{"id":248750,"date":"2022-01-25T08:33:03","date_gmt":"2022-01-25T08:33:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=248750"},"modified":"2022-01-27T06:33:57","modified_gmt":"2022-01-27T06:33:57","slug":"did-over-100000-people-older-than-124-years-vote-in-wisconsin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=248750","title":{"rendered":"Did over 100,000 people older than 124 years vote in Wisconsin?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Andrea Widburg \u2013 American Thinker Jan 23, 2022<\/strong><\/h1>\n

If you\u2019ve been wondering about the extent of voter fraud in America, we may be seeing a staggering amount of either fraud or grotesque negligence in Wisconsin voter rolls. A review of the state\u2019s voter roles showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918. Of that number, 20% of these people, all of whom must be at least 124 years old, voted last November. Biden \u201cwon\u201d in Wisconsin by 20,682 votes….<\/p>\n

For regular American Thinker<\/em> readers, this shouldn\u2019t come as a surprise. Roughly two weeks ago, Jay Valentine wrote about the extent of fraud<\/a> he and his team have discovered as they\u2019ve uploaded voter rolls (which often had corrupted data that seemed deliberately intended to keep information opaque) into Valentine\u2019s system. Once the information for any given state was loaded and sorted, it invariably revealed rather surprising information in both red and blue states. Among other things, in one red state, there were \u201c4,300 people over 100 years old on their rolls.\u00a0 Some were 121.\u00a0 Those were the kids.\u00a0 The really old ones were almost 2,000 years old, and there were a bunch of them \u2013 and they voted.\u201d<\/p>\n

(For those wondering, my understanding is that Valentine did not identify specific states because it\u2019s important for the volunteer canvassers to have complete anonymity. Naming states could make the officials who are being exposed as corrupt or inept start looking for canvassers.)<\/p>\n

The revelations out of Wisconsin (and I have no idea whether Jay Valentine has been part of the Wisconsin analysis) are staggering. It turns out that at least one out of every 14 voters in Wisconsin is at least 124 years old. Thus, to register in 1918, a person would have had to have been 21 or older. That means that one out of every 14 Wisconsin residents is older than 124 years. Even more amazing, 115,252 of those ancient people made the effort to vote in November. It\u2019s certain that some of them provided the votes that gave Biden that 20,682-vote lead.<\/p>\n

Wisconsin has tried to explain away the problem by saying that smaller precincts had technical problems when they tried to merge their data into the state\u2019s system. The system responded to those problems by giving the people on those lists a default registration date of January 1, 1918.<\/p>\n

In the video below, you can see an expert, Wisconsin Assembly Attorney Dean O\u2019Donnell, an expert on the election integrity team, explaining to the Wisconsin Elections Commission how unlikely that explanation is. That one out of fourteen people had a grossly inaccurate date of registration would wreak havoc with the integrity of the voter rolls, making it highly unlikely that a Secretary of State would allow such a technical error to stand.<\/p>\n

\n

Official explanation for why there are 119,283 "active voters" in WI who have been registered for over 100 years "does not hold water"<\/p>\n

569,277 voters have 1\/1\/1918 registration date, amounting to 1 out of every 14 voters in the system<\/p>\n

115,252 of them voted in November 2020 pic.twitter.com\/GwX037Qpxx<\/a><\/p>\n

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) January 20, 2022<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n