{"id":261627,"date":"2022-11-25T07:55:55","date_gmt":"2022-11-25T07:55:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=261627"},"modified":"2022-11-27T07:53:55","modified_gmt":"2022-11-27T07:53:55","slug":"died-suddenly-is-all-about-those-vaccines-killing-people-and-so-the-bbc-is-trying-to-kill-died-suddenly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=261627","title":{"rendered":"“Died Suddenly” is all about those “vaccines” killing people; and so the BBC is trying to kill “Died Suddenly”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mark Crispin Miller \u2013 News From Underground Nov 23, 2022<\/strong><\/h2>\n

First, if you have not yet seen Died Suddenly, <\/em>the killer documentary that dropped two days ago, I urge you to watch it as soon as you can\u2014it\u2019s a little over an hour\u2014and share it far and wide. Although it makes some trivial mistakes, it is a very solid piece of work\u2014as sound as it is harrowing, and that\u2019s really saying something; so all those who appreciate my weekly Substacks on the toll of the \u201cvaccines\u201d will also very much appreciate this film, and learn a lot from it (as I did):<\/p>\n

https:\/\/rumble.com\/v1wac7i-world-premier-died-suddenly.html<\/a><\/p>\n

I\u2019m certain that this film will open many people\u2019s eyes, which is (of course) why I am recommending it. The BBC has joined me in that expectation\u2014which has impelled them not <\/em>to recommend the film, but, on the contrary, to try to kill it, with this attempted takedown by one Rachael Schraer, who works for BBC as an \u201cdisinformation reporter\u201d (as indeed she is).<\/p>\n

On the one hand, Schraer\u2019s piece is a mighty effort at dissuasion, as she plays every trick she can to urge her readers not <\/em>to watch the film themselves, so they might make up their own minds. That\u2019s the last <\/em>thing she and her employer want, since, by now, so many <\/em>people have lost loved ones to the jab, and\/or have been thereby severely harmed themselves, that they may <\/em>be both staggered and enlightened by Died Suddenly<\/em>, which, if they\u2019re not activists already, might move them to speak out at last, and forge alliances with others who have also been severely hurt.<\/p>\n

And so, to move people not <\/em>to watch it, Schraer vigorously slimes it as a shoddy and deceptive piece of propaganda, based on weak research (if any), riddled with gross errors, and also an offensive <\/em>exercise, since all those poor people that it claims <\/em>have been bereaved or injured by their \u201cvaccination\u201d almost never <\/em>were, such consequences being \u201crare\u201d (as she says twice); and even hinting that they were <\/em>thus injured is a cruel and callous act of \u201ctrolling,\u201d typical of \u201canti-vaxxers.\u201d (Check out the rather murky anecdote with which Schraer starts her piece.) Above all, Schraer casts Died Suddenly <\/em>as an expression of delusion: \u201c<\/em>[T]he film tells a fictitious<\/em> story of a dangerous vaccine killing off swathes of young people – all part of an imagined<\/em> plot to depopulate the earth\u201d [emphasis added].<\/p>\n

And while she does all she can to make as many people as the BBC can reach not want <\/em>to see the film, Schraer also ends by hinting that right-minded people (like herself) should lobby Twitter\u2014that is, Elon Musk\u2014not <\/em>to let its users recommend the film, or, presumably, even talk about it in that forum.<\/p>\n

Again, Died Suddenly <\/em>does make some few mistakes; Schraer caught the film\u2019s misuse of video showing the mid-game collapse of Kansas State basketball player Keyontae Johnson\u2014presented as a sudden \u201cvaccine\u201d death, although the footage is from 2020, and Johnson is, in fact, alive and well. It\u2019s too bad that the filmmakers slipped up like that, since it\u2019s a gift to propagandists such as Schraer; but such things happen when you\u2019re dealing with a heavy volume of material (I\u2019ve made mistakes like that myself)\u2014but such errors in Died Suddenly <\/em>are few and far between, whereas Schraer\u2019s <\/em>piece is a tapestry of propaganda lies: I\u2019ve annotated it to highlight some of them; so read it, and my annotations, here, and make up your <\/em>own mind.<\/p>\n

And if you should be so moved, feel free to email Rachel Schraer (whose address is below her piece), and\/or BBC ombudsman Nick Bennett (whose address I can\u2019t seem to find), and ask her, or him, or them\u2014and as politely <\/em>as you can!\u2014if they think it\u2019s appropriate for an august journalistic <\/em>outlet like the BBC to function as a propaganda mouthpiece for Big Pharma\u2014which is precisely what the Beeb became with its so-called \u201cTrusted News Initiative,\u201d whereby Big Media outlets have been simultaneously pumping out disinformation and blacking <\/em>out all <\/em>those who have dissented from the official COVID narrative, no matter how extensive their experience or impressive their credentials.<\/p>\n

It is of course regrettable, and<\/em> wholly understandable, that people who have been bereaved or harmed by \u201cvaccination,\u201d but haven\u2019t yet faced up to it, should feel attacked by those who broach that possibility\u2014especially by strangers coming at them out of nowhere. And yet such random tactlessness is nowhere near as grave a sin as pushing lethal \u201cvaccination\u201d on the global population for no scientific reason, and without informed consent\u2014the mortal sin committed by the BBC and all its \u201cjournalistic\u201d peers, and one for which there can be no<\/em> forgiveness.<\/p>\n

On the \u201cTrusted News Initiative\u201d:<\/em><\/p>\n

The Trusted News Initiative – A BBC led organisation censoring Public Health experts who oppose the official narrative on Covid-19<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n