{"id":262740,"date":"2022-12-23T09:01:22","date_gmt":"2022-12-23T09:01:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=262740"},"modified":"2022-12-25T08:57:37","modified_gmt":"2022-12-25T08:57:37","slug":"mp-is-suspended-from-parliament-a-week-after-vaccine-harms-speech-but-he-has-not-been-silenced","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=262740","title":{"rendered":"MP is suspended from Parliament a week after \u201cvaccine harms speech\u201d but he has not been silenced"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rhoda Wilson \u2013 The Expose Dec 22, 2022<\/strong><\/h1>\n

After his tremendous speech in Parliament last Tuesday, Member of Parliament Andrew Bridgen was asked to provide a list of references that he relied on to write his \u201cvaccine harms debate speech<\/a>.\u201d He has uploaded a resource list on his website HERE<\/a>.\u00a0 \u201cThis is the same list that was sent to journalists and so-called \u2018fact checking\u2019 websites,\u201d Mr. Bridgen said<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

He has since been suspended from attending Parliament.\u00a0 But this hasn\u2019t stopped him from speaking out.\u00a0 This week he has given interviews with Irreverend<\/a> and, a few days later, James Delingpole<\/a>.\u00a0 In this article, we refer to the first interview. You can watch Mr. Bridgen\u2019s interview with Delingpole HERE<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Propaganda Media Coverage<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Mr. Bridgen\u2019s speech is on both Parliament TV and YouTube.\u00a0 And, despite Mr. Bridgen sending them a press pack, corporate media have gaslighted it except for an article the next day in the Express<\/a><\/em> and Scottish Daily Express<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n

Of course, Full Fact has written<\/a> a blog. \u201cYellow Card reporting rate estimates shouldn\u2019t be applied to Covid-19 vaccines,\u201d they wrote.\u00a0 Why? Because \u201cit is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported,\u201d Full Fact said without so much as a hint of recognising the irony in their reasoning.<\/p>\n

Another argument Full Fact attempted to make was that absolute risk reduction and relative risk reduction are two different things \u2013 a point Mr. Bridgen had already highlighted in his speech. \u00a0On another point, simply because Full Fact\u2019s bloggers weren\u2019t able to replicate statistics Mr. Bridgen used from a study regarding children under 5, the blogger determines Mr. Bridgen\u2019s statistics can\u2019t be true.<\/p>\n

The final point Full Fact made beggars belief. The conscientious bloggers overlooked the part in Mr. Bridgen\u2019s speech regarding the conflicts of interest and corruption in the UK\u2019s regulatory bodies and boldly argued Mr. Briggen must be wrong because \u201cmRNA Covid-19 vaccines have been approved<\/strong> as safe and effective.\u201d\u00a0 You couldn\u2019t make it up!<\/p>\n

Mr. Bridgen is Suspended<\/strong><\/h3>\n

A week to the day after Mr. Bridgen courageously gave his speech calling for the suspension of Covid injections, he was given a 5-day suspension from Parliament and could be in danger of losing almost a month\u2019s pay.<\/p>\n

The reasons given for the suspension were:<\/p>\n