{"id":293602,"date":"2024-08-24T06:00:15","date_gmt":"2024-08-24T06:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=293602"},"modified":"2024-08-26T06:17:35","modified_gmt":"2024-08-26T06:17:35","slug":"how-and-why-they-sell-x-as-a-bastion-of-free-speech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=293602","title":{"rendered":"How (and why) they sell X as a \u201cbastion of free speech\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Kit Knightley \u2013 Off-Guardian Aug 22, 2024<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>Donald Trump is back on the app formerly known as Twitter. After almost four years in <a href=\"https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/2021\/01\/14\/trumps-been-deleted-from-internet-and-any-one-of-us-could-be-next\/\">the \u201cTruth Social\u201d wilderness<\/a> he sat down with Elon Musk<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/realDonaldTrump\/status\/1823144316014911820\"> for a 3-hour conversation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>On our side of the pond, Musk is taking every opportunity he can to troll Keir Starmer\u2019s government, comparing the UK to something from 1984 (accurately, it must be said).<\/p>\n<p>During the Olympics, he chimed in with criticism of controversial Algerian boxer Imane Khelif for being a \u201cman beating up women\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Wherever there is controversy, Musk (or the PR intern running his X account) appears to pour fuel on the fire.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s not to say everything Musk says is wrong. A lot of it is right, or at least defensible and rational, but I think that itself is an integral part of the construction. Sugar among the salt, aiding in the sale of the overriding narrative:<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201cElon Musk \u2013 the world\u2019s richest man, and Free Speech Champion\u201d.<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p>(subtext \u2013 <em>there are some oligarchs you can really trust<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>How did it come to this? And Why?<\/p>\n<p>To give you my answer \u00a0to that, let\u2019s go back in time a few years B.E. \u2013 Before Elon.<\/p>\n<p>Under the <em>ancien r\u00e9gime<\/em>, Twitter purged the alt-news crowd, labelled provably real people as bots, and told dissenters <em>\u201cIf you don\u2019t like it, go and start your own platform\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The trouble with that was\u2026that\u2019s exactly what they did. Newer smaller versions of Twitter began to appear \u2013\u00a0 Truth Social and Gab and so on and so on.<\/p>\n<p>And when you\u2019re an all-encompassing supranational corporate-governmental monster addicted to surveillance and control\u2026that\u2019s kinda counterproductive, because now you can\u2019t hear what\u2019s being said, and you can\u2019t steer the conversation.<\/p>\n<p>What is the point of spending billions creating a massive surveillance network if you keep banning all the people you want to surveil?<\/p>\n<p>What good is it spending the budget of a medium-sized country on influencers, bots and shills, and then stopping people from seeing them?<\/p>\n<p>No, banning doesn\u2019t work, it just puts people <em>outside<\/em> your system of influence and control.<\/p>\n<p><em>Outside the system<\/em> is bad, they need everyone <em>inside<\/em>. They don\u2019t care if you\u2019re praising or criticising, loving or hating, defending its existence or denying it \u2013 everything is acceptable, as long as you do it <em>where they can see you<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>They needed to invite those banished souls back inside, and the most efficient way of doing that was to adapt the Red\/Blue fake dichotomy model of elections to the world of social media.<\/p>\n<p>In short, to bring the banned people back and patch over the hole they\u2019d made, they needed to rehabilitate Twitter.<\/p>\n<p>Enter Elon Musk, and \u201cX\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s all about creating a controlled opposition.<\/p>\n<p>The contrived binary between the \u201cgood\u201d social media platforms \u2013\u00a0 whose CEOs attend congressional hearings and simper about \u201csocial responsibility\u201d\u00a0 vs the \u201cbad\u201d social media platforms \u2013 whose CEOs post rude memes.<\/p>\n<p>The \u201csafe space\u201d vs the \u201cfree-for-all\u201d (or at least, the pretence of a free-for-all \u2013 but we\u2019ll get to that).<\/p>\n<p>From the moment Musk acquired Twitter, the rebrand was on.<\/p>\n<p>Alternate media journalists were invited to inspect <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Twitter_Files\">Twitter\u2019s \u201ctop secret files\u201d<\/a> and came away with some \u201cshocking\u201d revelations, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Twitter engaged in \u201cvisibility filtering\u201d (aka shadow banning) and algorithmic censorship of anti-establishment people and opinions!<\/li>\n<li>Twitter enabled the Pentagon to operate sock puppet accounts for running psyops!<\/li>\n<li>National governments used to ask Twitter to remove stuff, and sometimes they did!<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Phew! Who knew, right?<\/p>\n<p>It always amazes me how much traction they get by simply telling people an <em>incredibly watered-down<\/em> version of what we already know. I guess because we are all so pathetically grateful to hear even a small amount of semi-truth coming from \u2018official sources\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>But the Twitter files were just the start, further displays of overt \u2018pro-free speech\u2019 behaviour followed. Most recently including unbanning Trump and announcing the <a href=\"https:\/\/agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br\/en\/justica\/noticia\/2024-08\/social-network-x-closes-its-offices-brazil\">closure of X\u2019s Brazil office<\/a> rather than complying with government censorship.<\/p>\n<p>All of this has contributed to the birth of a cult of personality around Elon as the supposed \u201cchampion of free expression\u201d, with X itself labelled the \u201clast bastion of free speech\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>In the wake of the so-called assassination attempt on Donald Trump, the rallying cry of the Musk worshippers was \u201cthank God for X, or we\u2019d never have known the truth\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>So you get memes like this\u2026<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/musk-twitter-propaganda-meme-800x534-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt aligncenter wp-image-293603\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/musk-twitter-propaganda-meme-800x534-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"427\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/musk-twitter-propaganda-meme-800x534-1.jpg 640w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/musk-twitter-propaganda-meme-800x534-1-480x320.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 640px, 100vw\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>The branding is clear: Musk is the people\u2019s billionaire, the \u201cpick me\u201d mogul who\u2019s \u201cnot like the other oligarchs\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>You don\u2019t need me to explain how useful this dynamic is in controlling mass opinion. It\u2019s creating organised religion for the atheist generation. Tenets of faith no different in purpose and far tackier in presentation.<\/p>\n<p>Importantly we should ask: Has Twitter even really improved now that it\u2019s \u201cX\u201d?<\/p>\n<p>No it hasn\u2019t. The \u201cleft-wing\u201d Musk critics are right about that.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe there is an increased amount of overt racism and race-baiting, or maybe now it\u2019s just promoted. Either way, there\u2019s no ignoring it.<\/p>\n<p>What equally can\u2019t be ignored is the massive proliferation of ads and porn bots and the same gifs and videos clogging every discussion. Monetisation has led to an avalanche of accounts farming engagement with blatant clickbait, ragebait, cutebait\u2026.just, all the bait.<\/p>\n<p>All the while, these newly unpleasant facets of X are being brandished by the pro-censorship \u201cleft\u201d, and used to discredit the very idea of free speech in general.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cSee, absolute freedom of speech just means racism and porn\u201d,<\/em> they get to say,<em> \u201cWe need more regulation!\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Now, there\u2019s an argument that all the bait could be considered \u201cthe acceptable price of free speech\u201d\u2026<\/p>\n<p>\u2026if free speech was what we actually got.<\/p>\n<p>But it\u2019s not.<\/p>\n<p>For some reason, since the \u201cTwitter files\u201d released and in combination with Musk\u2019s unearned reputation as a \u201cfree speech absolutist\u201d, people have assumed that Twitter \u2013 now X \u2013 no longer allows shadowbans, psy-ops or cooperates with government-backed censorship.<\/p>\n<p>But they do. They very obviously do.<\/p>\n<p>Case in point: OffG. We have a Twitter\/X account with almost 61,000 followers.<\/p>\n<p>Back when Twitter was Still Twitter \u00a0any link to our website was subject to an auto-warning that it might be potential spam. We were also intermittently shadowbanned, which had a very obvious effect on our reach, though our tweets could still get thousands of retweets and likes.<\/p>\n<p>When Twitter became X the auto-warning was removed.<\/p>\n<p>But our reach diminished \u2013 \u00a0massively. \u00a0We are now told all the time that people haven\u2019t seen our tweets or links in years. A successful tweet of ours gets maybe 200 likes, most remain in double figures.<\/p>\n<p>So, for our account at least, \u201cuncensored\u201d X is no kind of improvement.<\/p>\n<p>CJ Hopkins (who has written about <a href=\"https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/2023\/08\/16\/the-free-speech-twitter-psyop\/\">this psyop<\/a> himself) was temporarily labelled a distributor of \u201cadult content\u201d, and hidden behind warnings, while dozens of OnlyFans girls can be found in almost any reply chain shilling their \u201cwares\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>This is quite obvious \u201cvisibility filtering\u201d in action, and all the truly anti-establishment thinkers are subject to it.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s all about <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.x.com\/en_us\/topics\/product\/2023\/freedom-of-speech-not-reach-an-update-on-our-enforcement-philosophy\">\u201cspeech not reach\u201d<\/a>, ensuring all independent thought is quarantined off in its own little virtual <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Gje3HiouzvQ\">\u201cfree speech cages\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of banning the voices they don\u2019t want to speak, they lock them up in soundproof rooms where they can scream their lungs out, and only the FBI agents set to monitor them can hear, and only bots designed to control them will respond.<\/p>\n<p>Now, clearly that\u2019s preferable to going to prison for posting anti-immigrant memes, but should free speech really be graded on that curve?<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, that\u2019s the situation in which we find ourselves.<\/p>\n<p>So, what we\u2019re left with is two versions of \u201cfree speech\u201d to choose from\u2026neither of which is <em>actual free speech<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The battle lines are drawn up and either you\u2019re with the government or you\u2019re with Elon Musk. An entirely fake a war between <em>overt<\/em> censorship and <em>covert<\/em> censorship.<\/p>\n<p>They won\u2019t allow a third way. Like everything else these days.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Support Off-Guardian:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ko-fi.com\/offguardian\">Ko-fi<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.subscribestar.com\/offguardian\">Subscribestar<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/donate\/?hosted_button_id=CKFB3MH8CGB9U\">Paypal<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/2024\/08\/22\/how-and-why-they-sell-x-as-a-bastion-of-free-speech\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The battle lines are drawn up and either you\u2019re with the government or you\u2019re with Elon Musk. They won\u2019t allow a third way. Just opposition they can control <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":252821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[42,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-293602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-controlling-the-news-andor-the-free-exchange-of-ideas-and-information","category-The_Media"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=293602"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293602\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":293604,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293602\/revisions\/293604"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/252821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=293602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=293602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=293602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}