{"id":303910,"date":"2025-02-21T07:24:17","date_gmt":"2025-02-21T07:24:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=303910"},"modified":"2025-02-22T06:24:39","modified_gmt":"2025-02-22T06:24:39","slug":"the-trilateralist-keir-starmer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=303910","title":{"rendered":"The Trilateralist Keir Starmer"},"content":{"rendered":"

Iain Davis \u2013 Off-Guardian Feb 20, 2025<\/strong><\/h1>\n

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is seemingly a serving member of the\u00a0Trilateral Commission<\/a>. If you check out the most recent Trilateral Commission membership record it\u00a0lists Starmer<\/a>\u00a0as a \u201cFormer Member in Public Service.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

In a recent Independent Media Alliance panel I was fortunate to have the opportunity to ask the world\u2019s leading expert on the Trilateral Commission\u00a0Patrick Wood<\/a>\u00a0why \u201cformer\u201d members would be listed on the current membership list.<\/p>\n

Patrick Wood\u00a0said<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Unless somebody resigns from the Commission they keep the name of a public servant in a special section below the active members. [. . .] When they get out of office they\u2019re simply moved up the list to the regular list again. [. . .] It supposedly shields them from criticism that, well, they\u2019re not really speaking for the Trilateral Commission. [. . .] What a sham!<\/p>\n

Sure enough if, for example, we look at Jake Sullivan, on the\u00a02022 membership list<\/a>\u00a0he was serving as the US National Security Advisor and was listed as a \u201cformer\u201d member. Yet, on the current list he has full membership as a \u201crecent\u201d former member, i.e., he\u2019s not a \u201cformer\u201d member anymore.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m not sure how long Triliateralists remain \u201crecent former\u201d members but, if we look at the\u00a02020 list<\/a>, Ken Juster for instance was a \u201cformer\u201d member serving as the US Ambassador to India. On the current list he has transitioned through the \u201crecent former\u201d designation phase to become a regular member again. So it seems the flimflam is maintained for no more than 4 years after a Trilateralist\u2019s so-called\u00a0public service<\/em>\u00a0ceases.<\/p>\n

Evidently, Patrick Wood is correct. His current listing as a former member indicates that Keir Starmer has not resigned from the Trilateral Commission. If we assume he is a\u00a0serving Trilateralist<\/a>\u00a0this raises a number of very serious questions.<\/p>\n

The Trilateral Commission\u2014founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller\u2014effectively promotes multipolarity. It divides the northern hemisphere into\u00a0three distinct regions<\/a>\u00a0or poles: North American, European, and Asian Pacific. This is practically identical to the\u00a0regionalised<\/em>\u00a0\u201cbalance of power\u201d system envisaged by the Rhodes\/Milner influenced\u00a0Anglo-American Establishment<\/a>\u00a0prior to WWII.<\/p>\n

This theme of\u00a0regionalisation<\/em>\u00a0was pursued by the Rockefellers in the postwar period. In the late 1950\u2019s\u00a0they determined<\/a>\u00a0that the \u201cregional approach has world-wide validity\u201d<\/em> and that they should \u201ccontribute to this <\/em>[regionalisation] process by constructive action.\u201d<\/em> The Trilateral Commission was established with that objective, among others, in mind.<\/p>\n

It is no coincidence that 1973 was also the year that the Rockefellers\u2019 and European Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development\u2019s (OECD\u2019s) global think-tank, the Club of Rome, published its report proposing a multipolar (regionalised) world titled\u00a0Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System<\/a>\u00a0(RAM).<\/p>\n

While the RAM report presents a computer model, that divided the world into ten \u201cKingdoms\u201d\u2014poles\u2014The Club of Rome added a vision statement:<\/p>\n

Our efforts in the immediate future will be concentrated on further use of the already developed [Kingdoms] model. [. . .] Implementation of the regional models in different parts of the world and their connection via a satellite communication network [will be] for the purpose of joint assessment of the long-term global future by teams from the various regions [Kingdoms or \u201cpoles\u201d]. Implementation of the vision for the future outlined by leaders from an underdeveloped region in order to assess with the model existing obstacles and the means whereby the [multi-Kingdom or multipolar] vision might become a reality.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/div>\n

More recently the World Economic Forum (WEF), founded by Klaus Schwab,\u00a0has argued<\/a>\u00a0the \u201cmost likely outcome along the globalization\u2013no globalization continuum lies in an in-between solution: regionalization.\u201d<\/p>\n

The global push toward regionalisation\u2014multipolarity\u2014has been ongoing for\u00a0more than a century<\/a>. It is the penultimate step prior to full-blown global governance: the ultimate objective.<\/p>\n

Membership of the Trilateral Commission would suggest Starmer is a participant in a privately funded think-tank which exercises the\u00a0Chatham House rule<\/a>\u00a0and deliberates on globalist policy initiatives in secret. Because it meets behind closed doors\u2014virtual or physical\u2014we are reliant on its published reports and released documents to piece together what those discussions entailed. It isn\u2019t particularly difficult to do so.<\/p>\n

The Trilateral Commission\u2019s\u00a0Task Force on Global Capitalism in Transition<\/a>\u00a0seeks to \u201cchart a path\u201d for \u201cgovernments, businesses, and nonprofit institutions and [define] specific steps they can take to achieve critical common goals.\u201d<\/p>\n

What \u201cspecific steps\u201d and whose \u201ccommon goals\u201d?<\/p>\n

To this end, the Trilateral Commission promotes\u00a0fifth stage capitalism<\/a>:<\/p>\n

We are now in the midst of a transition to a new fifth stage of capitalism. [. . .] Entering the fifth stage capitalism, the Trilateral countries should remake education on the scale of the reforms of the 19th and 20th centuries. [. . .] The public and private sectors will need to collaborate to leverage AI to mine insights from vast data sets available through social media, employment firms, and public sources. [. . .] Every person should live and work in a net-zero world by 2050.<\/p>\n

Trilateralists contend this vast social engineering project can achieve the desired outcomes through the widespread adoption of fifth stage capitalism-synonymous with stakeholder capitalism\u2014and the associated\u00a0global public-private partnerships<\/a>. The Trilateral Commission adds:<\/p>\n

Public-private collaboration: Although governments will lead in developing policy, these strategies must be true \u201cwhole of society\u201d efforts. Governments should thus also lead in convening a broad array of stakeholders. In many cases, though, other groups\u2014industry associations, nonprofits, academia, and other research institutions\u2014could also play an important role in establishing forums to engage stakeholders.<\/p>\n

Stakeholder capitalism was pioneered by\u00a0Klaus Schwab<\/a>\u00a0in the 1970s. In December 2019, Schwab wrote \u201cWhat Kind of Capitalism Do We Want<\/a>\u201d where he outlined the stakeholder capitalism concept:<\/p>\n

Stakeholder capitalism, a model I first proposed a half-century ago, positions private corporations as trustees of society, and is clearly the best response to today\u2019s social and environmental challenges.<\/p>\n

The legal definition of \u201ctrustee<\/a>\u201d is:<\/p>\n

The person appointed, or required by law, to execute a trust; one in whom an estate, interest, or power is vested, under an express or implied agreement to administer or exercise it for the benefit or to the use of another.\u201d<\/p>\n

The referenced \u201canother\u201d is us, the people. We all apparently agree that private corporations should be invested with the power to administer the nation state. This is the heart of stakeholder capitalism or, as the Trilateralists put it, fifth stage capitalism.<\/p>\n

The role and authority of the UK government, under Keir Starmer, is diminished by stakeholder capitalism. While the government supposedly leads policy development, the public-private partnership \u201cwhole of society\u201d approach means other private\u00a0stakeholders<\/em>\u00a0can \u201calso\u201d lead. Fifth stage capitalism formally shifts policy development from the public to the private sector.<\/p>\n

In 2023, in an\u00a0infamous interview<\/a>\u00a0with former BBC news anchor Emily Maitlis, Starmer was asked who he would prefer to engage with. Was it Davos (the globalists) or Westminster (the UK public\u2019s\u00a0allegedly<\/a>\u00a0democratic parliament)?<\/p>\n

Without a moments hesitation, Starmer replied:<\/p>\n

Davos. [. . .] Because Westminster is too constrained, it\u2019s closed, and we\u2019re not having meaning [. . .] Once you get out of Westminster, whether it\u2019s Davos or anywhere else, you actually engage with people who you can see working with in the future [fellow stakeholder capitalists]. [. . .] Westminster is just a tribal shouting place<\/p>\n

It seems Starmer is not overly interested in parliamentary democracy. This is entirely in keeping with the view held by the Trilateral Commission. In its 1975\u00a0Crisis of Democracy<\/a>\u00a0report, The Trilateralists observed:<\/p>\n

[. . .] democracy is only one way of constituting authority, and it is not necessarily a universally applicable one. In many situations the claims of expertise, seniority, experience, and special talents may override the claims of democracy as a way of constituting authority. [. . .] The arenas where democratic procedures are appropriate are, in short, limited. [. . .] Democracy is more of a threat to itself in the United States than it is in either Europe or Japan where there still exist residual inheritances of traditional and aristocratic values. The absence of such values in the United States produces a lack of balance in society which, in turn, leads to the swing back and forth between creedal passion and creedal passivity. [. . .] The vulnerability of democratic government in the United States thus comes not primarily from external threats, though such threats are real, nor from internal subversion from the left or the right, although both possibilities could exist, but rather from the internal dynamics of democracy itself in a highly educated, mobilized, and participant society. [. . .] We have come to recognize that there are potentially desirable limits to economic growth. There are also potentially desirable limits to the indefinite extension of political democracy.<\/p>\n

The democratic division of the \u201cthe left or the right\u201d and the \u201cexternal threats,\u201d purportedly posed by foreign nations, are not the most pressing risks as far as the Triliateralists are concerned. The real threat comes from \u201ca highly educated, mobilized, and participant society.\u201d\u00a0Aristocracy<\/em>, in the form of authority exercised by experts\u2014Technocracy<\/a>\u2014is preferable.<\/p>\n

The \u201ccreedal passion and creedal passivity\u201d of deliberative democracy\u2014or \u201ctribal shouting\u201d as Starmer coins it\u2014leads to a \u201clack of balance\u201d in the system. Therefore\u00a0The Limits to Growth<\/a><\/em>, both economic and political, should be set in order to ensure \u201ctraditional and aristocratic values\u201d maintain primacy because \u201cdemocracy is only one way of constituting authority.\u201d<\/p>\n

There is no evidence suggesting the Trilateral Commission has changed its opinion. Fifth stage capitalism is a mechanism for \u201cconstituting authority\u201d in the hands of a modern corporate aristocracy.<\/p>\n

Regardless of whether Starmer is a serving Trilateralist or not, everything he says and everything he does is entirely in keeping with the objectives of the Trilateral Commission.<\/p>\n

Blackrock CEO Larry Fink is definitely a serving Trilateralist and he, along with other corporate executives, were the stakeholders invited to\u00a0advise<\/em>\u00a0the UK government\u2019s economic growth policies at a Downing Street board meeting held in November 2024. Of course this is just the visible extent of the \u201cpartnership\u201d between the UK government and Blackrock which controls an estimated $11.5T (trillion) in assets. Blackrock\u2019s asset portfolio has nearly three times the monetary value of Britain\u2019s entire annual GDP\u2014according to the\u00a0World Bank and the OECD<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0Financial Times reported<\/a>\u00a0that this meeting supposedly prompted Starmer\u2019s Labour government to \u201coverhaul British [financial] regulators\u201d and commit to establishing \u201ca new unit in the UK Treasury\u201d to \u201cco-ordinate this work across government.\u201d It is obvious who will benefit from financial deregulation. \u201cGrowth\u201d doesn\u2019t mean what we think it means in the minds of Trilateralists like Fink.<\/p>\n

The evidence clearly indicates that Starmer, alongside Fink, is also a serving member of the Trilateral Commission and did not resign from it when he became the UK\u2019s prime minister. With regard to this apparent oversight, the Ministerial Code is\u00a0very clear<\/a>:<\/p>\n

[. . .] on appointment to each new office, ministers must provide a full declaration of private interests which might be thought to give rise to a conflict with the minister\u2019s public duties. [. . .] The list [of interests] includes affiliations with charities and non-public organisations [. . .] relevant to their ministerial portfolio or the broader work of their department. [. . .] The list includes other interests which could have relevance to a minister\u2019s specific ministerial responsibilities and broader work in government.<\/p>\n

Starmer\u2019s declared interests are that he is the Honorary Vice President of the Civil Service Sports Council and an Honorary Fellow of St Edmund Hall at the University of Oxford. There is no mention of his evident affiliation with the Trilateral Commission. Indeed, any mention of his Trilateralist links, active or not, are almost completely absent from the\u00a0legacy media<\/a>\u2014hardly surprising.<\/p>\n

If he is a serving Trilateralist, Starmer\u2019s lack of candour would not be anything new. Due to its deep links to the intelligence agencies, Starmer had a duty, both as a parliamentarian and, then, a Labour opposition cabinet member, to disclose that he had joined the Trilateral Commission\u2014somewhere around 2017-2018. Reportedly, he did not.<\/p>\n

Former Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn\u2019s spokesperson James Schneider, told\u00a0Declassified UK<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Starmer didn\u2019t inform us [and therefore parliament] that he was joining the Trilateral Commission while serving in the shadow cabinet. If he had, we would have put a stop to it. [. . .] Membership of the Trilateral Commission, a body dedicated to promoting corporate power, was plainly incompatible with Labour\u2019s then-stated policies of redistributing wealth and power from the few to the many.<\/p>\n

In all likelihood Starmer\u00a0is<\/em>, not\u00a0was<\/em>, a Trilateralist. His designation as a \u201cformer\u201d members is perception management and he maintains close working relationships with Triliateralists like Fink. His public statements echo the Trilateralist worldview as do his government\u2019s\u00a0policy initiatives<\/a>. We have no evidence to the contrary and the evidence available in public domain strongly suggests that he is currently working on behalf of the Trilateral Commission not the British people.<\/p>\n

If so, then Starmer\u2019s breach of the Ministerial Code is the least of our concerns. We currently have a prime minister who is committed to supporting multipolarity and, in so doing, subverting the UK to facilitate global governance; a so-called\u00a0leader<\/em>\u00a0who embraces fifth stage capitalism; a man who wants to install a Technocracy, who believes democracy should be limited and economic and political growth engineered to enable a corporate aristocracy to rule.<\/p>\n

None of which anyone voted for or even knew about, and all of which he either obfuscates or denies.<\/p>\n

We have every reason and every right to ask him who he represents.<\/p>\n

—<\/p>\n

Support Off-Guardian:<\/p>\n

Ko-fi<\/a><\/p>\n

Subscribestar<\/a><\/p>\n

Paypal<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Despite admitting to being a former member of the Tri-lateral Commission between 2017-2018, Iain Davis reveals that Keir Starmer is still an active member of the secretive group that was founded by David Rockefeller to promote regional world governance <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":288791,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-303910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Behind_The_News"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=303910"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303910\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":303948,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303910\/revisions\/303948"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/288791"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=303910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=303910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=303910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}