{"id":228075,"date":"2021-02-24T08:31:50","date_gmt":"2021-02-24T08:31:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=228075"},"modified":"2021-02-26T07:49:49","modified_gmt":"2021-02-26T07:49:49","slug":"the-u-s-air-force-just-admitted-the-f-35-stealth-fighter-has-failed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=228075","title":{"rendered":"The U.S. Air Force Just Admitted The F-35 Stealth Fighter Has Failed"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>David Axe \u2013 Forbes Feb 23, 2021<\/strong><\/h1>\n<div id=\"attachment_119474\" style=\"width: 654px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Two-F35-jets.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-119474\" class=\"size-full wp-image-119474\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Two-F35-jets.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"644\" height=\"362\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Two-F35-jets.jpg 644w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Two-F35-jets-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 644px) 100vw, 644px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-119474\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Two U.S. Marine F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters complete vertical landings aboard the USS Wasp (LHD-1) during operational testing May 18, 2015. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The U.S. Air Force\u2019s top officer wants the service to develop an affordable, lightweight fighter to replace hundreds of Cold War-vintage F-16s and complement a small fleet of sophisticated\u2014but costly and unreliable\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/davidaxe\/2020\/07\/01\/how-many-stealth-warplanes-are-there-in-the-world-and-who-has-them\/?sh=efbcaa762e30\" data-ga-track=\"InternalLink:https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/davidaxe\/2020\/07\/01\/how-many-stealth-warplanes-are-there-in-the-world-and-who-has-them\/?sh=efbcaa762e30\" aria-label=\"stealth fighters\">stealth fighters<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The result would be a high-low mix of expensive \u201cfifth-generation\u201d F-22s and F-35s and inexpensive \u201cfifth-generation-minus\u201d jets, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.airforcemag.com\/brown-launching-major-tacair-study-with-cape-considering-5th-gen-minus\/\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/www.airforcemag.com\/brown-launching-major-tacair-study-with-cape-considering-5th-gen-minus\/\" aria-label=\"explained\">explained<\/a> Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Brown Jr.<\/p>\n<p>If that plan sounds familiar, it\u2019s because the Air Force <em>a generation ago<\/em> launched development of an affordable, lightweight fighter to replace hundreds of Cold War-vintage F-16s and complement a small future fleet of sophisticated\u2014but costly and unreliable\u2014stealth fighters.<\/p>\n<p>But over 20 years of R&amp;D, that lightweight replacement fighter got heavier and more expensive as the Air Force and lead contractor Lockheed Martin <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/companies\/lockheed-martin\" data-ga-track=\"Ticker:LMT\" data-vars-event-label=\"ticker:LMT\" aria-label=\"LMT\">LMT<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/companies\/lockheed-martin\" data-ga-track=\"InternalLink:https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/companies\/lockheed-martin\" aria-label=\"LMT\">+0.9%<\/a> packed it with more and more new technology.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, we\u2019re talking about the F-35. The 25-ton stealth warplane has become the very problem it was supposed to solve. And now America needs a <em>new <\/em>fighter to solve that F-35 problem, officials said.<\/p>\n<p>With a sticker price of around $100 million per plane, including the engine, the F-35 is expensive. While stealthy and brimming with high-tech sensors, it\u2019s also maintenance-intensive, buggy and unreliable. \u201cThe F-35 is not a low-cost, lightweight fighter,\u201d said Dan Ward, a former Air Force program manager and the author of popular business books including <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Simplicity-Cycle-Making-Things-Without\/dp\/0062301977\/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&amp;keywords=Dan+Ward&amp;qid=1614026979&amp;sr=8-2\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Simplicity-Cycle-Making-Things-Without\/dp\/0062301977\/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&amp;keywords=Dan+Ward&amp;qid=1614026979&amp;sr=8-2\" aria-label=\"The Simplicity Cycle\"><em data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Simplicity-Cycle-Making-Things-Without\/dp\/0062301977\/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&amp;keywords=Dan+Ward&amp;qid=1614026979&amp;sr=8-2\">The Simplicity Cycle<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The F-35 is a Ferrari, Brown told reporters last Wednesday. \u201cYou don\u2019t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays. This is our \u2018high end\u2019 [fighter], we want to make sure we don\u2019t use it all for the low-end fight.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI want to moderate how much we\u2019re using those aircraft,\u201d Brown said.<\/p>\n<p>Hence the need for a new low-end fighter to pick up the slack in day-to-day operations. Today, the Air Force\u2019s roughly 1,000 F-16s meet that need. But the flying branch hasn\u2019t bought a new F-16 from Lockheed since 2001. The F-16s are <em>old<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>In his last interview before leaving his post in January, Will Roper, the Air Force\u2019s top acquisition official, <a href=\"https:\/\/aviationweek.com\/defense-space\/aircraft-propulsion\/us-air-force-talks-new-f-16-orders-latest-acquisition-shake\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/aviationweek.com\/defense-space\/aircraft-propulsion\/us-air-force-talks-new-f-16-orders-latest-acquisition-shake\" aria-label=\"floated the idea\">floated the idea<\/a> of new F-16 orders. But Brown shot down the idea, saying he doesn\u2019t want more of the classic planes.<\/p>\n<p>The 17-ton, non-stealthy F-16 is too difficult to upgrade with the latest software, Brown explained. Instead of ordering fresh F-16s, he said, the Air Force should initiate a \u201cclean-sheet design\u201d for a new low-end fighter.<\/p>\n<p>Brown\u2019s comments are a tacit admission that the F-35 has failed. As conceived in the 1990s, the program was supposed to produce thousands of fighters to displace almost all of the existing tactical warplanes in the inventories of the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.<\/p>\n<p>The Air Force alone wanted nearly 1,800 F-35s to replace aging F-16s and A-10s and constitute the low end of a low-high fighter mix, with 180 twin-engine F-22s making up the high end.<\/p>\n<p>But the Air Force and Lockheed baked failure into the F-35\u2019s very concept. \u201cThey tried to make the F-35 do too much,\u201d said Dan Grazier, an analyst with the Project on Government Oversight in Washington, D.C.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s a small-wing version for land-based operations, a big-wing version for the Navy\u2019s catapult-equipped aircraft carriers and, for the small-deck assault ships the Marines ride in, a vertical-landing model with a downward-blasting lift engine.<\/p>\n<p>The complexity added cost. Rising costs imposed delays. Delays gave developers more time to add yet more complexity to the design. Those additions added more cost. Those costs resulted in more delays. So on and so forth.<\/p>\n<p>Fifteen years after the F-35\u2019s first flight, the Air Force has just 250 of the jets. Now the service is signaling possible cuts to the program. It\u2019s not for no reason that Brown has begun characterizing the F-35 as a boutique, high-end fighter in the class of the F-22. The Air Force ended F-22 production after completing just 195 copies.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe F-35 is approaching a crossroads,\u201d Grazier said.<\/p>\n<p>Pentagon leaders have hinted that, as part of the U.S. military\u2019s shift in focus toward peer threats\u2014that is, Russia and China\u2014the Navy and Air Force might get bigger shares of the U.S. military\u2019s roughly $700-billion annual budget. All at the Army\u2019s expense.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf we\u2019re going to pull the trigger on a new fighter, now\u2019s probably the time,\u201d Grazier said. The Air Force could end F-35 production after just a few hundred examples and redirect tens of billions of dollars to a new fighter program.<\/p>\n<p>But it\u2019s an open question whether the Air Force will ever succeed in developing a light, cheap fighter. The <em>new <\/em>low-end jet could suffer the same fate as the <em>last<\/em> low-end jet\u2014the F-35\u2014and steadily gain weight, complexity and cost until it becomes, well, a <em>high-end<\/em> jet.<\/p>\n<p>If that happens, as it\u2019s happened before, then some future Air Force chief of staff might tell reporters\u2014in, say, the year 2041\u2014that the new F-36 is a Ferrari and you don\u2019t drive your Ferrari to work every day.<\/p>\n<p>To finally replace its 60-year-old F-16s, this future general might say, the Air Force should develop an affordable, lightweight fighter.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/davidaxe\/2021\/02\/23\/the-us-air-force-just-admitted-the-f-35-stealth-fighter-has-failed\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A top U.S. Air Force officer wants an inexpensive and reliable fighter developed to operate as an alternative to the expensive, and unreliable, F-35 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[58,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Current_Affairs","category-Fringe_Science_New_Discoveries_and_Developments"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=228075"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228075\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":228480,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228075\/revisions\/228480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=228075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=228075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=228075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}