{"id":268836,"date":"2023-05-14T09:36:30","date_gmt":"2023-05-14T09:36:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=268836"},"modified":"2023-07-09T20:35:47","modified_gmt":"2023-07-09T20:35:47","slug":"by-fomenting-border-chaos-and-lawlessness-globalists-have-set-trap-that-will-deceive-humanity-into-accepting-biometric-digital-id-that-will-tag-and-track-all-people-everywhere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=268836","title":{"rendered":"By fomenting border chaos and lawlessness, globalists have set trap that will deceive humanity into accepting biometric digital ID that will tag and track all people everywhere"},"content":{"rendered":"

Leo Hohmann \u2013 Leohohmann.com May 11, 2023<\/strong><\/h1>\n

There\u2019s an old saying: Be careful what you wish for. It could come back to bite you.<\/p>\n

There are many examples of this in history that should give us pause whenever we are faced with a crisis causing fear and confusion, times not unlike our own when the masses are demanding relief from those who populate the hallowed halls of government. Many of our most oppressive laws get enacted this way. Can you think of a few? I can. What about the USA Patriot Act and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security after 9\/11? People were begging for, demanding a measure of safety and they were eager to hand over their most basic rights and freedoms to the government in exchange for that promise of safety.<\/p>\n

You see it also with education. Public schools have been utterly destroyed by decades of leftist infiltration, to the point where professional educators actually participate in a devious form of mental trickery in which vulnerable young children as young as 4 and 5 years old are encouraged to question their gender. With those schools safely in the abyss, you can bet they\u2019re coming for the private and home schools next. How will they do this? Through something conservatives have for decades been begging for\u2014school choice or \u201cvouchers,\u201d where the tax dollars follow the student to whatever type of school the parent chooses. On its face, it sounds lovely. School choice. Who wouldn\u2019t be in favor of \u201cchoice?\u201d<\/p>\n

But he that taketh government funds placeth himself under government rules. School \u201cchoice\u201d eventually leads to no choice at all because the government, through its role as administrator over public tax dollars, now owns a monopoly on education \u2014 public and private.<\/p>\n

Perhaps no other issue today cries out for an analysis through the lens of be careful what you wish for<\/em> than that of immigration.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s currently the biggest story in the news, especially the conservative news<\/em>. Our government has intentionally created an atmosphere of complete chaos at the border, with tens of thousands of military-age men pouring over the border into the U.S. This is a national security crisis if there ever was one.<\/p>\n

Conservatives are getting very upset about this, and understandably so. For years, they have clamored for a wall to be built on the southern border. It sounds like a logical solution.<\/p>\n

But walls can be used to keep people in as well as keep them out. Ah, you say, but that only happens in countries run by totalitarian regimes. You assume much, dear reader, by thinking of America as anything but a burgeoning dictatorship.<\/p>\n

Then you have something called E-verify, where all employers would be forced to electronically verify that anyone they hire is a legal resident of the country. It sounds wonderful and conservatives want that, too.<\/p>\n

There are only a few smart conservatives like Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, who see the writing on the wall when it comes to E-Verify and how it will actually be used. Just like Homeland Security, the Patriot Act, school choice and most gun laws, E-Verify will be turned against law-abiding Americans.<\/p>\n

Below is an excerpt from a May 9 article in Reason Magazine<\/a><\/strong>:<\/p>\n

House Republicans are\u00a0rallying<\/a>\u00a0around the Secure the Border Act of 2023, a sprawling immigration enforcement\u00a0bill<\/a>\u00a0that will be brought up for a\u00a0vote<\/a>\u00a0later this week. It would resume border wall construction and seek to codify the Trump-era \u201cRemain in Mexico\u201d policy, which required migrants to await their U.S. immigration court dates in Mexico.<\/em><\/p>\n

But the bill wouldn\u2019t just target undocumented immigrants, as Rep. Thomas Massie (R\u2013Ky.) has pointed out. He\u00a0tweeted<\/a>\u00a0that a section requiring employers to use E-Verify systems to verify workers\u2019 citizenship status would be like giving the government \u201cthe ultimate on\/off switch\u201d for employment.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cI will NOT vote to require EVERY American to get [President Joe] Biden\u2019s permission if they want to work,\u201d Massie\u00a0continued<\/a>. \u201cGiving the federal government more power over YOU is a mistake.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Massie is spot on. For more information on E-Verify, see The New Immigration Bill Is a Trojan Horse for E-Verify and Is a Threat to All Americans<\/em><\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Then comes voter fraud. That\u2019s a big one. You\u2019d be hard pressed to find a conservative who isn\u2019t in favor of voter ID<\/strong> as a method of keeping non-citizens from voting. On paper it\u2019s an idea that makes sense. In reality, looking at voter ID as the panacea to our problems with election integrity is like missing the forest through the trees. Voter fraud surely accounts for a portion of the problem but it pales in comparison to election fraud<\/em>. America has systemic weaknesses in its election system that have nothing to do with individual voters and everything to do with governments outsourcing the entire elections process to private companies using proprietary technology that nobody, outside of those companies, controls or even fully understands. Until the whole system gets brought back to where it constitutionally belongs, at the state and local level of publicly accountable government officials, you will not solve the problem with election integrity, regardless of who you require to present an ID.<\/p>\n

But what if I told you all of these problems related to IDs\u2014problems at the border, in the workplace and in the voting booths\u2014are with us, not by accident but by design. As a result, they can and will be solved by requiring a biometric digital ID for all people.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Keep in mind that problems related to migration, elections, foreign workers and foreign travel, are not uniquely American problems. These are global problems. A global problem demands a global solution.<\/p>\n

Then comes the suddenly enormous issue of general artificial intelligence taking over the world. Ever wondered why almost every one of the big advocates of transhumanist, technocratic advancements\u2014folks like Elon Musk, Yuval Noah Harari, Klaus Schwab and Google\u2019s so-called \u201cGodfather\u201d of A.I., Geoffrey Hinton<\/a><\/strong>\u2014have all suddenly become worried about A.I. and are issuing \u201cwarnings\u201d about the dire threat A.I. poses to humanity? After pushing for these technologies for years now we\u2019re supposed to believe they suddenly found a conscience and don\u2019t want to see them applied in real life? Please.<\/p>\n

They are laying a trap. By stoking fear of their own inventions \u201cfalling into the wrong hands,\u201d creating an A.I. dystopia where nobody will be able to tell what\u2019s real and what\u2019s fake, where everyone is susceptible to having their identities stolen, their accounts hacked into, now they can introduce the solution, which they already have waiting in their back pocket.<\/p>\n

And that solution is a global, biometric digital ID for all people<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

You will need it to access the voting booth. You will need it to access the corporate workplace. You will need it to get a driver\u2019s license, to access public transportation and air travel, to travel across borders, to access healthcare, to receive government benefits, even to log onto and access the internet.<\/p>\n

They will entice us with the same refrain. It will be \u201csafer, more secure and more convenient\u201d to enlist in their invasive tagging and tracking system. They use good cop, bad cop psychological techniques to play on our most basic human fear, the fear of being violated<\/em>, in order to disguise their own violation of our privacy, our right to remain anonymous, and free.<\/p>\n

In the race to digitize humanity with these tagging and tracking devices, and for every new \u201cupgrade\u201d in the drive toward greater \u201csafety and security,\u201d not to mention ease and convenience, they require us to give up more of what makes us human.<\/p>\n

Tech companies are constantly conditioning us for the next step that brings us closer to the mark of the beast. They want our eye scans, facial scans, fingerprints and other unique identifiers, even our DNA. They want to own it all.<\/p>\n

Check out the latest from Google, described by BiometricUpdate.com<\/a><\/strong>:<\/p>\n

\u201cAs of May 3, 2023, Google users can opt to secure their accounts using passkeys rather than passwords, according to a\u00a0blog post<\/a>\u00a0on the company\u2019s website.\u00a0Passkeys<\/a>\u00a0allow users to sign in using fingerprint or face biometrics, or through a device screen lock, such as a local PIN.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cIn keeping with an industry-wide trend toward adopting passkeys, the company is promoting passkeys as a faster, simpler and more secure alternative to existing sign-in options, including multi-factor authentication.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The article continues, adding:<\/p>\n

\u201cUsing passwords puts a lot of responsibility on users \u2026Choosing strong passwords and remembering them across various accounts can be hard. In addition, even the most savvy users are often misled into giving them up during phishing attempts.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cSince a passkey exists only on a particular device, when a user signs in with one, it verifies that they are in possession of the device and have the ability to unlock it. This reduces the risk of a password being accessed by bad actors via\u00a0phishing<\/a>\u00a0or privacy breaches. Any shared biometric data unlocks the passkey locally and never goes beyond the device.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Do you see a pattern here? It\u2019s all about access<\/em> and who gets to control it. They want you to think you are in control of your personal data but once you give it to them, they own it. And ownership means they can do anything they want with it, including sell it to others.<\/p>\n

But don\u2019t believe me. Go to the United Nations website and other websites run by establishment elites, such as the World Economic Forum, to read up and see for yourself how hard they are pushing the digital ID as the answer to all of our uniquely 21st century problems.<\/p>\n

In fact, the need for a global digital ID system is embedded prominently in the United Nations Agenda 2030 Goals for Sustainable Development, or SDGs.<\/p>\n

There are 17 of these SDGs, which are supported by the governments of all U.N. member nations. You\u2019d be hard pressed to find a single Fortune 1000 corporation that doesn\u2019t have something on its website about its commitment to the sustainability goals as a means of \u201csaving the planet.\u201d<\/p>\n

These goals were signed onto by global heads of state in 2015. Barack Obama committed the U.S. to these goals and no president since, Trump or Biden, has repealed Obama\u2019s political declaration to achieve these goals by 2030, now just seven years away.<\/p>\n

The U.N. Agenda for 2030 makes it clear that its goals are for everyone. Principle Two of the Agenda is to \u201cLeave no one behind<\/a><\/strong>,\u201d the U.N. states on its website. They don\u2019t ask us if we want to be included in this agenda, they assume we do and declare it finished. Done. Period. No person, no community will be left alone. They\u2019re coming for you and they want you to know that. After all, how would they save the planet if they let us opt out of their plans?<\/p>\n

U.N. Sustainable Development Goal Number 16<\/strong><\/em> states: \u201cPromote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

The key word there is access<\/em>. How do you gain access to the U.N.\u2019s version of justice and peaceful tranquility, which the U.N. again stresses is intended for all<\/em>? The starting point for this access will be gained by presenting your digital ID, a QR code. This code will start out on your cellphone and eventually, if we listen to World Economic Forum advisor Yuval Harari, is will go \u201cunder the skin.\u201d<\/p>\n