{"id":306703,"date":"2025-04-12T05:52:47","date_gmt":"2025-04-12T05:52:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=306703"},"modified":"2025-04-14T07:04:25","modified_gmt":"2025-04-14T07:04:25","slug":"the-boundless-power-of-black-privilege","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=306703","title":{"rendered":"The Boundless Power of Black Privilege"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tobias Langdon \u2013 The Unz Review April 10, 2025<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/h1>\n

Here\u2019s a fascinating new concept: the one-off rape<\/a>. It\u2019s a rape committed in a moment of aberration by a special kind of man who is otherwise entirely respectable and worthy. Obviously, then, the man doesn\u2019t need to be seriously punished or censured for the rape, because he has never raped before and he\u2019s never going to rape again. And how do we know that? Well, because it\u2019s a one-off rape. One-off, see?<\/p>\n

Trained in Nigeria<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Now, you\u2019ll no doubt be wondering what kind of man gets to commit a one-off rape. Not a man like me, that\u2019s for sure. And not men like the vast majority of those who read the Occidental Observer<\/em> and Unz Review<\/em>. I\u2019m not special and they\u2019re not special. If I or one of them ever commit a single rape, it will merit harsh punishment and life-long labelling as \u201crapist.\u201d No, the special kind of man who gets to commit a one-off rape is described here:<\/p>\n

Doctor not struck off by panel over \u2018one-off\u2019 rape<\/strong><\/p>\n

A doctor found by a tribunal to have raped a young woman at his home avoided being struck off over what the panel described as a \u201cone-off\u201d attack. Dr Aloaye Foy-Yamah, then a consultant at Blackpool Victoria Hospital, instead had his medical licence suspended for 12 months for attacking the woman.<\/p>\n

Police investigated but did not charge Dr Foy-Yamah, but the Medical Tribunal Practitioners Service (MPTS) concluded on the balance of probabilities that he had raped the woman \u2014 which he denies. The panel, which emphasised the incident had not taken place at work, has been accused of \u201cvictim-blaming\u201d and failing to properly assess Dr Foy-Yamah\u2019s risk given that it found he had raped someone. [\u2026] The General Medical Council (GMC), which regulates the register of doctors licensed to practice in the UK, had asked an independent panel run by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) to permanently erase Dr Foy-Yamah\u2019s licence.<\/p>\n

However the panel stopped short, stating that Dr Foy-Yamah had not \u201cabused his position of trust as a doctor\u201d because the victim was not a patient, and noted a series of glowing testimonials from colleagues. The legally qualified chair of the panel, Angus Macpherson, wrote: \u201cThe Tribunal considered that this was a one-off event in Dr Foy-Yamah\u2019s personal life. It did not involve patient safety concerns. The Tribunal has found it will not be repeated.\u201d (\u201cDoctor not struck off by panel over \u2018one-off\u2019 rape<\/a>,\u201d BBC News, 29th March 2025)<\/p>\n

You need to know only one thing to understand why the tribunal was so lenient with Dr Aloaye Foy-Yamah, despite finding that he had in fact committed rape. The tribunal was lenient because Dr Foy-Yamah is Black. The BBC doesn\u2019t reveal that<\/a> he \u201ctrained at the University of Benin in Nigeria in 1995 before moving to the UK.\u201d This move means that he now benefits from Black privilege, the systemic bias in favor of Blacks that exists across the West.<\/p>\n

Black privilege is a sub-set of non-White privilege, which has protected rapists in a much worse way for a much longer time in towns like Rotherham<\/a>. Pakistani Muslim rape-gangs have been preying on White girls there for decades with the complicity \u2014 and sometimes active assistance \u2014 of the so-called Labour party, which was founded to champion the White working-class but now works tirelessly to harm the White working-class. However, here\u2019s a curious fact about Labour. Although it loudly professes to be an anti-racist and anti-sexist party, its leaders have always, without exception, been stale pale males, from Keir Hardie in 1906 to Keir Starmer in 2025.<\/p>\n

Gloriously non-White leaders<\/strong><\/h2>\n

But Labour\u2019s supposed political rivals, the Conservative party, have had four female leaders<\/a> and two gloriously non-White leaders. But that isn\u2019t six un-pale-stale-male leaders in total, because the current leader is both Black and female. She\u2019s the Nigerian Kemi Badenoch and succeeded the Indian Rishi Sunak. When Sunak became prime minister in 2022, some leftists and cuckservatives celebrated the fact that four regions of the British Isles had had non-White leaders in the twenty-first century. There was the Indian Rishi Sunak in England, the Pakistani Humza Yousuf in Scotland, the Indian Leo Varadkar in Ireland, and the Black Vaughan Gething in Wales.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Duds, not dynamos: the non-White leaders celebrated by leftists and cuckservatives<\/p><\/div>\n

What a wonderful time for the British Isles! That\u2019s what some leftists and cuckservatives said. But they\u2019ve now gone quiet about the Fantastic Four, because all of those non-White leaders have proved to be duds, not dynamos. Most glaringly of all, Sunak steered the Conservative party to its worst ever election defeat in 2024. Now the Tories are trying again with another non-White, Kemi Badenoch, who was widely hailed as a Black reincarnation of Margaret Thatcher, as an anti-woke dynamo who would ram home the devastating message that Labour are the real racists<\/em>. But alas for the Tories, Badenoch is also proving to be a dud, not a dynamo. It\u2019s becoming increasingly apparent that she too has benefited from Black privilege. It unjustly rescued a rape-accused Nigerian called Aloaye Foy-Yamah and it\u2019s unfairly elevated an incompetent Nigerian called Olukemi Adegoke.<\/p>\n

Bending the knee to Jewish power<\/strong><\/h2>\n

That was Kemi Badenoch\u2019s maiden name, before she married a rich White banker and began the essential work to become Tory leader and prime minister of Britain. And what is that essential work? Is it being highly competent and boundlessly energetic in one\u2019s jobs both before and after entering politics? No, not at all. If the very credible rumors are true, Badenoch has been lazy and useless in every job she\u2019s ever had, from the few months she spent as \u201cDigital Director\u201d at the Spectator<\/em> to her role as Minister for Women and Equalities in the Conservative government. No, the essential work for any ambitious politician in Britain consists not of being competent and energetic, but of strenuously sucking up to Jews and endlessly adulating Israel.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Bending the knee at Holocaust Central: Kemi Badenoch at Yad Vashem in 2023<\/p><\/div>\n

In short, to succeed in British politics you have to perform the goy-grovel<\/a> and prove that you\u2019ll be a devoted shabbos goy or shabbos shiksa. And Badenoch has certainly proved herself to be a devoted shabbos shiksa. In 2023, for example, she bent the knee<\/a> at Yad Vashem, the central shrine of Holocaustianity in Israel. Throughout the Gaza war, she has firmly backed Israel\u2019s massacre-machine. So has the Labour prime minister Keir Starmer, of course. He too knew that he\u2019d never get to the top without proving himself as a shabbos goy. That\u2019s why he\u2019s married to a Jew and has always firmly backed Israel. Robert Jenrick, Kemi Badenoch\u2019s chief rival in the Tory leadership election, is also married to a Jew. And Jenrick\u2019s Semito-sycophancy has soared even beyond Badenoch\u2019s. He is funded<\/a> by the Israeli billionaire Idan Ofer<\/a> and has said that<\/a> \u201cthe Star of David should be displayed at every point of entry to the UK to show\u201d that \u201cwe stand with Israel.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Diversity Hire vs Israel Cuck: Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick competing to be Tory leader<\/p><\/div>\n

But Jenrick is a stale pale male, not a vibrant Black female like Badenoch. He doesn\u2019t have Black privilege and he lost the final round of the leadership election to Badenoch. But he\u2019s not given up hope of succeeding her, because he thinks that Badenoch\u2019s incompetence and laziness will sooner or later outweigh her Black privilege. That\u2019s when she\u2019ll be removed and Jenrick can take over as chief Tory shabbos-goy. Working towards that happy day, he\u2019s been very active on social media and in parliament. He\u2019s trying to show that, unlike her, he works hard and is competent. But the demonic crime-thinker<\/a> Dominic Cummings thinks that the Tories will not learn any lessons from useless Black Kemi Badenoch. He\u2019s predicted that when she\u2019s forced out as leader, they\u2019ll replace her with useless Black James Cleverly, whom Cummings describes as<\/a> an \u201cNPC extraordinaire.\u201d This is what Cummings has said about Badenoch at his Substack:<\/p>\n

Kemi is lazy, brittle and delusional. In her previous jobs she was useless but learned to blame others. She doesn\u2019t have any of the things needed for a serious leader. The people who like her are a) people who\u2019ve swallowed Insider spin or b) a subset of Insider characters whose preferences and tastes are very far from the median voter. From all parts of the ideological spectrum I hear identical lines: \u2018She won\u2019t listen to anybody, she picks fights with everybody, she meets a businessman who made a fortune in X then explains why they\u2019re wrong about X, she\u2019s lazy and won\u2019t read, she sits in her office playing computer games on her iPad, she sees stuff on Twitter and blurts it out, I can\u2019t see her developing in the job\u2019. Most spads [special political advisors] and donors who created her did not work on her leadership contest because they got so disillusioned. People inside her inner circle are already telling friends \u2018I can\u2019t see this working\u2019. (\u201cTSP #5: What comes in 2025-6 as both parties & Whitehall fail? What can be done<\/a>?,\u201d Dominic Cummings Substack, as updated from 13th February 2025 [TSP = The Start-Up Party, which is Cummings\u2019 name for a proposed new party to replace the Conservatives and Labour])<\/p>\n

Cummings is always careful not to give his enemies grounds to call him \u201cracist,\u201d so he doesn\u2019t discuss how someone as useless as Badenoch became Tory leader. That is, he doesn\u2019t discuss Black privilege or Semito-sycophancy. And when he describes a shadowy figure<\/a> called Henry Newman<\/a> as a \u201cKemi handler\u201d who works on behalf of translunacy, he doesn\u2019t note that Newman is Jewish. But Cummings still delivers a devastating indictment of the \u201cBlack Thatcher,\u201d as he mockingly calls her. Badenoch isn\u2019t the Black Thatcher \u2014 she\u2019s the British Barack. Like Barack Obama, she\u2019s an over-promoted Black narcissist and intellectual nullity. When Obama became president, it was the apotheosis of AA in the USA, of Affirmative Action in America. If Badenoch ever becomes prime minister, it will be the apotheosis of AA in the Yoo-Kay. I don\u2019t think she will become prime minister, but she\u2019s certainly fulfilled all the stereotypes of the Black diversity hire, from laziness<\/a> and lateness<\/a> to the way her work was done<\/a> for her by a White colleague.<\/p>\n

High-testosterone and high-narcissism: useless Black Kemi Badenoch, current leader of the Conservative party (image from Wikipedia)<\/a><\/p>\n

Or so the rumors run. And those rumors are getting louder all the time. It seems as though she won\u2019t last much longer as Tory leader and one anonymous insider has already proclaimed that \u201cBadenoch must go<\/a>,\u201d arguing that the \u201chapless Conservative leader is consigning the party to complete irrelevance.\u201d Nevertheless, Kemi Badenoch is doing a good job at one thing. It\u2019s the same thing as Sunak, Yousuf, Varadkar and Gething were good at: proving that non-White leaders are bad for the native Whites of the British Isles. As another of her disillusioned colleagues has said<\/a> of Badenoch: \u201cAll the things we thought she\u2019d be good at, she\u2019s not. And all the things we thought she\u2019d be bad at, she is.\u201d If Black James Cleverly replaces Black Kemi Badenoch as Tory leader, we can confidently expect that he will do the same good job at being useless and helping to build the Blacklash, namely, the growing White revolt against the worship of Blacks and other non-Whites.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Black shabbos goy James Cleverly, \u201cNPC extraordinaire,\u201d meets Jewish crook Volodymyr Zelensky<\/p><\/div>\n

And what about the stale pale male Robert Jenrick? Well, if he succeeds either Badenoch or Cleverly, his Semito-sycophancy will further expose Jewish control of British politics. At Neo-Krat, Colin Liddell has compared Jenrick<\/a> to the French president Emmanuel Macron, who has long been rumored to be gay, like Blair and Obama<\/a> before him, and whose wife is much older than he is. Wikipedia notes that<\/a> Jenrick\u2019s wife, Michal Berkner, \u201cis nine years older than [him], and is the grandchild of Holocaust survivors. She is an Israeli-born and US-educated corporate lawyer who practises mainly in London. Together, they have three daughters, whom they are bringing up in the Jewish faith.\u201d As Liddell himself sardonically concludes<\/a>: \u201cNice to know that Jewish concerns will have a prominent place at the breakfast table should Mr Jenrick proceed further in his career!\u201d<\/p>\n

Liddell is right: it is nice to know that. And it will be even nicer if Jenrick topples Badenoch and she responds by accusing the Tory party of racism. She would look ridiculous to do that after all her anti-woke posturing, but her narcissistic rage may prove stronger than her reason. Her Black privilege has taken her to the top of the Tory party and she will be very angry when her Black pathologies force her White colleagues to depose her.<\/p>\n

Originally published in The Occidental Observer<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It Rescues Rapists, Elevates Incompetents and Is Building the Blacklash<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-306703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-Race"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=306703"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306703\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":306712,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306703\/revisions\/306712"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=306703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=306703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=306703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}