{"id":284183,"date":"2024-03-24T09:12:13","date_gmt":"2024-03-24T09:12:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=284183"},"modified":"2024-03-26T08:24:32","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T08:24:32","slug":"terrorist-attack-in-moscow-who-did-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=284183","title":{"rendered":"Terrorist Attack in Moscow — Who Did It?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Larry Johnson \u2013 SONAR.com March 22, 2024<\/strong><\/h1>\n

On the \u201cUsual Suspects\u201d list we have Ukraine and we have ISIS. A good case can be made for both. I am posting three videos \u2014 some of it is repetitive \u2014 that discusses the attack and the very odd behavior of the Biden Administration. Let\u2019s go through the chronology of events.<\/p>\n

On March 7 US Embassy Moscow issued the following alert<\/a>:<\/p>\n

The Embassy is monitoring reports that extremists have imminent plans to target large gatherings in Moscow, to include concerts, and U.S. citizens should be advised to avoid large gatherings over the next 48 hours.<\/p>\n

What you need to understand is that this warning was not issued at the discretion of the embassy. This was approved in Washington, DC at Main State and would have required some intelligence that was deemed somewhat specific and \u201ccredible.\u201d When I was doing this job at State Counter Terrorism in 1990, this was in the aftermath of the bombing of Pan, 103. It was widely believed in the public that state department, and the CIA had information in advance about the terrorist bombing of that plane, and warned our person out not to get on board. That was not true but it did raise the issue of when, and how to warn the public about a potential threat. We came up with a system that required specific and credible intelligence. The more specific and credible the intelligence, the less need to warn the public. Consider, for example, that if we knew a terrorist attack was going to be carried out on Friday at a public concert hall by a particular group, we would be able to alert appropriate authorities and take precautions to intercept the attack without alarming the public.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, if the information was not in great detail, but did come from a credible source, then we would take the time to put together a public warning. That is what happened when the US Embassy Moscow issued the warning on 7 March. They had information they thought was credible, but not terribly specific. This raises a key question \u2014 did the United States warn Russian authorities? Normally, when I was doing the job, we would share the information with the appropriate government and law enforcement authorities, in order to try to prevent the attack. Based on public comments by Maria Zakharova and Dimitri Medvedev, following the March 7, warning, and following today\u2019s attack, it appears that the United States did not share any of its information with Russia. I would note there is a Wall Street Journal report tonight, stating that the United States did warn, but Russian authorities insist that they were not provided with an Intel heads up.<\/p>\n

What makes the entire situation so bizarre and questionable in terms of what the United States knew, and when it knew it, is that the State Department issued a statement within two hours of the bombing \u2014 remember, we still did not know how many attackers, what kind of weapons, how many casualties, and whether or not, they were hostages \u2014 declaring that Ukraine was not responsible for this attack. How did State Department know that? It\u2019s strongly suggests that the United States had intelligence, which did not share with Moscow.<\/p>\n

Then we have this very unusual X message (formerly Twitter) that was posted at 3:30 AM this morning, 22 March, by OSINTdefender<\/a> (which I think of has a CIA front for spreading messages the CIA wants out there):<\/p>\n

Members of U.S. National Security Council and the White House have reportedly started to become Increasingly Frustrated by \u201cUnauthorized Brazen Actions\u201d taken by Ukraine against Russia, including their recent Campaign of Long-Range Drone Strikes having Targeted at least 25 Oil Refineries, Terminals, Depots and Storage Facilities across Western Russia; with some Biden Administration Officials believing these Strikes will cause a Spike in Global Oil Prices as well as Significant Escalation and Retaliation against Ukraine like was seen during tonight\u2019s Large-Scale Missile Attack.<\/p>\n

Do you think that is just a happy coincidence that the Biden White House is bemoaning Ukraine taking \u201cunauthorized brazen actions\u201d on the same day there is a massive terrorist attack in Moscow? I don\u2019t believe in coincidence. I think the Biden ministration was trying to get out ahead of an attack that they knew was coming.<\/p>\n

Some claims have emerged late in the day with ISIS, allegedly, taking credit for the attack. What makes that interesting is that we have evidence that some members of ISIS have been fighting in Ukraine against Russia, so this does not necessarily exonerate, either Ukraine or the United States.<\/p>\n

Anyway, I deal with these issues from different perspectives in the following videos:<\/p>\n