{"id":204756,"date":"2020-03-30T07:48:58","date_gmt":"2020-03-30T07:48:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=204756"},"modified":"2020-04-01T05:26:46","modified_gmt":"2020-04-01T05:26:46","slug":"theres-powerful-evidence-this-great-panic-is-foolish-yet-our-freedom-is-still-broken-and-our-economy-crippled","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=204756","title":{"rendered":"There\u2019s powerful evidence this Great Panic is foolish, yet our freedom is still broken and our economy crippled"},"content":{"rendered":"

Peter Hitchens \u2013 The Mail on Sunday March 29, 2020<\/h1>\n

As I watched the Prime Minister order mass house arrest on Monday night, I felt revulsion, anger and grief \u2013 as anyone brought up when this was a free and well-governed country would. I also felt terribly alone.<\/span><\/p>\n

You could not have known, from anything broadcast that night or printed the following day, that anyone was unhappy with these events. But they were.<\/span><\/p>\n

So, above all things this week, I would like to thank all the kind, perplexed people who have got in touch with me by so many means, to say they share my doubts about the Government\u2019s handling of Covid-19<\/span><\/strong><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Many will have seen the films, pictured, taken by Derbyshire police drones, of lonely walkers on the remote, empty hills, publicly pillorying them for not obeying the regulations. It is genuinely hard to see what damage these walkers have done, writes PETER HITCHENS. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

There are, in fact, many of us. If you feel this way, you are nothing like as solitary as you think.<\/span><\/p>\n

Next, I would like to thank all those who disagree with me, who choose to abuse me, often with lies, personal smears and swearwords. Your childish, intolerant reaction has strengthened me in my conviction that mine is the better case. If your policy is so good, why can you not defend it like civilised adults? Do you really think that I regret needless deaths any less than you? Can you not accept that I also have good motives?<\/span><\/p>\n

I now suspect this dark season might get still worse before we see the clear, calm light of reason again. The greater the mistake we have made, the less willing we are to admit it or correct it. This is why I greatly fear worse developments in the coming few days.<\/span><\/p>\n

When I predicted roadblocks in my column two weeks ago, which I did, I did so out of an instinct that we were entering on the craziest period of our lives since the death of Princess Diana. And now there are such roadblocks, officious, embarrassing blots on our national reputation.<\/span><\/p>\n

But even I would not have dared to predict the mass house arrest under which we are all now confined.<\/span><\/p>\n

I have found the origin of this bizarre Napoleonic decree \u2013 a few clauses in the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, which I confess I had not even heard of. It just goes to show how careful you have to be with the wording of the laws you pass.<\/span><\/p>\n

If the TV this weekend is full of pictures of people sunning themselves in city parks or escaping to the high hills, there will be plenty of zealots and politicians ready to call for yet more restrictions, subjecting all of us to collective punishment.<\/span><\/p>\n

Perhaps we will emulate the French or Italian states, which have returned to their despotic origins and reduced their populations to a sort of cowering serfdom, barely able to step into the street.<\/span><\/p>\n

I wonder whether there might also be restrictions on what can be said and published. I can see no necessary bar to this in the law involved.<\/span><\/p>\n

Section 45 C (3) (c) of the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 (appropriately enough) is the bit that does it. Once the Health Secretary believes there is a threat to public health, he has \u2013 or claims to have \u2013 limitless powers to do what he likes, \u2018imposing or enabling the imposition of restrictions or requirements on or in relation to persons, things or premises in the event of, or in response to, a threat to public health\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

The former Supreme Court Judge Lord Sumption doubts that the Act can be used in this way and warns: \u2018There is a difference between law and official instructions. It is the difference between a democracy and a police state. Liberty and the rule of law are surely worth something, even in the face of a pandemic.\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n

Lord Sumption is generally a liberal hero, and he was invited to deliver last year\u2019s BBC Reith Lectures. But the Human Rights crowd have all melted away in the face of this outrage. So his warning was buried on Page 54 of The Times on Thursday, and Parliament, already supine, has slunk away after its craven acceptance of new attacks on liberty on Monday.<\/span><\/p>\n

If it ever meets again, it will be as a poor, neutralised thing. One day it may come to be called the Dummy Parliament. Where is the Supreme Court when you really need it, come to that?<\/span><\/p>\n

So do not be surprised by anything. After last week, can we rule anything out? This new Stasi society has a horrifying level of support. Humberside police are already advertising a \u2018portal\u2019 for citizens to inform on their neighbours for breaking the \u2018social distancing\u2019 rules.<\/span><\/p>\n

If you think they won\u2019t get any takers, think again. Northamptonshire police have revealed that their control room has had \u2018dozens and dozens\u2019 of calls about people ignoring the order.<\/span><\/p>\n

They said: \u2018We are getting calls from people who say, \u201cI think my neighbour is going out on a second run \u2013 I want you to come and arrest them.\u201d \u2019<\/span><\/p>\n

Most people will, by now, have viewed the online film of Metropolitan police officers bellowing officiously at sunbathers on Shepherd\u2019s Bush Green in London, energetically stamping out the foul crime of lying on the grass (would they have paid so much attention, two weeks ago, to a gaggle of louts making an unpleasant noise, or to marijuana smokers?).<\/span><\/p>\n

Others will have seen the films, taken by Derbyshire police drones, of lonely walkers on the remote, empty hills, publicly pillorying them for not obeying the regulations. It is genuinely hard to see what damage these walkers have done.<\/span><\/p>\n

But as a former resident of the USSR, I can tell you that this sort of endless meddling by petty authority in the details of life, reinforced by narks, is normal in unfree societies \u2013 such as we have now become for an indefinite period. It is, by the way, also a seedbed for corruption.<\/span><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, our economy is still crippled, and the overpraised Chancellor Rishi Sunak, like some beaming Dr Feelgood with a case full of dodgy stimulants, seeks to soothe the pain by huge injections of funny money.<\/span><\/p>\n

He will get this back from us as soon as we are allowed out again. Just you wait till you get the bill, in increased taxes, inflation and devastated savings.<\/span><\/p>\n

It ought not to be so. In fact, several powerful pieces of evidence have come to light, suggesting that the Great Panic is foolish and wrong.<\/span><\/p>\n

I shall come to these, to underline the fact that it is not I, alone, who have these doubts. I do not claim to be an expert. But I refer to those who definitely are experts, who doubt the wisdom of what we are doing.<\/span><\/p>\n

It is sad that far too little of this is being reported as prominently as it should be by our supposedly diverse and free media, especially the BBC, which has largely closed its mind and its airwaves to dissent. It is quite funny that a statue of George Orwell stands by the entrance to the BBC, bearing the inscription: \u2018If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n