{"id":210142,"date":"2020-07-11T07:00:39","date_gmt":"2020-07-11T07:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=210142"},"modified":"2020-07-15T05:27:32","modified_gmt":"2020-07-15T05:27:32","slug":"leicesters-unnecessary-second-lockdown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=210142","title":{"rendered":"Leicester\u2019s Unnecessary Second Lockdown"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Lockdown Sceptics \u2013 July 4, 2020<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/build-build-build-a-wall-around-Leicester.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-210143\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/build-build-build-a-wall-around-Leicester-768x497.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" height=\"349\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/build-build-build-a-wall-around-Leicester-768x497.png 768w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/build-build-build-a-wall-around-Leicester-300x194.png 300w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/build-build-build-a-wall-around-Leicester.png 815w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">I\u2019m a doctor at University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust. We have about 2000 inpatient beds across three main sites and serve roughly 1 million people in Leicester city, Leicestershire county and Rutland. Leicester is a multi-cultural city and 36% of our 16,000 health care workers are from BAME backgrounds.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Many of my colleagues are angry and confused about what is happening nationally and particularly in Leicester and Leicestershire. We are reminded daily that we are not allowed to speak to journalists or on social media, which is why I am stringently anonymous and more vague than I\u2019d like to be here. I love being a doctor, and I risk suspension for speaking out.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">I\u2019m going to use Public Health England\u2019s own numbers for this analysis (found <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><a style=\"color: #ccffff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/covid-19-exceedances-in-leicester\">here<\/a><\/strong><\/span>) and I\u2019m going to explain why I think the conclusions they (and the politicians) have drawn are wrong.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The Leicester and Leicestershire experience of COVID-19 echoes the majority of cities in England, with the exception of Birmingham and London, whose peaks were harder and faster. In early March, we could see the COVID-19 crisis coming. We weren\u2019t ready, it\u2019s fair to say. We rapidly wrote guidelines, trained staff and fought over who needed the little PPE that was available. Every day brought new guidance from Public Health England. Each day, the guidance was different to the day before and it was incredibly stressful.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">We already run at maximum capacity the vast majority of the time and with the standard shortages of doctors at middle grade \u201cregistrar\u201d level, we were terrified about how we would manage. Suddenly, on March 16th, shielding was announced along with stringent social distancing for pregnant women. We had to protect our staff. We lost 15% of our department, who could no longer provide face-to-face care.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">In Leicester Hospitals, we rapidly increased our numbers of inpatients and patients on ITU with COVID-19 in the last two weeks of March. It was a distressing time for staff, particularly due to the lack of equipment and the daily changing guidance. We were petrified for our families and ourselves and many were also juggling negotiating key worker school places (not automatic), trying to buy food around odd shift patterns and worried about how much worse it was going to get.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">By April, we got access to PPE via the Army and the guidelines started changing weekly instead of daily. Everybody calmed down. We were going to manage. We encouraged social distancing among staff, but not rigidly. We wore masks, plastic aprons and gloves for patient care outside of theatres and ITU and still didn\u2019t seem to catch COVID-19. Nothing seemed as bad as had been described elsewhere. Oddly, colleagues in other large English cities were also reporting fewer cases than they had expected. Our younger children were in schools or nursery and despite no social distancing at all and full mixing with all those risky key workers, nobody\u2019s children were ill. We heard about and worried about deaths of health care workers across the UK, but locally, relatively few colleagues were ill and the vast majority recovered without needing hospital admission. The early deaths <a style=\"color: #ccffff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ons.gov.uk\/peoplepopulationandcommunity\/healthandsocialcare\/causesofdeath\/bulletins\/coronaviruscovid19relateddeathsbyoccupationenglandandwales\/previousReleases\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>data appeared from the ONS<\/strong><\/span><\/a> showing that security guards and chefs had the highest risk of death, not health workers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">By May, positive cases averaged around 10 a day and deaths were continuing to fall. In late May, we started swabbing every single admission to the hospitals, and this is where things get interesting. I work in a department that isn\u2019t respiratory medicine. This means that the patients who are in our area are there for other health issues that are not caused by COVID-19 (think surgery or mental health). Of those we swabbed, just 1% tested positive and all of them were asymptomatic. That rate has been steady since May 23rd. I believe that our patients are representative of the rate in the UK population and, for what it\u2019s worth, it\u2019s the same story in Manchester, Leeds and Guildford, where I\u2019ve been comparing notes with colleagues. Unpublished data shared on an open forum from Leeds, Manchester, Sussex also confirms this \u2013\u00a01%, all asymptomatic when testing positive. These patients have, almost without exception, not developed any symptoms, although some have had household members with a cough.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">By June we were down to between three and eight positive cases a day in UHL (also known as Pillar 1 testing, shown as dark green on the graph). This has remained unchanged throughout the whole of June.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/leicester-01-Epidemic-curve.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-210144\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/leicester-01-Epidemic-curve.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" height=\"246\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/leicester-01-Epidemic-curve.png 684w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/leicester-01-Epidemic-curve-300x137.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The point of \u201cLockdown\u201d has always been to \u2018flatten the curve\u2019 in order to \u2018Protect the NHS\u2019. Given we were coping on March 31st, when we had nearly ten times the number of positive cases in hospitals, with relatively little access to testing, we are certainly coping now. The issue and alleged cause of the \u201cLocal Lockdown\u201d is our Pillar 2 numbers, which are the lighter green ones on the graph. These are the community tests outsourced to private companies. There is no guarantee that these tests are all taken from different people (unlike the Pillar 1 data, which is cross checked against a unique patient identifier). In fact, the Government accepts that the number of Pillar 2 cases is not the same as the number of people with COVID-19 because Pillar 2 data includes people who\u2019ve been tested more than once \u2013 often because they have to re-test before they\u2019re<a style=\"color: #ccffff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/coronavirus-covid-19-testing-data-methodology\/covid-19-testing-data-methodology-note\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong> allowed back to work<\/strong><\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">We have also brought in two mobile testing stations into these areas, just so we can find all of these people with the virus, which, as I say, are almost certainly no more than 1% of the population. So lets get this really clear: we have locked down based on unreliable test results which may contain multiple positives for one person, all accompanied by a falling rate of hospital admissions and deaths.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Some might say that these community rates are really serious and that all these people could be admitted to hospital in two weeks. However, these rates have been high since mid-May, and our Pillar 1 hospital numbers remain unchanged \u2013 so there\u2019s little evidence they\u2019re being admitted to hospital. The other key thing to note is that our Pillar 2 positive numbers have already fallen as shown by the blue line on the Public Health England graph below. Note that there\u2019s no data about what community rates looked like when we had our actual peak of COVID-19 \u2013 they weren\u2019t doing Pillar 2 testing then.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/leicester-02b.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-210145\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/leicester-02b.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" height=\"390\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/leicester-02b.png 700w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/leicester-02b-300x217.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The final reason we don\u2019t need to worry about the risk of overwhelming the hospital is the age of the people affected. The median age of those with a positive community test is 39. The risk of a 39 year-old dying from COVID-19 is less than that of them drowning (based on the ONS data). Thirty-nine year-olds are out at work, particularly 39 year-olds who live in North Evington, the worst affected area in Leicester city. Over 95% cases are in under-65 year-olds, again at substantially decreased risk. North Evington has a higher than average population who were not born in the UK, and have fewer qualifications and work in manual jobs. They live in smaller houses with less outside space. This means that they have not had a middle class luxury lockdown with <a style=\"color: #ccffff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ilivehere.co.uk\/statistics-evington-city-of-leicester-12770.html\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>working from home and sitting in their garden<\/strong><\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">They are out working <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><a style=\"color: #ccffff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/metro.co.uk\/2020\/07\/01\/clothes-factory-owners-leicester-refuse-close-second-lockdown-12926381\">in the garment factories<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, which never closed and are poorly ventilated, in our hospitals and in food production. They are crucial to our country, and it is inevitable that some will now be carrying the virus. They are now crucial to our COVID-19 response too. They are the people, along with all the other exposed key workers, that could bring Leicester to our crucial 20% infection rate to give us the herd immunity that we need to get our vulnerable people back out of their homes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The most criminal thing about the whole of this investigation is that they have only managed to track-and-trace 11 cases. That is, they\u2019ve only managed to trace the contacts of 11 out of approximately 900 new cases in the past two weeks. You won\u2019t be shocked to hear that they found no links between those 11 cases \u2013 statistically they wouldn\u2019t.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The only other thing I want to address is the myth of Covid and children. We had one child with COVID-19 in our hospitals back in May and none since. Public Health England say in their report \u201cthat the number of children with positive tests remains relatively static\u201d. We absolutely do not need to worry about our children or teachers under the age of 65. The research worldwide is clear. However, they have shut our schools again. Education is the best long-term route out of poverty, the best thing we can do for vulnerable children and we are punishing them for a disease that isn\u2019t even making our population ill.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Local Lockdown in Leicester is purely a tool of control. It\u2019s a threat to make us behave. We weren\u2019t actually misbehaving for the record \u2013 our protests have had lower numbers and less violence than the national average, we haven\u2019t been going to any beaches \u2013 there aren\u2019t any \u2013 and the vast majority of the population have taken the random rules of lockdown very seriously. Be warned. Given our cases have already started falling, they will be able to call this a success in two weeks. By then it might be your turn.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Dr Q<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/lockdownsceptics.org\/why-leicester-doesnt-need-a-local-lockdown\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Another anonymous doctor speaks out over Covid-19. The re-imposition of a lockdown in Leicester is, he writes, and \u201cpurely a tool of control\u201d  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-coronavirus"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=210142"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":210148,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210142\/revisions\/210148"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=210142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=210142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=210142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}