{"id":240376,"date":"2021-08-07T05:35:42","date_gmt":"2021-08-07T05:35:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=240376"},"modified":"2021-08-08T08:00:39","modified_gmt":"2021-08-08T08:00:39","slug":"apple-to-scan-u-s-iphones-for-images-of-child-sexual-abuse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=240376","title":{"rendered":"Apple to scan U.S. iPhones for images of child sexual abuse"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Frank Bajak and Barbara Ortutay — AP Aug 5, 2021<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Apple unveiled plans to scan U.S. iPhones<\/a> for images of child sexual abuse, drawing applause from child protection groups but raising concern among some security researchers that the system could be misused, including by governments looking to surveil their citizens.<\/p>\n

The tool designed to detected known images of child sexual abuse, called \u201cneuralMatch,\u201d will scan images before they are uploaded to iCloud. If it finds a match, the image will be reviewed by a human. If child pornography is confirmed, the user\u2019s account will be disabled and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children notified.<\/p>\n

Separately, Apple plans to scan users\u2019 encrypted messages for sexually explicit content as a child safety measure, which also alarmed privacy advocates.<\/p>\n

The detection system will only flag images that are already in the center\u2019s database of known child pornography. Parents snapping innocent photos of a child in the bath presumably need not worry. But researchers say the matching tool \u2014 which doesn\u2019t \u201csee\u201d such images, just mathematical \u201cfingerprints\u201d that represent them \u2014 could be put to more nefarious purposes.<\/p>\n

Matthew Green, a top cryptography researcher at Johns Hopkins University, warned that the system could be used to frame innocent people by sending them seemingly innocuous images designed to trigger matches for child pornography. That could fool Apple\u2019s algorithm and alert law enforcement. \u201cResearchers have been able to do this pretty easily,\u201d he said of the ability to trick such systems.<\/p>\n

Other abuses could include government surveillance of dissidents or protesters. \u201cWhat happens when the Chinese government says, \u2018Here is a list of files that we want you to scan for,\u2019\u201d Green asked. \u201cDoes Apple say no? I hope they say no, but their technology won\u2019t say no.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tech companies including Microsoft, Google, Facebook and others have for years been sharing digital fingerprints of known child sexual abuse images. Apple has used those to scan user files stored in its iCloud service, which is not as securely encrypted as its on-device data, for child pornography.<\/p>\n

Apple has been under government pressure for years to allow for increased surveillance of encrypted data. Coming up with the new security measures required Apple to perform a delicate balancing act between cracking down on the exploitation of children while keeping its high-profile commitment to protecting the privacy of its users.<\/p>\n

But a dejected Electronic Frontier Foundation,<\/a> the online civil liberties pioneer, called Apple\u2019s compromise on privacy protections \u201ca shocking about-face for users who have relied on the company\u2019s leadership in privacy and security.\u201d<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the computer scientist who more than a decade ago invented PhotoDNA, the technology used by law enforcement to identify child pornography online, acknowledged the potential for abuse of Apple\u2019s system but said it was far outweighed by the imperative of battling child sexual abuse.<\/p>\n

\u201cIs it possible? Of course. But is it something that I\u2019m concerned about? No,\u201d said Hany Farid, a researcher at the University of California at Berkeley, who argues that plenty of other programs designed to secure devices from various threats haven\u2019t seen \u201cthis type of mission creep.\u201d For example, WhatsApp provides users with end-to-end encryption to protect their privacy, but also employs a system for detecting malware and warning users not to click on harmful links.<\/p>\n

Apple was one of the first major companies to embrace \u201cend-to-end\u201d encryption, in which messages are scrambled so that only their senders and recipients can read them. Law enforcement, however, has long pressured the company for access to that information in order to investigate crimes such as terrorism or child sexual exploitation.<\/p>\n

Apple said the latest changes will roll out this year as part of updates to its operating software for iPhones, Macs and Apple Watches.<\/p>\n

\u201cApple\u2019s expanded protection for children is a game changer,\u201d John Clark, the president and CEO of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, said in a statement. \u201cWith so many people using Apple products, these new safety measures have lifesaving potential for children.\u201d<\/p>\n

Julia Cordua, the CEO of Thorn, said that Apple\u2019s technology balances \u201cthe need for privacy with digital safety for children.\u201d Thorn, a nonprofit founded by Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher, uses technology to help protect children from sexual abuse by identifying victims and working with tech platforms.<\/p>\n

But in a blistering critique<\/a>, the Washington-based nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology called on Apple to abandon the changes, which it said effectively destroy the company\u2019s guarantee of \u201cend-to-end encryption.\u201d Scanning of messages for sexually explicit content on phones or computers effectively breaks the security, it said.<\/p>\n

The organization also questioned Apple\u2019s technology for differentiating between dangerous content and something as tame as art or a meme. Such technologies are notoriously error-prone, CDT said in an emailed statement. Apple denies that the changes amount to a backdoor that degrades its encryption. It says they are carefully considered innovations that do not disturb user privacy but rather strongly protect it.<\/p>\n

Separately, Apple said its messaging app will use on-device machine learning to identify and blur sexually explicit photos on children\u2019s phones and can also warn the parents of younger children via text message. It also said that its software would \u201cintervene\u201d when users try to search for topics related to child sexual abuse.<\/p>\n

In order to receive the warnings about sexually explicit images on their children\u2019s devices, parents will have to enroll their child\u2019s phone. Kids over 13 can unenroll, meaning parents of teenagers won\u2019t get notifications.<\/p>\n

Apple said neither feature would compromise the security of private communications or notify police.<\/p>\n

___<\/p>\n

AP technology writer Mike Liedtke contributed to this article.<\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Naturally most will approve of apprehending child abusers and that\u2019s the thing. Because approving this sort surveillance opens the way for more sinister surveillance. So that it\u2019s a short step before iPhones are scanned for anti-vaccination messages<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[59],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-240376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Surveillance"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=240376"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240376\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":240377,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240376\/revisions\/240377"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=240376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=240376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=240376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}