{"id":277957,"date":"2023-12-14T07:00:21","date_gmt":"2023-12-14T07:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=277957"},"modified":"2023-12-15T08:31:45","modified_gmt":"2023-12-15T08:31:45","slug":"german-scientist-researchers-fiddling-with-temperature-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=277957","title":{"rendered":"German scientist: Researchers fiddling with temperature data"},"content":{"rendered":"

CFact \u2013 Dec 12, 2023<\/strong><\/h1>\n

A German scientist is raising serious questions as to whether government data-keepers have been tampering with scientific data to conjure up warming trends where none exist.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is important to understand whether CO2 truly causes climate change,\u201d said Professor Dr. Friedrich-Karl Ewert (above), \u201cWe rely entirely on simulation models.\u00a0 Reality looks very different from simulations.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dr. Ewert is professor emeritus of geophysics at the University of Paderborn.\u00a0 He spoke at a scientific conference put on by EIKE, the European Institute for Climate and Energy in Essen, Germany that was co-sponsored by CFACT and the Heartland Institute.<\/p>\n

Ewert conducted exhaustive research comparing climate computer models to real world temperature.\u00a0 His findings confirm what others have concluded, that the models run far hotter than measured observations. He points out that the UN IPCC likes to carefully select the dates and data it presents, but that, \u201cif we look at temperature changes over a larger period, any temperature trend disappears.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the course of his research, Ewert found something shocking.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn 2012, we realized that the data offered by NASA was not the same as that offered in 2010. \u00a0The data had been altered. \u00a0If in 2010 someone had, for instance, looked up the data for Palma de Mallorca, they would have seen a cooling of .0076 degrees. \u00a0But in 2012 it suddenly showed a temperature increase of .0074 degrees.\u00a0 This is not a one-off.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cUntil then measurements were sacrosanct. \u00a0Can you call it fraud or falsification? \u00a0I\u2019m not a lawyer, but I can say it has been changed retroactively. \u00a0If I show you the data a negative judgment is justified.\u00a0 In 2012 there was twice as much warming in the sample we examined compared with just two years prior.\u201d<\/p>\n

Warming campaigners have been confounded by a lack of any global warming since last century.\u00a0 This contradicts large numbers of computer model projections that warming should have occurred.\u00a0 They\u2019ve attempted to gloss over this inconvenient fact by trumping up records.\u00a0 They routinely claim some period of time as the \u201chottest ever,\u201d in the expectation that the casual observer will never realize that their records are set by meaningless hundredths of a degree.\u00a0 These tiny measurements run far below the margin of error.\u00a0\u00a0 Even the word \u201chottest\u201d is unjustified.\u00a0 Global temperature has been running around one half degree above baseline with just a few years above.\u00a0 Nothing hot about that.<\/p>\n

It is fundamental to the scientific method that scientists must adapt their conclusions to fit their data.\u00a0 They must never alter their data to serve a favored conclusion.<\/p>\n

In just a few hours we expect negotiators at COP 21, the UN climate conference in Paris to announce a final climate agreement that will shift global power, harm economies, redistribute fortunes and cost trillions of dollars.\u00a0 It is ever increasingly apparent that that deal rests on false promises and false premises.<\/p>\n

Dr. Ewert presents a powerful case.\u00a0 If we cannot trust the keepers of the scientific data taxpayers paid for, what is there about global warming we can trust?<\/p>\n

Source <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

German scientist calls into question the accuracy and reliability of data behind claims of \u2018global warming\u2019. Says temperature records have been \u2018altered\u2019 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":277959,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[72],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-277957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ClimateGate"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=277957"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":277962,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277957\/revisions\/277962"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/277959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=277957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=277957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=277957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}