![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/JA-Hill.jpg\" "\\"JA")
<\/a>At 4pm on Thursday 12th<\/sup> May at Southwark Crown Court the jury returned and declared Muad\u2019Dib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to \u2018pervert the course of justice\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\nMr. Hill has spent 151 days incarcerated in Wandsworth prison over the past few months and this verdict spared him, mercifully, a sentence of up to 20 years in jail.<\/span><\/p>\n Muad\u2019Dib\u2019s trial started on Monday 9th<\/sup> May, with a\u00a0challenge to the monarchy and, hence, the authority of the court. This was ruled \u2018out of order\u2019 by the judge. On Tuesday a jury were sworn in.<\/span><\/p>\n On Wednesday they watched all of his film, \u2018<\/strong><\/span>The Ripple Effect<\/span>\u2019<\/strong><\/span><\/a>, in open court.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Over the Tuesday and Wednesday the jury heard in-depth discussions of both 7\/7 and 9\/11, with Mr Hill laying out clearly, and at his own leisurely pace under cross-examination, the reasons he believes that both these \u2018attacks by terrorists\u2019 were, in fact, false flag attacks by agencies of the state against its own people carried out with the purpose of providing a pretext for invasion of innocent countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n This was surely the first ever fully-explored set of such allegations of false flag terror made against any state before an ordinary collection of the citizens of that state.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n It is also clear from the verdict that, when such information is placed before such ordinary citizens the majority of them \u2018get it.\u2019 <\/strong>The jury had announced that it could not be unanimous, so the judge allowed a \u2018majority verdict\u2019, i.e. ten or more of the 12.<\/span><\/p>\n It is surely not unfair to deduce that Southwark Crown Court\u2019s jury of ordinary persons did not reject Muad\u2019Dib\u2019s false-flag narrative as outrageous or even necessarily untrue. One wonders how many of that jury have now themselves been converted into active \u2018troofers\u2019? <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n During the trial (on Wednesday) JAH\/Hill\/Muad\u2019Dib was asked why he moved to Ireland: \u201cTo pursue my study of the lost Ark of the Covenant\u201d was his reply. Here is a character, both serious and refreshing, who brings a mythic dimension into life. Onlookers were impressed by the way he was able to conduct himself without fear in the witness-box, sometimes pausing 5-10 seconds to reflect, before replying. A group of \u00a0up to 25 supporters attended the four days of the trial, a couple travelling from as far afield as Finland and the state of Montana.<\/span><\/p>\n Let\u2019s hope that will be the end of the persecution of Mr JAH by the British state \u2013 and, that he soon starts on a 2nd edition of his Ripple Effect.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n It\u2019s the opinion of Sheffield University philosophy professor Ridley-Duff, that Mr Hill\u2019s Ripple Effect\u2019s<\/em> narrative of what happened on that day, is more plausible than that of the BBC\u2019s 7\/7\u00a0\u2018<\/span>Conspiracy Files<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/a> program. <\/span>His study focussed<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/a> very much on what happened at Canary Wharf on that morning, seeing the Ripple <\/em>narrative, whereby the young alleged bombers had been inveigled into a terror drill that morning, then fled to Canary wharf where they were shot \u2013 as the best account yet. The new 3rd<\/sup> edition of my book Terror on the Tube<\/em><\/span><\/a><\/strong> <\/span>endorses this view. In contrast, the so-called \u2018July 7th<\/sup> Truth Campaign\u2019 has <\/span><\/strong><\/span>scoffed at this narrative <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/a>calling it \u2018evidence-free conjecture,\u2019 a quite breathtaking (and very revealing) remark. <\/span><\/p>\n