{"id":282076,"date":"2024-02-19T08:28:10","date_gmt":"2024-02-19T08:28:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=282076"},"modified":"2024-02-21T09:26:10","modified_gmt":"2024-02-21T09:26:10","slug":"offg-recommendswag-the-dog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=282076","title":{"rendered":"OffG Recommends\u2026Wag the Dog"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Kit Kightly \u2013 Off Guardian Feb 18, 2024<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px; text-align: center;\">Why does a dog wag its tail? Because a dog is smarter than its tail. If the tail were smarter, the tail would wag the dog.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Wag the Dog is possibly the greatest political satire Hollywood has \u00a0produced. It\u2019s just that simple. If you only take one message away from this review, it should be that.<\/p>\n<p>That might seem an absurd claim in a world where <em>Dr Strangelove<\/em> and <em>Network<\/em> exist, but <em>Wag the Dog<\/em> does something no other film has ever really dared to do\u2026<\/p>\n<p>\u2026it keeps the story real.<\/p>\n<p>It doesn\u2019t feel the need to extend into absurdity to water down its points, nor make concessions to the character or intentions of the ruling class.<\/p>\n<p>So often, too often, films or television which are hailed as \u201cbiting satire\u201d \u2013 think The Thick of It or Veep \u2013 are de-fanged by becoming <em>cosy<\/em>. The political world portrayed as a circus inhabited by foolish but <em>well-meaning<\/em> clowns. Failures are of imagination or competence, never character or intent. People may be self-centered or shallow, but never really malign.<\/p>\n<p>Wag the Dog, uniquely, \u00a0doesn\u2019t pull any of those punches.<\/p>\n<p>Directed by Barry Levinson and released in 1997, the story follows political \u201cfixer\u201d Conrad Brean (Robert De Niro) who is drafted in by the incumbent administration to divert the public\u2019s attention away from a Presidential sex scandal.<\/p>\n<p>With the election just twelve days away the POTUS has been accused of sexual misconduct by a teenaged girl. Knowing that such a huge scandal can only be diffused by an equally huge distraction, Brean enlists Hollywood producer Stanley Motss with a simple mission: <em>Fake a war.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>And they do.<\/p>\n<p>They invent soldiers and heroes and casualties and enemies. They fake atrocities and POWs and public support. With nothing but narrative \u2013 briefings, press-releases, strategic \u201cleaks\u201d and denials, Brean constructs an entirely fake reality and his audience live in it, and never doubt it for a moment.<\/p>\n<p><em>Wag the Dog<\/em> is brilliant in its comedy and brutal in its bleakness.<\/p>\n<p>Really, when discussing it we need to focus on its dual aspects \u2013 as both film and political message.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>The Film<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Satire aside, <em>Wag the Dog<\/em> is an achievement as a piece of art.<\/p>\n<p>Visually it\u2019s nothing special. Levinson steers the story and does very little else. He\u2019s at home in the medium of the intimate, mid-budget character pieces \u2013 think of <em>Rain Man<\/em> or <em>Diner<\/em>. <em>Wag the Dog<\/em> is another example in that genre, though the scope of the story is wide its scale is small. The world outside the camera is much bigger than one we witness in front of it.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a story, mostly, about the interplay of two men \u2013 Brean and Motss. There\u2019s hardly a shot that doesn\u2019t have one of them in it, and there\u2019s no quirk of editing, lighting or setting to entertain the eye, it\u2019s just told straight.<\/p>\n<p>These days stories this small are usually highly stylized, the domain of eccentric auteurs like Wes Anderson or Yorgos Lanthimos. In that way the film is dated, an example of the grounded visually real drama\/comedy that flourished briefly from the mid 90s to the end of the 2010s thanks to writer\/directors like Alexander Payne or Peter Hedges.<\/p>\n<p>The performances, across the board, are pitch perfect, with fun small parts for Woody Harrelson, Dennis Leary and Willie Nelson, and good supporting work from the late Anne Heche.<\/p>\n<p>But, really, the movie belongs to the two leads.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_282079\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Wag-The-Dog-de-niro-hoffman-800x533-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-282079\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt wp-image-282079\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Wag-The-Dog-de-niro-hoffman-800x533-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Wag-The-Dog-de-niro-hoffman-800x533-1.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Wag-The-Dog-de-niro-hoffman-800x533-1-480x320.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 600px, 100vw\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-282079\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Brean (De Niro, right) finds a kindred spirit in Motss (Hoffman, left)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>It is the contrast between the characters and performances that drives the film forward.<\/p>\n<p>De Niro plays Brean as cerebral, cool-headed \u00a0and quiet, a friendly face over a core of steel. We don\u2019t know exactly who he is or what he does, we only get a few clues for reference.<\/p>\n<p>We know he was instrumental in setting the stage for Desert Storm, and was privy to the first draft of the Warren Report (<em>\u201cIt said Kennedy was killed by a drunk driver\u201d<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>And we know his reach is as limitless as his cynicism. He is witty, charming\u2026and psychopathically pragmatic. He doesn\u2019t particularly want to lie, he doesn\u2019t want to hurt anyone\u2026but he will without hesitation \u00a0if he needs to.<\/p>\n<p>Opposite that you have Hoffman\u2019s ebullient and theatrical Motss \u2013 a more straightforward trope. A consummate showman who revels in the thrill of \u201cproducing\u201d on the fly. A man so engrossed in creating his pretend war he never truly engages with the reality of his situation until he\u2019s forced to.<\/p>\n<p>What they share is something that few others in either the film world or real world have \u2013 an innate understanding of how to spin a narrative, and how people respond to storytelling.<\/p>\n<p>This shared vision is what drives the movie and their success.<\/p>\n<p>The music, too, deserves a mention. With the stand-out being the song pastiches, most particularly the \u201cThe American Dream\u201d, an almost cruel pastiche of charity songs such as\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=9AjkUyX0rVw\"><em>We Are the World<\/em><\/a> or <em><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Do_They_Know_It%27s_Christmas%3F\">Do They Know It\u2019s Christmas?<\/a><\/em>:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/enH2igVo55U?si=mCHjPUeWm_DxlJES\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><br \/>\n&#8212;<\/div>\n<p>All that said, the star of the movie is the script. It is sharp and subtle and moves along at pace. It conveys a lot of information quickly, but sacrifices no craft to this efficiency.<\/p>\n<p>As with most of the screenplays that work the winding route from initial idea to finished film, it is the product of several hands, the last of which was David Mamet. You can feel Mamet\u2019s sharpness in the dialogue, and his cynicism in the characters. He also displays his complex understanding of both human nature and showbusiness. I don\u2019t doubt at least some of the Hollywood types Motss uses to paint his pictures are based on people Mamet had met in real life.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, as a piece of well-written, well-acted cinema <em>Wag the Dog<\/em> is rare, but as a piece of political satire it is singular, if not entirely unique.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>The Politics<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>In the late 90s, reeling from the sexual scandal with Monica Lewinsky, US President Bill Clinton\u2019s administration bombed a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. Four months later, in the midst of his impeachment, Clinton launched a huge bombing campaign against Saddam Hussein\u2019s Iraq. The next year they entered the Yugoslav war and bombed Belgrade.<\/p>\n<p>Anyone familiar with US politics from this time, and hearing a rough summary of the plot of <em>Wag the Dog<\/em>, would assume it was written as a direct analogy to Clinton\u2019s handling of the Lewinsky scandal.<\/p>\n<p>The truth is it was released in December 1997, exactly a month <em>before<\/em> the Lewinsky story broke.<\/p>\n<p>A demonstration of the film\u2019s level of, if not insider knowledge, then at least insider\u00a0<em>understanding<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>But <em>Wag the Dog<\/em> is not just prescient of the months following its release, it \u201cpredicts\u201d much further into the future.<\/p>\n<p>It didn\u2019t just anticipate the Lewinsky scandal by a few weeks, it got the jump on \u00a0the war on terror by four years.<\/p>\n<p>When Brean and Motss have chosen their enemy, Albania (<em>\u201cWhy Albania?\u201d \u2014 \u201cWhy not?\u201d<\/em>), they need to decide on a reason for the war to start\u2026<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>MOTSS:<\/strong> What do we have that they want?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>BREAN:<\/strong> Freedom.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>MOTSS:<\/strong> No, no, no. Fuck Freedom. No. Fuck Freedom. They\u2026. They Want\u2026 They Want To Destroy the Godless Satan of the United States\u2026They want to destroy <em>our Way of Life<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>It is perfect, and as we now know \u2013 totally real. It could be lifted straight from a post-9\/11 Cheney or Rumsfeld speech.<\/p>\n<p>The eventual story of their \u201cwar\u201d \u2013 that Albanian terrorists have built a \u201csuitcase\u201d nuclear bomb and are attempting to smuggle it into the US over the Canadian border \u2013 \u00a0is patently absurd. There is, of course, no nuclear suitcase bomb, they just made it up because it sounds cool. There are no Albanian terrorists.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a silly, reality-defying comic book narrative of a kind we\u2019re now all too \u00a0familiar with. Remember the Salisbury \u201cnerve agent\u201d, or \u201cCovid sniffer dogs\u201d or myriad other impossible lies sold with straight faces.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s the uniqueness of the film, that it \u201csees the future\u201d of spiraling anti-reality, drawing a picture of a society that was only just taking shape in 1997: the society we live in now.<\/p>\n<p>In short, it just <em>gets it<\/em>, in a way few people do and no movies ever do.<\/p>\n<p>The White House Press secretary is a talking head, a sock puppet. At one point Brean makes a phone call during a press conference to dictate a trite and irrelevant response, which the Press Secretary repeats, word for word, without question or pause. He never asks why, and none of the reporters ask why he\u2019s suddenly changed topic. Brean does this to prove a point about the nature of his control.<\/p>\n<p>When the war is in the planning stages, Brean and Presidential Aide Ames (Anne Heche) briefly discuss how there could be a \u201cback end\u201d to financially compensate Motss and his team. Brean suggests a product tie-in, selling ribbons or badges, like the <a href=\"https:\/\/diplomacy.state.gov\/stories\/yellow-ribbon-hostages\/#:~:text=Closely%20following%20the%20crisis%20for,hope%20for%20their%20safe%20return.\">\u201cYellow Ribbon\u201d<\/a> campaign for the Iran Hostages. When Ames off-handedly begins to say that was a naturally occurring phenomenon, Brean\u2019s wry smile shuts her down.<\/p>\n<p>In Brean\u2019s world, the elite political spin doctor\u2019s world, nothing is a \u201cnaturally occurring phenomenon\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Later, as they are shooting fake war footage in front a blue screen, a debate rages over whether the fleeing Albanian \u201cpeasant girl\u201d should be carrying a puppy or a kitten. Meanwhile the \u201cpeasant girl\u201d is asking if she can put this on her resum\u00e9, she\u2019s told no.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_282080\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/wag-the-dog-still-dunst-hoffman-800x577-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-282080\" class=\"wpa-warning wpa-image-missing-alt wp-image-282080\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/wag-the-dog-still-dunst-hoffman-800x577-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"433\" data-warning=\"Missing alt text\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/wag-the-dog-still-dunst-hoffman-800x577-1.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/wag-the-dog-still-dunst-hoffman-800x577-1-480x346.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"(min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 480px) 480px, (min-width: 481px) 600px, 100vw\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-282080\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Cap Shooting \u201cwar atrocities\u201d on a bluescreen.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>At one point Brean commissions someone to write an old-sounding country song, his team doctors it to make it sound aged, record it on vinyl and have it placed in the library of congress as if it\u2019s been there for sixty years.<\/p>\n<p>Nothing is sacred, truth is relative, the best story beats reality every time.<\/p>\n<p>When they are officially starting the \u201cwar\u201d, they don\u2019t <em>announce it<\/em> they <em>deny it<\/em>. Before the press conference reporters are forewarned \u2013 \u00a0\u201cdon\u2019t ask about the situation in Albania\u201d. Naturally, one of them does. \u00a0And then another does. \u00a0A third asks if the situation is linked to \u201cMuslim extremist groups\u201d, something no one has mentioned until now.<\/p>\n<p>Pretty soon \u201cthe situation in Albania\u201d becomes the only thing they want to talk about. The journalists think they\u2019re challenging authority when they are actually doing its bidding.<\/p>\n<p>We see this in the real world all the time, with careful \u201cleaks\u201d telling people \u2013 even alternate media who should know better \u2013 the alleged \u201ctrue story\u201d, revealing the \u201cforbidden knowledge\u201d that we \u201cmust not talk about.\u201d It\u2019s not exactly steered, it\u2019s just a stone rolled down a hill. Few of the people think they\u2019re being controlled, but all of them \u00a0are.<\/p>\n<p>One of the most powerful and interesting scenes in the film comes roughly halfway through the movie. The \u201cwar\u201d is well underway by now, when Brean and Ames find themselves face-to-face with the Director of the CIA who tries to give them a reality check. He tells them he knows there is no war, his agents know of no terrorist activity in Albania and no combat forces on the ground, \u00a0spy satellites show nothing.<\/p>\n<p>Ames immediately goes on the defensive, excusing herself in myriad ways and ruing the decisions that lead them here. Brean, however, goes on the offense, telling the CIA that if their spy satellites don\u2019t see his war <em>\u201cthen what good are they?\u201d<\/em>, that if the CIA doesn\u2019t play along their job is essentially pointless, and lecturing the man on the nature of modern warfare\u2026<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">If you go to war again, who is it going to be against? Your \u201cability to fight a Two-ocean War\u201d against who? Sweden and Togo? Who you sitting here to Go To War Against? That time has passed. It\u2019s passed. It\u2019s over.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">The war of the future is nuclear terrorism. It is and it will be against a small group of dissidents who, unbeknownst, perhaps, to their own governments, have blah blah blah [\u2026] that is the war of the future, and if you\u2019re not gearing up, to fight that war, eventually the axe will fall. And you\u2019re gonna be out in the street. And you can call this a \u201cdrill,\u201d or you can call it \u201cjob security,\u201d or you can call it anything you like [\u2026] Because there ain\u2019t no war but ours.<\/p>\n<p>The premise is that the age of wars \u2013 as they are commonly understood \u2013 ended when the Soviet Union fell. Maybe even before that. Now war \u2013 as Orwell says in <em>1984<\/em> \u2013 is a product for domestic consumption and control, a story to tell. \u00a0The details don\u2019t matter to guys like Brean.<\/p>\n<p>What matters is one arresting image to get public attention, a memorable slogan, a hero to cheer and a villain to jeer. Brean communicates this neatly in his opening pitch to Motss, claiming all wars are essentially showbusiness, products you advertise:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Here\u2019s the Short Course: Fifty-Four, Forty or Fight. What does that mean? Remember the Maine\u2026Tippecanoe and Tyler, Too!<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">We remember the slogans, we can\u2019t even remember the fucking wars. Y\u2019know why. Cause it\u2019s show business. That\u2019s why I\u2019m here.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Naked girl, covered in Napalm. Five marines Raising the Flag, Mount Suribachi. Churchill, V for Victory, Y\u2019remember the Picture, fifty years from now, they\u2019ll have forgotten the war. Gulf War? Smart Bomb, falling through the roof. 2500 missions a day, 100 days, One Shot of One Bomb. The American people bought that war. M\u2019I getting through to you? [\u2026] It\u2019s show business, Mister Motss.<\/p>\n<p>Instrumental in all of this is the role of television. Television is almost its own character in the film. In almost every scene there is a news station in either background or foreground, usually reporting lies \u2013 lies we\u2019ve seen our protagonists write \u2013 as if they are the truth.<\/p>\n<p>Television is the oracle that holds a spell over the public, if they see it on TV it is true. But this power comes with limitations and rules. Primarily, you can never \u2013 ever \u2013 retract or reverse something that was shown on TV.<\/p>\n<p>They demonstrae this when, suddenly and unbeknownst to Brean or Motss, Senator Neal (Craig T Nelson) \u2013 the man running against the incumbent President \u2013 goes on TV to announce an end to the war: <em>\u201cthe situation in Albania is resolved\u2026My military sources confirm that our troops, along the Canadian Border, and overseas are standing down\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cHe just ended the war\u201d<\/em>, Brean tells Motss, who replies, <em>\u201che can\u2019t do that\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Brean tells him: <em>\u201cHe just did, I saw it on TV.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>There are rules being alluded to here. Brean knows they can\u2019t simply hold their own press conference and say \u201cNeal was wrong\u201d, or \u201cNeal was lying\u201d, because to countermand the voice of the TV breaks the oracle\u2019s spell. If just one thing on television is shown to be untrue it might burst the bubble, it might wake people up to the fact <em>anything<\/em> they are watching could be a lie.<\/p>\n<p>In this fashion the media becomes a tug of war, the battlefield of competing narratives in a combative never-ending game of <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Yes,_and...\">\u201cYes, and\u2026\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Too familiar isn\u2019t it in our world of \u201clab-leaks\u201d and \u201cnew studies\u201d and whistleblowers that seek to direct and control the narrative without ever going too far and questioning the underlying assumptions upon which it\u2019s built or threatening any vested interests.<\/p>\n<p>There are threads no one can pull, or the whole system unravels.<\/p>\n<p>The movie ends the only way it can end, the apotheosis of constructed reality. A fake army unit singing a made up song over the coffin of a man who never existed who \u201cdied\u201d in a war that never happened\u2026all livestreamed on national television.<\/p>\n<p>People are probably at home saluting the TV, or crying and hugging.<\/p>\n<p>The President wins his election, McDonalds has a tie-in burger range, Nike are selling \u201ccommemorative\u201d shoes\u2026<\/p>\n<p>the war is over.<\/p>\n<p>\u2026and as the credits roll over the only real tragedy of the film, the television sparks up one last time:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\u2026this just in, a group calling itself \u201cAlbania Unite\u201d is claiming responsibility for the bombing moments ago of the village of Close, Albania. The President was unavailable for comment, but General Scott of the Joint Chiefs of Staff says he has no doubt we\u2019ll be sending planes and troops back in to finish the job.<\/p>\n<p>This war might be over, but who knows when you might need the next one?<\/p>\n<p>Is this more of Brean\u2019s work, or has the system picked up the \u201cfake war\u201d ball and started running with it?<\/p>\n<p>We don\u2019t know, we\u2019re not told and in truth it doesn\u2019t matter.<\/p>\n<p>As I said, Wag the Dog is the greatest political satire Hollywood had ever produce. Get yourself a copy, a physical copy, before it gets memory-holed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Support Off-Guardian:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ko-fi.com\/offguardian\">Ko-fi<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.subscribestar.com\/offguardian\">Subscribestar<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/donate\/?hosted_button_id=CKFB3MH8CGB9U\">Paypal<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/2024\/02\/18\/offg-recommends-wag-the-dog\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kit Knightly reviews Wag the Dog, a bleak, biting, brilliant satire that really get\u2019s it<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":282077,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-282076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Commentary"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=282076"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282076\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":282083,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282076\/revisions\/282083"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/282077"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=282076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=282076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=282076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}