{"id":306660,"date":"2025-04-12T06:00:54","date_gmt":"2025-04-12T06:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=306660"},"modified":"2025-04-14T07:00:56","modified_gmt":"2025-04-14T07:00:56","slug":"trump-concocted-the-tariffs-hoax-to-decouple-with-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=306660","title":{"rendered":"Trump Concocted the &#8216;Tariffs Hoax&#8217; to &#8216;Decouple&#8217; with China"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Mike Whitney \u2013 The Unz Review April 10, 2025<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p><strong>The Trump tariff extravaganza was never about trade deficits, reindustrialization, or bringing jobs back to America. It was always about China<\/strong>. Now that Trump has either eased or lifted the tariffs on 90 other countries, we can see what\u2019s actually going on. Trump is using the \u2018tariffs smokescreen\u2019 to implement his decoupling policy, a strategy that is designed to isolate, encircle and eventually crush the People\u2019s Republic of China. That\u2019s the motive that drives the policy. The tariffs were just a means to an end. This is from <em>CNN<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>President Donald Trump announced a complete three-month pause on all the \u201creciprocal\u201d tariffs that went into effect at midnight, with the exception of China,<\/strong> a stunning reversal from a president who had insisted historically high tariffs were here to stay.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">But <strong>enormous tariffs will remain on China, the world\u2019s second-largest economy. In fact, Trump said they will be increased to 125% <\/strong>from 104% after China announced additional retaliatory tariffs against the United States earlier Wednesday. All other countries that were subjected to reciprocal tariff rates Wednesday will see rates go back down to the universal 10% rate, he said.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201cBased on the lack of respect<\/strong> that China has shown to the World\u2019s Markets, I am hereby raising the Tariff charged to China by the United States of America to 125%, effective immediately,\u201d Trump said in his social media post. \u201cAt some point, hopefully in the near future, China will realize that the days of ripping off the U.S.A., and other Countries, is no longer sustainable or acceptable,\u201d he wrote. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2025\/04\/09\/business\/reciprocal-tariff-pause-trump\/index.html\">Trump announces 90-day pause on \u2018reciprocal\u2019 tariffs with exception of China<\/a>, <em>CNN<\/em><\/p>\n<p>China\u2019s \u201clack of respect\u201d? So, Trump is setting US trade policy based on bruised feelings??<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s just not a credible explanation. Something else is going on here.<\/p>\n<p><strong>China is being targeted because China\u2019s meteoric rise and explosive growth has made it a threat to America\u2019s global hegemony.<\/strong> That is why China has entered Washington\u2019s crosshairs. By imposing prohibitive 125% tariffs on Chinese exports, Trump is indicating that <strong>the era of integrated markets in a globalized system is over. <\/strong>The world is being redivided into warring blocs by wealthy <strong>Capitalists in the West who cannot compete with China\u2019s government-led model that controls the nation\u2019s critical industries and recycles massive profits back into vital infrastructure, education, R&amp;D and technology. <\/strong>The West\u2019s highly financialized model\u2014that increasingly depends on skimming the cream off toxic securities and stock buybacks\u2014cannot remake itself into a manufacturing powerhouse willing to compete with China on a level playing field. Instead, it must use its waning influence to jolt the system with some unexpected fireworks display (the tariffs) that sends shockwaves through the system and panic across the markets. These contrived spectacles, that border on economic terrorism, are all part of Uncle Sam\u2019s repertoire that are used to subdue the opposition and maintain Washington\u2019s tenuous grip on power.<\/p>\n<p>But do they work?<\/p>\n<p>Trump seems to think so. Here\u2019s Trump with his billionaire friends discussing \u2018the killing\u2019 they made when he eased the tariffs and markets soared.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">NEW:<\/p>\n<p>\uf1fa\uf1f2 Donald Trump was caught on video explaining that his billionaire friends made billions yesterday with tariffs and stock market manipulation. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/ku1J7Ke1pa\">pic.twitter.com\/ku1J7Ke1pa<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Megatron (@Megatron_ron) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Megatron_ron\/status\/1910238378064257143?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">April 10, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>We should have seen through this hoax from the very beginning. After all, <strong>if Trump was serious about bringing jobs back to the US, wouldn\u2019t he have convened a Blue-Ribbon panel of industry experts and economists to create an industrial policy that would provide a roadmap for how to proceed? <\/strong>Wouldn\u2019t he have looked into the feasibility of re-industrialization in a country that has already shuttered the bulk of its factories and no longer has a workforce that is trained to do the jobs that are about to be created? And wouldn\u2019t he have solicited the support of wealthy Capitalists who could be persuaded to make the long-term investments required for an industrial project of this magnitude?<\/p>\n<p>Yes, he would have. But he didn\u2019t do any of those things, because he wasn\u2019t serious about any of it. <strong>The whole tariffs-fracas was just an illusionist\u2019s trick aimed at creating a pretext for attacking China. <\/strong>That\u2019s why it was so easy for Trump to end the charade with a wave of his hand as if nothing had happened. Because nothing had happened. It was all a glitzy light-show devoid of any real substance.<\/p>\n<p>And no one makes my case that \u2018this was all about China\u2019 better than Trump\u2019s right-hand man, Treasury Scott Secretary Bessent. Check out this clip of Bessent boasting about how he tricked China.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/BehizyTweets\/status\/1910032448676626726\">@BehizyTweets<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Treasury Secretary Bessent just revealed that President <strong>Trump laid a trap and China fell into it. \u201cThis was driven by the president\u2019s strategy\u2026 You might even say that he goaded China into a bad position.<\/strong> They responded. They have shown themselves to the world to be the bad actors, and we are willing to cooperate with our allies and with our trading partners who did not retaliate.\u201d \u201cIt wasn\u2019t a hard message. Don\u2019t retaliate. Things will turn out well.\u201d China screwed up badly.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Treasury Secretary Bessent just revealed that President Trump laid a trap and China fell into it.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This was driven by the president&#8217;s strategy&#8230; You might even say that he goaded China into a bad position. They responded. They have shown themselves to the world to be the bad\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/JNjiMzemG9\">pic.twitter.com\/JNjiMzemG9<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 George (@BehizyTweets) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/BehizyTweets\/status\/1910032448676626726?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">April 9, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Bessent is obviously pleased that he and Trump were able to \u2018pull a fast one\u2019 on China. Bessent thinks that\u2019s good policy. And, of course, the American people\u2014most of whom are distrustful of China to begin with\u2014agree. <strong>\u201cChina is ripping us off\u201d, says the president whose nation\u2019s bank account is $36 trillion overdrawn and whose country lives on \u2018the generosity of strangers.\u2019 <\/strong>\u201cChina is stealing our jobs\u201d, say the corporate bosses who uprooted their businesses and factories lock-stock-and-barrel and shipped them to China to take advantage of the cheap labor and free security. But now China must be crushed for aspiring to compete with \u201ctheir betters\u201d in the USA. Now China must be \u2018brought to heel\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>Isn\u2019t that what\u2019s really going on? (if we\u2019re honest with ourselves) Isn\u2019t this really a case of sour grapes?<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Global-manufacturing-output.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt aligncenter size-full wp-image-306662\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Global-manufacturing-output.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"851\" height=\"900\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Global-manufacturing-output.jpg 851w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Global-manufacturing-output-480x508.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 851px, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>Indeed, it is. China has overtaken the US as the manufacturing capitol of the world through intelligence, hard work, ingenuity and an organizational model (recycled profits into productive activity) that is the result of good governance. That is why China is rapidly surpassing the US in science, technology, AI, quantum computing, robotics and nearly everything else. <strong>Because they are governed by people who aspire to create a civilization in which individuals and community achieve their full potential. This is why the entire country is crisscrossed with high-speed rail linking shiny, space-age cities together in a vision of 21st century modernity that is unrivaled in the world today<\/strong>. Whatever one may think about China, they must admit that\u2014as a civilization and a society\u2014they are headed in the right direction while the dilapidated, threadbare and deeply polarized US is in steep decline.<\/p>\n<p>In any event, China\u2019s success has generated considerable envy among western elites who are now determined to do everything in their power to turn back the clock to the post war era when the global economy was their oyster, and the \u201crules-based order\u201d was the only game in town. <strong>The goal is to \u201ccontain China\u2019s growth\u201d, which is a sobriquet for subverting China\u2019s development at every turn. The particular strategy even has a name. It\u2019s called \u201cdecoupling\u201d which refers to the process by which the United States (and other Western countries) reduce their economic, technological, and financial interdependence with China. <\/strong>In other words, western elites want to terminate trade with China as much as possible which will lead to isolation, encirclement and eventually, regime change. Sound familiar?<\/p>\n<p>The trick is to make \u201cdecoupling\u201d (economic isolation) look like it is being forced upon the United States which is why Trump keeps repeating the inane phrase, \u201cChina is ripping us off.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Just to clarify that point: <strong>China gives US consumers quality merchandise that requires expensive resources, factories and investment in exchange for green sheets of paper of diminishing value. On which end of that deal would you rather be? <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Take a minute and watch this short video with economist Larry Summers who explains that China is NOT cheating anyone by producing inexpensive goods that it is willing to exchange for USD.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">I&#8217;m normally not a big fan, but this is an absolutely brilliant answer by Larry Summers to the oft-repeated argument that China is somehow &#8220;cheating&#8221; in trade.<\/p>\n<p>In fact it&#8217;s probably the best answer I&#8217;ve ever heard on this.<\/p>\n<p>It goes back to the point I was making\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/bnqRykzTGK\">pic.twitter.com\/bnqRykzTGK<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Arnaud Bertrand (@RnaudBertrand) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RnaudBertrand\/status\/1910296288610189704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">April 10, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Lawrence Summers: \u201cIf China wants to sell us things at really low prices and the transaction is we get solar collectors or we get batteries that we can put in electric cars and we send them pieces of paper that we print. Do you think that\u2019s a good deal for us or a bad deal for us?\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Characterizing this as \u201ccheating\u201d, like Summers rightly says, should be rejected entirely. At the end of the day, who\u2019s more \u201ccheated\u201d: the party doing the hard work of producing goods at very low prices on razor thin margins, or the party that simply prints a virtually infinite amount of fiat money to pay for all this stuff?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/manufacturing-share-of-US-employment.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt aligncenter size-full wp-image-306663\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/manufacturing-share-of-US-employment.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"466\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/manufacturing-share-of-US-employment.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/manufacturing-share-of-US-employment-480x350.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 640px, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>In short, the \u2018tariffs flap\u2019 was just a way to kick off the new policy (which is decoupling) which is aimed at intensifying the hostility between Washington and Beijing. With that in mind, I asked Grok the following question:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Does President Trump support decoupling with China?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Yes, former President Donald Trump has been a strong advocate for decoupling from China<\/strong>, both during his presidency (2017\u20132021) and in his subsequent political activities as of April 2025\u2026.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Trump initiated a trade war with China in 2018 by imposing tariffs on billions of dollars worth of Chinese goods\u2026 In 2018, the U.S. imposed tariffs on $50 billion of Chinese imports, followed by additional tariffs on $200 billion more in 2019\u2026.Trump framed this as a necessary step to \u201cdecouple\u201d from China\u2019s economy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Trump banned U.S. companies from using equipment from Chinese telecom giants like Huawei and ZTE, citing national security risks. He also pushed for restrictions on TikTok and WeChat, arguing they posed threats to data privacy and could be used for espionage\u2026 He encouraged allies to exclude Huawei from their 5G networks, framing it as part of a broader effort to reduce technological dependence on China\u2026..<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly called for even tougher measures against China, including higher tariffs (proposing rates as high as 60% on all Chinese goods) and a complete overhaul of trade relations. In a speech in Ohio in March 2024, he said, \u201cWe\u2019re going to decouple from China like never before. They\u2019ve ripped us off for decades, and it\u2019s time to end it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Trump has argued that decoupling would protect American jobs, strengthen the economy, and reduce national security risks. In a post from January 2025, he wrote, \u201cChina has taken advantage of us for too long. We need to cut the cord and build everything here at home.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">As of 2025, however, his tone has hardened, with less emphasis on negotiation and more on confrontation\u2026.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Posts on X from early 2025 show Trump doubling down on his anti-China stance, with supporters praising his \u201ctoughness\u201d\u2026. Grok<\/p>\n<p>So, Trump is a big proponent of decoupling, which tells you everything you need to know.<\/p>\n<p>Also, Trump\u2019s hard-nosed policies towards China are heaped under the patriotic-sounding rubric, <strong>\u201ceconomic nationalism\u201d, as if American workers derived some benefit from higher prices and soaring inflation.<\/strong> <strong>The fact is, however, is that ordinary people will suffer greatly from decoupling and see their standards of living fall even further.<\/strong> That\u2019s because the policy is not intended to create jobs, increase wages, improve health care or provide lower-cost education. It is aimed at preserving Washington\u2019s grip on global power so that corrupt western elites can create more mischief while driving the country further into debt and despair. Here\u2019s more from Grok:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Many economists forecast that these wide-ranging tariffs will accelerate inflation and dampen US economic growth, resulting in stagflation as economic growth falters even as prices remain painfully high<\/strong>\u2026. Additionally, China is unlikely to lower its tariffs to appease Trump; instead, it has retaliated with 34% tariffs on US goods. Both countries\u2019 increased tariffs will reduce bilateral trade.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>While China can survive without importing most of the US$125 billion in American goods, the US and many other countries will continue to rely on China<\/strong> for various parts and components. Even if the US imports goods from other countries, those countries will still depend on China for parts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Potential contradictions and economic consequences<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Trump\u2019s reciprocal tariffs are likely to cause a self-inflicted recession in the US. Also, it could create confusion and unintended consequences\u2026 <strong>Seven years ago, Trump\u2019s first wave of tariffs raised the cost of Chinese goods by 20%, but US imports from China continued to grow\u2026<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">In the future, <strong>even if tariffs on Chinese products rise to 54%, the US will still need to buy from China<\/strong>. By contrast, American products, such as soybeans or crude oil, have limited competitiveness in China. China\u2019s retaliatory tariffs on the US will force it to find alternative markets, leading to losses for US soybean and crude oil exporters\u2026.Grok<\/p>\n<p>What part of the above excerpt sounds like a \u2018good deal\u2019 for the American people?<\/p>\n<p>None of it. It\u2019s all bad. And the one glimmer of light in this whole dismal affair is the fact that the American people oppose the policy because they know they\u2019ll be hurt by it. Take a look at this survey at PEW:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Tariffs On China<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Tariffs are another key part of Trump\u2019s foreign policy. <strong>Increased tariffs on China, specifically, receive more negative than positive evaluations<\/strong>\u2026. Many more think the increased tariffs on China will be bad for the U.S. than say they will be good, though around a quarter either see them having no effect or are unsure.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Views of the tariffs\u2019 personal impact are similarly negative: <strong>Americans are about five times as likely to say the increased tariffs on China will be bad for them as they are to say the tariffs will be beneficial. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say increased tariffs on China will be good for the U.S. and good for them personally. Still, when it comes to the personal impact of these tariffs, Republicans are more likely to say the impact will be bad (30%) than good (17%), even as substantial shares express uncertainty or anticipate the tariffs will have limited personal impact. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/global\/2025\/04\/08\/americans-give-early-trump-foreign-policy-actions-mixed-or-negative-reviews\/\">Tariffs On China,<\/a> PEW Research Center<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Americans-surveyed-on-Tarifs.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt aligncenter size-full wp-image-306664\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Americans-surveyed-on-Tarifs.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"634\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Americans-surveyed-on-Tarifs.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Americans-surveyed-on-Tarifs-480x476.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 640px, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>So, at least there exists a slim majority of Americans who oppose decoupling, oppose the relentless provocations and incitements, and oppose Trump\u2019s pointless War on China. Let\u2019s hope that majority holds.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Trump-launches-golden-age-of-stupid.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt aligncenter size-full wp-image-306665\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Trump-launches-golden-age-of-stupid.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"543\" height=\"900\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Trump-launches-golden-age-of-stupid.jpg 543w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Trump-launches-golden-age-of-stupid-480x796.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 543px, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unz.com\/mwhitney\/trump-concocted-the-tariffs-hoax-to-decouple-with-china\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mike Whitney explains why Trump\u2019s tariffs are not intended to bring jobs back to America. The real objective is to isolate, encircle and eventually crush China<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":306661,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[78,61,58,66],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-306660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-china","category-Commentary","category-Current_Affairs","category-Economics"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=306660"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306660\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":306713,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306660\/revisions\/306713"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/306661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=306660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=306660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=306660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}