{"id":231683,"date":"2021-04-14T08:20:10","date_gmt":"2021-04-14T08:20:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=231683"},"modified":"2021-04-16T07:44:50","modified_gmt":"2021-04-16T07:44:50","slug":"pure-unalloyed-evil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=231683","title":{"rendered":"Pure, Unalloyed Evil"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mike Whitney \u2013 The Unz Review April 11, 2021<\/strong><\/h1>\n

\u201cHell is empty and all the devils are here.\u201d William Shakespeare, The Tempest<\/p>\n

Mike Yeadon is a soft-spoken microbiologist and a former Vice President of Allergy and Respiratory Research at Pfizer. He spent 32 years working for large pharmaceutical companies and is a leading expert on viral respiratory infections. He is also a man on a mission, and his mission is to inform as many people as possible about the elite powerbrokers that are using the pandemic as a smokescreen to conceal their real objectives. Here\u2019s Yeadon in a recent interview:<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you wanted to depopulate a significant portion of the world<\/strong>, and to do it in a way that wouldn\u2019t require destruction of the environment with nuclear weapons, or poisoning everyone with anthrax or something, And you wanted plausible deniability, whilst you had a multi-year infectious disease crisis; I don\u2019t think you could come up with a better plan of work than what seems to be in from of me.<\/strong> I can\u2019t say that\u2019s what they\u2019re going to do, but I cannot think of a benign explanation for why they are doing it.\u201d (\u201cInterview with Dr Mike Yeadon<\/a>\u201c, The Delingpole Podcast; Minute 44: 25)<\/p>\n

\u201cDepopulation\u201d? Who said anything about depopulation? Isn\u2019t it a bit of a stretch to go from a mass vaccination campaign to allegations of a conspiracy to \u201cdepopulate a significant portion of the world\u201d?<\/p>\n

Indeed, it is, but Yeadon has done extensive research on the matter and provides compelling evidence that such a diabolical objective may, in fact, be the goal. Moreover, it is not for lack of proof that people are not persuaded that Yeadon is right, but something more fundamental; the inability to grasp that men are capable of almost-unimaginable viciousness and cruelty. Here\u2019s Yeadon again:<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s become absolutely clear to me, even when I talk to intelligent people, friends, acquaintances \u2026 and they can tell I\u2019m telling them something important, but they get to the point [where I say] \u2018your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death and that of your children,\u2019<\/strong> and they can\u2019t begin to engage with it. And I think maybe 10% of them understand what I said, and 90% of those blank their understanding of it because it is too difficult. And my concern is, we are going to lose this, because people will not deal with the possibility that anyone is so evil\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cBut I remind you of what happened in Russia in the 20th Century, what happened in 1933 to 1945, what happened in, you know, Southeast Asia in some of the most awful times in the post-war era. And, what happened in China with Mao and so on\u2026.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve only got to look back two or three generations. All around us there are people who are as bad as the people doing this. They\u2019re all around us. So, I say to folks, the only thing that really marks this one out, is its scale.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cBut actually, this is probably less bloody, it\u2019s less personal, isn\u2019t it? The people who are steering this \u2026 it\u2019s going to be much easier for them. They don\u2019t have to shoot anyone in the face.<\/strong> They don\u2019t have to beat someone to death with a baseball bat, or freeze them, starve them, make them work until they die. All of those things did happen two or three generations back\u2026 That\u2019s how close we are.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd all I\u2019m saying is, some shifts like that are happening again, but now they are using molecular biology.\u201d (\u201cFormer Pfizer VP: \u2018Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.<\/a>\u201c, LifeSite News)<\/p>\n

He\u2019s right, isn\u2019t he? Whereas, a great many people know that the government, the media and the public health officials have been lying to them about everything from the efficacy of masks, social distancing and lockdowns, to the life-threatening dangers of experimental vaccines, they still refuse to believe that the people orchestrating this operation, might be pushing them inexorably towards infertility or an early death. They cannot imagine anything so demonic, so they stick their heads in the sand and pretend not to see what is going on right beneath their noses. It\u2019s called \u201cdenial\u201d and it is only strengthening the position of the puppetmasters that are operating behind the scenes. Here\u2019s more from Yeadon:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026In the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything<\/strong>. It\u2019s a fallacy this idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don\u2019t have symptoms, but you are a source of a virus. That lockdowns work, that masks have a protective value obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary things and we even need to close international borders in case some of these nasty foreign variants get in.\u201d (\u201cFormer Pfizer VP: \u2018Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death\u201d<\/a>, Lifesite News)<\/p>\n

Many readers may have noticed that this interview appeared on a small Christian website, called \u201cLifesite News\u201d. Why is that? Shouldn\u2019t the informed observations of a former Pfizer vice president appear on the front pages of the New York Times or Washington Post? Wouldn\u2019t you expect the big cable news channels to run a hot-button interview like this as their headline story?<\/p>\n

Of course, not. No one expects that, because everyone knows that the media honchos reflexively quash any story that doesn\u2019t support the \u201cofficial narrative\u201d, that is, that Covid is the most contagious and lethal virus of all time which requires a new authoritarian political structure and the wholesale evisceration of civil liberties. Isn\u2019t that the underlying storyline of the last year? Covid skeptics and naysayers, like Yeadon, are not allowed to refute the official propaganda or debate the issue on a public forum. They\u2019re effectively banned from the MSM and consigned to the outer reaches of the Internet where only a scattered few will what they have to say. Here\u2019s more:<\/p>\n

\u201cEverything I have told you, every single one of those things is demonstrably false. But our entire national policy is based on these all being broadly right, but they are all wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cBut what I would like to do is talk about immune escape because I think that\u2019s probably going to be the end game for this whole event<\/strong>, which I think is probably a conspiracy. Last year I thought it was what I called \u2018convergent opportunism,\u2019 that is a bunch of different stakeholder groups have managed to pounce on a world in chaos to push us in a particular direction. So, it looked like it was kind of linked, but I was prepared to say it was just convergence.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI [now] think that\u2019s na\u00efve. There is no question in my mind that very significant powerbrokers around the world have either planned to take advantage of the next pandemic or created the pandemic. One of those two things is true because the reason it must be true is that dozens and dozens of governments are all saying the same lies and doing the same inefficacious things that demonstrably cost lives.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cAnd they are talking the same sort of future script which is, \u2018We don\u2019t want you to move around because of these pesky\u2026 \u201cvariants\u201d\u2026 <\/strong>they are all saying \u2018don\u2019t worry, there will be \u201ctop-up\u201d vaccines that will cope with the potential escapees.\u2019 They\u2019re all saying this when it is obviously nonsense.<\/strong>\u201d (\u201cFormer Pfizer VP: \u2018Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death\u201d, Lifesite News)<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s pause for a minute, and ask ourselves why a modest, self-effacing microbiologist who operated in the shadows for his entire professional career, has thrust himself into the limelight when he knows, for certain, he will either be ridiculed, smeared, discredited, dragged through the mud or killed. In fact, he openly admits that he fears for his safety and assumes that he could be \u201cremoved\u201d (\u2018assassinated\u2019) by his enemies. So, why is he doing this? Why is he risking life and limb to get the word out about vaccines?<\/p>\n

It\u2019s because he feels a moral obligation to warn people about the danger they face. Yeadon is not an attention-seeking narcissist, in fact, he\u2019d rather vanish from public-life altogether. But he\u2019s not going to do that because he\u2019s selflessly committed to doing his duty by sounding the alarm about a malign strategy that may well lead to the suffering and death of literally tens of millions of people. That\u2019s why he\u2019s doing it, because he\u2019s an honorable man with a strong sense of decency. Remember decency?. . Here\u2019s more:<\/p>\n

\u201cYou can see that I am desperately trying not to say that it is a conspiracy, because I have no direct evidence that it is a conspiracy. Personally, all my instincts are shouting that it\u2019s a conspiracy as a human being, but as a scientist, I can\u2019t point to the smoking gun that says they made this up on purpose.<\/strong>\u201d (\u201cYeadon Interview<\/a>, Delingpod, minute 41:25)<\/p>\n

Many of us who have followed events closely for the last year and have searched the internet for alternate points of view, are equally convinced that it is a conspiracy, just as Russiagate was a conspiracy. And while we might not have conclusive, rock-solid proof of criminal activity, there is voluminous circumstantial evidence to support the claim. By definition, a \u201cconspiracy\u201d is \u201can evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons.\u201d (Dictionary<\/a>.com) What is taking place presently across the western world, meets that basic definition. Just as the contents of this article meets the basic definition of a \u201cConspiracy theory<\/strong>\u201c, which is: \u201can attempt to explain harmful or tragic events as the result of the actions of a small powerful group. <\/strong>Such explanations reject the accepted narrative surrounding those events; indeed, the official version may be seen as further proof of the conspiracy.\u201d (Britannica<\/a>)<\/p>\n

We make no attempt to deny that this is a conspiracy theory, any more than we deny that senior-level officials at the FBI, CIA, DOJ and US State Department were involved in a covert operation aimed at convincing the American people that Donald Trump was a Russian agent. That was a conspiracy theory that was later proven to be a fact. We expect that the facts about the Covid operation will eventually emerge acquitting us on that account as well. Here\u2019s more from Yeadon:<\/p>\n

\u201cI think the end game is going to be, \u2018everyone receives a vaccine\u2019\u2026 Everyone on the planet is going to find themselves persuaded, cajoled, not quite mandated, hemmed-in to take a jab.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWhen they do that every single individual on the planet will have a name, or unique digital ID<\/strong> and a health status flag which will be \u2018vaccinated,\u2019 or not \u2026 and whoever possesses that, sort of single database, operable centrally<\/strong>, applicable everywhere to control, to provide as it were, a privilege, you can either cross this particular threshold or conduct this particular transaction or not depending on [what] the controllers of that one human population database decide. And I think that\u2019s what this is all about because once you\u2019ve got that, we become playthings and the world can be as the controllers of that database want it.\u201d (LifeSite)<\/strong><\/p>\n

So mass vaccination is actually the pathway to absolute social control by a technocratic elites accountable to no one? Are we there yet?<\/p>\n

Pretty close, I\u2019d say. Here\u2019s more:<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd they are talking the same sort of future script which is, \u2018We don\u2019t want you to move around because of these pesky \u201cvariants\u201d<\/strong>\u2019\u2014 (but) \u2018don\u2019t worry, there will be \u201ctop-up\u201d vaccines that will cope with the potential escapees.\u2019 They\u2019re all saying this when it is obviously nonsense.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Is he right? Is the variant hobgoblin now being invoked to prolong the restrictions, intensify the paranoia and pave the way for endless rounds of mass vaccination?<\/p>\n

Judge for yourself, but here\u2019s a sampling of articles that appeared in today\u2019s news that will help you decide:<\/p>\n

1\u2013 Reuters, South African variant can \u2018break through\u2019 Pfizer vaccine, Israeli study says<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe coronavirus variant discovered in South Africa can \u201cbreak through\u201d Pfizer\/BioNTech\u2019s COVID-19 vaccine<\/strong> to some extent, a real-world data study in Israel found, though its prevalence in the country is low and the research has not been peer reviewed\u2026.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe found a disproportionately higher rate of the South African variant among people vaccinated with a second dose<\/strong>, compared to the unvaccinated group. This means that the South African variant is able, to some extent, to break through the vaccine\u2019s protection,\u201d said Tel Aviv University\u2019s Adi Stern. (So, according to the article\u2013 the vaccine doesn\u2019t work.)<\/p>\n

2\u2013 The New York Times: Rise of Variants in Europe Shows How Dangerous the Virus Can Be<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cEurope, the epicenter of the coronavirus pandemic last spring, has once again swelled with new cases, which are inundating some local hospitals and driving a worrisome global surge of Covid-19.<\/p>\n

But this time, the threat is different: The rise in new cases is being propelled by a coronavirus variant first seen in Britain and known as B.1.1.7. The variant is not only more contagious than last year\u2019s virus, but also deadlier.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The variant is now spreading in at least 114 countries. Nowhere, though, are its devastating effects as visible as in Europe, where thousands are dying each day and countries\u2019 already-battered economies are once again being hit by new restrictions on daily life\u2026.<\/p>\n

Vaccines will eventually defeat the variants, scientists say.<\/strong> (So, they don\u2019t work now??) And stringent restrictions can drive down cases of B.1.1.7.<\/strong> (So, don\u2019t leave your home.)..<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve seen in so many countries how quickly it can become dominant,\u201d said Lone Simonsen, a professor and director of the PandemiX Center at Roskilde University in Denmark. \u201cAnd when it dominates, it takes so much more effort to maintain epidemic control than was needed with the old variant.\u201d (In other words, we are effectively dealing with a different pathogen that requires a different antidote. It\u2019s an admission that the current crop of vaccines doesn\u2019t work.)<\/p>\n

3\u2013 SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and P.1escape from neutralizing antibodies, cell.com<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026.our findings indicate that the B.1.351and P.1 variants might be able to spread in convalescent patients or BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals<\/strong> and thus constitute an elevated threat to human health. Containment of these variants by non-pharmaceutic interventions is an important task.\u201d<\/strong> (Note\u2013 In other words, the new vaccines don\u2019t work against the new Covid strains, so we might need to preserve the onerous lockdown restrictions forever.)<\/p>\n

How can people read this fearmongering bunkum and not see that it is designed to terrify and manipulate the masses into sheeplike compliance?<\/p>\n

There\u2019s no denying that the variant is being used to fuel the Covid hysteria and perpetuate the repressive social restrictions. So, the question we should be asking ourselves is whether we can trust what we are being told by the media and the public health officials?<\/p>\n

And the answer is \u201cNo\u201d, we cannot trust them. They have repeatedly misled the public on all manner of topics including masks, asymptomatic transmission, immunity, Infection Fatality Rate, social distancing and now variants. According to Sunetra Gupta, who is Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology in the Department of Zoology at the University of Oxford, and a Royal Society Wolfson Research Fellow:<\/p>\n

\u201c...some of these variants could be more transmissible<\/strong>, but the truth is\u2026 even with a marginal increase in transmissibility\u2026 that does not have much of a material effect or difference in how we deal with the virus.<\/strong> In other words, the surge of the virus cannot be ascribed to a new variant\u2026.<\/p>\n

The other question is are these variants more virulent, and the truth is we don\u2019t know, but it is unlikely because the data don\u2019t seem to say so despite the scary headlines\u2026Pathogens tend to evolve towards lower virulence\u2026.because that maximizes their transmissibility\u2026It is much more probable that these strains will not be materially so different that we would have to alter our policies.\u201d<\/strong> (Sunetra Gupta: Are these new variants more transmissible?<\/a>\u201d You Tube)<\/p>\n

So, according to Gupta, even if the new strains of Covid are more transmissible, it is highly-unlikely that they are more lethal.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s more on the topic from Diagnostic pathologist, Dr Claire Craig who provides a more technical explanation:<\/p>\n

\u201cSARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence has ~30,000 letters. Alterations in a handful of letters will not change it\u2019s shape much \u2013 if it did it wouldn\u2019t function properly anyway<\/strong>. Fear mongering about immune escape is not needed and is irresponsible especially when no evidence to support the claims.\u201d<\/strong> (Claire Craig<\/a>)<\/p>\n

In essence, Craig is saying the same thing we said earlier, that the slight mutations to the infection will not impact the immune reaction of people who already had the virus. Thus, the current crop of \u201cvariants\u201d should not be a cause for alarm<\/strong>. If you have already had Covid or if you already have prior-immunity due to previous exposure to similar infections, (SARS, for example) the new strain should not be a problem. It should also not be a problem if the new vaccines provide the type of broad-based immunity that one should expect of them. Again, the mutations represent only the slightest change in the composition of the pathogen (less than 1%), which means that \u2013if the vaccines don\u2019t work\u2013 they are, in effect, useless.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s a longer explanation that some readers might find overly technical and perhaps tedious, but it\u2019s worth wading through in order to see that the media is deliberately misstating the science to terrify the public. This excerpt is from an article by Yeadon. Here\u2019s what he said:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe idea is planted in people\u2019s mind that this virus is mutating in such a way as to evade prior immunity. This is completely unfounded,<\/strong> certainly as regards immunity..(that is) gained naturally, after repelling the virus \u2026.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s important to appreciate that upon infection, the human immune system cuts up an infectious agent into short pieces. Each of these short pieces of protein are presented to other cells in the immune system, like an identity parade. \u2026These have a range of functions. Some make antibodies & others are programmed to kill cells infected by the virus, recognized by displaying on their surface signals that tell the body that they\u2019ve been invaded.<\/p>\n

In almost all cases,\u2026 this smart adaptive system overcomes the infection. Crucially\u2026 this event leaves you with many different kinds of long-lived \u2018memory\u2019 cells which, if you\u2019re infected again, rapidly wipe out any attempt at reinfection. So, you won\u2019t again be made ill by the same virus, and because the virus is simply not permitted to replicate, you are also no longer able to participate in transmission<\/strong>\u2026.<\/p>\n

The general \u2018direction of travel\u2019 (for viruses) is to become less injurious but easier to transmit<\/strong>, eventually joining the other 40 or so viruses which cause what we collectively term \u2018the common cold\u201d.<\/p>\n

What generally doesn\u2019t happen is for mutants to become more lethal<\/strong> to the hosts (us). But the key point I wanted to get across is just how large SARS-COV-2 is. I recall it\u2019s of the order of 30,000 letters of genetic code which, when translated, make around 10,000 amino acids in several viral proteins. Now you can see that the kinds of numbers of changes in the letters of the genetic code are truly tiny in comparison with the whole. 30 letter changes might be roughly 0.1% of the virus\u2019s code. In other words, 99.9% of that code is not different from the so-called Wuhan strain. Similarly, the changes in the protein translated from those letter code alterations are overwhelmed by the vast majority of the unchanged protein sequences. So your immune system, recognizing as it does perhaps dozens of short pieces\u2026. will not be fooled by a couple of small changes to a tiny fraction of these. No: your immune system knows immediately that this is an invader it\u2019s seen before, and has no difficulty whatsoever in dealing with it swiftly & without symptoms. So, it\u2019s a scientifically invalid\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2026 even if mutations did change a couple of these, the majority of the pieces\u2026. of the mutated virus will still be unchanged & recognized by the vaccine-immune system or the virus-infected immune system & a prompt, vigorous response will still protect you<\/strong>.\u201d (\u201cVariants, Covid\u201d,<\/a> Michael Yeadon, My Thread Reader)<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s summarize:<\/p>\n

We have presented the informed views of three reputable scientists all of who explicitly refute the idea that the so called \u201cvariants\u201d:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Are more lethal<\/li>\n
  2. Have the potential to reinfect people who have already had Covid<\/li>\n
  3. Have mutated enough to reinfect people who have already been vaccinated (unless, of course) the vaccine does not provide broad-based immunity to begin with. (which is possible since Phase 3 long-term trials were never conducted.)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    So, why are the public health officials and the media lying about this matter which is fairly clear-cut and uncontroversial? That is the question.<\/p>\n

    Yeadon concludes that there is something flagrantly diabolical about their denial. He thinks they are lying in order to dupe more people into getting injected with a substance that will either render them infertile, cause them great bodily harm or kill them outright. Take your pick. Here\u2019s more:<\/p>\n

    \u201cThe eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power and this is a really artful way of getting you to line-up and receive some unspecified thing that will damage you<\/strong>. I have no idea what it will actually be, but it won\u2019t be a vaccine because you don\u2019t need one. And it won\u2019t kill you on the end of the needle because you would spot that.<\/p>\n

    \u201cIt could be something that will produce normal pathology, it will be at various times between vaccination and the event, it will be plausibly deniable because there will be something else going on in the world at that time,<\/strong> in the context of which your demise, or that of your children will look normal.<\/p>\n

    \u201cThat\u2019s what I would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world\u2019s population. And I think that\u2019s what they\u2019re doing.\u201d (LifeSite<\/a>)<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \u201cThe eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power\u201d?<\/p>\n

    Has Yeadon gone mad? Has the pressure of the global pandemic pushed him off the deep end or is he \u2018on to something\u2019 big, something that no one even dares to even think about; a plan so dark and sinister that its implementation would constitute the most grievous and coldblooded crime against humanity of all time; the injection of billions of people with a toxic elixir whose spike protein dramatically compromises their immune systems clearing the way for agonizing widespread suffering followed by mountains of carnage?<\/p>\n

    There are others, however, who see a connection between the current vaccination campaign and \u201cthe eugenicists\u201d, in fact, Dr. Joseph Mercola points to the link between the lead developer of the AstraZeneca vaccine, Adrian Hill, and the Eugenics movement. According to Mercola:<\/p>\n

    \u201cHill gave a lecture at the Galton Institute (which was known as the U.K. Eugenics Society) in 2008 for its 100-year anniversary. As noted in Webb\u2019s article:8<\/p>\n

    \u201cArguably most troubling of all is the direct link of the vaccine\u2019s lead developers to the Wellcome Trust and, in the case of Adrian Hill, the Galton Institute, two groups with longstanding ties to the UK eugenics movement.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The latter organization, named for the \u2018father of eugenics\u2019 Francis Galton, is the renamed U.K. Eugenics Society, a group notorious for over a century for its promotion of racist pseudoscience and efforts to \u2018improve racial stock\u2019 by reducing the population of those deemed inferior.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The ties of Adrian Hill to the Galton Institute should raise obvious concerns given the push to make the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine he developed with [Sarah] Gilbert the vaccine of choice for the developing world, particularly countries in Latin America, South and Southeast Asia, and Africa, the very areas where the Galton Institute\u2019s past members have called for reducing population growth \u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Emeritus professor of molecular genetics at the Galton Institute and one of its officers is none other than David J. Galton, whose work includes \u2018Eugenics: The Future of Human Life in the 21st Century.\u2019<\/p>\n

    David Galton has written that the Human Genome Mapping Project\u2026 had \u2018enormously increased \u2026 the scope for eugenics \u2026 because of the development of a very powerful technology for the manipulation of DNA.\u2019<\/p>\n

    This new \u2018wider definition of eugenics,\u2019 Galton has said, \u2018would cover methods of regulating population numbers as well as improving genome quality by selective artificial insemination by donor, gene therapy or gene manipulation of germ-line cells.\u2019<\/strong> In expanding on this new definition, Galton is neutral as to \u2018whether some methods should be made compulsory by the state, or left entirely to the personal choice of the individual\u2026.<\/p>\n

    \u201cThe Wellcome Centre regularly cofunds the research and development of vaccines and birth control methods with \u2026. a foundation (name withheld) that actively and admittedly engages in population and reproductive control in Africa and South Asia by, among other things, prioritizing the widespread distribution of injectable long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs).<\/p>\n

    The Wellcome Trust has also directly funded studies that sought to develop methods to \u2018improve uptake\u2019 of LARCs in places such as rural Rwanda\u2026.\u2019 LARCs afford women in the Global South \u2018the least choice possible short of actual sterilization.\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Some LARCs can render women infertile for as long as five years, and, as Levich argues, they \u2018leave far more control in the hands of providers, and less in the hands of women, than condoms, oral contraceptives, or traditional methods.\u2019\u2026<\/p>\n

    Slightly modified and rebranded as Jadelle, the dangerous drug was promoted in Africa\u2026 Formerly named the Sterilization League for Human Betterment, EngenderHealth\u2019s original mission, inspired by racial eugenics, was to \u2018improve the biological stock of the human race.’\u201d<\/strong> (\u201cExploring the Oxford-AstraZeneca Eugenics Links\u201d<\/a>, Mercola.com)<\/p>\n

    So, how does \u201ceugenics\u201d factor into the creation and distribution of the mRNA vaccine? Is there a link or are we grasping at straws?<\/p>\n

    We can\u2019t answer that question, but a recent article by Mathew Ehret at The Off-Guardian provides a few interesting clues. Here\u2019s what he said:<\/p>\n

    \u201cThe fact that the organizations promoting the rise of this eugenics policy throughout Nazi Germany and North America included such powerhouses as the Rockefeller Foundation, the Wellcome Trust and the Human Sterilization League for Human Betterment\u2026 which have all taken leading roles in the World Health Organization over recent decades is more than a little concerning.<\/p>\n

    The fact that these eugenics organizations simply re-branded themselves after WWII and are now implicated in modern RNA vaccine development alongside the Galton Institute (formerly British Eugenics Association), Oxford\u2019s AstraZeneca, Pfizer and the\u2026. Foundation should give any serious thinker pause as we consider what patterns of history we are willing to tolerate repeating in our presently precarious age.\u201d <\/strong>(\u201cNazi Healthcare Revived Across the Five Eyes: Killing Useless Eaters and Biden\u2019s COVID Relief Bill\u201d,<\/a> The Off-Guardian)<\/p>\n

    We\u2019ll end this piece with an excerpt from a 2010 article by Andrew Gavin Marshall at Global Research
    \nwho presciently noted that:<\/p>\n

    \u201cEugenics is about the social organization and control of humanity\u2026. (particularly) population control<\/strong>\u2026.<\/p>\n

    The ideas of Malthus, and later Herbert Spencer and Charles Darwin were remolded into branding an elite ideology of \u201cSocial Darwinism\u201d,<\/strong> which was \u201cthe notion that in the struggle to survive in a harsh world, many humans were not only less worthy,<\/strong> many were actually destined to wither away as a rite of progress. To preserve the weak and the needy was, in essence, an unnatural act.\u201d This theory simply justified the immense wealth, power and domination of a small elite over the rest of humanity, as that elite saw themselves as the only truly intelligent beings worthy of holding such power and privilege.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Francis Galton later coined the term \u201ceugenics\u201d to describe this emerging field. His followers believed that the \u2018genetically unfit\u2019 \u201cwould have to be wiped away,\u201d<\/strong> using tactics such as, \u201csegregation, deportation, castration, marriage prohibition, compulsory sterilization, passive euthanasia \u2013 and ultimately extermination.\u201d\u2026 Sir Julian Huxley was also a life trustee of the British Eugenics Society from 1925, and its President from 1959-62. \u2026 \u201cHuxley believed that eugenics would one day be seen as the way forward for the human race,\u201d and that, \u201cA catastrophic event may be needed for evolution to move at an accelerated pace.\u201d\u2026<\/strong>. It is much the same with ideas whose time has not yet come; they must survive periods when they are not generally welcome.\u201d<\/p>\n

    The 21st-century technologies are so powerful that they can spawn whole new classes of accidents and abuses. Most dangerously, for the first time, these accidents and abuses are widely within the reach of individuals or small groups<\/strong>. They will not require large facilities or rare raw materials. Knowledge alone will enable the use of them\u2026. I think it is no exaggeration to say we are on the cusp of the further perfection of extreme evil, an evil whose possibility spreads well beyond that which weapons of mass destruction bequeathed to the nation-states, on to a surprising and terrible empowerment of extreme individuals.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \u2026.<\/strong> Due to improved techniques the elite will have greater control over the masses; and because human work will no longer be necessary the masses will be superfluous, a useless burden on the system. If the elite is ruthless they may simply decide to exterminate the mass of humanity<\/strong>. If they are humane they may use propaganda or other psychological or biological techniques to reduce the birth rate until the mass of humanity becomes extinct, leaving the world to the elite\u2026.<\/p>\n

    A horrifying vision indeed; but one which builds upon the ideas of Huxley, Russell and Brzezinski, who envisioned a people who \u2013 through biological and psychological means \u2013 are made to love their own servitude. Huxley saw the emergence of a world in which humanity, still a wild animal, is domesticated; where only the elite remain wild and have freedom to make decisions, while the masses are domesticated like pets. Huxley opined that, \u201cMen and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.\u201d<\/strong> (\u201cNew Eugenics and the Rise of the Global Scientific Dictatorship\u201d,<\/a> Andrew Gavin Marshall, Global Research)<\/p>\n

    We must ask ourselves whether the current mass vaccination campaign is a science-based effort to relieve sickness and disease or a fasttrack to a dark and frightening dystopia conjured up by evil men seeking to tighten their grip on all humanity?<\/p>\n

    Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Mike Yeadon is a former Vice President of Allergy and Respiratory Research at Pfizer. So when he says the \u201cgovernment and its advisers are lying \u2026 about everything to do with this coronavirus”, we should pay attention. Especially as he claims their ultimate objective is mass depopulation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":231685,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[19,61,105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-231683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Behind_The_News","category-Commentary","category-coronavirus"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=231683"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231683\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":231689,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231683\/revisions\/231689"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/231685"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=231683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=231683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=231683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}