u201d for refusing to let in more immigration, but the Utoya Massacre did sent a strong signal that many people feel bad about immigration and want it stopped.<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0Actually, immigration into Norway slowed down to a trickle. The government of Norway \u2013 like many West European governments \u2013 made immigration almost impossible. In a famous case, a young girl from Caucasus lived for some ten years in Norway, completed her university studies, wrote a novel in Norwegian \u2013 and still was deported as illegal alien. Multiculturalism is a slogan of yesterday, so Breivik is as outdated as Prashad.<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0(to be continued)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
With time we\u2019ll recognise the cinematic quality of Utoya Massacre being drawn from trashy horror movies. Israel Shamir analyses the events of Friday July 22<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":102,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31104","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31104","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/102"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31104"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31104\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31239,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31104\/revisions\/31239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}