{"id":222169,"date":"2020-12-03T08:12:16","date_gmt":"2020-12-03T08:12:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=222169"},"modified":"2020-12-06T08:54:29","modified_gmt":"2020-12-06T08:54:29","slug":"belgian-minister-of-health-admits-that-the-closure-of-shops-had-no-health-basis-but-was-intended-to-create-an-electric-shock-in-the-population","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=222169","title":{"rendered":"Belgian Minister of Health admits that the closure of shops had no health basis but was intended to create an electric shock in the population"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Lerebelle. — reseauinternational.net Dec 2, 2020 <\/strong><\/h1>\n

Machine Translation
\n<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Asked at the exit of the Concertation Committee this Friday, November 27, the Minister of Health held a speech which challenged many people, including his coalition partners.<\/p>\n

Returning to the decision to reopen non-essential shops from December 1, Frank Vandenbroucke (sp.a) explained that \u201cshopping did not really involve any risk when everything was well controlled\u201d. Words to which the VRT journalist immediately reacted, asking why these stores had to close their doors on October 30.<\/p>\n

\u201cBecause at one point we needed to make a shock decision, we needed an electric shock and that implied that we immediately close non-essential businesses,\u201d retorted the Minister of Health, who also admitted that he it was a “psychological” measure.The closing of the stores was not a health measure but an “electric shock” for the population<\/p>\n