{"id":200199,"date":"2020-01-03T08:12:30","date_gmt":"2020-01-03T08:12:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=200199"},"modified":"2020-01-06T07:32:30","modified_gmt":"2020-01-06T07:32:30","slug":"russia-and-the-usa-both-finish-the-year-with-a-grand-finale-of-sorts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=200199","title":{"rendered":"Russia and the USA both finish the year with a \u201cGrand Finale\u201d of sorts"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\">The Saker \u2013 thesaker.is Jan 1, 2020 This analysis was written <a href=\"https:\/\/www.unz.com\/tsaker\/russia-and-the-usa-both-finish-the-year-with-a-grand-finale-of-sorts\/\">for the Unz Review<\/a><\/h1>\n<div id=\"attachment_199899\" style=\"width: 470px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Avangard-hypersonic-missile.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-199899\" class=\"wp-image-199899 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Avangard-hypersonic-missile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"460\" height=\"275\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Avangard-hypersonic-missile.jpg 460w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Avangard-hypersonic-missile-300x179.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 460px) 100vw, 460px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-199899\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Avangard hypersonic boost-glide weapon, shown during testing in July 2018, is now deployed operationally.<\/p><\/div>\n<h5>The end of the year is often a time of relative calm when the various parties to a conflict take a moment off, even when they declare nothing of the sort publicly (there are, of course, exceptions to this rule of thumb, such as the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979). This year, both the Russians and the USA ended the year in a climax of sorts which we shall look into.<\/h5>\n<h5>Another rule of thumb says that, \u201c<em>past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior<\/em>\u201d, and this turned out to be very true in both cases: the Russians did more of what they have done all year long, as did the Americans. Specifically:<\/h5>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h5>Uncle Shmuel decided to bomb five bases of the group Kata\u2019ib Hizbullah in Iraq in retaliation for an attack on the K1 U.S. base in Iraq<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h5>Defense Minister Shoigu announced that the first regiment of <span style=\"color: #ffff00;\"><a style=\"color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/missilethreat.csis.org\/missile\/avangard\/\">Avangard<\/a><\/span> equipped ICBMs was fully operational and on combat alert.<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5>Let\u2019s take a look at the implications and consequences of these two events.<\/h5>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">The U.S. airstrikes on Kata\u2019ib Hizbullah units in Iraq<\/h2>\n<h5>First, just to clarify, Kata\u2019ib Hizbullah has nothing to do with Hezbollah in Lebanon. The word \u201cHezbollah\/Hizbullah\u201d simply means \u201cparty of God\u201d and Kata\u2019ib Hizbullah simply means \u201cBrigades of the Party of God\u201d. Yes, both groups have similar names and they are both Shia. Kata\u2019ib Hizbullah probably aims at becoming an Iraqi version of Hezbollah, and while they even have a similar flag, Kata\u2019ib Hizbullah is neither an offshoot nor creation of Hezbollah. Kata\u2019ib Hizbullah was created as a direct response to the U.S. invasion of Iraq (whereas Hezbollah in Lebanon was blow-back from the Israeli invasion of Lebanon).<\/h5>\n<h5>This being said, there is no doubt in my mind that the U.S. actions in the Middle-East, and especially the total and abject subservience of the USA to Israel (and when I say \u201csubservience\u201d I am being polite, really) have greatly contributed to facilitating the alliance and cooperation of all Shia factions in the Middle-East. The best example of such cooperation is the support the Yemeni Houthis get from Iran (but \u201csupport\u201d is not the same as \u201cproxy\u201d, and Iran had nothing to do with the devastating Houthi counter-strikes against the KSA).<\/h5>\n<h5>I won\u2019t go into the details of the recent strike, especially since \u201cb\u201d on Moon of Alabama already has done a <span style=\"color: #ffff00;\"><a style=\"color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.moonofalabama.org\/2019\/12\/after-us-strike-on-iraqi-forces-its-troops-will-again-have-to-leave.html\">very good job analyzing it<\/a><\/span>. What I will do is simply suggest an answer to the rhetorical question \u201cb\u201d asks at the end of his analysis: \u201c<em>Yesterday\u2019s attacks guarantee that all U.S. troops will have to leave Iraq and will thereby also lose their supply lines to Syria. One wonders if that was the real intent of those strikes<\/em>\u201d.<\/h5>\n<h5>My personal opinion is that Occam\u2019s razor and past events ought to suggest that the most straightforward explanation is much more plausible than any kind of \u201c5d chess\u201d strategy.<\/h5>\n<h5>Furthermore, far from suggesting that this latest expression of the hatred of the Iraqi people for Uncle Shmuel will result in a withdrawal, we already see the exact opposite happening: not only has the USA announced that it will send <span style=\"color: #ffff00;\"><a style=\"color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dw.com\/en\/us-to-send-troops-to-middle-east-following-iraq-embassy-attack\/a-51848514\">another 750 soldiers to Iraq<\/a><\/span>, but it has also announced that<span style=\"color: #ffff00;\"> <a style=\"color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/troops-middle-east-baghdad-embassy-kuwait\">another 4\u2019000 troops might also be send to the region<\/a><\/span>, to the immense joy of its Israeli overlords who can\u2019t wait for a US attack on Iran (how nice that the \u201conly democracy in the Middle-East\u201d is always cheering for as much violence and wars as possible).<\/h5>\n<h5>Does that look like a preparation for withdrawal to you?<\/h5>\n<h5>Finally, there is also Donald The Great with his usual garden variety of empty threats like this wonderful tweet:<\/h5>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">&#8230;.Iran will be held fully responsible for lives lost, or damage incurred, at any of our facilities. They will pay a very BIG PRICE! This is not a Warning, it is a Threat. Happy New Year!<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/realDonaldTrump\/status\/1212121026072592384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 31, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<h5>And, sure enough, Iran\u2019s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei quickly replied:<\/h5>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">If the Islamic Republic decides to challenge &amp; fight, it will do so unequivocally. We\u2019re not after wars, but we strongly defend the Iranian nation\u2019s interests, dignity, &amp; glory.<\/p>\n<p>If anyone threatens that, we will unhesitatingly confront &amp; strike them.<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Khamenei.ir (@khamenei_ir) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/khamenei_ir\/status\/1212307890524053504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">January 1, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<h5>and<\/h5>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">That guy has tweeted that we see Iran responsible for the events in Baghdad &amp; we will respond to Iran.<br \/>1st: You can\u2019t do anything.<br \/>2nd: If you were logical \u2014which you\u2019re not\u2014 you\u2019d see that your crimes in Iraq, Afghanistan\u2026 have made nations hate you. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/hMGOEDwHuY\">https:\/\/t.co\/hMGOEDwHuY<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Khamenei.ir (@khamenei_ir) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/khamenei_ir\/status\/1212301034871279616?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">January 1, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<h5>It sure doesn\u2019t look like anybody in Tehran is taking Trump, or the US, seriously.<\/h5>\n<h5>And, frankly, why would they?<\/h5>\n<h5>As Ayatollah Ali Khamenei correctly pointed out \u2013 there is nothing much the US <em><strong>can<\/strong><\/em> do about what is taking place all over the Middle-East; except, of course, starting a war which the US will most definitely lose (Hollywood inspired delusions of invincibility notwithstanding).<\/h5>\n<h5>I believe that the U.S. Deep State has no intentions at all of leaving Iraq (or Syria, for that matter). Furthermore, far from being a strike to justify a withdrawal, this strike was aimed at bullying the Iraqi people into submission and acceptance of the lawless and thug-like behavior of the USA in their country. Simply put, Pompeo &amp; Co. did what Uncle Shmuel always does when they do not know what to do: they crudely decided to use brute force with the goal of terrorizing their adversaries into submission.<\/h5>\n<h5>You might object that this strategy has not worked in decades, and you would be right. But here is the catch: the weaker the AngloZionist Empire looks, the more the Empire feels that it ought to restore its putative ability to terrorize by doubling-down, again and again. This mental block is called, \u201c<em>la fuite en avant<\/em>\u201d in French, which can be translated as a <em>flight forward: <\/em>that is what you do when all you can do is what got you into serious trouble in the first place, because:<\/h5>\n<h5 style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">1. It did work in the past.<br \/>\n2. You don\u2019t have the intellectual capability to imagine any other approach.<br \/>\n3. Because you sincerely believe that violence always solves all problems (as in the German saying \u201cWenn es mit Gewalt nicht geht, dann geht es mit mehr Gewalt\u201d)<\/h5>\n<h5>Those familiar with Hegelian dialectics will immediately see what is happening; the Empire is being destroyed from within, as a result of its own internal contradictions and its inability to evolve to a higher level of functioning. This inherent corrosiveness within the Empire does not require an external enemy, it destroys itself due to its very nature.<\/h5>\n<h5>There are rumors that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/global-opinions\/trump-is-already-searching-for-his-next-secretary-of-state\/2019\/12\/26\/9a521e2e-2803-11ea-b2ca-2e72667c1741_story.html\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">Trump wants to get rid of Pompeo<\/span><\/a>, but I don\u2019t believe them. Assuming that these rumors are true in the first place, are they linked to the recent air strikes or is this an expression of Trump\u2019s comparative benevolence? Again, I doubt it. <span style=\"color: #ffff00;\"><a style=\"color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/global-opinions\/trump-is-already-searching-for-his-next-secretary-of-state\/2019\/12\/26\/9a521e2e-2803-11ea-b2ca-2e72667c1741_story.html\">Trump is already blaming Iran<\/a><\/span> for the fact that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rt.com\/news\/477181-iraq-protesters-break-into-us-embassy\/\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">the US embassy in Iraq was attacked by large crowds of US-hating Iraqi<\/span>s<\/a>.<\/h5>\n<h5>Finally, and just as pathologically dysfunctional, is the fact that the only \u201csolution\u201d the leaders of the Empire could devise to the current crisis is to send in <em><strong>even more<\/strong><\/em> forces to reinforce the huge embassy compound in Baghdad. Obviously, Uncle Shmuel can\u2019t even begin to imagine a strategy not solely predicated on violence.<\/h5>\n<h5>This clearly shows that the expression, \u201c<em>insanity is repeating the same thing over and over again expecting different results<\/em>\u201d still fully applies to the rulers of the USA.<\/h5>\n<h5>Now let\u2019s take a look at how Russia ended the year<\/h5>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">Russia deploys the Avangard (and more)<\/h2>\n<h5>Remember how after Putin\u2019s famous speech, the so-called \u201cRussia specialists\u201d declared that all these weapons did not exist, that they were all just computer animations?<\/h5>\n<div id=\"attachment_167098\" style=\"width: 370px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Kinzhal-hypersonic-missile.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-167098\" class=\"wp-image-167098\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Kinzhal-hypersonic-missile-1024x614.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"360\" height=\"216\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Kinzhal-hypersonic-missile-1024x614.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Kinzhal-hypersonic-missile-300x180.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Kinzhal-hypersonic-missile.jpg 1675w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 360px) 100vw, 360px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-167098\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A still from a Russian government video shows the Kinzhal hypersonic missile detaching from a MiG-31 aircraft. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n<h5>Well, now probably the most exotic and \u201cincredible\u201d weapon mentioned by Putin (the Avangard) is <span style=\"color: #ffff00;\"><a style=\"color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.janes.com\/article\/93421\/russia-declares-first-avangard-regiment-operational\">fully operational and on combat duty<\/a><\/span>. The Russians went so far as to <a href=\"https:\/\/defence-point.com\/2019\/11\/28\/russia-demonstrates-avangard-hypersonic-system-for-us-inspectors-vid\/\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">show that weapon to US inspectors<\/span><\/a>. Still, there remains a tiny minority which do not believe the \u201cRussian hype\u201d, despite an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gao.gov\/assets\/700\/695981.pdf\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">unambiguous report by the GAO<\/span><\/a> which clearly states that \u201c<em>There are no existing counter-measures<\/em>\u201d against hypersonic weapons, and who will only admit the existence of these weapon systems if they get vaporized by them. But what do these Russian weapons (especially the Mach 10+ Kinzhal and the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.defensereview.com\/russian-avangard-hypersonic-glide-vehicle-flies-at-mach-27-and-can-make-sharp-maneuvers-around-opponents-defenses-according-to-claims\/\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">Mach 27+ Avangard<\/span><\/a>) mean for the rest of us?<\/h5>\n<h5>One one hand, this is very good news because it it yet another sign that Russia is now fully prepared for war, including total nuclear war. To put it differently, <em><strong>all the hopes that the U.S. had regarding the development of an ABM system which could stop a Russian counter-strike (following a U.S. attack) are now gone<\/strong><\/em>. Not only have the new Russian weapons made the US carrier fleet obsolete, it also made the US ABM plans obsolete too. Thus, in theory, this new reality ought to deter even the craziest folks at the Pentagon, CIA, NSA and White House.<\/h5>\n<h5>On the other hand, however, this is not good news, because now the U.S. has a factual basis to declared that it feels threatened. Why? Because of the tricky issue of first-strike stability.<\/h5>\n<h5>I can state categorically that Russia will never deliberately start a war, least of all against the USA (the Russians understand that Russia could never escape a US counter-strike, even if delivered by the comparatively old US nuclear triad), but <em><strong>that is not an assumption the Pentagon\u2019s force planners can make<\/strong><\/em>. Simply put, the Avangard +<span style=\"color: #ffff00;\"> <a style=\"color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/9M730_Burevestnik\">Burevestnik<\/a><\/span> (nuclear powered infinite range cruise missile) combo could seem rather destabilizing from the point of view of what is called <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rand.org\/pubs\/notes\/N2526.html\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">first strike stability<\/span><\/a> (for a detailed discussion see <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rand.org\/content\/dam\/rand\/pubs\/reports\/2008\/R3765.pdf\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">here<\/span><\/a>). For the time being, only one ICBM regiment has been outfitted with the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicles while the Burevestnik is still in the late stages of testing. But we also know that three more regiments are scheduled to receive the Avangard in the near future while the testing and evaluation of the Burevestnik is near completion (in spite of a possible recent accident). Once ready, this missile will probably be deployed in large numbers. Right now <em><strong>U.S. defense planners will have to assume that both systems will be deployed in numbers sufficient to affect the first strike stability between Russia and the USA<\/strong><\/em>.<\/h5>\n<h5>The solution? To hammer out a new strategic arms treaty between the two countries. Alas, at this point in time, the U.S. leaders show no interest in any such treaty. Worse, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/11\/08\/opinion\/dont-let-the-new-start-treaty-lapse.html\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">the New Start Treaty will soon lapse<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\n<h5>I suppose that in the demented political culture of the USA any kind of treaty with Russia is a \u201csign of weakness\u201d and is therefore \u201cunpatriotic\u201d. Still, first strike stability is one of those things which, along with cooperation in space, self-evidently benefits <em><strong>both<\/strong><\/em> nations (not to mention the rest of the planet) and, therefore, almost any strategic arms limitation\/reduction would be highly desirable (the one exception to this rule would be a dramatic reduction in the number of deliverable warheads, even by both sides, which would threaten also first strike stability; see <a href=\"https:\/\/thesaker.is\/remembering-the-important-lessons-of-the-cold-war\/\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">here<\/span><\/a> and <span style=\"color: #ffff00;\"><a style=\"color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/thesaker.is\/newly-revealed-russian-weapons-systems-political-implications\/\">here<\/a><\/span> for a discussion).<\/h5>\n<h5>Finally, Russia ended the year by launching the newest <span style=\"color: #ffff00;\"><a style=\"color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Yasen-class_submarine\">Yasen-M-class<\/a><\/span> SSN\/SSGN, the Novosibirsk. This class of subs, arguably the most advanced on the planet, can function as both a nuclear attack and a missile attack submarine: it has eight torpedo tubes as well as ten vertical missile launch silos which can launch all sorts of missiles, including hypersonic ones. Most amazingly, it has only 64 crewmen, which suggest an unprecedented level of automation (the latest Virginia-class sub has a crew of 134). The Yasen-M is truly an amazing submarine, the big question now is how many of those Russia will be able to build? Probably not enough to really please the Russian force planners, but probably enough to create yet another major headache for the USN.<\/h5>\n<h5>What is crucial to understand here is that the Avangard, the Yasen-M and all the other weapons systems Russia has deployed (the Avangards, Zirkons, Bastions, Sarmats, Pereswets, Burevestniks, Poseidons etc. are only the ones discussed in the western media, in reality there are many more) are but the tip of a much bigger iceberg: <em><strong>for the past 5 years or so Russia has been preparing for total war precisely to try to deter the USA from doing something literally \u201cterminally\u201d stupid<\/strong><\/em>. Will that be enough to shock the leaders of the AngloZionist Empire out of their delusions or grandeur and invincibility?<\/h5>\n<h5>I honestly don\u2019t know. I hope that it will. But, frankly, I am not sure. Listening to the likes of Trump, Pompeo, Bolton and the rest of these ignorant and self-deluded clowns, not to mention the English language corporate media, I don\u2019t feel very reassured, to put it mildly. Let us pray that the <em><strong>actual<\/strong><\/em> deep-state decision makers can still discriminated between feel-good propaganda for the masses and the actual reality out there.<\/h5>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">Conclusion: two diametrically opposed approaches to security<\/h2>\n<h5>Trump is stuck in a position where he has no other choice but to continue to threaten anybody and everybody. This kind of manic aggression towards the entire planet is what passes for \u201clooking presidential\u201d in the current US political <em>doxa<\/em>. This, at leasts, is not Trump\u2019s fault and it all began a very long time ago (remember <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/magazine\/story\/2013\/11\/dukakis-and-the-tank-099119\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">Dukakis cruising around in a M-1 tank<\/span><\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usnews.com\/news\/blogs\/press-past\/2013\/05\/01\/the-other-symbol-of-george-w-bushs-legacy\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">Dubya landing on a carrier<\/span><\/a> with \u201cMission Accomplished\u201d in the background?). Not that I am excusing Trump in any way: no adult leader of a nuclear superpower should even think issuing such silly but nonetheless most dangerous threats towards any other sovereign country, nevermind another nuclear superpower. But let\u2019s be honest here: every single US President starting with Clinton and all his successors was a clown of one kind or another and Trump is probably not the worst of them. As I have said many times, <em><strong>at this point the problem is not the man (or woman) in the White House, it is the entire system which is both terminally dysfunctional and unreformable<\/strong><\/em>.<\/h5>\n<h5>The year 2020 will be dominated by the (frankly treacherous) attempts of the Dems to subvert the US Constitution and overthrow Trump. Like many others, I predict that this will boomerang into the Dems collective face and will yield a landslide victory for Trump (the Democratic Party is at least as unreformable as the US political system). Externally, Trump will probably continue to simultaneously threaten the EU, Russia, China, Iran, Syria, North Korea, Yemen, Lebanon, Venezuela, Mexico, Turkey, etc. and the entire worldwide Muslim community (keep in mind <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/fact-tank\/2017\/01\/31\/worlds-muslim-population-more-widespread-than-you-might-think\/\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">the following stats<\/span><\/a>: there are about 2 billion Muslims out there, and make up a majority of the population in 49 countries around the world). Basically, the US believes that it can <em><strong>simultaneously<\/strong><\/em> threaten, sanction and otherwise bully (or even attack), most of the countries on the planet and prevail. To call this delusional is an understatement.<\/h5>\n<h5>For Russia 2020 will be an <em><strong>important transition year<\/strong><\/em>. This is best illustrated by the compromise deal reached with the EU and the Ukraine on gas: Russia yielded to some of the Ukrainian demands solely in order to show support for the EU which is now slowly showing signs of truly getting fed-up with the endless stream of threats and demands coming from across the Atlantic. You could say that Russia agreed to a tactical concession in order to secure a strategic objective.<\/h5>\n<h5>The Germans and the French, in particular, seemed to have finally (!) realized that they gained nothing and lost a lot in their subservience to the USA . The Russian plan is quite simple, really: show the EU that Russia has more than enough force to smash any US\/NATO\/EU attacking force while, at the same time, indicating that Russia is more than willing to cooperate, and even compromise, to establish normal, civilized, relations with Europe. This being said, Russia will only agree to relatively minor compromises, simply because her real priorities, political and economic, are not in the West anymore, but in the South, North and East and, especially, China [quick reminder: <a href=\"https:\/\/oec.world\/en\/profile\/country\/rus\/\"><span style=\"color: #ffff00;\">the top exports of Russia<\/span><\/a> are crude petroleum ($96.6B), refined petroleum ($58.4B), petroleum gas ($19.8B), coal briquettes ($16.1B) and wheat ($7.93B); the top export destinations of Russia are China ($39.1B), the Netherlands ($27.7B), Germany ($19.9B), Belarus ($18.5B) and the United States ($15.4B).] Yes, the EU is still important to Russia, but not a top priority anymore.<\/h5>\n<h5>How can all this be summed up?<\/h5>\n<h5>Well, and paraphrasing a famous quote by Foreign Minister Lavrov, we could say that<\/h5>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h5>the US plan is to turn allies into friends, turn friends into partners, turn partners into neutrals and turn neutrals into enemies and<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h5>the Russian plan is to turn enemies into neutrals, turn neutrals into partners, turn partners into friends and turn friends into allies.<\/h5>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5>I will let you decide which of these two plans is viable and which one is not.<\/h5>\n<h5>I wish you all the best in 2020, especially peace.<\/h5>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/thesaker.is\/russia-and-the-usa-both-finish-the-year-with-a-grand-finale-of-sorts\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Saker explains why he believes the U.S. has no intention of leaving Syria or Iraq. And why this could lead to a confrontation with Russia, which America is not prepared for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":199899,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,91],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Commentary","category-russia"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200199","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=200199"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200199\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":200205,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200199\/revisions\/200205"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/199899"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=200199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=200199"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=200199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}