{"id":224496,"date":"2021-01-06T09:09:37","date_gmt":"2021-01-06T09:09:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=224496"},"modified":"2021-01-08T07:23:04","modified_gmt":"2021-01-08T07:23:04","slug":"medical-weapons-of-mass-destruction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=224496","title":{"rendered":"Medical weapons of mass destruction"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Jon Rappoport \u2013 No More Fake News January 5, 2021<\/strong><\/h1>\n

(To join our email list, click here<\/a><\/u>.)<\/em><\/h3>\n

A continuing tradition, in which COVID is the latest example<\/h2>\n

After a hundred years of intense propaganda promoting the idea that diseases are everywhere, and each disease is caused by a single germ, which must be killed by a medical drug\u2026<\/p>\n

The fallout has been extreme, to say the least.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s start here:<\/p>\n

When will hysterical defenders of \u201cscience\u201d face up to the destruction the US medical system is causing?<\/p>\n

Millions of masked people, who border on hysteria, believe they know COVID science.<\/p>\n

On closer examination, these people believe what their television sets tell them. They believe Fauci because he\u2019s on television, and he\u2019s talking from the White House, and he disagrees with Trump.<\/p>\n

Of the millions who believe in Fauci television science, there are many who will say science is \u201cstudies.\u201d They are quite sure these studies back up what Fauci and Redfield are spouting, and any contradictory studies would be artifacts dreamed up by secret minions of Trump.<\/p>\n

I recently analyzed COVID-19 from the point of view of false data<\/a><\/u>.<\/p>\n

COVID case numbers and death numbers are being fraudulently inflated to the skies. That\u2019s an enormous crime, because the lockdowns and the economic devastation have been based on these data.<\/p>\n

Now I want to apply that same direct analysis to the entire US medical system. In this instance\u2026<\/p>\n

True data are buried, hidden, and ignored.<\/p>\n

What data? Actual numbers of deaths and maiming CAUSED by medical treatment.<\/p>\n

When you see the dimensions of this crime and this mass human tragedy, you\u2019ll also see further implications\u2014titanic insurance fraud, tax fraud, and, indeed, millions upon millions of work-hours irretrievably lost to the nation\u2019s economy.<\/p>\n

Insurance companies are paying out billions of dollars for medical treatment that is destructive, not helpful.<\/p>\n

Insurance companies are also paying billions in death benefits as a result of doctors, not diseases, killing people.<\/p>\n

And all this medical destruction is being subsidized by the taxpayer.<\/p>\n

No one has calculated the $$ cost. No one can calculate the tragic human cost.<\/p>\n

Now here is the analysis. Understand that the vital data in these mainstream reports have been briefly revealed, then hidden.<\/p>\n

ONE: \u201cThe Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs.\u201d The author is Donald Light, who teaches at Rowan University, and was the 2013 recipient of ASA\u2019s [American Sociological Association\u2019s] Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology. Light is a founding fellow of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. In 2013, he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard. He is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford University.<\/p>\n

Donald Light: \u201cEpidemiologically, appropriately prescribed, prescription drugs are the fourth leading cause of death, tied with stroke at about 2,460 deaths each week in the United States. About 330,000 patients die each year from prescription drugs in the United States and Europe. They [the drugs] cause an epidemic of about 20 times more hospitalizations [6.6 million annually], as well as falls, road accidents, and [annually] about 80 million medically minor problems such as pains, discomforts, and dysfunctions that hobble productivity or the ability to care for others. Deaths and adverse effects from overmedication, errors, and self-medication would increase these figures.\u201d (ASA publication, \u201cFootnotes,\u201d November 2014)<\/p>\n

TWO: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998: \u201cIncidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.\u201d<\/p>\n

The authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors had given them, met the following fate:<\/p>\n

Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.<\/p>\n

Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.<\/p>\n

The authors write: \u201c\u2026Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly prescribed and administered.\u201d<\/p>\n

So this study had nothing to do with doctor errors, nurse errors, or improper combining of drugs. And it only counted people killed or maimed who were admitted to hospitals. It didn\u2019t begin to tally all the people taking pharmaceuticals who died as consequence of the drugs, at home.<\/p>\n

THREE: July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; \u201cIs US health really the best in the world?\u201d<\/p>\n

Starfield reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans per year. 106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the numbers to a decade: that\u2019s 2.25 million deaths. You might want to read that last number again.<\/p>\n

I interviewed Starfield in 2009. I asked her whether she was aware of any overall effort by the US government to eliminate this holocaust. She answered a resounding NO. She also said her estimate of medically caused deaths in America was on the conservative side.<\/p>\n

FOUR: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: \u201cIt [the Institute] calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing \u2018serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

The report called this \u201cone of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.\u201d<\/p>\n

The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA\u2019s own database of \u201cserious adverse [medical-drug] events.\u201d<\/p>\n

Therefore, to say the FDA isn\u2019t aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn\u2019t saying anything about it, because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are routinely maiming and killing Americans. Every public health agency knows the truth.<\/p>\n

FIVE: None of the above reports factor in death or injury by vaccine.<\/p>\n

The US system for reporting severe adverse effects of vaccines is broken.<\/p>\n

Barbara Loe Fisher, of the private National Vaccine Information Center, has put together a reasonable analysis:<\/p>\n

\u201cBut how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it really only one in 110,000 or one in a million who are left permanently disabled after vaccination? Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse events following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, \u2018Introducing MEDWatch,\u2019 JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThere have been estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other serious health problems following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal sanctions for not reporting; doctors can refuse to report and suffer no consequences.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cEven so, each year about 12,000 reports are made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS]; parents as well as doctors can make those reports. [See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, \u2018Vaccine safety,\u2019 Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cHowever, if that number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then the actual number may be 120,000 vaccine-adverse events [per year]. If doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said they report prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1 percent of the actual total, then the real number may be 1.2 million vaccine-adverse events annually.\u201d<\/p>\n

Medical crimes.<\/p>\n

Medically caused deaths of friends, family members, loved ones, who are buried along with the truth.<\/p>\n

No criminal investigations, no prosecutions, no guilty verdicts, no prison sentences.<\/p>\n

But of course, you can believe everything leading lights of the US medical system tell you about COVID.<\/p>\n

You can believe everything the press\u2014who buries the truth about this medical holocaust\u2014tells you about COVID.<\/p>\n

Given the reports on medically caused death and maiming I\u2019ve just cited and described in this article, it\u2019s obvious that\u2026<\/p>\n

Leading medical journals around the world, which routinely publish glowing accounts of clinical trials of medical drugs\u2026<\/p>\n

Are spilling over with rank fraud, on page after page.<\/p>\n

Indeed, here is a stunning quote from a woman who has quite probably read and analyzed more medical-drug studies than any doctor in the world:<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.\u201d (Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, \u201cDrug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption)<\/p>\n

Compare that quote with one from \u201cthe father of COVID science,\u201d Tony Fauci. In an interview with the National Geographic, Fauci stated: \u201cAnybody can claim to be an expert even when they have no idea what they\u2019re talking about\u2026If something is published in places like New England Journal of Medicine, Science, Nature, Cell, or JAMA\u2014you know, generally that is quite well peer-reviewed because the editors and the editorial staff of those journals really take things very seriously.\u201d<\/p>\n

They take things so seriously, they routinely publish glowing studies of medical drugs that are killing people in great numbers.<\/p>\n

Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED<\/a><\/u>, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX<\/a><\/u>, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX<\/a><\/u>, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th<\/sup> District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free<\/strong> NoMoreFakeNews emails here<\/strong><\/a><\/u> or his free<\/strong> OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here<\/strong><\/a><\/u>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Millions of masked people, who border on hysteria, believe they know COVID science. On closer examination, these people believe what their televisions tell them<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39260,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,105,22,53],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-224496","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-coronavirus","category-Health","category-mind_control"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224496","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39260"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=224496"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224496\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":224527,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224496\/revisions\/224527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=224496"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=224496"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=224496"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}