Surveys over the years have found that concern about uncontrolled immigration has been uppermost in the minds of many British voters. Successive governments have ignored or brushed aside the issue.<\/p>\n
However, despite being characterized by the mainstream media as \u201cright-wingers\u201d, many of those involved in the recent protests in the UK would dispute that description.<\/p>\n
They would argue that they are simply concerned citizens who have been ignored for too long by too many governments.<\/p>\n
The new Labour government has just announced that it will cut winter fuel payments<\/a> to pensioners to help them pay for winter fuel. According to the Treasury this will help the government save \u00a31.5 billion per year.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, in contrast, the previous Conservative government was spending \u00a35.4 billion per year to house illegal migrants<\/a>.<\/p>\n You don\u2019t have to be an extreme \u201cright-winger\u201d to see the obvious discrepancy in priorities here.<\/p>\n Young men, many without family ties, or skills or job prospects are attracted to Britain by the lure of free handouts. While native pensioners, many of whom fought for Britain in WWII, are left to face a cold winter without any assistance.<\/p>\n Such obvious discrepancy in priorities gives credence to claims that successive UK governments are actually more interested in population replacement than the well being of their citizens. The idea being that newly arrived migrants will more readily accept lower wages and fewer political rights than native Britons.<\/p>\n For the ruling elite the appeal is obvious. A large underclass with lower political aspirations provides them with a cheaper workforce that can be more easily managed.<\/p>\n All the elite have to do to achieve this is to get their bought and paid for politicians and media underlings to argue that anyone who opposes this is a \u201cright-winger\u201d or a \u201cracist\u201d. Ed.<\/p>\n Sir Mark Rowley of the Metropolitan Police Service. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n Britain\u2019s top law enforcement official ripped out a reporter\u2019s microphone after being asked a question about double standards in policing the immigration-related riots across the UK.<\/p>\n Sir Mark Rowley of the Metropolitan Police Service had just left a government meeting in Westminster about handling the unrest when journalists approached him on Monday.<\/p>\n \u201cAre we going to end two-tier policing sir?\u201d<\/em> a Sky News reporter asked. Rowley responded by destroying his recording equipment and continuing to walk to his car. He took no questions from the press.<\/p>\n Sky News crime correspondent Martin Brunt described Rowley\u2019s actions as a \u201cpetulant, childish even\u201d<\/em> response to a \u201cperfectly legitimate\u201d<\/em> question.<\/p>\n \u201cIt was a storm in a teacup, but perception is everything,\u201d<\/em> Brunt said, adding that Rowley\u2019s explanation that he had been in a hurry was \u201cmitigation, not a defense.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n Though the Sky reporter could have pressed charges for assault, criminal damage, or misconduct in public office, he reportedly chose to give Rowley a pass.<\/p>\n BREAKING: Commissioner of the Met Police Sir Mark Rowley has been seen leaving the Cabinet Office in Westminster.<\/p>\n As he left, he was asked a question about two-tier policing, but Sir Mark grabbed the journalist's microphone and dropped it to the ground.https:\/\/t.co\/sSlOq3trXp<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/tbcyehnADf<\/a><\/p>\n — Sky News (@SkyNews) August 5, 2024<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\nLondon police chief attacks journalist\u2019s equipment (VIDEO)<\/strong><\/h1>\n
RT.com \u2013 Aug 5, 2024<\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Sir-Mark-Rowley.jpg\")
<\/a>\n