{"id":222241,"date":"2020-12-05T07:09:35","date_gmt":"2020-12-05T07:09:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=222241"},"modified":"2020-12-08T07:22:42","modified_gmt":"2020-12-08T07:22:42","slug":"the-displacement-of-the-straight-white-male","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=222241","title":{"rendered":"The Displacement of the Straight White Male"},"content":{"rendered":"

Paul Craig Roberts \u2013 paulcraigroberts.org Dec 4, 1010<\/strong><\/h1>\n

The Nasdaq stock exchange has told its listed companies that they must appoint to their boards a \u201cself-identified\u201d female and a lesbian or transgender or some other sexual deviant or be delisted from the stock exchange.\u00a0 https:\/\/www.rt.com\/usa\/508359-nasdaq-diversity-quotas-lgbt-women\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Think about this.\u00a0 A stock exchange has no right to structure the corporate boards of the companies listed on the exchange.\u00a0 That decision is for the boards and the shareholders of the companies.\u00a0 It is none of Nasdaq\u2019s business. If a company\u2019s shareholders and board think that having sexual deviants on their boards would improve the company\u2019s performance, they can search out such people who might make a good board member.\u00a0 But it is none of Nasdaq\u2019s business.<\/p>\n

What Nasdaq is doing is imposing an ideology on corporations that normalizes sexual deviancy and that does so by forcing corporations to either waste shareholders\u2019 money by expanding their boards or displacing a straight white male with a sexual deviant.\u00a0 In other words, Nasdaq sees a normal heterosexual white male as less valuable to a corporation than a sexual deviant.<\/p>\n

If the SEC is silly enough to go along with Nasdaq, I suppose corporations could meet this requirement \u00a0by having two males self-identify as women.\u00a0 As no one is permitted to challenge those who self-identify as the opposite sex, this is an easy way to respond to Nasdaq\u2019s ridiculous assertion of power over corporations.<\/p>\n

But there is a better solution. The corporations should just tell Nasdaq to go to Hell and form their own exchange or join some other exchange.\u00a0 Who really needs Nasdaq in the digital age?<\/p>\n

But this would take men with more balls than they have.<\/p>\n

We can enjoy a laugh about this, but what we are witnessing is the ongoing displacement of white males since Alfred W. Blumrosen, compliance chief of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commisson (EEOC) violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which strictly prohibited racial quotas, and imposed racial quotas on America.\u00a0 Blumrosen reasoned that he could get away with it because courts defer to the regulatory authority. What Franklin D. Roosevelt\u2019s New Deal did was to turn legislation passed by Congress into an authorization bill for regulatory agencies to make the law.\u00a0 Blumrosen understood this and used it to deny the protection of the 14th Amendment to white males. I and Lawrence Stratton explain the history and misuse of the Civil Rights Act in The New Color Line<\/em> (1995).\u00a0 The purpose of the Civil Rights Act was to enforce the 14th Amendment\u2019s equal protection clause, but the result in practice was to deny equal protection to white males.<\/p>\n

As a joke Rep. Howard W. \u201cJudge\u201d Smith, (D, Va) added to the Civil Rights Act an amendment prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex. Feminists jumped on this and got Smith\u2019s joke\u00a0 passed as part of the bill.\u00a0 This gave Blumrosen two avenues for displacing white males in university admissions, employment and promotion.\u00a0 At the time the normalization of homosexuality and the concept of transgender were in the distant future, but Judge Smith\u2019s joke also gives preference to homosexuals and transgendered over straight white males.\u00a0 The consequence today is that blacks, women, and sexual deviants have legally enforced preferences over straight white males.\u00a0 Nasdaq is simply doing today what Blumrosen did in the 1960s.<\/p>\n

For more than a half century the position of American white males has been eroding. Today the husband often earns less than the wife and has less job security.\u00a0 This diminishes his importance in the family and his self-esteem.\u00a0 Identity Politics, the ideology of the Democrat Party and Nasdaq, further demeans him as a rascist misogynist victimizer.\u00a0 In America, and throughout the disintergrating Western World, the white male is portrayed as an obstacle to social justice.<\/p>\n

Few people comprehend that the protector of Western civilization is being eliminated. New generations are being born into a time when the orchestrated descent of the straight white male is in progress.\u00a0 For them, the lowly position of the white male is normal. It is what they are born into. They know no different. They have no idea of the past or of the consequences of what is happening. Women and preferred minorities become more and more aggressive and straight white men become accustomed to their second class status.\u00a0 The young have never known any different. As white males are almost eliminated as heroes in movies and novels, have no champions,\u00a0 and are no longer seen even in advertisements, they experience their discredited status as normal.\u00a0 https:\/\/www.paulcraigroberts.org\/2020\/12\/01\/erasing-the-white-male\/<\/a><\/p>\n

We now hear of young white males having identity problems and of rising suicide rates. The destruction of white male identity is what Alfred Blumrosen\u2019s perversion of the 1964 Civil Rights Act achieved.<\/p>\n

Support Your Website<\/a> or you will have torely on CNN, NPR, and the New York Times.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Few people comprehend that the protector of Western civilization is being eliminated. Paul Craig Roberts explains <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":131,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-Current_Affairs"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/131"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=222241"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":222242,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222241\/revisions\/222242"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=222241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=222241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=222241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}