{"id":203973,"date":"2020-03-16T07:39:11","date_gmt":"2020-03-16T07:39:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=203973"},"modified":"2020-03-23T19:57:28","modified_gmt":"2020-03-23T19:57:28","slug":"how-many-people-have-coronavirus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=203973","title":{"rendered":"How Many People Have Coronavirus?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jon Rappoport \u2013 No More Fake News March 15, 2020<\/strong><\/h1>\n

None? Let\u2019s go to the tests and find out<\/h3>\n

Lockdown of the population, panic shopping, and the virus<\/h3>\n

\u00a0<\/em> (To join our email list, click here<\/a><\/strong><\/span>.)<\/em><\/h3>\n

Note: this article contains several major points. I could have written it as four or five separate pieces. But because the points are related, they\u2019re under one roof here. I ask serious readers to dig in. (For further reference, full archive of \u201ccorona epidemic\u201d articles here<\/a><\/strong><\/span>.)<\/span><\/p>\n

The other day, I was in a UPS store, and a customer was paying for a large box he was sending to Florida. I asked him what was in the box.<\/span><\/p>\n

He said, \u201cToilet paper.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The new economy.<\/span><\/p>\n

The majority of the people stripping items off store shelves know nothing about the virus, and if they did, they wouldn\u2019t care. They\u2019re acting like frothing marauders because other people are, too. \u201cI\u2019ve got to get paper towels and pet food because everyone else is hoarding them.\u201d Now there\u2019s REAL contagion.<\/span><\/p>\n

The corollary: If no one were hoarding, store shelves would be adequately stocked, and shopping would be a relatively calm affair.<\/span><\/p>\n

Quarantines, lockdowns, the advice to maintain \u201csocial distancing,\u201d and wall-to-wall propaganda about \u201ctransmission of the virus\u201d have resulted in mass cancelation of public events and the shuttering of large venues. Untold numbers of small businesses are in serious trouble.<\/span><\/p>\n

This is a direct attack on the economy. It is also a ripping of the right to \u201cpeaceably assemble,\u201d one of the natural freedoms embodied in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. As usual, \u201cthe threat to public safety and health\u201d is invoked to override freedoms and rights. You would think the public sees through this tired excuse for dictatorial control, but it is not the case. Parental government as a concept and a practice has invaded minds. \u201cWell, sure, they\u2019re taking care of us.\u201d If you believe that, I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon.<\/span><\/p>\n

At another level, quarantines serve to enforce the idea that all people are medical patients for their whole lives\u2014and, therefore, they must follow medical orders. Get tested, diagnosed, drugged, vaccinated. For what? For all possible diseases and infections.<\/span><\/p>\n

As far as the coronavirus is concerned, forget about contagion and transmission for the moment. What about the widespread diagnostic test for the virus in humans? Is this PCR test accurate? Is it useful? I keep coming back to the issue, because the whole designation of a \u201ccoronavirus case,\u201d if it means anything at all, depends on the veracity of the test\u2014not in a lab or a medical journal, but in life, in the world.<\/span><\/p>\n

I repeat what I wrote in a recent article: Outside of China, the most widely used test is called the PCR. It must be done with tremendous care, because contamination with irrelevant microbes and cellular material can yield a misleading and absurd result.<\/span><\/p>\n

The PCR, it is claimed, can take a tiny, tiny bit of material from a patient and blow it up many times, so it can be identified. \u201cThis is the coronavirus. This patient is infected.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Not only that, the test\u2019s proponents assert that, quite easily, the PCR can also determine the AMOUNT of virus in the patient\u2019s body. Why is that vitally important? Because, to even begin talking about the patient ever getting sick, he must have millions and millions of coronavirus actively replicating in his body.<\/span><\/p>\n

There are people (and I\u2019m one of them) who challenge the claim that the PCR can show how much virus is in the patient\u2019s body. The experts try to brush us off\u2014we don\u2019t understand the intricacies of the test, it\u2019s highly technical, we\u2019re not qualified to make a judgment, etc.<\/span><\/p>\n

I\u2019ve been searching for a way around this futile argument. In the process, I\u2019ve discovered something important about the PCR. I SEE NO EVIDENCE THAT THE ACCURACY OF THE TEST HAS EVER BEEN PROVEN.<\/span><\/p>\n

Let me explain. You bring your car to a good repair shop. The mechanics hook it up to a device and run a test to diagnose what\u2019s causing the car to stall. Who says their tests are accurate? At some point in the past, these diagnostic procedures have been vetted, to make sure they work properly.<\/span><\/p>\n

And sure enough, when the mechanics say, \u201cWe\u2019ve found the problem,\u201d and when they correct that problem, you drive the car and it doesn\u2019t stall anymore. This is called a real-life result.<\/span><\/p>\n

This is not the situation re the PCR. Its proponents claim it can count how much virus is in a patient\u2019s body\u2014how much of a particular virus. But where is the proof, in real-life terms, that the PCR can do that? How was that proof ever established?<\/span><\/p>\n

When I say proof, I don\u2019t mean technical mumbo-jumbo. I\u2019m not referring to the highly dense language these scientists use among themselves. I\u2019m talking about real live human patients, and results.<\/span><\/p>\n

After all, if the PCR is being used to diagnose people, and if the results are being used to count the number of coronavirus cases in various countries, and if the number of cases forms the basis for, say, locking down the whole of Italy in a mass quarantine\u2026THE TEST IS IMPORTANT, WOULDN\u2019T YOU SAY?<\/span><\/p>\n

I have seen no wide-ranging proof that the PCR was ever checked properly, when it was first introduced, to show it could do what researchers say it can do.<\/span><\/p>\n

WHO TESTED THE TEST?<\/span><\/p>\n

I have come up with a process\u2014a simple process\u2014which will check the veracity of the PCR. It should have been carried out decades ago. The fact that it wasn\u2019t is an enormous scandal.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here it is.<\/span><\/p>\n

From a hundred patients, very small tissue samples are taken. The PCR lab people don\u2019t take the samples. They don\u2019t ever see the patients or know who they are.<\/span><\/p>\n

The lab professionals run these hundred samples through the PCR, obtain results, and then report: what virus did they find in each case, and how much of that virus did they find?<\/span><\/p>\n

Let\u2019s say, in six instances, the lab techs claim they found a great amount of virus in the patients.<\/span><\/p>\n

Well, those patients should be sick.<\/span><\/p>\n

Are they? ARE THEY?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve determined that patients 4, 9, 32, 54, 65, and 86 all have a huge amount of virus in their bodies.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cInteresting. Thanks. Let\u2019s see. Hmm. Turns out these people are fit as a fiddle. Not sick. I guess your test didn\u2019t work. It\u2019s a flop.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Or maybe the test does work. The six patients are sick. LET\u2019S FIND OUT. IN THE WORLD, NOT IN JOURNALS.<\/span><\/p>\n

That\u2019s what I mean by real-life results. No jive, no tap dancing.<\/span><\/p>\n

There is more. This experiment with the hundred patients? It should be done, not just once, but many times. A hundred patients here at this facility, a hundred patients there at that facility. Thirty or forty different facilities, and thirty or forty different sets of a hundred patients. It should be done by independent scientists without conflicts of interest.<\/span><\/p>\n

It should have been done decades ago. I see no evidence that it was.<\/span><\/p>\n

THE TEST WAS NEVER PROPERLY TESTED. A GIANT SCANDAL.<\/span><\/p>\n

Think about what that means.<\/span><\/p>\n

Now let\u2019s go to China, where we\u2019re told the majority of people who \u201chave the virus\u201d reside. What diagnostic test are they using there? CT scans of the lungs. Looking for what? Pneumonia. Why? Because it\u2019s being called the number one symptom of coronavirus infection.<\/span><\/p>\n

They\u2019re kidding, right?<\/span><\/p>\n

Unfortunately, no.<\/span><\/p>\n

Well, pneumonia has many causes, none of which needs the presence of a coronavirus. That\u2019s number one. Number two, roughly 300,000 people in China die of pneumonia every year\u2014long before the supposed coronavirus emerged. And number three, in the city of Wuhan, where the \u201cepidemic\u201d supposedly started, the air quality is horrific. Last summer, protests on the streets of Wuhan attested to citizen outrage at the problem. And, breaking news: disastrous air quality can cause pneumonia\u2014no germs of any kind necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

But of course, we can sweep all these concerns off the table because, well, who cares about the accuracy of tests? If people in Los Angeles are fighting over who gets the last six rolls of toilet paper, that\u2019s all the proof we need: this is a global epidemic caused by a virus. Right?<\/span><\/p>\n

Finally, I\u2019ll make a few comments concerning the \u2018BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS\u2019 PEOPLE. They have endless questions centering on reports of corona cases in this country, that country, this city, that town, another planet, another galaxy. I have answered some of those questions. There is a basic point covering all the questions:<\/span><\/p>\n

DO NOT ASSUME THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SICK IN VARIOUS PLACES ARE ALL SUFFERING FROM THE SAME CAUSE. You might want to read that statement several times.<\/span><\/p>\n

Since the diagnostic tests for the virus are inaccurate, wrong-headed, and absurd, the LUMPING OF ALL THESE SICK PEOPLE EVERYWHERE UNDER THE SAME LABEL\u2014CORONAVIRUS\u2014IS MEANINGLESS AND DECEPTIVE. Don\u2019t fall for it. Be smarter than that. Stop trying to use one explanation to account for all supposed cases of the virus.<\/span><\/p>\n

And furthermore, don\u2019t make the false assumption that all these reported coronavirus cases are the result of NEW disease or never- before-seen disease. Where people are genuinely ill, many or most of them have the same health conditions that have been affecting humans for a long, long time\u2014now recycled and re-labeled CORONAVIRUS.<\/span><\/p>\n

I\u2019m giving you insights I gained in 1987 while researching AIDS. In a nutshell, I took the groups the CDC claimed were at high-risk for AIDS\u2014Haitians, Africans in certain countries, IV street drug users, gay men, hemophiliacs\u2014and found that, for the most part, the groups were suffering from very old diseases and long-standing horrendous environmental conditions. Nothing to do with HIV. And where new illness was present, the causes were mainly chemical toxicity.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt has to be all coronavirus or all something else.\u201d Wrong. False. Misguided. Baloney. Start over.<\/span><\/p>\n

I discovered this central con-hustle of the medical cartel 34 years ago, and it applies precisely and across the board, in the current \u201cepidemic.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

For example, for those people researching 5G technology and its harmful health effects, stop stretching your necks trying to prove that 5G has to be THE real and single cause of ALL supposed corona cases. If you show 5G applies to one or two areas where people are being falsely labeled with the virus, you\u2019ve done a major service. If you can\u2019t prove 5G applies to other areas, that\u2019s not a problem.<\/span><\/p>\n

We\u2019re looking at multiple factors here. Some people are sick because of X. Others because of Y. Others because of Z. Still others are not sick at all.<\/span><\/p>\n

But ALL OF THEM are being falsely corralled under the LABEL of coronavirus.<\/span><\/p>\n

We don\u2019t need to replace one fake label with another single label.<\/span><\/p>\n

Frankly, to use a technical term, this bullshit needs to stop.<\/span><\/p>\n

If you\u2019re somewhat puzzled by this article, go back and read it again. Keep doing that until it comes clear. I say this because, in 1987, I had the same facts in front of me, the same basic facts I \u2018ve presented in this article\u2014and it took me three months to realize the implications and see where I\u2019d bought the big con.<\/span><\/p>\n

The biggest con of all: THIS EPIDEMIC IS ONE THING.<\/span><\/p>\n

No. It isn\u2019t.<\/span><\/p>\n

Jon Rappoport<\/span><\/p>\n

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX<\/span><\/a><\/strong>, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX<\/span><\/strong><\/a>, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th<\/sup> District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free<\/strong> NoMoreFakeNews emails here<\/span><\/strong><\/a> or his free<\/strong> OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here<\/strong><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Lockdown of the population, panic shopping, and the virus: Jon Rappoport looks at the Coronavirus “epidemic”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39260,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,105,58,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-coronavirus","category-Current_Affairs","category-Health"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39260"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=203973"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203973\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":203981,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203973\/revisions\/203981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=203973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=203973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=203973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}