{"id":200296,"date":"2020-01-04T07:32:26","date_gmt":"2020-01-04T07:32:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=200296"},"modified":"2020-01-07T07:58:02","modified_gmt":"2020-01-07T07:58:02","slug":"soleimani-murder-what-could-happen-next","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=200296","title":{"rendered":"Soleimani Murder: What Could Happen Next?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\">The Saker \u2013 The Unz Review Jan 3, 2020<\/h1>\n<h3><strong>First, a quick recap of the situation<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">We need to begin by quickly summarizing what just happened:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">General Soleimani was in Baghdad on an official visit to attend the funeral of the Iraqis murdered by the US on the 29th<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The US has now officially claimed responsibility for this murder<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The Iranian Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei <a style=\"color: #ccffff;\" href=\"https:\/\/thesaker.is\/message-by-the-leader-ayatullah-khamenei-regarding-the-martyrdom-of-shahid-sardar-qasem-suleimani\/\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>has officially declared<\/strong><\/span><\/a> that \u201c<em>However, a severe retaliation awaits the criminals who painted their corrupt hands with his and his martyred companions\u2019 blood last night<\/em>\u201c<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>The US paints itself \u2013 and Iran \u2013 into a corner<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The Iranians simply had no other choice than to declare that there will be a retaliation. There are a few core problems with what happens next. Let\u2019s look at them one by one:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">First, it is quite obvious from the flagwaving claptrap in the US that Uncle Shmuel is \u201clocked and loaded\u201d for even more macho actions and reaction. In fact, <strong>Secretary Esper has basically painted the US into what I would call an \u201cover-reaction corner\u201d by <a style=\"color: #ccffff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.redstate.com\/streiff\/2020\/01\/02\/secdef-warns-iran-us-will-strike-preemtively\/\">declaring that<\/a> \u201c<\/strong><em><strong>the game has changed<\/strong><\/em><strong>\u201d and that the US will take \u201c<\/strong><em><strong>preemptive action<\/strong><\/em><strong>\u201d whenever it feels threatened<\/strong>. Thus, the Iranians have to assume that the US will over-react to anything even remotely looking like an Iranian retaliation.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">No less alarming is that this creates the absolutely <strong>perfect conditions for a false flag \u00e0 la \u201c<a style=\"color: #ccffff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.usslibertyveterans.org\/store.html\">USS Liberty<\/a>\u201c<\/strong>. Right now, the Israelis have become at least as big a danger for US servicemen and facilities in the entire Middle-East as are the Iranians themselves. How? Simple! Fire a missile\/torpedo\/mine at any USN ship and blame Iran. We all know that if that happens the US political elites will do what they did the last time around: let US servicemen die and protect Israel at all costs (read up on the USS Liberty if you don\u2019t know about it)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\"><strong>There is also a very real risk of \u201cspontaneous retaliations\u201d by <\/strong><em><strong>other<\/strong><\/em><strong> parties (not Iran or Iranian allies)<\/strong>. In fact, in his message, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has specifically declared that \u201c<em>Martyr Suleimani is an international face to the Resistance and all lovers of the Resistance share a demand in retaliation for his blood. All friends \u2013 as well as all enemies \u2013 must know the path of Fighting and Resistance will continue with double the will and the final victory is decidedly waiting for those who fight in this path.<\/em>\u201d He is right, Soleimani was loved and revered by many people all over the globe, some of whom might decided to avenge his death. This means that we might well see some kind of retaliation which, of course, will be blamed on Iran but which might not be the result of any Iranian actions at all.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Finally, <strong>should the Iranians decide not to retaliate, then we can be absolutely sure that Uncle Shmuel will see that as a proof of his putative \u201cinvincibility\u201d and take that as a license to engage in even more provocative actions.<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div id=\"attachment_200297\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Khemenei-Soleimani-300x168-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-200297\" class=\"size-full wp-image-200297\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Khemenei-Soleimani-300x168-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"168\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-200297\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A spiritual father kisses his beloved son<\/p><\/div>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">If we look at these four factors together we would have to come to the conclusion that <strong>Iran HAS to retaliate and HAS to do so publicly<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Why?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\"><strong>Because whether the Iranian do retaliate or not, they are almost guaranteed another US attack in retaliation for anything looking like a retaliation, whether Iran is involved or not<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><strong>The dynamics of internal US politics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Next, let\u2019s look at the internal political dynamics in the US:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">I have always claimed that <strong>Donald Trump is a \u201cdisposable President\u201d for the Neocons<\/strong>. What do I mean by that? I mean that the Neocons have used Trump to do all sorts of truly fantastically dumb things (pretty much ALL his policy decisions towards Israel and\/or Syria) for a very simple reason. If Trump does something extremely dumb and dangerous, he will either get away with it, in which case the Neocons will be happy, or he will either fail or the consequences of his decisions will be catastrophic, at which point the Neocons will jettison him and replace him by an even more subservient individual (say Pence or Pelosi). In other words, <strong>for the Neocons to have Trump do something both fantastically dangerous and fantastically stupid is a win-win situation<\/strong>!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Right now, the Dems (still the party favored by the Neocons) seem to be dead-set into committing political suicide with that ridiculous (and treacherous!) impeachment nonsense. Now think about this from the Neocon point of view. They might be able to get the US goyim to strike Iran AND get rid of Trump. I suppose that their thinking will go something like this:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Trump looks set to win 2020. We don\u2019t want that. However, we have been doing everything in our power to trigger a US attack on Iran since pretty much 1979. Let\u2019s have Trump do that. If he \u201cwins\u201d (by whatever definition \u2013 more about that further below), we win. If he loses, the Iranians will still be in a world of pain and we can always jettison him like a used condom (used to supposedly safely screw somebody with no risks to yourself). Furthermore, if the region explodes, this will help our beloved Bibi and unite US Jewry behind Israel. Finally, if Israel gets attacked, we will immediately demand (and, of course, obtain) a massive US attack on Iran, supported by the entire US political establishment and media. And, lastly, should Israel be hit hard, then we can always use our nukes and tell the <em>goyim<\/em> that \u201cIran wants to gas 6 million Jews and wipe the only democracy in the Middle-East off the face of the earth\u201d or something equally insipid.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Ever since Trump made it into the White House, we saw him brown-nose the Israel Lobby with a delectation which is extreme even by US standards. I suppose that this calculation goes something along the lines of \u201cwith the Israel Lobby behind me, I am safe in the White House\u201d. He is obviously too stupidly narcissistic to realize that he has been used all along. To his (or one of his key advisor\u2019s) credit, he did NOT allow the Neocons to start a major war against Russia, China, the DPRK, Venezuela, Yemen, Syria, etc. However, Iran is a totally different case as it is the \u201cnumber one\u201d target the Neocons and Israel wanted strike and destroy. The Neocons even had <a style=\"color: #ccffff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/views\/2018\/06\/15\/boys-go-baghdad-real-men-go-tehran\">this motto<\/a> \u201c<em>boys go to Baghdad, real men go to Tehran<\/em>\u201c. Now that Uncle Shmuel has lost all this wars of choice, now that the US armed forces have no credibility left, now is the time to restore the \u201cmacho\u201d self-image of Uncle Shmuel and, indeed, \u201cgo to Tehran\u201d so to speak.<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">My statement on the killing of Qassem Soleimani. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/4Q9tlLAYFB\">pic.twitter.com\/4Q9tlLAYFB<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JoeBiden\/status\/1212954848666234880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">January 3, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><a style=\"color: #ccffff; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/pjmedia.com\/election\/2020-dems-condemn-trump-airstrike-as-reckless-making-iran-more-dangerous\/\">Dems (Biden) are already saying<\/a><\/strong><\/span> that Trump just \u201c<em>tossed a stick of dynamite into a tinderbox<\/em>\u201c, as if they cared about anything except their own, petty, political goals and power. Still, I have to admit that Biden\u2019s metaphor is correct \u2013 that is exactly what Trump (and his real bosses) have done.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">If we assume that I am correct in my evaluation that Trump is the Neocon\u2019s\/Israeli\u2019s \u201cdisposable President\u201d, then we also have to accept the fact that the US armed forces the Neocon\u2019s\/Israeli\u2019s \u201cdisposable armed forces\u201d and that the US as a nation is also the Neocon\u2019s\/Israeli\u2019s \u201cdisposable nation\u201d. This is very bad news indeed, as this means that <strong>from the Neocon\/Israeli point of view, there are no real risks into throwing the US into a war with Iran<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">In truth, the position of the Dems is a masterpiece of hypocrisy which can be summed up as follows: <em><strong>the assassination of Soleimani is a wonderful event, but Trump is a monster for making it happen<\/strong><\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">A winner, no?<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><strong>What would the likely outcome of a US war on Iran be?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">I have written so often about this topic that I won\u2019t go into all the possible scenarios here. All I will say is the following:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">For the US, \u201cwinning\u201d means achieving regime change or, failing that, destroying the Iranian economy.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">For Iran, \u201cwinning\u201d simply means to survive the US onslaught.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">This is a HUGE asymmetry which basically means that the US cannot win and Iran can only win.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">And, not, the Iranians don\u2019t have to defeat CENTCOM\/NATO! They don\u2019t need to engage in large scale military operations. All they need to do is: remain \u201cstanding\u201d once the dust settles down.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Ho Chi Minh once told the French \u201c<em>You can kill ten of my men for every one I kill of yours, but even at those odds, you will lose and I will win<\/em>\u201c. This is exactly why Iran will eventually prevail, maybe at a huge cost (Amalek must be destroyed, right?), but that will still be a victory.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><strong>Now let\u2019s look at the two most basic types of war scenarios: outside Iran and inside Iran.<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The Iranians, including General Soleimani himself, have publicly declared many times that by trying to surround Iran and the Middle-East with numerous forces and facilities the US have given Iran a long list of lucrative targets. The most obvious battlefield for a proxy war is clearly Iraq where there are plenty of pro and anti Iranian forces to provide the conditions for a long, bloody and protracted conflict (Moqtada al-Sadr has just declared that the Mahdi Army will be remobilized). But Iraq is far from being the only place where an explosion of violence can take place: the ENTIRE MIDDLE-EAST is well within Iranian \u201creach\u201d, be it by direct attack or by attack by sympathetic\/allied forces. Next to Iraq, there is also Afghanistan and, potentially, Pakistan. In terms of a choice of instruments, the Iranian options range from missile attacks, to special forces direct action strikes, to sabotage and many, many more options. The only limitation here is the imagination of the Iranians and, believe me, they have plenty of that!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">If such a retaliation happens, the US will have two basic options: strike at Iranian friends and allies outside Iran or, as Esper has now suggested, strike inside Iran. In the latter case, we can safely assume that any such attack will result in a massive Iranian retaliation on US forces and facilities all over the region and a closure of the Strait of Hormuz.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Keep in mind that the Neocon motto \u201c<em>boys go to Baghdad, real men go to Tehran<\/em>\u201d implicitly recognizes the fact that a war against Iran would be qualitatively (and even quantitatively) different war than a war against Iraq. And, this is true, if the US seriously plans to strike inside Iran they would be faced with an explosion which would make all the wars since WWII look minor in comparison. But the temptation to prove to the world that Trump and his minions are \u201creal men\u201d as opposed to \u201cboys\u201d might be too strong, especially for a president who does not understand that he is a disposable tool in the hands of the Neocons.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><strong>Now, let\u2019s quickly look at what will NOT happen<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Russia and\/or China will not get militarily involved in this one. Neither will the US use this crisis as a pretext to attack Russia and\/or China. The Pentagon clearly has no stomach for a war (conventional or nuclear) against Russia and neither does Russia have any desire for a war against the US. The same goes for China. However, it is important to remember that Russia and China have other options, political and covert ones, to really hurt the US and help Iran. There is the UNSC where Russia and China will block any US resolution condemning Iran. Yes, I know, Uncle Shmuel does not give a damn about the UN or international law, but most of the rest of the world very much does. This asymmetry is further exacerbated by Uncle Shmuel\u2019s attention span (weeks at most) with the one of Russia and China (decades). Does that matter?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Absolutely!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">If the Iraqis officially declare that the US is an occupation force (which it is), an occupation force which engages in acts of war against Iraq (which it does) and that the Iraqi people want Uncle Shmuel and his hypocritical talking points about \u201cdemocracy\u201d to pack and leave, what can our Uncle Shmuel do? He will try to resist it, of course, but once the tiny figleaf of \u201cnation building\u201d is gone, replaced by yet another ugly and brutal US occupation, the political pressure on the US to get the hell out will become extremely hard to manage, both outside and even inside the US.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">In fact, <a style=\"color: #ccffff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.euronews.com\/2020\/01\/03\/a-declaration-of-war-and-an-escalation-the-world-reacts-to-soleimani-killing\">Iranian state television<\/a> called Trump\u2019s order to kill Soleimani \u201c<em>the biggest miscalculation by the U.S.\u201d since World War II. \u201cThe people of the region will no longer allow Americans to stay,\u201d<\/em> it said.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Next, both Russia and China can help Iran militarily with intelligence, weapons systems, advisors and economically, in overt and covert ways.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Finally, both Russia and China have the means to, shall we say, \u201cstrongly suggest\u201d to other targets on the US \u201ccountry hit list\u201d that now is the perfect time to strike at US interests (say, in Far East Asia).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">So Russia and China can and will help, but they will do so with what the CIA likes to call \u201cplausible deniability\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><strong>Back The Big Question: what can\/will Iran do next?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The Iranians are far most sophisticated players than the mostly clueless Americans. So the first thing I would suggest is that the Iranians are unlikely to do something the US is expecting them to do. Either they will do something totally different, or they will act much later, once the US lowers its guard (as it always does after declaring \u201cvictory\u201d).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">I asked a well-informed Iranian friend whether it was still possible to avoid war. Here is what he replied:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Yes I do believe fullscale war can be avoided. I believe that Iran can try to use its political influence to unite Iraqi political forces to officially ask for the removal of US troops in Iraq. Kicking the US out of Iraq will mean that they can no longer occupy eastern Syria either as their troops will be in danger between two hostile states. If the Americans leave Syria and Iraq, that will be the ultimate revenge for Iran without having fired a single shot.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">I have to say that I concur with this idea: one of the most painful things Iran could do next would be to use this truly fantastically reckless event to kick the US out of Iraq first, and Syria next. That option, if it can be exercised, might also protect Iranian lives and the Iranian society from a direct US attack. Finally, such an outcome would give the murder of General Soleimani a very different and beautiful meaning: this martyr\u2019s blood liberated the Middle-East!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Finally, if that is indeed the strategy chosen by Iran, this does not at all mean that on a tactical level the Iranians will not extract a price from US forces in the region or even elsewhere on the planet. For example, there are some rather credible rumors that the destruction of PanAm 103 over Scotland was not a Libyan action, but an Iranian one in direct retaliation for the deliberate shooting down by the USN of IranAir 655 Airbus over the Persian Gulf. I am <strong><em>not<\/em><\/strong> saying that I know for a fact that this is what really happened, only that Iran does have retaliatory options not limited to the Middle-East.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion: we wait for Iran\u2019s next move<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The Iraqi Parliament is scheduled to debate a resolution demanding the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq. I will just say that while I do not believe that the US will gentlemanly agree to any such demands, it will place the conflict in the political realm. That is \u2013 by definition \u2013 much more desirable than any form of violence, however justified it might seem. So I strongly suggest to those who want peace that they pray that the Iraqi MPs show some honor and spine and tell Uncle Shmuel what every country out there always wanted from the US: Yankees, go home!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">If that happens this will be a total victory for Iran and yet another abject defeat (self-defeat, really) by Uncle Shmuel. This is the best of all possible scenarios.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">But if that does not happen, then all bets are off and the momentum triggered by this latest act of US terrorism will result in many more deaths.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">As of right now (19:24 UTC) I still think that there is a roughly 80% chance of full scale war in the Middle-East and, again, will leave 20% of \u201cunexpected events\u201d (hopefully good ones).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">PS: this is a text I wrote under great time pressure and it has not be edited for typos or other mistakes. I ask the self-appointed Grammar Gestapo to take a break and not protest again. Thank you.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unz.com\/tsaker\/soleimani-murder-what-could-happen-next\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Saker asks: can a full-scale war be avoided?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,58,51,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-Current_Affairs","category-Iran","category-Iraq"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=200296"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200296\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":200301,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200296\/revisions\/200301"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=200296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=200296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=200296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}