{"id":271032,"date":"2023-07-13T05:58:32","date_gmt":"2023-07-13T05:58:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=271032"},"modified":"2023-07-15T05:30:10","modified_gmt":"2023-07-15T05:30:10","slug":"reality-check-no-we-didnt-just-have-the-hottest-week-in-100000-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=271032","title":{"rendered":"Reality Check: No, we didn\u2019t just have \u201cthe hottest week in 100,000 years\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Kit Knightly \u2013 Off-Guardian July 12, 2023<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p>The buzz in the Climate Change news is that the five hottest days in the last 100,000 years all happened last week, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2023\/jul\/11\/uncharted-territory-un-declares-first-week-of-july-worlds-hottest-ever-recorded\">according to the World Meteorological Organization<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>You can read an article about it <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/maryroeloffs\/2023\/07\/05\/july-4-was-earths-hottest-day-in-over-100000-years-breaking-record-for-2nd-day-in-a-row\/\">from Forbes<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">The Fourth of July was the hottest day on Earth in as many as 125,000 years\u2014breaking a record set the day before\u2014as the return of the El Ni\u00f1o weather pattern collides with soaring temperatures at the start of summer, researchers say.<\/p>\n<p>Or, if you prefer, you can read Climate alarmists rending their garments on Twitter:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The 7 hottest days on Earth in the last 100,000+ years all happened in the last week:<\/p>\n<p>July 6 ~ 17.23\u00b0C \/ 63.01\u00b0F<br \/>July 7 ~ 17.20\u00b0C \/ 62.96\u00b0F<br \/>July 4 ~ 17.18\u00b0C \/ 62.93\u00b0F<br \/>July  5 ~ 17.18\u00b0C \/ 62.92\u00b0F<br \/>July 8 ~ 17.17\u00b0C \/ 62.90\u00b0F<br \/>July 10 ~ 17.12\u00b0C \/ 62.81\u00b0F<br \/>July 9 ~ 17.11\u00b0C \/ 62.79\u00b0F<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Prof. Eliot Jacobson (@EliotJacobson) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EliotJacobson\/status\/1678727804110905344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 11, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now, first off let\u2019s be clear \u2013 we haven\u2019t had the \u201c7 the hottest days\u201d \u00a0in the last 100,000 years since July 4\u2026<\/p>\n<p>\u2026or, more accurately, there is absolutely no way for anyone to reliably know if we have or not.<\/p>\n<p>Actually <em>think<\/em> about what they\u2019re saying when they make this claim.<\/p>\n<p>They are claiming that they know, <em>for a fact<\/em>, the global average temperature to <em>two decimal points<\/em> over the last <strong>36 million days.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Couple of things to bear in mind here before we go any further.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1 <\/strong>\u2013 Humans have only had the ability to accurately measure the temperature of <em>anything<\/em> for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC7120475\/#:~:text=Thermoscopy-,The%20earliest%20thermal%20instruments%20were%20developed%20during%20the%20sixteenth%20and,open%20thermometers%20were%20termed%20thermoscopes.\">maybe four-hundred years<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong> \u2013 Official \u201cglobal temperature\u201d records <a href=\"https:\/\/climate.nasa.gov\/faq\/21\/why-does-the-temperature-record-shown-on-your-vital-signs-page-begin-at-1880\/\">only began in 1880<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong> \u2013 Beyond \u00a0that point we only have partial, local and pretty inaccurate readings <a href=\"https:\/\/www.metoffice.gov.uk\/hadobs\/hadcet\/\">back to the mid-17th century<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s 400 years, give or take.<\/p>\n<p>So, how do climatologists get the data for <em>the other 99,600 years<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p>Well \u2013 they \u00a0guess.<\/p>\n<p>Sorry, they \u201cmodel\u201d, using <a href=\"https:\/\/climate.nasa.gov\/news\/2540\/tree-rings-provide-snapshots-of-earths-past-climate\/\">tree ring data<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/icecores.org\/about-ice-cores\">ice core samples<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>NASA claims by comparing modern tree rings from known weather systems they can figure out the weather patterns that created tree rings in the past.<\/p>\n<p>This is not scientific, it is interpretive.<\/p>\n<p>A tree ring represents a growth cycle, that is all. The factors which affect that growth \u2013 specific to the individual tree, the local area or on a global level \u2013 are far too complicated for them to have any kind of predictive value.<\/p>\n<p>Disease, volcanic activity, competition from other trees, rainfall, solar activity, parasitic insect or fungal infection\u2026we can\u2019t accurately account for any of these factors, and they all impact tree growth.<\/p>\n<p>In short, all a tree ring can tell you is the length of a growth cycle. Everything else is extrapolation and modelling based on nothing but an <em>a priori<\/em> assumption of causation.<\/p>\n<p>But really, that\u2019s a secondary issue. There is something more important I want to talk about: The very <em>idea <\/em>of \u201caverage global temperature\u201d.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>\u201cAverage global temperature\u201d \u2013 an entirely meaningless statistic<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Using numbers and measures to bamboozle the public and control mass-opinion is not a new practice. In fact a shocking amount of propaganda is entirely predicated upon most people\u2019s inability to actually understand statistics. (This inability is actively encouraged by the media and education system, but that\u2019s another story).<\/p>\n<p>This use of statistics probably reached its zenith with the Covid \u201cpandemic\u201d, but no narrative is more deeply steeped in it, or more heavily reliant on it, than Climate Change.<\/p>\n<p>The appeal of using statistics in this manner is it removes the need to overtly lie.<\/p>\n<p>\u2013 You can report nothing but real numbers and yet <em>still totally mislead people.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u2013 You\u00a0can publish nothing but facts, <em>whilst completely disregarding \u2013 or even disguising \u2013 the truth.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Damned lies and statistics, you know.<\/p>\n<p>Averages \u2013 specifically <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mathsisfun.com\/mean.html\">mean averages<\/a> \u2013 are wonderful for this.<\/p>\n<p>For those who don\u2019t know an \u201caverage\u201d or \u201cmean\u201d is calculated by adding all the values within a set of numbers together and then dividing the total by the number of members in the group.<\/p>\n<p>For example, if <strong>5<\/strong> friends go to dinner together and their <em>total bill<\/em> is <strong>\u00a385<\/strong>, then the <em>average<\/em> each man spent on food would be 85\/5, or \u00a317.<\/p>\n<p>This kind of average is excellent at creating deceptive statistics because they can be highly useful or completely misleading totally depending on context, and very few people understand that.<\/p>\n<p>A good example of this problem is \u201caverage life expectancy\u201d. I experienced this first hand when studying history in college.<\/p>\n<p>Some people in my class read that life expectancy was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.english-heritage.org.uk\/learn\/story-of-england\/victorian\/food-and-health\/#:~:text=Although%20Victorians%20who%20attained%20adulthood,men%20and%2042%20for%20women.\">40 years old for men in Victorian London<\/a>, and they genuinely thought that meant men were literally aging faster, going grey and getting dementia in their late 30s.<\/p>\n<p>Which is completely wrong by the way.<\/p>\n<p>The truth is most Victorian era males who made it to adulthood generally lived a reasonably normal lifespan, as people have been known to live from time immemorial (<em>\u201cthree score years and ten\u201d<\/em>, according <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bible.com\/bible\/1\/PSA.90.10-12.KJV\">to the psalms<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>However, Victorian England had a very <a href=\"https:\/\/www.populationspast.org\/imr\/1861\/#6\/54.457\/-5.131\/bartholomew\">high infant mortality<\/a>, and the number of children dying <em>before reaching 1 year old<\/em> considerably lowers the <strong>average<\/strong> age of death.<\/p>\n<p>So, the <em>statistics appear to suggest<\/em> most people died at 40, but <em>the truth<\/em> is that very few died at 40, \u00a0but many died at around the age of 1 and many others died around the age of 70.<\/p>\n<p>An \u201caverage\u201d can be at the same time completely true and yet not at all representative of reality.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGlobal average temperature\u201d is the perfect example of this. It produces a number that people can be made to find scary because it lacks all context or any real-world application. It is literally meaningless.<\/p>\n<p>Now, this is not just the rant of a journalist with an A level in statistics. Many scientists and academics over the years have said that the very idea of a \u201cglobal temperature\u201d is meaningless.<\/p>\n<p>Such as in this paper, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20100201165706\/http:\/\/www.uoguelph.ca\/~rmckitri\/research\/globaltemp\/GlobTemp.JNET.pdf\">\u201cDoes a Global Temperature Exist?\u201d<\/a><\/em>, published in the June 2006 edition of the Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, which argues [emphasis added]:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>There is no global temperature.<\/strong> The reasons lie in the properties of the equation of state governing local thermodynamic equilibrium, and the implications cannot be avoided by substituting statistics for physics. Since temperature is an intensive variable, the total temperature is meaningless in terms of the system being measured, and hence <strong>any one simple average has no necessary meaning.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As an antidote to the academic language, I\u2019ll demonstrate with an example:<\/p>\n<p>First of all, the globe is pretty huge, the scale alone can blind people. Let\u2019s reduce it down \u2013 let\u2019s say it\u2019s just my kitchen. We\u2019ll figure out the \u201caverage temperature\u201d of my kitchen.<\/p>\n<p>Second of all, we should realise that the name itself is misleading. When they talk about \u201caverage global temperature\u201d, they obviously don\u2019t mean they have measured literally everywhere on Earth. They <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theccc.org.uk\/what-is-climate-change\/measuring-a-warming-world-2\/\">really mean<\/a> the <em>\u201caverage surface-level temperature from a series of weather stations on land and weather buoys at sea.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>These temperature readings form the set we use to make our mean average. Over the globe there are thousands and thousands of these, in our kitchen we\u2019ll just use four: One in the fridge, one in the stove and one at each end of the kitchen table.<\/p>\n<p>We wake up, and the first thing we do is take the temperature at our \u201ckitchen monitoring stations\u201d. They are as follows: 6<sup>o<\/sup>C in the fridge, 19<sup>o<\/sup>C at both ends of the table and 17<sup>o<\/sup>C in the stove. Our average temperature reading: 15.25 degrees.<\/p>\n<p>This data suggests the kitchen is comfortably the coldest room in the house, and is actually much colder even than average room temperature, or the average Summer day.<\/p>\n<p>Later, after cooking dinner, we take the temperatures again: 6<sup>o<\/sup>C in the fridge, 21<sup>o<\/sup>C at both ends of the table and 176<sup>o<\/sup>C in the stove. Our average temperature is now 56<sup>o<\/sup>C.<\/p>\n<p>This is alarming data, don\u2019t you think? Firstly, according to this data it is no longer medically safe to even go into my kitchen, and more worryingly if this rate of increase continues my house will burst into flames by midnight tomorrow.<\/p>\n<p>Certainly it\u2019s the hottest kitchen since records began (that would be this morning). And judging by old photographs of the people who lived in this house before me, it doesn\u2019t <em>look<\/em> like the kitchen was ever this swelteringly hot before.<\/p>\n<p>Hopefully everyone reading this gets the point.<\/p>\n<p>Four measuring stations across an entire room is very few, and fully 50% of them experience local extremes of temperature that a) don\u2019t apply to the vast majority of the room and b) massively impact the final outcome.<\/p>\n<p>Neither of those \u201caverage temperatures\u201d \u2013 high or low \u2013 is even close to representative of the actual ambient temperature of the kitchen, nor is it likely to have any impact on the real lives of the real people who use that kitchen.<\/p>\n<p>They do not reflect reality, and have no application to the real world.<\/p>\n<p>This next bit \u00a0may shock you \u2013 but the world is vastly bigger and more complex than my kitchen. Much of it has no weather station coverage at all, much of it is subject to infinitely complex local weather systems you can\u2019t possibly account for.<\/p>\n<p>A statistic is only as demonstrative as it is thorough, only as useful as it is representative of reality. You cannot create a useful \u201caverage\u201d over a huge range of data without taking into account the local differences in systems.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dryukselyurttas.com\/post\/average-height-men-and-women#:~:text=On%20a%20global%20scale%2C%20the,4%20inches%20(162%20cm).\">\u201caverage global height\u201d<\/a> of an adult human is 66 inches (168cm). Based on that, a 5 foot 8 inch Dutch man would be said to be \u201ctaller than average\u201d\u2026when he\u2019s actually <a href=\"https:\/\/worldpopulationreview.com\/country-rankings\/average-height-by-country\">comfortably shorter than most Dutch men<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Reporting \u201caverage temperature\u201d, from different sources over a varied and constantly changing globe, is pointless. Especially if you don\u2019t know the context of the recorded data or the multivariate local factors that contribute to it (for example many weather monitoring stations are at airports, which are always hotter than surrounding areas, there\u2019s also the question of \u201curban heat islands\u201d and how weather stations are not evenly distributed over the world etc).<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/too_long;_didn%27t_read\">\u201ctoo long, didn\u2019t read\u201d<\/a> version: They have no idea if last week was \u201cthe hottest week ever\u201d, they can\u2019t possibly know the \u201caverage global temperature\u201d today let alone 125,000 years ago, and even if they could it would be data so vague as to be meaningless.<\/p>\n<p>\u2026of course, all of that is assuming they\u2019re not just making them up. Which I supposed they could easily be doing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Support Off-Guardian<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ko-fi.com\/offguardian\">Ko-fi<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.subscribestar.com\/offguardian\">Subscribestar<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/liberapay.com\/OffGuardian\/donate\">Liberapay<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/2023\/07\/12\/reality-check-no-we-didnt-just-have-the-hottest-week-in-100000-years\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kit Knightly on \u201chow people are blinded by meaningless statistics\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":75860,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[72],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-271032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ClimateGate"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=271032"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271032\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":271033,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271032\/revisions\/271033"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/75860"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=271032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=271032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=271032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}