{"id":222276,"date":"2020-12-06T09:13:59","date_gmt":"2020-12-06T09:13:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=222276"},"modified":"2020-12-08T22:59:53","modified_gmt":"2020-12-08T22:59:53","slug":"hate-filled-hindu-priti-patel-is-sycophantic-to-jews-psychopathic-to-whites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=222276","title":{"rendered":"Hate-Filled Hindu: Priti Patel Is Sycophantic to Jews, Psychopathic to Whites"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tobias Langdon \u2013 The Unz Review Dec 3, 2020<\/strong><\/h1>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Shakespeare got it wrong. \u201cThere\u2019s no art to find the mind\u2019s construction in the face,\u201d says King Duncan in Macbeth<\/em> (c. 1606), meaning that psychology can\u2019t be read from physiognomy. But Shakespeare never saw Priti Patel<\/a>, the British-born Indian Hindu who currently serves as Home Secretary. When you look at Patel, do you see gentleness, humility and good-nature? I doubt it.<\/p>\n

No, Priti Patel looks like what she is: a nasty piece of work. As I said in \u201cA Shameless Shabbos-Shiksa<\/a>,\u201d she\u2019s a high-T fem-pol, that is, a female politician with typically elevated levels of testosterone. She\u2019s aggressive, ambitious and entirely without principle or loyalty to the country of her birth. That makes her an ideal shabbos-shiksa, or gentile servant, for Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), which the Jewish Chronicle<\/em> described as<\/a> \u201cthe biggest lobbying group in Westminster\u201d (i.e., British politics). Lord Polak<\/a>, CFI\u2019s very powerful but little-known chief, steered Patel to a long series of secret meetings with important Israeli politicians. That definite conspiracy was finally exposed in 2017<\/a> and Patel lost her job as International Development Secretary in Theresa May\u2019s government of grovelling goys.<\/p>\n

Working for Jewish interests<\/strong><\/h2>\n

What happened at the meetings? Only Patel and her Jewish puppet-masters know, but she certainly wasn\u2019t conspiring with Jews to benefit British Whites. After the scandal broke, she should have been prosecuted as an agent of a foreign power and permanently excluded from politics. But that isn\u2019t how things work in Brave New Britain. Instead, Patel bounced back to a much bigger and better job in Boris Johnson\u2019s government of grovelling goys<\/a>, in which the very powerful but little-known treasurer is the Israeli plutocrat Ehud Sheleg<\/a>. Patel is now Home Secretary, supposedly overseeing law, immigration and border security for Britain, in reality working for Jewish interests as she has always done. And now she\u2019s back at the centre of another scandal, this time about her obnoxious behaviour towards White civil servants. An official report found that<\/a> she had broken the ministerial code of conduct by bullying staff and should therefore resign for the second time from the cabinet.<\/p>\n

However, Boris Johnson decided that the rules needn\u2019t apply to his fellow Friend of Israel, and Patel is still there. There are rumours that she\u2019ll lose her post<\/a> soon for incompetence, but obnoxiousness was not a problem. After all, she\u2019s not been obnoxious to the only people who matter in Brave New Britain: the tiny Jewish minority that funds and controls the Conservative Party and that wields hugely disproportionate influence in the media and academia. Patel has risen to high office by being sycophantic to Jews and psychopathic to Whites.<\/p>\n

Death-goddess Kali with White men\u2019s heads<\/strong><\/h2>\n

And she may well be a full psychopath, like a disproportionate number of politicians<\/a> and of the lawyers<\/a> who are massively over-represented in Western politics. For example, Patel has a psychopathic indifference to truth. She knows from the inside that Jews have controlled the Conservative government under Johnson<\/a>, May, and Cameron just as they previously controlled the Labour government under Blair<\/a> and Brown. That\u2019s why she had so many secret meetings with Israeli politicians. But she would instantly condemn anyone who named and opposed the very Jewish control that she has so carefully allied herself with and worked to strengthen. Indeed, she would be happy to imprison anyone telling the truth about Jewish control. Psychopaths don\u2019t care about truth or morality: they care about power. And some psychopaths like to exercise power in sadistic ways, as Patel did when she shouted and swore at her White staff. Which brings me to another image from Brave New Britain<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

That painting<\/a>, called Housewives With Steak Knives<\/em> (1985), is a \u201cself-portrait \u2026 as the multi-armed Hindu Goddess Kali\u201d by Sutapa Biswas<\/a>, another Indian Hindu currently enriching Brave New Britain. Do you think the painting shows hostility towards White men? I do and I would link the psychology of Sutapa Biswas, as revealed in her painting, to the psychology of Priti Patel, as revealed in her behaviour towards White civil servants. Of course, no mainstream commentator in Britain would dare suggest that Patel\u2019s Hinduism and Indian genetics have played any role in her obnoxious behaviour. But here at the Occidental Observer<\/em>, the Home of Hate, I\u2019m suggesting exactly that.<\/p>\n

Pernicious parallels<\/strong><\/h2>\n

After all, a very similar scandal has happened before. In 1998, a female Hindu lawyer called Kamlesh Bahl was appointed Deputy Vice President of the Law Society and was expected to rise swiftly to become its President. But Bahl was dismissed in 1999<\/a> after accusations that she was a power-crazed bully who terrorized and humiliated her White staff in just the way that Priti Patel is accused of doing.<\/p>\n

And just as Patel got her big job despite being known to have bullied staff in her previous ministries, Bahl got her big job despite being known to have bullied staff when she was head of the Equal Opportunities Commission. Like Patel, Bahl had non-White privilege. And to round off the parallels, Bahl denied that she had done anything wrong just as Patel has done. I don\u2019t think these parallels are coincidental. Like Kamlesh Bahl, Priti Patel is a hate-filled alien invader whose genetics and psychology are rooted in India, not in Britain.<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t accept immigrants from India<\/strong><\/h2>\n

India is a fascinating and complex region in all manner of ways, from religion to genetics (as I acknowledged in my discussion<\/a> of the Parsi Indian Freddie Mercury). But one thing is certain amid all that complexity: India is a very bad place for any Western nation to accept immigrants from. Its culture is both hugely corrupt and horrendously cruel, as one of England\u2019s greatest writers saw long ago. Rudyard Kipling (1865\u20131936) was born in India and recorded life there with sharp insight and understanding. Leftists call him a racist<\/a>; I call him a realist. You can see some of his realism about India in the short-story collection<\/a> Plain Tales from the Hills<\/em> (1888). One of the stories, with the ironic title \u201cBeyond the Pale<\/a>,\u201d begins with these lines: \u201cA man should, whatever happens, keep to his own caste, race and breed. Let the White go to the White and the Black to the Black. Then, whatever trouble falls is in the ordinary course of things \u2014 neither sudden, alien, nor unexpected.\u201d<\/p>\n

Leftists would call that racist; I call it realist. And I think it applies to the trouble caused by Priti Patel and Kamlesh Bahl. Kipling would have been horrified to see mass immigration from India into the West. And rightly so. His story \u201cBeyond the Pale\u201d is about a love-affair between a White British man called Trajego and a Brown Indian widow called Bisesa. At first Trajego sees some of the beauty and charm of India. Then, following a quarrel with his brown-skinned lover, he sees a little of the horror:<\/p>\n

A week, and then three weeks, passed without a sign from Bisesa. Trejago, thinking that the rupture had lasted quite long enough, went down to Amir Nath\u2019s Gully for the fifth time in the three weeks, hoping that his rap at the sill of the shifting grating would be answered. He was not disappointed.<\/p>\n

There was a young moon, and one stream of light fell down into Amir Nath\u2019s Gully, and struck the grating, which was drawn away as he knocked. From the black dark, Bisesa held out her arms into the moonlight. Both hands had been cut off at the wrists, and the stumps were nearly healed.<\/p>\n

Then, as Bisesa bowed her head between her arms and sobbed, some one in the room grunted like a wild beast, and something sharp \u2014 knife, sword or spear \u2014 thrust at Trejago in his boorka. The stroke missed his body, but cut into one of the muscles of the groin, and he limped slightly from the wound for the rest of his days. (\u201cBeyond the Pale<\/a>\u201d)<\/p>\n

\u201cGenius\u201d is an over-used word, but I\u2019m happy to apply it to Rudyard Kipling. His ability to understand the multitudinous realities of India was matched by his ability to describe those realities. He didn\u2019t portray Whites as inexcusable sinners or non-Whites as immaculate saints. Instead, he was a realist, which is why he\u2019s now called a racist. But I can see no hate or malice in his stories about brown-skinned Indians. Indeed, \u201cThe Story of Muhammad Din<\/a>,\u201d about the life and death of a tiny Muslim boy, must be one of the most moving and compassionate stories ever written \u2013 and without the insincerity and sentimentality that accompany<\/a> leftist minority-worship.<\/p>\n

Leftism mandates blindness to reality<\/strong><\/h2>\n

But although Kipling could sympathize with brown-skinned Indians and recognize their full humanity, that did not make him think Indians and Whites were the same under the skin (or that White Germans and White Brits are the same<\/a>). Like Charles Dickens<\/a>, another literary genius, Kipling did not allow his enormous powers of sympathy to blind him to reality. But modern leftism mandates blindness to reality. That\u2019s why the leftist Guardian<\/em> can report that<\/a> \u201cIndia remains the most unsafe country for women in the world, with a woman raped every 20 minutes,\u201d while simultaneously supporting unlimited immigration from India. This would ensure that India\u2019s vibrant rape-culture found new settings, just as Pakistan\u2019s rape-culture has been successfully transplanted to Britain<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In short, the Guardian<\/em> claims to oppose rape while supporting the non-White immigration that massively increases rape. Its readers and journalists don\u2019t recognize the contradiction. Thanks to minority-worship, leftists apply the Orwellian principle<\/a> of crimestop<\/em>, which \u201cmeans the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to [minority-worship], and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction.\u201d<\/p>\n

Racism is realism<\/strong><\/h2>\n

And although British leftists have condemned<\/a> Priti Patel and her bullying, none of them would acknowledge that she is yet another example of the harm done by mass immigration. As an Indian Hindu and shabbos-shiksa, Priti Patel supports the highly ethnocentric governments of Israel and India while working against the legitimate ethnic interests of Britain\u2019s fast-shrinking White majority. Patel is bad for Britain, like the part-Jewish, part-Turkish prime minister Boris Johnson and like her fellow Indian Hindu Rishi Sunak<\/a>, who came to the post of Chancellor from Goldman Sachs<\/a> and the highly Jewish and globalist world of banking.<\/p>\n

It is not racist to say that these aliens are bad for Britain: it is realist. Or rather, racism is realism. It is both rational and realistic to understand that race is a valid scientific concept<\/a> and has huge consequences for politics, culture and criminality. Rudyard Kipling understand those obvious truths and Rudyard Kipling would have been entirely unsurprised by Muslim rape-gangs<\/a> and the malign behaviour of the Indian Hindus Priti Patel and Kamlesh Bahl. But the West is no longer governed by the thinking of far-sighted White geniuses like Kipling and Dickens. Instead, the West is governed by the thinking of subversive Jewish charlatans like Karl Marx<\/a> and Franz Boas<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Sajid Javid, Priti Patel and Boris Johnson make thei case before CFI. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

And that\u2019s why Britain has a hate-filled Hindu called Priti Patel at the top of government. Her sadistic behaviour towards her White staff is a portent of what will happen right across the West as Whites lose control to their non-White enrichers. Patel is bad for Britain and doesn\u2019t belong here, which is precisely why, in true psychopathic fashion, she sniffed out and bowed before the hidden centre of power in her party: Conservative Friends of Israel. And Jews were delighted to recruit her as a shabbos-shiksa<\/a>. They know that outsiders like Patel have no loyalty to or concern for British Whites.<\/p>\n

But you won\u2019t see anyone in the mainstream media speak these obvious truths. After all, this is Brave New Britain, where it\u2019s against the law to speak the truth about Jewish control and minority malice. And who oversees the law in Brave New Britain? You\u2019ve seen her pernicious punim already in this article: it\u2019s Priti Patel, Home Secretary, Friend of Israel and Foe of Whites.<\/p>\n

(Republished from The Occidental Observer<\/a> by permission of author or representative)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pritti Patel was forced to resign her ministerial post after she held secret meetings with Israeli ministers. Since then she\u2019s been reinstated and promoted to Home Secretary. Has being a \u201cFriend of Israel\u201d played a role in her revived fortunes?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,37,38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-Israel_Anti-Semitism_Zionism_and_US-UK_allies","category-Race"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=222276"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222276\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":222308,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222276\/revisions\/222308"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=222276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=222276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=222276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}