{"id":215027,"date":"2020-10-15T06:44:04","date_gmt":"2020-10-15T06:44:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=215027"},"modified":"2020-10-18T07:33:31","modified_gmt":"2020-10-18T07:33:31","slug":"academic-admits-to-making-wild-over-estimate-of-covid-deaths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=215027","title":{"rendered":"Academic Admits To Making \u201cWild-Over-Estimate\u201d of Covid Deaths"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction \u2013 Oct 14, 2020<\/strong><\/h1>\n
Another “expert” who had been advising the British government on its response to Covid-19 has been forced to scale back his original estimate on the number deaths it would cause. Like Professor Neil Ferguson who had initially warned that Covid could cause 500,000 deaths<\/span><\/a>, Professor Matt Keeling has admitted that his suggestion that 100,000 lives could be saved with a new lockdown was a wild over-estimate.<\/h5>\n
So why are the authorities still listening to these so-called \u201cexperts\u201d when they\u2019ve been wrong, repeatedly? Or has the government, like many others around the world, already decided on lockdowns and they are simply using\u00a0 the likes of Professors Ferguson and Keeling as fall guys to take the heat for their policy?<\/h5>\n
Apart from being instrumental in wrecking the economy and making possibly hundreds of thousands, even millions, jobless they are ruining science’s reputation. Once it was held in high esteem: it was seen infallible and beyond question. The way religion was seen in the middle ages.<\/h5>\n
That is now changing thanks to the likes of Professors Ferguson and Keeling. Ed.<\/h5>\n

Academic behind startling ‘circuit breaker’ study which found half-term lockdown could save up to 100,000 lives by New Year admit their death figures are wildly over-estimated and say they wish they’d never used them<\/h2>\n