{"id":201182,"date":"2020-01-22T07:31:46","date_gmt":"2020-01-22T07:31:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=201182"},"modified":"2020-01-25T06:41:26","modified_gmt":"2020-01-25T06:41:26","slug":"how-michael-bloombergs-journalists-propagandize-for-more-u-s-aggressions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=201182","title":{"rendered":"How Michael Bloomberg\u2019s \u2018Journalists\u2019 Propagandize for More U.S. Aggressions"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse \u2013 Strategic Review Jan 21, 2020<\/strong><\/h1>\n
\"\"<\/a>

ZIONIST PARTNERS IN CRIME – Michael Bloomberg and Bibi Netanyahu during Israel’s aggression against Gaza. Bloomberg and Netanyahu also happen to be two of the highest people involved in the 9-11 crime and cover-up. Bloomberg served as the mayor of New York City for 12 years after 9-11, during which time he oversaw the management of the cover-up. He is also the chairman of the 9-11 museum and memorial in which the official version, the false narrative, is pushed on the public like a product. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

This will be exposing typical U.S.-regime propaganda. That\u2019s propaganda favoring U.S. imperialism, which actually violates the intentions of America\u2019s Founders, and the spirit of the U.S. Constitution<\/a><\/strong><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

The U.S. regime\u2019s propaganda doesn\u2019t come from the Government directly, but instead from the 607 billionaires who control the regime, via their corrupt control over the successful politicians (in both Parties), financing their careers<\/strong><\/span><\/a>, and by their owning (and otherwise controlling) the regime\u2019s \u2018news\u2019-media, which are privately owned and which carry the same propaganda as the Government\u2019s \u2018publicly owned\u2019 \u2018news\u2019-media do \u2014 all of America\u2019s mainstream \u2018news\u2019-media being in favor of the U.S. Government\u2019s sanctioning (economic-blockading) and trying to overthrow by means of coup or sometimes outright invasion, countries (such as Iraq, Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Libya, etc.) that had never invaded, nor even threatened to invade, the United States<\/em>. U.S. imperialism is commonly called \u201cneoconservatism,\u201d but it is basically the same as other imperialistic regimes throughout history \u2014 it is controlled by the given invading nation\u2019s aristocracy, which deceives in its propaganda regarding the reasons why \u201cregime change\u201d is supposedly needed in the targeted countries. By means of these lies, the nation\u2019s public are made willing to fund these invasions in their taxes and can even think that it is their patriotic duty, instead of being a massively criminal enterprise that they\u2019ve been fooled into supporting with their dollars and sometimes with their very bodies.<\/span><\/p>\n

First here will be essential historical background, in order for a reader to be able to understand typical U.S.-and-allied propaganda; and, then, will come a typical example which displays the results of that history and which thereby exposes the crucially implicit lies in that propaganda, and which cause it to be effective<\/em> propaganda \u2014 the sort of deceits that fool most of the public into favoring these invasions and other international aggressions, which aggressions routinely produce mass-murders, benefitting only the aggressor-nation\u2019s aristocracy and the aristocracies that are allied with them. This is the way that wealth in the U.S. has come to be so extremely narrowly held, so that, for example, a January 2018 study done for Deutsche Bank, \u201cUS Income and Wealth Inequality<\/strong><\/span>\u201d<\/a>, reported (p. 9) that \u201cUS: Top 0.1% owns as many assets as the bottom 90%\u201d, and (p. 11) that, out of all the 34 OECD nations, America has the most unequal incomes \u2014 the most extreme inequality, of them all<\/em>. The billionaires and their agents say that this is okay because, as the wealthy economist Lawrence Summers once put it, \u201cwe should accept inequality of results, recognizing that those who earn more are in a better position to contribute more to support society<\/strong><\/span>.\u201d<\/a> (In other words: poor people are less worthy than rich people are. Rich people tend to believe that, and to reward economists such as Summer for teaching that. It\u2019s essential to their propaganda \u2014 and they fool especially themselves into believing it.)<\/span><\/p>\n

The example to be dissected here will be from Wall Street\u2019s Michael Bloomberg. Though he doesn\u2019t deceive the public more than other billionaires do, he is running to become America\u2019s President in order to replace another deceptive billionaire, Donald Trump, and so his \u2018news\u2019-operation provides a typical example of the mendacity of America\u2019s mainstream (that\u2019s to say, its billionaire-controlled) \u2018journalism\u2019 (virtually everything concerning international relations in U.S.-and-allied \u2018journalism\u2019 is propaganda: written so as to deceive). In Bloomberg\u2019s case, the medium isn\u2019t merely billionaire-controlled; it is billionaire-owned, just like Jeff Bezos\u2019s Washington Post<\/em>is. Washington DC and NYC both get their \u2018news\u2019 from such highly compromised, billionaires-owned-and-controlled, \u2018news\u2019-media, as these. America\u2019s broadcast media then spread that \u2018news\u2019, nationally, and internationally.<\/span><\/p>\n

The individuals who report \u2018news\u2019 at a \u2018news\u2019-medium such as Bloomberg \u2018News\u2019, do what the operation\u2019s owners and its advertisers want them to do, which is to propagandize for their aristocracy \u2014 their own and allied billionaires\u2019 corporations\u2019 expansion so as to extend their empire into more countries and push aside the local aristocracy there, and, in this way, to concentrate the world\u2019s wealth into their own and allied corporations. An expansionist or \u201cimperialistic\u201d aristocracy\u2019s goals are analogous to gangland operations, except that an aristocracy writes and enforces the laws, instead of merely <\/strong>violates<\/strong><\/em> the laws (as gangland-operations do)<\/strong>. It creates laws within its own nation, and it creates laws also internationally via alliances and treaties, and it uses alliances and treaties against \u2018enemies\u2019, such as the military alliance and treaty organization NATO, in order to pump increased sales of their own nation\u2019s corporations\u2019 weaponry (such as from Raytheon Corporation), and it also uses those international laws via sanctions and secondary sanctions, which can become the preliminary phase of an outright military invasion of the targeted country after finally declaring the nation to be<\/em> an \u2018enemy\u2019 and thus \u2018acceptable\u2019 to invade and take over, for \u2018us\u2019 against \u2018them\u2019. (For example: Trump is outright refusing the demand by Iraq\u2019s sovereign Government for all U.S. forces to leave.) Mere gangsters cannot do any such things, and so they are much more under the gun than \u201cbanksters\u201d (aristocrats and their agents) are.<\/span><\/p>\n

Controlling the \u2018news\u2019-media is essential to any expansionist aristocracy\u2019s operations. No empire can be achieved or maintained without deceiving the nation\u2019s public, who must pay the taxes and sometimes supply the corpses to build and increase the aristocracy\u2019s empire.<\/span><\/p>\n

This is the difference between imperialistic operations versus organized-crime operations. Organized crime is lower-class because it doesn\u2019t control the government, but, when the anti<\/em>-organized-crime Kennedy brothers were briefly in power in the U.S., organized crime did at least provide crucial assistance to eliminating<\/em> the Kennedys; and, in that sense, organized crime was itself part of America\u2019s Establishment, at least at that time. Furthermore, as Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair documented in their classic 1998 WHITEOUT: The CIA, Drugs and the Press<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/span> (p. 134), \u201cFrom the moment of its inception, the CIA held to the same policies of its progenitors in keeping gangster organizations in business. By 1947 the Agency was backing heroin producers in Marseilles, Burma, Lebanon, and western Sicily.\u201d Organized crime is often essential to the CIA\u2019s \u201cSpecial Operations.\u201d Organizations such as the Mafia are valuable assets of the CIA. They are experts at getting things done secretly. And such operations are less likely than any other to ever be exposed as having been<\/em> CIA operations. Organized crime is thus a terrific asset to international intelligence agencies \u2014 especially to America\u2019s CIA, which promotes itself as representing a \u2018democracy\u2019, even though it represents, instead, a fascist-imperialist regime.<\/span><\/p>\n

Two years before the CIA got into protecting the heroin trade, U.S. President Harry S. Truman was, on 26 July 1945<\/a>, persuaded by his top general, Dwight David Eisenhower (hypocritical inventor of the PR phrase he used against the Establishment \u2014 which he actually always supported<\/em> \u2014 \u201cmilitary-industrial complex\u201d) that if the United States wouldn\u2019t conquer the Soviet Union, then the Soviet Union would conquer the United States, and so the suckered-by-Eisenhower Truman launched the Cold War on that date; and, on that basis, he turned America\u2019s most essential WW II ally, the Soviet Union, into an enemy, and the Cold War secretly remains U.S. policy till this very day<\/strong><\/span><\/a>. (This was exactly the opposite of what Truman\u2019s immediate predecessor, FDR, had intended<\/em>.) The strategy, after U.S. President George Herbert Walker Bush (on 24 February 1990<\/a><\/strong><\/span>) secretly ordered America\u2019s leading vassals to continue the Cold War on the U.S.-and-allied side after the Soviet Union and its communism and their Warsaw-Pact mirror to America\u2019s NATO would all end the following year, has been to surround Russia with enemies (Russia-allied countries that would be flipped to become U.S.-allied countries, by means of CIA subversion<\/a>, coups<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, etc.), with the aim being ultimately to go in and conquer Russia<\/a><\/strong><\/span>. This plan requires a massive<\/a><\/strong><\/span> amount of propaganda<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, but it has been very successful, in ousting Russia-friendly governments such as in Yugoslavia in 1991-99, Iraq 2003, Libya 2011, and Ukraine 2014<\/strong><\/span><\/a>, though not yet achieving its final destination, winning World War III (WW-III) by grabbing control over Russia itself<\/strong><\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

The first CIA coup (these coups were done by their \u201cSpecial Operations<\/strong><\/span>\u201d<\/a> division) was in Thailand in the second year of the CIA\u2019s existence, 1948, and it was done in order to take over the opium-heroin trade in southeast Asia (including Burma \u2014 now Myanmar) and to use it for providing essential off-the-books finance to the CIA in order for the CIA to do its part of the job of conquering Russia, \u201cSpecial Operations.\u201d As WHITEOUT<\/em> (p. 136) put it:<\/span><\/p>\n

This was the modus operandi of the CIA for the next fifty years. Though Truman was pressing for the secret operations<\/em> [Special Operations], his signature was on no compromising document. The authority for the operations was given by the National Security Council. There was no congressional appropriation, so funding came from private sources inside the U.S., through a network of proprietary front organizations, millionaires, and criminal enterprises<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n

That was how the \u201cThe Buck Stops Here\u201d President, Truman, actually functioned. (Similarly, Hitler\u2019s \u201csignature was on no compromising document\u201d about the Holocaust, but, as I documented in my own 2000 WHY the Holocaust Happened<\/em>, Hitler was the individual who ordered it \u2014 that was an executive action from the very top. It wasn\u2019t any truer that Truman was a \u2018weak dictator\u2019 than that Hitler, whom some Hitler-supporters label with that phrase, was. However, there were important differences between them: Truman\u2019s impact turned out to shape subsequent history even more than Hitler\u2019s impact did. And, whereas Truman\u2019s vastly harmful impact resulted from his being the Deep State\u2019s fool and thus his starting the Cold War on 26 July 1945, Hitler\u2019s vastly harmful impact was from his own, very private and longstanding, personal and always secret obsession against \u201cblood-poisoning\u201d of pureblooded Christians or \u201cAryans,\u201d by Jews, which had started obsessing him in him in 1919, twenty years before the war to impose this exterminationist goal upon the the entire world became publicly unveiled \u2014 a war that he partly lost when WW II ended, whereas Truman\u2019s war already partly won in 1991, and continues on even now, with the U.S. regime still planning to go in for the final kill, if and when it ever can.)<\/span><\/p>\n

WHITEOUT<\/em> also noted (p. 138) that,<\/span><\/p>\n

CIA officer Miles Copeland wrote twenty-five years later that had it not been for the Mafia the Communists would have been in control of Italy, so crucial had the criminal organization been in murdering labor organizers and terrorizing the political process. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Furthermore,<\/span><\/p>\n

The CIA\u2019s financing mechanisms for these abuses of its charter came in the form of large subventions from American businessmen among whom Allen Dulles and Forrestal passed the hat at New York\u2019s Brook Club, getting contributions from fearful millionaires such as \u2026<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

And (p. 225),<\/span><\/p>\n

General Phao had been made director of Thailand\u2019s national police after the CIA-backed coup of 1948 led by Major General Phin Choohannan. Phao\u2019s 40,000-member police force, the Police Knights, immediately engaged in a campaign of assassinations of Phin and Phao\u2019s political enemies. These troops also assumed control of Thailand\u2019s lucrative opium trade. \u2026 Phao\u2019s control of the opium trade was directly abetted by the CIA, which had funnelled him $35 million in aid. Thailand would thereafter become the CIA\u2019s main base of operations in the region.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

In the 1950s the CIA backed General Phao in a struggle with another Thai general for monopoly of control of Thailand\u2019s opium and heroin trade\u2026Backed by squads of CIA advisers, Phao set about the task of turning Thailand into a police state. The country\u2019s leading dissidents and academics were jailed. \u2026 Phao also cornered the country\u2019s gold market, played a leading role on the top twenty corporate boards in the country, charged leading executives and businessmen protection fees and ran prostitution houses and gambling dens. Phao became great friends with Bill Donovan, at that time U.S. ambassador to Thailand<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n

So: that was the CIA\u2019s first coup, and it happened in 1948, to Thailand: this operation was aimed at reducing the amount of off-the-books funds for U.S. intelligence \u201cSpecial Operations<\/strong><\/span>\u201d<\/a> that needed to come from America\u2019s aristocrats. Such Special Operations are crucial to the illegal, treasonous (anti-Constitutional), control over the U.S. Government, by the Deep State (the aristocrats \u2014 America\u2019s hundreds of billionaires who finance the bulk of successful political campaigns for federal office; these are the individuals who determine who will and who won\u2019t be able to become a serious contender for Congress, the Presidency, and judgeships). Not all of the money to fund Special Operations comes from the billionaires. An unknown percentage of it comes also from organized criminals \u2014 violators of laws, instead of writers<\/em> of laws. America\u2019s billionaires (via their paid agents, including gangsters) are the ones who write<\/em> the laws. Organized criminals aren\u2019t that powerful, because they can only violate the laws. And when a gangster serves a billionaire, only<\/em> the billionaire is standing above<\/em> the law.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n

This is essential historical context in order to be able to interpret accurately the 26 December 2019 Bloomberg \u2018News\u2019 article, <\/strong>\u201cPutin\u2019s Grand Gas Project Makes Sense Now<\/span>\u201d<\/strong><\/a>, by \u201cOpinion\u201d writer Leonid Bershidsky.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here, now, in bold italics<\/strong><\/em>, are the especially relevant excerpts from it which indicate Bloomberg\u2019s publication of propaganda that\u2019s against Russia, and for isolating Russia by overthrowing governments which (like Saddam Hussein\u2019s, Muammar Gaddafi\u2019s, Viktor Yanukovych\u2019s, Bashar Assad\u2019s, Nicol\u00e1s Maduro\u2019s, and Evo Morales\u2019s) had (or have) friendly relations with Russia:<\/span><\/p>\n

It\u2019s been reported in Ukraine that Russia might resume direct supplies of gas for Ukraine\u2019s own needs \u2014 something unthinkable under former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko\u2019s government, when Ukraine was buying Russian gas in the EU rather than deal with the invader of Crimea.<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

This ignores that by no later than June of 2013, the U.S. regime was already at the early implementation stage of its planned take-over not only of all of Ukraine but especially of Russia\u2019s largest naval base, which since 1783 has been and still remains in Crimea (which from 1954 to 2014 was part of Ukraine). That was to become yet another U.S. naval base. This coup was already in the planning stage by no later than June of 2011. So: that Bloomberg-published phrase \u201cthe invader of Crimea\u201d belongs actually to Obama, instead of to Putin, who merely responded to that U.S. invasion of Ukraine in the way that was essential for the national security of Russia. In doing so, Russia\u2019s President Putin also was protecting the people who live in Crimea<\/strong><\/span><\/a>, which is why they passionately wanted this response<\/a> <\/strong><\/span>from him.<\/span><\/p>\n

Zelenskiy, is more pragmatic than Poroshenko was and eager to end the armed conflict Russia has instigated in Ukraine\u2019s eastern regions.<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The Bloomberg-published phrase \u201cthe armed conflict Russia has instigated in Ukraine\u2019s eastern regions\u201d refers actually to the Obama-installed new Ukrainian regime\u2019s ethnic cleansing in that region<\/a><\/strong><\/span> to eliminate as many of the residents there as possible, because 90+% of them had voted for the man whom Obama had just overthrown, Viktor Yanukovych; and, if those voters would still remain inside Ukraine, then Obama\u2019s new Ukrainian regime would easily be voted out of power and would thus quickly end. Obama\u2019s regime didn\u2019t want too many of those voters still to be living there if and when that area, called \u201cDonbass,\u201d would finally become restored to Ukraine and they would become Ukrainian voters again, because that would surely then lead to an end of America\u2019s control over Ukraine. The civilian population in Donbass were specifically targeted<\/strong><\/span>.<\/a> Here\u2019s a map of the election in which Yanukovych became Ukraine\u2019s President, and as you can see there, the far-eastern dark purple area, where Yanukovych received at least 90% of the vote, is the \u201ceastern regions\u201d that refused to be ruled by the Obama-installed Ukrainian regime<\/strong><\/span>.<\/a> The purpose of the newly installed Ukrainian Government\u2019s ethnic cleansing in that area wasn\u2019t only to kill as many people there as they could, but especially to force millions of them to flee across the border into Russia, so that, if and when that region would ever become restored again to Ukrainian control, as many voters as possible who had lived there would either have been killed or else become Russians and resettled in Russia.<\/span><\/p>\n

Putin will be gone by then, but Russia\u2019s energy trade will be more diversified than when he came to power. More benign Russian governments will be able to use it as a basis for good neighborly relations rather than as an instrument of pressure.<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

On 27 February 2006, David McClintick headlined a now-classic 20,000-word article in Institutional Investor<\/em>magazine, \u201cHow Harvard lost Russia<\/strong><\/span>\u201d<\/a>, and he detailed there the rape of Russia in the early 1990s, by Lawrence Summers and his Harvard team of corrupt and deceiving economists, whom first Mikhail Gorbachev, and then Boris Yeltsin, naively brought in to guide Russia through the process of transforming from a communist to a capitalist economy. (Those two Russian leaders didn\u2019t understand fascism, and especially not its imperialistic type, such as Harvard and most of its ilk represent.) Basically, Summers, whose entire career has been spent assisting and helping America\u2019s billionaires, selected a team of advisors for this who when they weren\u2019t themselves outright corrupt, were nonetheless incredibly destructive in privatizing Russia\u2019s state-owned assets to Russia\u2019s most corrupt and well-connected insiders, who became billionaires in the process and secreted their newly gained wealth in London and elsewhere, so that the Russian Government\u2019s system of social-welfare benefits and of infrastructure were yanked out from under Russia\u2019s public. Those were the \u201cMore benign Russian governments\u201d \u2014 the pre-Putin ones \u2014 that Bloomberg \u2018News\u2019 here praises and wants to replace the Putin-led Government. If you want to see in charts and graphs what the impact upon Russia has been from Putin\u2019s treating as criminals the most-corrupt of those Russian billionaires and his trying to get them to pay the taxes that they had avoided and hid abroad, click here<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, to see those charts and graphs. As is shown there, Russia\u2019s economy approximately halved between 1990-2000 when Putin became President, who turned this around so that Russia has thrived under his leadership. Bershidsky wants to restore the pre-Putin type of leadership \u2014 near-starvation to the Russian masses.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2026 multiple players \u2014 Putin the ambitious authoritarian, his situational allies such as Erdogan and Xi, his adversaries such as the U.S., his reluctant partners such as the EU and his victims such as Ukraine \u2014 can combine efforts to build something worthwhile.<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Whereas Bloomberg \u2018News\u2019 pumps the lie about Putin\u2019s \u201cvictims such as Ukraine,\u201d the clear and incontestable reality is that Barack Obama destroyed Ukraine in 2014<\/strong><\/span><\/a>, and that \u201cThe Obama Regime\u2019s Plan to Seize the Russian Naval Base in Crimea<\/strong><\/span>\u201d<\/a> started being implemented by the Obama Administration by no later than June 2013 \u2014 well before his coup.<\/span><\/p>\n

The U.S. was backing an outright racist-fascist, or nazi, operation in Ukraine, as is clearly shown here<\/a> and here<\/a>. No one can reasonably assert that today\u2019s America isn\u2019t at least fascist, if not outright nazi (though predominantly anti-Russian instead of anti-Semitic, but any<\/em> form of racist fascism is nazi ideology, and Obama\u2019s was a form of that: anti-Russian).<\/span><\/p>\n

So: anyone who places any trust whatsoever in American billionaires\u2019 \u2018news\u2019-media is either ignorant or else stupid, because the facts are conclusively the exact opposite, and those media \u2014 as is exemplified well in this article from Bloomberg\u2019s Leonid Bershidsky \u2014 base their international-\u2018news\u2019 reporting, and analysis, on what is of benefit to America\u2019s billionaires, instead of to their victims, either at home or abroad. What type of fascists would produce such fascist propaganda? How is it not<\/em> extreme? It\u2019s an extremist form of capitalism, of the most dangerous type: both racist and imperialist.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n

Even most of the allegedly \u2018anti-war\u2019 or \u2018progressive\u2019 \u2018news\u2019-media in America are actually pro-imperialistic, and the contrary front by them is itself part of their propaganda<\/a><\/strong><\/span>. Their function is to publish criticism of billionaires and of the Government, but nothing that would encourage any sort of revolution to eliminate the dictators (including their agents) and to replace them by a different system. In the United States, where the existing Constitution is democratic and the Government simply violates it routinely and the corrupt judges after 1970 have employed lies to label these clear violations \u2018constitutional\u2019<\/strong><\/span><\/a>, a revolution would need to eliminate the dictators but not the Constitution. In some other dictatorships, it would need to replace both, and replacing the system would thus have to be more drastic than merely replacing the existing rulers. Fortunately, that\u2019s not necessary in the United States; so, a bloodless revolution could restore America to democracy, though all post-1970 Constitutional rulings would need to be then reviewed by completely changed personnel in the U.S. Supreme Court, for possible reversal. In a bloodless revolution, changing all members would take decades; so, that process would have to start only after all other stages of such a revolution are already completed. It\u2019s possible, but unlikely. America will therefore probably remain a dictatorship by its richest. Though America\u2019s Founders sought not only to eliminate the British aristocracy here, but any subsequent aristocracy from ruling (even an American one) in the United States, America\u2019s richest did rise, after WW-II, to become America\u2019s aristocracy (now called America\u2019s \u201cDeep State<\/strong><\/span>\u201d<\/a>), and the U.S. Constitution will probably remain, and increasingly become, a dead letter here \u2014 increasingly lied-about by America\u2019s top Court as it establishes more and more fraudulent precedents, which insult the consensus-intentions of the great men who wrote and signed the Constitution and each one of its Amendments.<\/span><\/p>\n

America\u2019s Founders warred against not only the British empire but actually against any<\/em> empire. Even the Monroe Doctrine in 1823<\/a><\/strong><\/span> (which is so often cited by American imperialists to \u2018justify\u2019 rapes and attempted rapes by the U.S. regime against countries in the Western Hemisphere such as Bolivia and Venezuela) was anti<\/em>-imperialistic, and simply said that the United States opposed European countries\u2019 efforts to take over countries in the Western Hemisphere. But this Doctrine subsequently became \u2018interpreted\u2019 by rising U.S. aristocrats to be instead an authorization for the U.S. government to replace European governments as imperial rulers in other countries of this Hemisphere \u2014 yet another<\/em> historical lie by the aristocracy. American fascism (especially of the imperialistic sort, which is commonly called now \u201cneoconservatism\u201d) is not<\/strong><\/em> rooted in the U.S. Constitution; it violates<\/strong><\/em> the U.S. Constitution. Our current Government does not represent the United States of America (the U.S. Constitution \u2014 \u201cWe, the People \u2026\u201d \u2014 and that\u2019s all<\/em> Americans). But it does represent hundreds of today\u2019s Americans, the Deep State, which need to be eliminated and replaced so that this country becomes, again, a democracy.<\/span><\/p>\n

Other key sources, than the Cockburn-St.-Clair WHITEOUT<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/a>, in order to understand today\u2019s U.S. Government, are Paul L. Williams\u2019s 2018 Operation Gladio: The Unholy Alliance between the Vatican, the CIA, and the Mafia<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/a>; L. Fletcher Prouty\u2019s 2008 The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/a>;<\/em>my own 9 September 2019 \u201cHow the U.S. Created the Cold War<\/strong><\/span>\u201d<\/a>, and the BBC\u2019s 1992 documentary posted to youtube as \u201cOperation Gladio \u2014 Full 1992 documentary BBC<\/strong><\/span>\u201d<\/a>. All of these describe the operation that agents of America\u2019s aristocrats carried out after FDR\u2019s 1945 death, in order, ultimately \u2014 with the consciously planned ultimate aim being \u2014 to surround Russia by enemies (transforming even its former allies into its enemies), and then to take control over both Russia and China, and thus to become dictators to the entire planet, nullifying U.S. President FDR\u2019s intention, which had been instead for an international democratic federal republic of nations emerging from the U.N. \u2014 for the termination<\/em>, instead of for the culmination<\/em>, of all imperialisms.<\/span><\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Modern propaganda doesn\u2019t come from the Government directly, but from the billionaires who control it, via their control over bought and paid for politicians (in both Parties), and their ownership of the corporate media<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,42,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-201182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-controlling-the-news-andor-the-free-exchange-of-ideas-and-information","category-The_Media"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=201182"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201182\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":201189,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201182\/revisions\/201189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=201182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=201182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=201182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}