{"id":257764,"date":"2022-08-24T07:23:19","date_gmt":"2022-08-24T07:23:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=257764"},"modified":"2022-08-25T06:49:15","modified_gmt":"2022-08-25T06:49:15","slug":"thousands-of-scientists-sign-formal-declaration-there-is-no-climate-emergency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=257764","title":{"rendered":"Thousands of scientists sign formal declaration: \u201cThere is no climate emergency\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ethan Huff \u2013 Natural News Aug 22, 2022<\/strong><\/h1>\n

A growing number<\/a> of scientists and other professionals and experts are of the same mind that so-called \u201cglobal warming\u201d and other climate change fictions are just that: fiction<\/em>.<\/p>\n

At least 1,200 of them have signed on to the World Climate Declaration, which declares that there is \u201cno climate emergency,\u201d despite what corrupt governments and academic institutions claim.<\/p>\n

It turns out that the climate is always<\/em> changing. And humans play little-to-no role in temperatures and weather patterns, which are dictated by factors far outside the control of mankind.<\/p>\n

The political establishment and its official \u201cscience\u201d outlets claim that it is a \u201csettled\u201d matter, but the World Climate Declaration specifies otherwise. (Related: Hundreds of scientists signed a similar declaration<\/a> back in 2019 declaring the alleged climate emergency to be fiction.)<\/p>\n

Norwegian physics Nobel Prize laureate Professor Ivar Giaever is one of the declaration\u2019s signatories. He says that climate change dogmas are more religion than they are science \u2013 a full list of World Climate Declaration signatories is available here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe scale of the opposition to modern day \u2018settled\u2019 climate science is remarkable, given how difficult it is in academia to raise grants for any climate research that departs from the political orthodoxy,\u201d reports Legal Insurrection<\/em>.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnother lead author of the declaration, Professor Richard Lindzen, has called the current climate narrative \u2018absurd,\u2019 but acknowledged that trillions of dollars and the relentless propaganda from grant-dependent academics and agenda-driven journalists currently says it is not absurd.\u201d<\/p>\n

Global warming is about as real as the Easter bunny<\/strong><\/h2>\n

One common piece of \u201cevidence\u201d put forth in favor of the climate emergency narrative is the consortium of climate models<\/em>, which claim to use math and science to \u201cprove\u201d the existence of global warming.<\/p>\n

These climate models are central to the discussion on climate change, and yet they are merely a product of whatever their creators want them to be \u2013 i.e., they show whatever the people who made them want them to show.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe should free ourselves from the na\u00efve belief in immature climate models,\u201d the World Climate Declaration states. \u201cIn the future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n

The CLINTEL Group has created an action plan for fighting back against the climate agenda. That plan includes the following main points, which the CLINTEL Group says it will give to governments and companies worldwide for consideration:<\/p>\n