{"id":226416,"date":"2021-01-29T08:48:58","date_gmt":"2021-01-29T08:48:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=226416"},"modified":"2021-02-03T04:58:48","modified_gmt":"2021-02-03T04:58:48","slug":"there-is-no-pandemic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=226416","title":{"rendered":"There is No Pandemic"},"content":{"rendered":"

Nick Kollerstrom \u2013 Terror on the Tube Jan 28, 2021<\/strong><\/h1>\n

A British View of the Imposture<\/strong><\/h2>\n
2020 saw 14% more deaths than average, last year in England & Wales and that amounted to seventy-five thousand extra deaths. We here use the Office of National statistics<\/a><\/span> figures, as it gives total weekly deaths, and it also gives an average value of corresponding weekly deaths over the previous five years.[1]<\/a><\/h5>\n
That compares with the figure of ninety thousand deaths<\/a><\/span> for the entire United Kingdom that year, due allegedly to covid-19.<\/h5>\n
We here ask and answer the question, what caused that excess of deaths<\/em>? The answer will not be certain, but will be the simplest possible explanation. By Occam\u2019s razor we are obliged to take it.<\/h5>\n
For the first quarter of last year, deaths in England and Wales were down<\/em>: for whatever reason, overall weekly mortality was 3% below<\/em> the yearly average. Then around the spring equinox on March 23rd<\/sup> Lockdown was announced and suddenly, deaths surged right up so that thousands of extra deaths started happening week after week. That continued all through April and May and then finally, in the first week of June Britons were allowed out again: with relief we could walk the streets and parks, cafes and pubs opened up again.<\/h5>\n
Those months of Lockdown saw fifty-nine thousand<\/em> excess deaths, see graph. (That comes from counting the eleven weeks ending 27 March to the 5th<\/sup> June, as being the lockdown period.)<\/h5>\n
The question arises as to what caused them? Could it have been, for example, the shock? The month of April averaged ninety percent<\/em> more deaths than usual! Then May was not quite so bad, as folk got used to the grim new reality.<\/h5>\n
In the weeks after the Lockdown i.e. after the first week of June the whole excess of deaths suddenly vanished. Over the next four months deaths remained exactly average<\/em> compared to previous years.<\/h5>\n
The graph shows this distinct, three-stage process.<\/h5>\n
Total deaths data for weeks ending \u2013<\/u><\/h5>\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 2020 \/ 2015-19 average<\/h5>\n
3 Jan \u2013 20 Mar\u00a0 12 weeks\u00a0 \u00a0138,916 \/ 143,738\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2013 4,822\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 -3%<\/h5>\n
27 Mar \u2013 5 Jun\u00a0 \u00a011 weeks\u00a0 168,396 \/ 109,703\u00a0 \u00a0+ 58,693\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 +54%\u00a0\u00a0 LOCKDOWN<\/h5>\n
12 Jun \u2013 9 Oct\u00a0 \u00a018 weeks\u00a0 \u00a0 166,392 \/ 165,808\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0+ 584\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 0%<\/h5>\n
These figures suggest that it is the lockdown itself and not any virus, that caused the excess deaths.<\/h5>\n
We\u2019re here reminded of a careful survey done last May<\/a><\/span> which found that, in all countries with reliable death-figures, their increase in mortality began after the lockdown<\/a><\/span> was imposed and not before. There is a simple difference between cause and effect: the cause comes first, before the effect!<\/h5>\n
A second Lockdown was imposed over the month of November. This lacked the same terror and shock value of the first and so only reached a net 18% excess of mortality: for the five weeks from week ending 6 November to that of 4th December there were nine thousand excess deaths, compared to the seasonal average.<\/h5>\n
\"\"<\/a>

Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

Figure<\/u>: weekly data from the Office of National Statistics for 2020, comparing total mortality per week with its estimated average from the previous five years.<\/h5>\n
After the autumn equinox as the nights grew longer the government again started to terrorise the population with talk of the \u2018dark winter\u2019 to come. Somehow they knew that a \u2018second wave\u2019 was coming, and so there would have to be a \u2018second lockdown\u2019 and no Christmas. Here\u2019s what I predicted in a <\/span>podcast<\/span> on 20th<\/sup> October<\/span><\/a>:<\/h5>\n
“They are trying to resuscitate another big scare, trying to claim there is a second wave \u2026 come this autumn, they have started drumming up fear again, they have imposed these levels of Lockdown which are rather terrifying. A lot of stress they are putting on people, I\u2019ve been wondering, are the deaths going to go up again like last time?”<\/h5>\n
Did that happen? The figures show as before a surge around the time of the lockdown and just before it, however this time it did not vanish after the lockdown. That\u2019s because there was not really any easing up. On the contrary yet more draconian measures were announced, with the unheard-of measure of police stopping people walking outdoors, to ask them if they had good reason to be out of their house? Meeting friends was forbidden, etc. That pressure pushed up the mortality even more and we here especially note the \u2018Christmas week\u2019 ending 25th<\/sup> December, with a whopping 45% excess mortality! That is not a merry Christmas, it\u2019s an extra three and a half thousand people popping off (as compared to previous years) in a week, caused presumably by shock and despair of Xmas being cancelled. The week after that it was still very high, 26% excess, as folk faced the bleak new year.<\/h5>\n
It helps to express that excess mortality as overall monthly means, for the last few months of 2020. Thus taking each month as a whole and selecting four weeks of data for each month:<\/h5>\n
September\u00a0\u00a0 from weeks ending 11 Sept to\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Oct.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 +4%<\/h5>\n
October\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Oct\u00a0\u00a0 to\u00a0 30th<\/sup> Oct\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 +7%<\/h5>\n
November\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a06 Nov\u00a0\u00a0 to\u00a0 27\u00a0\u00a0 Nov\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 +18%<\/h5>\n
December\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4 Dec\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 to\u00a0\u00a0 1st<\/sup>\u00a0 Jan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 +21%<\/h5>\n
Slowly the excess deaths (comparing, as before, with previous years) have increased through the autumn and winter. The month of December had ten thousand extra deaths. Should one take the government\u2019s view, that these deaths were caused by<\/em> the CV19 virus, and that the increasingly severe restrictions were a necessary response to \u2018contain\u2019 the spread of this virus? A simpler hypothesis would be that there is no virus killing people, whereas the stress of bankruptcy, solitude, loneliness, etc. imposed by government edicts really has been killing people. Thus for example \u2018tier 4\u2019 was announced on 19th<\/sup> December for large parts of England and that resulted in<\/em> the highest mortality for the week following. That knockout blow to everyone\u2019s Christmas \u2013 never banned since the days of Oliver Cromwell \u2013 had the deep impact, driving up the mortality index.<\/h5>\n
Overall it would appear to be the government\u2019s lockdown policy that has been killing people and not some new disease. Stress, loneliness, fear and despair have been causing<\/em> the excess of deaths: together with emptying out of hospitals, especially of old folk and cancellation of normal services because of the \u2018pandemic.\u2019 If the government knows this, then it is a population-reduction program.<\/h5>\n
A recent US Centre for Disease Control report<\/a><\/span> agreed with the approach we\u2019ve here taken, that the significance of CV19 can only be appreciated in terms of total mortality. Published on the John Hopkins University website on 22nd<\/sup> November (but soon removed), it endorses the view that no virus is killing people, any more than normal flu, whereas deaths from other causes are being re-classified as Covid19:<\/h5>\n
According to\u00a0new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master\u2019s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled \u201cCOVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.\u201d<\/h5>\n
From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.<\/h5>\n
She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.<\/h5>\n
After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.<\/h5>\n
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.<\/h5>\n
\u201cThe reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,\u201d Briand said.<\/h5>\n
Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/h5>\n
These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people\u2019s assumptions,\u00a0the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming.\u00a0In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States\u2026<\/em><\/strong><\/h5>\n
When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.<\/h5>\n
This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below,\u00a0the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19.\u00a0<\/strong>This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19.\u00a0<\/em><\/h5>\n
Based on this analysis, the best way to end the ongoing mass-killing of elderly Britons would be to terminate the lockdowns and resume normal life. As Dr Simone Gold (of Frontline Doctors ) well explained<\/a><\/span>, CV19 is just \u2018killing\u2019 elderly people who were about to die anyhow. It cannot be shown that \u2018having\u2019 CV19 i.e. testing PCR-\u2018positive\u2019 contributed to shortening their life. So that isn\u2019t a causal connection, i.e. the alleged illness has not \u2018caused\u2019 their death. That\u2019s why the age-distribution of CV-19 is indistinguishable from that of the normal population.<\/h5>\n
The average age of death in England & Wales is 81.5 years, while the average age of \u2018Covid-19 fatalities\u2019 is 82.4 years<\/span><\/a> (ONS data). What this tells us is very simple: the disease does not exist.<\/em><\/h5>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 The concept of PCR \u2018testing\u2019 has always been fraudulent<\/a><\/span>. The so-called PCR \u2018test\u2019 multiplies up fragments of nucleotide-chains and the number of \u2018positive\u2019 cases depends on the multiplication factor<\/span><\/a> used as well as how many persons are tested. There will never come a time when the virus is \u2018cured\u2019 or \u2018solved\u2019 or whatever people imagine the government is trying to do (if it knows!), such that the PCR test ceases to generate \u2018positive\u2019 tests. No-one will ever give you evidence that people who test \u2018positive\u2019 get ill more often than others. Is there an aim of government policy, aside from terrorising the populace? Is it to kill the virus? That can never happen because the virus isn\u2019t alive.<\/h5>\n
The World Health Organization has now backtracked over the PCR \u2018test\u2019, saying (January 13th<\/sup>) it is merely a diagnostic tool<\/span><\/a> that can assist. It now advises \u2013<\/h5>\n
“Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.”<\/h5>\n
In other words, a single PCR test should not be used<\/em> for diagnosing Sars-Cov-2 infection. It\u2019s merely a guide!<\/h5>\n
“Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”<\/h5>\n
So we finally have it that the PCR cannot be relied<\/em> upon a diagnostic test. Which is exactly what its inventor Kary Mullis said. So forget all of the figures you\u2019ve heard about \u2018cases\u2019 and \u2018covid deaths\u2019 \u2013 they cannot be relied upon.<\/h5>\n
\"\"<\/a>

Alexander Myasnikov was appointed in April to his new role of informing Russians about coronavirus treatment and prevention methods and to battle \u201cfake news\u201d about Covid-19<\/p><\/div>\n

If one did want to believe there was a disease associated with this virus, then surely we\u2019d agree with Dr Alexander Myasnikov, appointed last year as Russia\u2019s chief medical advisor.\u00a0 In an interview he explained<\/a><\/span> how the world had greatly over-reacted to the CV19 story and death numbers in the West were greatly over-counted. He added:<\/h5>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s all exaggerated. It\u2019s an acute respiratory disease with minimal mortality.\u201d<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Thus the former <\/strong>Chief Medical Officer of Ontario has recently challenged his government\u2019s policy<\/span><\/a> saying, \u201cWe\u2019re Being Locked-down for an Infection Fatality Rate of Less than 0.2%?\u201d and the lockdown is not \u201csupported by strong science.\u201d He here means, that for those who test PCR-positive one in five hundred will die. The time-period here involved needs to be defined, eg it could be one month: we all die, and given the median age of alleged-CV19 deaths is around 80 that could well be a normal rate of mortality \u2013 especially if they are PCR-testing everyone admitted to hospitals.<\/h5>\n
Last November a Cornish nurse went public<\/span>,<\/a> saying the hospital wards had been empty over months when it was claimed they were overflowing. She said whenever they had flu patients they were classified as Covid: \u2018flu and Covid cases are now recorded as \u2018the same thing\u2019 on death certificates.\u2019 That wouldn\u2019t be necessary if the disease really existed. Not surprisingly, the flu this winter has mysteriously vanished<\/a><\/span>. One woman who walked round her local hospital filming its empty wards was arrested by police<\/a> entering her home the next day.<\/h5>\n
The virus itself cannot be shown to exist, by which we mean that it cannot be reliably differentiated from all the other normal coronaviruses, that have been with us since time began. It has <\/strong>never been isolated,<\/em> let\u2019s be clear about that. Last April an <\/strong>EU science department admitted<\/span><\/a>:<\/strong><\/h5>\n
\u201cNo virus isolates with a quantified amount of the SARS-CoV-2<\/em> are currently available \u2026\u201d<\/h5>\n
And the same thing was echoed a few months later by the US Centre for Disease Control:<\/h5>\n
\u201cSince no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available<\/em>, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA\u2026\u201d[2]<\/a><\/h5>\n
In other words, nobody can hold a test-tube or petri-dish and say, \u2018Here is COVID-19.\u2019 Published gene-sequences of the alleged virus are mere hypothetic constructs. Yes some disease broke out in Wuhan in November 2019 and yes the Chinese authorities published a gene-sequence allegedly of it, but so what?<\/h5>\n

Fear Porn Promotion<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The government needs your fear. It wants your attention but<\/em> knows that it has no prospect of improving your life in any way. Thus we have a health minister who knows nothing about health or well-being: he can get your attention by telling you that you won\u2019t be able to fly without a vaccine. They need your fear,<\/em> and in the last century the government was able to arouse your fear by threatening to press the nuclear button. That doesn\u2019t work any more. The UK govts latest exercise in fear-porn advises citizens to behave as if they are ill<\/em>.\u00a0 (\u2018Act like you\u2019ve got it\u2019) Yes, that sounds just like how to promote health.<\/h5>\n
It further promotes the diabolical idea that perfectly healthy persons can transmit disease (\u2018anyone can spread it\u2019). Here one could quote the WHO expert Dr Maria van Kerkhove: \u2018From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onwards to a\u00a0secondary individual. Its very rare.\u2019 (Head of the WHO Emerging disease and zoonosis unit at a news briefing from the UN agency\u2019s headquarters at Geneva,\u00a0 6.6.20). Admittedly she was pressured to backpedal and retract, but she did say it.[3]<\/a><\/h5>\n
\"\"<\/a><\/h5>\n
In the words of the Daily Mail<\/em>, \u2018Terrifying new TV ads\u2019 are being promoted by the Government (23 Jan 2021) <\/strong>The above fear-porn promotion is through the US media agency Omnigov, who signed a\u00a0\u00a3<\/strong>110 million Lockdown advertising deal<\/a> <\/span>\u2013 on March 2nd<\/sup>, three weeks before <\/em>the Lockdown.<\/h5>\n
\"\"<\/a><\/h5>\n
The journalist Neil Clark commented<\/strong>[4]<\/a> on \u2018the report in the Daily Telegraph<\/em> newspaper<\/a><\/span> that the UK government struck a deal worth \u00a3119m with an American advertising company, OMD Group, urging people to \u2018Stay Home, Stay Safe\u2019 a full three weeks before Boris Johnson ordered a lockdown. Think about what this means.\u2019 \u00a0That meme \u2018Stay home Stay safe\u2019 would have been blueprinted the previous year at the US \u2018Event 201\u2019 by Bill Gates <\/strong>et. al.<\/em> Fear blocks out rational, coherent thought which is why the government needs it. <\/strong><\/h5>\n
People may be forgetting how debilitating winter flu can be and how it can last for weeks. Now they want to call it COVID. Let\u2019s here support Prof. Dolores Cahill, who has been looking at the sequencing of PCR testing. In Ireland it was found that of fifteen hundred PCR tests \u2018all of them were influenza A and B, not one of them were SARS-COV2.\u2019 Her group will be seeking legal action where the tests come back as influenza rather than the specific CV19 and doctors can be sued for medical negligence. (<\/strong>Corbett Report,<\/span><\/a> 23 mins<\/span>) That sounds like a promising way of dealing with this phantomic virus.<\/strong><\/h5>\n
\"\"<\/a><\/h5>\n
\u2018Is this an epidemic of despair?\u2019 asked that perceptive commentator <\/strong>Peter Hitchins<\/span><\/a>.<\/span> Scientists are trained not to take notice of emotions and instead to look for material things as causative agents, whereas here we agree with Peter Hitchens that the negative soul-conditions of the populace caused by government policies are leading to death. Hitchens\u2019 article quotes <\/strong>the distinguished professor of medical microbiology, Sucharit Bhakdi:<\/h5>\n
\u2018He said that older people had the right to make efforts to stay fit, active, busy and healthy. But he warned that the shutdown of society would condemn them to early death by preventing this.<\/h5>\n
\u2018Social contacts and social events, theatre and music, travel and holiday recreation, sports and hobbies, all help to prolong their stay on earth. The life expectancy of millions is being shortened.\u2019<\/h5>\n
In a prediction that has turned out to be terribly accurate, he added: \u2018The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences for medical care are profound. Already services to patients who are in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.\u2019<\/h5>\n
That is what is killing people, there is no other pandemic.<\/h5>\n
\"\"<\/a><\/h5>\n
For comparison let\u2019s end with a graph showing<\/a><\/span> the US weekly mortality rate over 2020. We see the very same effect, with a\u00a0deficit in mortality in the first months of the year, followed by the huge excess in April right after Lockdown.\u00a0This graph shows in red an excess of 280k deaths above normal-expected levels, following the lockdown. The web-page hosting this graph states \u2018The large spike in deaths in April 2020 corresponds to the coronavirus outbreak\u2019 but we here take a different view.<\/h5>\n
By way of contrast, Sweden had no lockdown,<\/em> and so\u00a0Swedish deaths right through 2020 remained\u00a0absolutely normal<\/a><\/span>\u00a0[5]. They had no excess mortality that year! What that demonstrates is very simple \u2013<\/h5>\n

there is no pandemic.<\/em><\/h3>\n
By Nick Kollerstrom<\/a>,\u00a0 PhD, author of The Great British coronavirus Hoax, A Sceptics view<\/em> (banned by Amazon.)<\/h5>\n
[1]<\/a> \u00a0Using fifty-two weeks i.e. 364 days of the year, from the week ending 3rd<\/sup> January 2020 to that of 1st<\/sup> January 2021. The ONS helpfully compares each week in 2020 with an average value of that week for 2015-9.\u00a0 To see data, click on the Excel spreadsheet, let it download, open it up & click on \u20182020 data.\u2019<\/h5>\n
[2]<\/a> CDC \u20182019-Novel Coronavirus Real-Time PCR Diagnostic Panel performance characteristics\u2019 p.39, 13.7.20. This has been scrubbed from the Web, but see BMJ response to it.<\/a><\/h5>\n
[3]<\/a> A huge Chinese study of ten million around Wuhan between May and June showed \u2018no evidence that positive cases without symptoms spread the disease\u2019: Nature<\/em>\u00a0 20.11.20 \u2018Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening\u2019.<\/h5>\n
[4]<\/a> RT \u2018Covid-19 reverse psychology\u2019 by Neil Clarke, 28.10.20, deleted but preserved on the Hugo Talks video<\/a><\/h5>\n
[5] Click \u2018Google Translate\u2019 on this link.<\/h5>\n
Source <\/a><\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The \u201cpandemic\u201d is a media\/government created phenomenon, argues Nick Kollerstrom, and the \u201cexcess deaths\u201d are the result of lockdowns, not Covid-19 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":134,"featured_media":224780,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Commentary","category-coronavirus"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/134"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=226416"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226416\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":226478,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226416\/revisions\/226478"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/224780"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=226416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=226416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=226416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}