![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Being-Ahead-of-Time.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nSource: https:\/\/www.unz.com\/<\/a><\/h5>\n
In my recent book,\u00a0Being in Time<\/em>, I analyse Jewish controlled opposition. I argue that some self-identified Jews end up being on both polar extremes of every debate that is even mildly relevant to Jewish existence: Those who have recently been disturbed about the\u00a0Jews who are at the centre<\/span><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0of the impeachment trial have also found that Jews hold key positions on Trump\u2019s defense team. Those who accuse Jews of\u00a0pushing immigration<\/span><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0and multiculturalism can\u2019t deny that Trump\u2019s senior policy advisor on immigration is Stephen Miller and that\u00a0breitbart.com<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0was \u201cconceived in Jerusalem<\/strong><\/a><\/span>.\u201d The Palestinians\u2019 solidarity movement is dominated by a few well organized Jewish solidarity groups that do little but divert the discourse from the Palestinian\u00a0right of return<\/span><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0and exhaust the movement in their relentless witch-hunting of\u00a0truth speakers and seekers<\/strong><\/a><\/span>.<\/h5>\n
In\u00a0Being in Time<\/em>, I point out that as soon as an issue or event is identified as a potential Jewish problem, a Jewish satellite dissent emerges to \u2018calm things down.\u2019 As soon as Corbyn became the modern Amalek (\u2018existential threat\u2019),\u00a0Jews for Jeremy<\/span><\/strong><\/a> was formed to dismantle the idea that Jews hate Corbyn collectively. Those who view Capitalism as a Jewish construct are similarly reminded that Marx was also a Jew. In\u00a0Being in Time<\/em>\u00a0I argue that none of this is necessarily conspiratorial. It is only natural for Jews to denounce the crimes that are committed on \u2018their behalf\u2019 by a state that defines itself as \u2018The Jewish State.\u2019 The same applies to Jews who are genuinely tormented by the vast over representation of Jews in some problematic spheres. Yet, the outcome of all this is potentially volatile: every crucial debate regarding the West and its future; Globalism, Neocons wars, capitalism, immigration, multiculturalism, Israel and so on, is too frequently reduced into an internal Jewish exchange.<\/h5>\n
It was therefore just a matter of time before some Jews would admit that the involvement of a few prominent Jewish celebrities in some spectacular sex crimes is becoming rather embarrassing<\/a><\/span> and even dangerous for the Jews.<\/h5>\n
It seems as if Jonah Goldberg has launched the \u2018Jews against pedophilia\u2019 campaign. Today,\u00a0The Jewish World Review<\/em>\u00a0published an article titled \u201cFrench pedo flap a cautionary tale for OUR cultural aristocrats.<\/span>\u201d<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0In the commentary, Goldberg digs into the activities of Jewish radical ideology, along with those of the notorious paedophile, Gabriel Matzneff.<\/h5>\n
Goldberg was triggered by a\u00a0New York Times<\/span><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0article that examined the rise and fall of the paedophilia devotee. Matzneff is 83, an old man now, but he has been the darling of the French literary world and media for decades: his work was supported by leading newspapers and literary publications. \u201cHe\u2019d appear on highbrow TV shows,\u201d Goldberg writes, where he\u2019d \u201cregale interviewers and audiences with the sublime pleasures of having sex with children in France and on sex tours of southeast Asia.\u201d<\/h5>\n
In his book \u201cUnder 16 Years Old,\u201d Matzneff wrote, \u201cTo sleep with a child, it\u2019s a holy experience, a baptismal event, a sacred adventure.\u201d<\/h5>\n
But the contrast Goldberg draws between Jeffrey Epstein and Matzneff is surprisingly clumsy: \u201cThe well-connected billionaire spent vast sums to keep his sexual abuses at least somewhat secret. Matzneff not only confessed to his crimes, his confessions were celebrated as literary contributions.\u201d I feel the need to remind Goldberg that nicknaming one\u2019s plane the \u201cLolita Express\u201d is hardly an attempt to hide one\u2019s sexual morbidity and crimes. If anything Matzneff is like Epstein in that both celebrated a peculiar sense of impunity. Needless to mention, no Jewish outlet denounced either of them or their not very secretive activities before they were caught and charged.<\/h5>\n
Jewish Radicals and the role of the Orgasm<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Next comes the \u2018rationalisation.\u2019 \u201cMatzneff was a Child of 68,\u201d Goldberg writes, \u201ca product of the left-wing \u2018May 68\u2019 movement that shook France in the 1960s. These radicals subscribed to the idea that anything smacking of traditionalism or bourgeois morality was backward. Conventional sexual morality was part of the same rotten edifice as imperialism and racism.\u201d<\/h5>\n
Goldberg doesn\u2019t approve of the \u2018Jewish radicals and their ideology. He reminds us that \u201ca few years ago, Daniel Cohn-Bendit (a.k.a. Dany le Rouge), the famous former radical and leader of the European Green movement, got in hot water for his earlier writings and statements about \u201cerotic\u201d encounters with 5-year-olds. He (Cohn-Bendit ) dodged major consequences by disavowing his own words, saying they were merely intended to provoke.\u201d<\/h5>\n
Goldberg is a\u00a0well-known and successful writer<\/span><\/strong><\/a>, he could have published his criticism of Matzneff and Jewish radicals in numerous national American news outlets but, presumably he made the decision to use a Jewish outlet. Whether intentionally or not, Goldberg provides an insight into Jewish survival strategy in general and Jewish controlled opposition in particular. Criticizing radical philosophy and the advocacy of pedophilia on ideological grounds by Jews in a Jewish media outlet conveys the image that Jews can deal with their problems. The goyim should let it go or, even better, move on.<\/h5>\n
But Goldberg\u2019s account is either mistaken or misleading. The sex revolution that branched into advocating paedophilia wasn\u2019t invented in 1968. Its radical Jewish roots take us back to the 1920-30s and, in particular, to the early work of Wilhelm Reich.<\/h5>\n
The Following is an excerpt from\u00a0Being in Time<\/em>\u00a0in which I delve into Wilhelm Reich and his \u2018genital utopia.\u2019<\/h5>\n
In his 1933 work,\u00a0The Mass Psychology of Fascism<\/em>, Jewish Marxist and Freudian psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich attempted to explain the striking victory of \u2018reactionary\u2019 Fascism over \u2018progressive\u2019 Communism. Reich was desperate to rescue the relevance of revolutionary Marxism. In order to do so he formed a new \u2018post Marxist\u2019 theoretical outlook to explain why the Germans of his time favoured \u2018authoritarianism\u2019 over a \u2018preferable\u2019 communist revolution.<\/h5>\n
According to Reich, the attraction of reactionary and conservative politics and the inclination towards fascism is driven by a long history of rigid, authoritarian patriarchy which affects the family, parenting, primal education and eventually, society as a whole.\u2028Of course, the remarkable popularity of fascism in Europe could have provided the scientifically-orientated Reich with a clear refutation of Marxist working class politics, theories and predictions. After all, dialectical Marxism had failed as a social theory as well as a methodical prophecy. But for some reason, he, like many other Jewish intellectuals of his time, decided to stick with Marx. Hoping to rescue what was left of dialectical materialism, and insisting that true communist political revolution would prevail once sexual repression was overthrown, Reich synthesized Marx and Freud into a \u2018Sex Revolution.\u2019<\/h5>\n
Wilhelm Reich posited that sexual liberation on a mass scale would save Marxist dogmatism and working people as well. In chapter five of\u00a0The Mass Psychology of Fascism<\/em>, he declared war on the patriarchal and conservative family which he saw as being at the core of mass conservatism: \u201cFrom the standpoint of social development,\u201d Reich wrote, \u201cthe family cannot be considered the basis of the authoritarian state, only as one of the most important institutions which support it.\u201d The traditional family is a \u201ccentral reactionary germ cell, the most important place of reproduction of the reactionary and conservative individual. Being itself caused by the authoritarian system, the family becomes the most important institution for its conservation.\u201d<\/h5>\n
In the eyes of the neo-Marxist affection, both romanticism and traditional family values were obstacles to socialist reform and Reich\u2019s vehicle towards the new world order was \u2026 orgasm! In his 1927 study, The Function of the Orgasm, he came to the conclusion that: \u201cthere is only one thing wrong with neurotic patients: the lack of full and repeated sexual satisfaction.\u201d In the hands of Reich, the Marx-Freud hybrid was leading to what some critical cynics dubbed \u201cgenital utopia.\u201d<\/h5>\n
Reich believed that for women within the patriarchal society, sex was within the realm of duty and\/or restricted to procreation. \u201cThe maintenance of the authoritarian family institution requires more than economic dependence of wife and children on husband and father. This dependence can be tolerated only under the condition that the consciousness of being a sexual being is extinguished as far as possible in women and children. The woman is not supposed to be a sexual being, only the producer of children.\u201d(The Mass Psychology of Fascism<\/em>, Wilhelm Reich pg 56 37. Ibid pg 56)<\/h5>\n
Within the traditional society, the woman was robbed of any libidinal consciousness<\/em>: \u201cThis idealization of motherhood is essentially a means of keeping women from developing a sexual consciousness and from breaking through the barriers of sexual repression, of keeping alive their sexual anxieties and guilt feelings. The very existence of woman as a sexual being would threaten authoritarian ideology; her recognition and social affirmation would mean its collapse.\u201d Women were mere baby factories, who had only an instrumental role because: \u201cImperialistic wars require that there be no rebellion in the women against the function that is imposed on them, that of being nothing but child-bearing machines.\u201d This description of the woman and the family fits the traditional Jewish orthodox family rather better than, say, the German, French, Italian or Spanish family cell.<\/h5>\n
But Wilhelm Reich wasn\u2019t only a dialectic social revolutionary, he was also a pragmatist. He invented the Orgone Energy Accumulator, a wooden box about the size of a telephone booth, lined with metal and insulated with steel wool. The Orgone itself was a vague concept: an esoteric energy, a universal life force that was massless yet omnipresent and\u00a0promised to\u00a0<\/em>charge up the body with the life force that circulated in the atmosphere and which he christened \u201corgone energy.\u201d His Orgone box promised to improve \u201corgastic potency\u201d and, by extension, physical and mental health\u00a0.\u00a0<\/em>Thus, the newly liberated Western subject was invited to experience the true meaning of Marx and Freud through sweating towards full emancipation by means of accumulating \u2018Orgone energy\u2019 in this wooden box.<\/h5>\n
Those who watched Woody Allen\u2019s comedy film\u00a0Sleeper\u00a0<\/em>(1973) probably remember the Orgasmatron \u2013 the orgasm inducing machine. In Allen\u2019s satirical take on Reich\u2019s Orgone box, it is actually the authoritarian regime that encourages its citizens to emancipate themselves by means of their genitalia. In Allen\u2019s prophetic movie, the orgasm, like consumerism is a reward from the oppressive regime that diverts the masses\u2019 attention from their existential misery.<\/h5>\n