{"id":298308,"date":"2024-11-10T08:08:35","date_gmt":"2024-11-10T08:08:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=298308"},"modified":"2024-11-11T08:50:50","modified_gmt":"2024-11-11T08:50:50","slug":"kamalas-campaign-was-objectively-the-worst-in-recent-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=298308","title":{"rendered":"Kamala\u2019s Campaign Was Objectively the Worst in Recent History"},"content":{"rendered":"

No matter one\u2019s political leanings, one must admit: Kamala Harris\u2019 campaign was objectively one of the cringest, tone-deaf political campaigns in recent history. Here\u2019s a look at some of its defining moments.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Vigilant Citizen \u2013 vigilantcitizen.com Nov 8, 2024<\/strong><\/h1>\n

I want to preface this article by stating that it is not partisan. I\u2019m Canadian, so I didn\u2019t have a horse in this race. In fact, a Trump presidency will most likely negatively affect Canada\u2019s economy due to the imposition of tariffs. And, if Trump goes ahead with mass deportations, illegal immigrants will most likely flock to Canada, and we all know that our WEF-controlled Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will do nothing about it.<\/p>\n

That said, this site is about objectively analyzing media, and we have been flooded with a tsunami of it in the past weeks. And, no matter one\u2019s political leanings, one has to admit that the Kamala Harris campaign was one of the worst in recent history. It perfectly encapsulated the elite\u2019s advanced state of \u201cout-of-touchness\u201d as every attempt at appearing relatable looked like outright satire. Sometimes, I thought, \u201cAre they deliberately trying to lose?\u201d<\/p>\n

Kamala Harris\u2019 campaign relied on nearly unlimited funds, the unwavering support of legacy media, and a constant stream of celebrity endorsements. Despite all of this, she lost spectacularly. How could this have possibly happened?<\/p>\n

Well, many of us saw this coming a mile away. Although Kamala had all the necessary resources to win, she was like Dorothy at the beginning of The Wizard of Oz<\/em>: She needed a brain, a heart, and courage to complete her quest. However, her campaign showed none of these things. She didn\u2019t have the brain to answer basic questions and devise a coherent program. She didn\u2019t have the heart to truly connect with citizens, as she let disconnected Hollywood pawns speak for her. Finally, she lacked the courage to take a firm stand on issues, as she constantly resorted to vague, non-sensical platitudes to weasel her way out of essential questions.<\/p>\n

This led many to realize: If Kamala doesn\u2019t want to say anything, why am I even listening to her? So, millions of people completely tuned her out and dismissed her as a potential President. Considering that only a few million Americans were still undecided at that point, that was very unfortunate for her.<\/p>\n

Despite Kamala being a catastrophic choice for the Democratic Party, donors (such as Bill Gates) threw hundreds of millions of dollars at her as an army of operatives and PR specialists shaped her image. Their goal: To make this terrible candidate appear cool, trendy, relatable, and, if we still have time, Presidential.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately for Kamala, those in charge of her propaganda were terrible at it. At every turn, they churned out some of the cringiest and tone-deaf attempts at political advertising in recent history.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s a look at some of the lowlights of her campaign.<\/p>\n

Kamala is Brat<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Continues\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kamala Harris\u2019 campaign relied on nearly unlimited funds, the unwavering support of legacy media, and a constant stream of celebrity endorsements. Despite all of this, she lost spectacularly. How could this have possibly happened?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":127,"featured_media":298309,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-298308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Commentary"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/127"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=298308"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298308\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":298310,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298308\/revisions\/298310"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/298309"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=298308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=298308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=298308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}