{"id":246482,"date":"2021-12-03T08:20:34","date_gmt":"2021-12-03T08:20:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=246482"},"modified":"2021-12-05T10:13:48","modified_gmt":"2021-12-05T10:13:48","slug":"research-game-changer-spike-protein-increases-heart-attacks-and-destroys-immune-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=246482","title":{"rendered":"Research “Game-changer”: Spike Protein Increases Heart Attacks and Destroys Immune System"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mike Whitney \u2013 The Unz Review Dec 1, 2021<\/strong><\/h1>\n

\u201cThis is really a technology designed to poison people, there\u2019s really no two-ways about it.\u201d Dr. Michael Palmer<\/a> on mRNA vaccines<\/p>\n

Question\u2013<\/strong> Does the Covid-19 vaccine cause heart attacks?<\/p>\n

Answer\u2013<\/strong> It does, and researchers are closer to understanding the mechanism that triggers those events.<\/p>\n

Question\u2013<\/strong> How can I be sure you\u2019re telling the truth?<\/p>\n

Answer\u2013 <\/strong>Well, for starters, there\u2019s a research paper that appeared recently in the prestigious Circulation magazine that draws the same conclusion. Here\u2019s an excerpt from the paper:<\/p>\n

\u201cWe conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium (layer of cells lining the blood vessels) and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis (clotting), cardiomyopathy, (a group of diseases that affect the heart muscle) and other vascular events following vaccination.\u201d<\/strong> (\u201cAbstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning\u201d<\/a>, Circulation)<\/p>\n

It\u2019s actually quite rare for researchers to be so blunt in their analysis, but there it is in black and white. As you can see, they didn\u2019t pull their punches. Here\u2019s how Alex Berenson summed it up on his blogsite at Substack:<\/p>\n

\u201cA new study of 566 patients who received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines shows that signs of cardiovascular damage soared following the shots. The risk of heart attacks or other severe coronary problems more than doubled months after the vaccines were administered<\/strong>, based on changes in markers of inflammation and other cell damage. Patients had a 1 in 4 risk for severe problems after the vaccines, compared to 1 in 9 before. (\u201cIf you like heart problems, you\u2019ll love the Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines\u201d<\/a>, Alex Berenson, Substack)<\/p>\n

\u201cDoubled\u201d? \u201cThe risk of heart attacks.. more than doubled\u201d after vaccination?<\/p>\n

Apparently, so. No wonder cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra is so flabbergasted. Here\u2019s what he said in a recent interview:<\/p>\n

\u201cExtraordinary, disturbing and upsetting. We now have evidence of a plausible biological mechanism of how mRNA vaccine may be contributing to increased cardiac events.<\/strong> The abstract is published in the highest impact cardiology journal so we must take these findings very seriously.\u201d<\/p>\n

Indeed, we must, but our public health experts continue to pretend that nothing has changed, even though more and more professionals continue to speak out. Here\u2019s Malhotra again:<\/p>\n

\u201cI have alot of interaction with the cardiology community across the UK, and anecdotally, I have been told by colleagues that they are seeing younger and younger people coming in with heart attacks\u2026. Now since July, there\u2019s been at least 10,000 non-covid deaths, and most of those have been driven by circulatory disease, in other words, heart attack and stroke<\/strong>. And there\u2019s been a 30% increase in deaths at home, often because of cardiac arrest\u2026. (So) The signal is quite strong\u2026 This needs to be investigated\u2026 And I think it is high-time that policymakers around the world put an end to the mandates, because \u2013if this signal is correct\u2013 then history will not be on their side and the public will not forgive them for it.\u201d (Dr Aseem Malhotra reveals increase in risk of heart attack following the mRNA COVID vaccine,<\/a> Bitchute, Minute-1:35)<\/p>\n

Video Link\u00a0<\/a>(The video is restricted in the UK, due to an alleged “incitement to hatred”)<\/p>\n

Shocking, right? And what\u2019s more shocking is the media\u2019s response which is aimed at concealing the fact that these toxic injections pose a clear threat to the lives of millions. Is that overstating the case?<\/p>\n

No, not at all.<\/p>\n

So, what conclusions can we draw from this new research? What is the science telling us?<\/p>\n

It\u2019s telling us that the vaccine can reduce the flow of blood to the heart, damage heart tissue, and greatly increase the risk of a heart attack. The authors are telling readers point-blank that the vaccine can either kill or severely injure them. Can you see that?<\/p>\n

Question\u2013<\/strong> I can\u2019t say. I haven\u2019t read the report.<\/p>\n

Answer\u2013<\/strong> No, you haven\u2019t, and you probably won\u2019t either since the big news organizations and social media giants are going to make sure it never sees the light of day. But just read that one paragraph over again and try to grasp what the authors are saying. They\u2019re saying that many people who choose to get vaccinated will either die or have years shaved off their lives. And\u2013remember\u2013this isn\u2019t an opinion piece. It\u2019s science. It\u2019s also a straightforward repudiation of a mass vaccination campaign that is demonstrably killing people.<\/p>\n

Question\u2013<\/strong> You always exaggerate. This is just one report from one group of researchers. I could easily provide you with research that refutes your theory.<\/p>\n

Answer\u2013<\/strong> I\u2019m sure you could, in fact there\u2019s a small army of industry-employed propagandists (aka\u2013 \u201cfact checkers\u201d) who spend all their waking hours cobbling together fake news stories that do just that; discredit the science that veers even slightly from the official narrative. The truth is, the pro-vaxx disinformation campaign has been vastly more effective than the vaccine itself. I don\u2019t think even you\u2019d disagree with that.<\/p>\n

Question\u2013<\/strong> I do disagree with that, and I resent your characterization of the widespread support for these essential procedures as \u201cpro-vaxx disinformation\u201d. That is an extremely biased and ignorant statement.<\/p>\n

Answer\u2013<\/strong> Is it? In the last few weeks, we\u2019ve produced hard evidence that a great many people who died after vaccination, died from the vaccination. We showed, for example, that two German pathology professors, Arne Burkhardt and Walter Lang, found that in five of the ten autopsies, \u201cthe two physicians rate the connection between death and vaccination as very probable, in two cases as probable.\u201d These same doctors found that \u201clymphocytic myocarditis, the most common diagnosis.<\/strong>\u2026(along with) autoimmune phenomena, reduction in immune capacity, acceleration of cancer growth, vascular damage \u201cendothelitis\u201d, vasculitis, perivasculitis and erythrocyte \u201cclumping\u201d.. In other words, the whole \u2018dog\u2019s breakfast\u2019 of maladies that have been linked to the \u201cpoison-death shot\u201d. (See full report here; \u201cLymphocyte riot\u2019: Pathologists investigate deaths after Corona vaccination\u201d<\/a>, Free West Media)<\/p>\n

These same pathologists found evidence of a \u201clymphocyte riot\u201d, potentially in all tissues and organs.<\/strong> (Note\u2013 Lymphocytes are white blood cells in the immune system that swing into action to fight invaders or pathogen-infected cells. A \u201clymphocyte riot\u201d suggests the immune system has gone crazy trying to counter the effects of billions of spike proteins located in cells in the bloodstream. As the lymphocytes are depleted, the body grows more susceptible to other infections which may explain why a large number of people are now contracting respiratory viruses in late summer.)<\/p>\n

The autopsies provide hard evidence that the vaccines do, in fact, cause significant tissue damage. So, my question to you is this: How do you brush aside the rock-solid proof that the vaccines inflict significant injury on people who get injected? Do you need to examine the maligned corpses yourself before you change your mind and admit you\u2019re wrong?<\/p>\n

Question\u2013<\/strong> Nothing can be deduced from just 10 autopsies. More than a billion people have been vaccinated so far, and the deaths are still within an acceptable range given the severity of the disease.<\/p>\n

Answer\u2013 <\/strong>\u201cThe severity of the disease\u201d? You mean a virus that is survived by over 99.98% of the people who catch it? You mean an infection that \u2013according to the latest figures from Johns Hopkins\u2013 killed 351,000 in the US in 2020 which is roughly half the number of people who die from heart disease every year? And when you say: \u201cNothing can be deduced from just 10 autopsies\u201d, you are very much mistaken. You can detect a pattern of vaccine-generated disease that is produced by the injection of a toxic substance (spike protein) that causes bleeding, clotting and autoimmunity even in the people who survive. \u201cSurvival\u201d does not mean undamaged. Oh, no. And anyone who has seen the many videos of healthy athletes dropping dead on the field of play months after being jabbed, should understand that \u201cThere go I but for the grace of God.\u201d Bottom line: If you get injected, you\u2019re never going to know whether you\u2019ll be struck-down without warning by a similar cardio-type event. (See: \u201cAt least 69 athletes collapse in one month, many dead\u201d<\/a>, freewestmedia.com)<\/p>\n

Do you think that if these athletes knew they could die from the vaccine, they would have made the choice they did?<\/p>\n

Question\u2013 <\/strong>You\u2019re being overly dramatic. Naturally, not everyone is going to react the same to an emergency-use drug, but\u2013 on balance\u2013 the vaccines have mitigated the impact of a deadly pandemic the likes of which we haven\u2019t seen for more than a century.<\/p>\n

Answer\u2013<\/strong> You really believe that, don\u2019t you? Just like you really believe that Covid-19 is a totally unique and \u201cnovel\u201d virus. If you just researched it a bit, you\u2019d know that that theory has been thoroughly debunked. The Coronavirus isn\u2019t new; it is an iteration of numerous other infections that have spread through the population for a least 2 decades. Take a look at this except from a research paper by the Doctors for Covid Ethics and you\u2019ll see what I\u2019m talking about:<\/p>\n

\u201cSeveral studies have demonstrated that circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA antibodies became detectable within 1-2 weeks after application of mRNA vaccines..<\/strong>. Rapid production of IgG and IgA always indicates a secondary, memory-type response that is elicited through re-stimulation of pre-existing immune cells<\/strong>\u2026. Importantly, however, IgG rose faster than IgM, which confirms that the early IgG response was indeed of the memory type. This memory response indicates pre-existing, cross-reactive immunity due to previous infection<\/strong> with ordinary respiratory human coronavirus strains\u2026.<\/p>\n

Memory-type responses have also been documented with respect to T-cell-mediated immunity. Overall, these findings indicate that our immune system efficiently recognizes SARS-CoV-2 as \u201cknown\u201d even on first contact<\/strong>. Severe cases of the disease thus cannot be ascribed to lacking immunity. Instead, severe cases might very well be caused or aggravated by pre-existing immunity through antibody-dependent enhancement.<\/p>\n

This study confirms the above assertion that the immune response to initial contact with SARS-CoV-2 is of the memory type<\/strong>. In addition, it shows that this reaction occurs with almost all individuals, and particularly also with those who experience no manifest clinical symptoms.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Conclusion\u2013 The collective findings discussed above clearly show that the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful.<\/strong> In contrast, the harm the vaccines do is very well substantiated, with more than 15.000 vaccination-associated deaths now documented in the EU drug adverse events database (EudraVigilance), and over 7.000 more deaths within the UK and the US.\u201d (\u201cLetter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding COVID-19 Immunity and Vaccines \u2013 Implications for Safety and Efficacy\u201d<\/a>, Doctors for Covid Ethics)<\/p>\n

Repeat: If the vast majority of people already have robust, pre-existing immunity, \u201cthen the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u200bIs that a reasonable \u201cevidence-based\u201d conclusion? And, if it is, then shouldn\u2019t there have been a debate on this matter before over a billion people were inoculated with an experimental substance that causes, bleeding, clotting, autoimmunity, strokes, and heart attacks? And how could it not be true, after all, if there was no pre-existing immunity in a US population of 330 million people, then the number of fatalities would be exponentially higher. Instead, after a full two years of exposure\u2013 the percentage of deaths in the US is still less than one-third of one percent, a veritable drop in the bucket. Would that be possible with a truly super-contagious \u201cnovel\u201d virus?<\/p>\n

No, it would not be possible, which means that Fauci and Co lied. And the reason they lied was to convince people that they\u2019re more vulnerable than they really are. It\u2019s just one of many fearmongering scams they used to promote the vaccine: \u201cGet vaccinated or die\u201d, that was the message.<\/p>\n

Doesn\u2019t that bother you? Doesn\u2019t it bother you to know the government and public health authorities twisted the truth in order to dupe you into an invasive and potentially-lethal medical procedure?<\/p>\n

Question\u2013<\/strong> I think our public health officials did the best they could given the circumstances.<\/p>\n

Answer\u2013<\/strong> I think you are wrong about that. I think they have lied repeatedly in order to advance a predominantly-political agenda. But, let\u2019s assume you\u2019re right for a minute. Then why do they continue to ignore groundbreaking research that conflicts with their political objectives? Have you thought about that? I already mentioned the shocking report above that indicates the vaccine reduces the flow of blood to the heart and increases the risk of a heart attack. Have you heard a peep out of Fauci or Walensky about that report?<\/p>\n

No, not a thing.<\/p>\n

Why do you think that is? You\u2019d assume that if Fauci had our best interests in mind, he\u2019d use his sway with the media to spread-the-word far and wide. But, no. He\u2019s made no effort to confirm what the research indicates; that there\u2019s a clear link between the production of the spike protein and cardiovascular damage. He hasn\u2019t lifted a finger in that regard, and it shows. The surge in fatalities and the sharp uptick in excess deaths in the vast number of countries that launched mass vaccination campaigns earlier in the year, are mainly circulatory deaths, that is, heart attacks, strokes and the like. The latest example of this phenom is the Netherlands which has seen a 20% spike in deaths over the previous year. Check it out:<\/p>\n

\u201cLast week the number of deaths was more than 20 percent higher than usual for this time of year. <\/strong>The Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) reported 3 750 deaths, nearly 850 more than expected. According to the statistical office, the higher mortality can be seen in all age groups.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the Netherlands, 85 percent of people over the age of 18 are fully vaccinated<\/strong>, and many had their jabs only recently. \u2026
\nDutch officials have started injecting those 80 with boosters on Thursday, weeks earlier than planned\u2026<\/p>\n

Based on weekly data from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) in the UK, vaccinated people under 60 are twice as likely to die as unvaccinated people.<\/strong> And overall deaths in Britain are far above normal.<\/p>\n

As in Germany, Swedes also appear to die at rates 20 percent or more above normal for weeks after receiving their second Covid jab,<\/strong> according to data from a Swedish study.\u201d (\u201cDutch deaths more than 20% higher than previous year\u201d<\/a>, Free West Media)<\/p>\n

And this isn\u2019t just happening in the Netherlands and Germany either. It\u2019s happening everywhere that mass vaccination campaigns were launched earlier in the year. Now, all of those countries are seeing a sharp uptick in cardiac arrests, strokes, vascular damage and blood clots. Why? What did we do differently in 2021 than we did in the years before?<\/p>\n

Question\u2013<\/strong> Where are you going with this? I feel like you\u2019re setting me up for something?<\/p>\n

Answer\u2013<\/strong> I am. I want you to admit that the data now supports the case for terminating the vaccination campaign immediately. That\u2019s my main objective, to convince people that we\u2019re on the wrong track and need to stop this madness before more people die.<\/p>\n

Did you know that the vaccines also damage the immune system?<\/p>\n

It\u2019s true, the injections are immuno-suppressant which means the body is less capable of fighting off infections, viruses and diseases. Think about that for a minute. The vaccine was supposed to protect its recipients from sickness and death, instead it does the exact opposite. It prevents cells from producing the antibodies that are needed to stave-off infection. Check out this short blurb from Dr. David Bauer of Francis Crick Institute who explains what\u2019s going on:<\/p>\n

\u201cSo, the key message from our finding is that, we found that recipients of the Pfizer vaccine\u2013 those who have two doses\u2013 have five to six-fold lower of neutralizing antibodies.<\/strong> These are the \u201cgold standard\u201d private-security antibodies of your immune system, which block the virus from getting into your cells in the first place. So, we found that that\u2019s less for people with two doses. We also found that for people with just one dose of the Pfizer jab, that they are less likely to have high levels of these antibodies in their blood.<\/strong> And perhaps most importantly, we see that the older you are, the lower your levels are likely to be, <\/strong>and the time since you\u2019ve had your second jab, the longer that time goes on, the lower your levels are likely to be. So, that\u2019s telling us that we\u2019re probably going to need to prioritize boosters for older and more vulnerable people, coming up soon, especially if this new variant spreads.\u201d (\u201cDr David LV Bauer Francis Crick institute destroys the immune system\u201d<\/a>, Bitchute, 1 minute)<\/p>\n