![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/never-corbyn.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n(1) England<\/strong><\/h2>\nJewish logic is astounding! The Jews fought Jeremy Corbyn\u2019s Labour tooth and claw. Their newspapers claimed he is a new Hitler. Their Chief Rabbi issued a fatwa<\/em> against Corbyn. Israel\u2019s Foreign Minister said<\/a><\/span> he hopes Corbyn will lose British election. And Labour had been soundly trashed in the British elections. Jews could congratulate themselves with this result: they\u2019ve got what they wished. But such a response would be too simple-minded for Jews.<\/h5>\nWhen the results of the elections became known, immediately, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz<\/span><\/a> responded with: \u201cThe blaming of the Jews for this historic defeat has already begun. It will only get louder.\u201d Well, this is the nature of elections. If you actively support one, winning side, you\u2019d be congratulated by the winners and blamed by the losers. This is just, this is right. But it is not good enough for the Jews. The smart people want a better deal: to be congratulated by the winners, while the losers should just regret they haven\u2019t had you on their side. They can\u2019t blame you for it will be antisemitic act.<\/h5>\nThis is the great Jewish trick: they always win, and they never lose. When their side loses, they say they didn\u2019t act qua<\/em> Jews. Even if they pull the Jewish solidarity card, and say that as Jews they have to be for unlimited immigration everywhere but in Israel; or as Jews they want Corbyn to lose; you are not allowed to \u201cblame\u201d them for the result. The Jews are always blameless. You may congratulate them with the result, never blame.<\/h5>\nJonathan Freedland, the Guardian journalist who had worked overtime blowing Corbyn antisemitism hoax into flame, twitted \u201cI predicted Labour would be defeated\u201d. He was corrected: \u201cit was not predicted, it was manufactured by you!\u201d And the Jews responded with \u201cHow do you dare to blame a Jew?\u201d<\/h5>\nAnd now, if you are unhappy with Corbyn\u2019s defeat, should you blame the Jews? Yes and no. No, because whatever Jews say, it is Brits that vote. No, so they won\u2019t think that Jews decide everything. And still, yes. They contributed their energy to his defeat. The Jewish onslaught on Corbyn had one immediate unfortunate consequence: Corbyn have tried to accommodate the attackers and sought a compromise with wealthy Remainers at the expense of the workers. And a politician who accommodates Jews is likely to be defeated twice: once, by a politician who is totally, without reservations, on the Jewish side; and the second time, by your supporters who would leave you. This is what happened to Corbyn. He went towards Jews, away from the British working class; while on the Jewish territory, he was easily defeated by Johnson, the eager friend of Israel.<\/h5>\nCorbyn had a chance: if he would unleash a Night of the Long Knives on Blairites after his victory in the party, if he would allow the party members to deselect the pro-Remain Blairite Jewish MPs, if he would drop silly pseudo-left notions of climate change, green economy, gender discourse, migrants, if he were to stick to the hard left class line, he would surely win. People are sick of fence sitters.<\/h5>\nInstead of being horrified by Jewish fatwa, he could make it his banner. Instead of blessing Jews<\/a><\/span> with the Hanukkah and getting \u201cGo f*ck yourself\u201d in return from Stephen Pollard, editor of the Jewish Chronicle<\/em>, he could bless the British people with coming Christmas. But then, he won\u2019t be Corbyn.<\/h5>\nThis development has a long history. The close aide to Jeremy Corbyn and a leading Labour strategist Seumas Milne had published a piece in the Guardian (he was then the paper\u2019s leading columnist) called \u201cThis slur of anti-semitism is used to defend repression<\/span><\/a>\u201d. That was in 2002, and he wrote: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the left have been closely intertwined. The left\u2019s appeal to social justice and universal rights created a natural bond with a people long persecuted and excluded by the Christian European establishment. Despite the changed class balance of many Jewish communities, Jews remain disproportionately active in progressive political movements throughout the world\u201d but now they accuse the Left of anti-semitism.<\/h5>\nI replied to him<\/span><\/a> then:<\/h5>\nIn civilised New York, a girl eager to brush-off an insistent admirer does not have to be rude. She slips him a phone number to call, and there a recorded message informs him, \u201cThe person you are calling does not wish to remain in contact with you. If you want to listen to a sad poem, press ONE, if you want to cling to unrealistic dream of reunion, press TWO, if you want to have counselling and advice, press THREE.\u201d<\/h5>\nThe Milne\u2019s article is a rejected lover\u2019s complaint. Apparently, he can\u2019t overcome his rejection by the Daughter of Zion. He laments the glorious days of their alliance: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the Left have been closely intertwined. From the time of Marx, Jews played a central role across all shades of the left.\u201d Mr Milne and the Left are in need of some advice and counselling (press THREE).<\/h5>\nEverything that has a beginning, Mr Milne, has an end as well. Before the French Revolution, the Jewish people supported despotism against the aristocracy, and the Magna Carta was signed by King John despite their opposition. After Napoleon, the Jewish people had had a long alliance with the Left. It was long, but not everlasting. This alliance was severed in the aftermath of the failed 1968 revolution. Since that time the Jewish People have built a new alliance, with Globalisation forces.<\/h5>\nGive it a thought, Mr. Milne: if the Daughter of Zion could ally herself with the Left, why could she not change her partners? Should she be considered a permanently beneficial force, next to God Almighty? Jewish leadership benefited from the union with the Left while it was an aspiring force, struggling with the traditional upper classes. After their aspirations were satisfied, they had no more interest in such an ally.<\/h5>\nWhy should one describe as a \u2018natural bond\u2019 rather than a \u2018marriage of convenience\u2019 this relationship with the rich Jewish bankers and newspaper owners who had supported the Left? It was quite an unnatural bond, formed against the obvious class interests of the involved sides, and its collapse was inevitable. The Left accepted the help of rich Jews, disregarding their motives. It paid a heavy price: alienation from the working classes who had had a long and painful history of Jew-Gentile relations, alienation from the Church, and the uncompromising hostility of the upper classes. The Jews used the energy of the Left until it ran out, and then ditched it. Now, the Left can dial a phone number in New York and listen to the pre-recorded message. (Read this article in full here<\/span><\/a>.)<\/h5>\nSince 2002, the Left didn\u2019t part with Jews; instead, it went to the desert the wealthy Jews wanted to send it, to the desert of identity politics and climate bull, to the desert of accommodating Jews and disregarding Christians. This policy came to the natural end in the 2019 elections. The new leadership of the Labour should learn its lesson and complete the disengagement from the Jews.<\/h5>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Stalin-ishamir.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nThey could learn much from Joseph Stalin, whose 140th<\/sup> anniversary had been celebrated yesterday in Moscow and elsewhere. This great and victorious leader of the Left didn\u2019t stray away from his course of liberating mankind on fashionable nonsense; he had no use for Derrida\u2019s deconstruction; he was a friend and a patron of the Church; he didn\u2019t encourage gender changes and perversions, he developed industry instead of promoting green sources; he banned abortions; immigration was tiny (mainly American workers and engineers fleeing the Great Recession).<\/h5>\nAs for Jews, he was a friend, but not a slave. He didn\u2019t hesitate to jail and execute the treasonous ones, he rewarded the loyal ones, he saved millions of Jews from the Nazi death machine. Jews \u2013 from Tel Aviv to London and from Moscow to New York \u2013 worshipped him. Eventually the fickle Daughter of Zion ditched him, but she always does.<\/h5>\nHis enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/glenn_greenwald.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
When the results of the elections became known, immediately, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz<\/span><\/a> responded with: \u201cThe blaming of the Jews for this historic defeat has already begun. It will only get louder.\u201d Well, this is the nature of elections. If you actively support one, winning side, you\u2019d be congratulated by the winners and blamed by the losers. This is just, this is right. But it is not good enough for the Jews. The smart people want a better deal: to be congratulated by the winners, while the losers should just regret they haven\u2019t had you on their side. They can\u2019t blame you for it will be antisemitic act.<\/h5>\nThis is the great Jewish trick: they always win, and they never lose. When their side loses, they say they didn\u2019t act qua<\/em> Jews. Even if they pull the Jewish solidarity card, and say that as Jews they have to be for unlimited immigration everywhere but in Israel; or as Jews they want Corbyn to lose; you are not allowed to \u201cblame\u201d them for the result. The Jews are always blameless. You may congratulate them with the result, never blame.<\/h5>\nJonathan Freedland, the Guardian journalist who had worked overtime blowing Corbyn antisemitism hoax into flame, twitted \u201cI predicted Labour would be defeated\u201d. He was corrected: \u201cit was not predicted, it was manufactured by you!\u201d And the Jews responded with \u201cHow do you dare to blame a Jew?\u201d<\/h5>\nAnd now, if you are unhappy with Corbyn\u2019s defeat, should you blame the Jews? Yes and no. No, because whatever Jews say, it is Brits that vote. No, so they won\u2019t think that Jews decide everything. And still, yes. They contributed their energy to his defeat. The Jewish onslaught on Corbyn had one immediate unfortunate consequence: Corbyn have tried to accommodate the attackers and sought a compromise with wealthy Remainers at the expense of the workers. And a politician who accommodates Jews is likely to be defeated twice: once, by a politician who is totally, without reservations, on the Jewish side; and the second time, by your supporters who would leave you. This is what happened to Corbyn. He went towards Jews, away from the British working class; while on the Jewish territory, he was easily defeated by Johnson, the eager friend of Israel.<\/h5>\nCorbyn had a chance: if he would unleash a Night of the Long Knives on Blairites after his victory in the party, if he would allow the party members to deselect the pro-Remain Blairite Jewish MPs, if he would drop silly pseudo-left notions of climate change, green economy, gender discourse, migrants, if he were to stick to the hard left class line, he would surely win. People are sick of fence sitters.<\/h5>\nInstead of being horrified by Jewish fatwa, he could make it his banner. Instead of blessing Jews<\/a><\/span> with the Hanukkah and getting \u201cGo f*ck yourself\u201d in return from Stephen Pollard, editor of the Jewish Chronicle<\/em>, he could bless the British people with coming Christmas. But then, he won\u2019t be Corbyn.<\/h5>\nThis development has a long history. The close aide to Jeremy Corbyn and a leading Labour strategist Seumas Milne had published a piece in the Guardian (he was then the paper\u2019s leading columnist) called \u201cThis slur of anti-semitism is used to defend repression<\/span><\/a>\u201d. That was in 2002, and he wrote: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the left have been closely intertwined. The left\u2019s appeal to social justice and universal rights created a natural bond with a people long persecuted and excluded by the Christian European establishment. Despite the changed class balance of many Jewish communities, Jews remain disproportionately active in progressive political movements throughout the world\u201d but now they accuse the Left of anti-semitism.<\/h5>\nI replied to him<\/span><\/a> then:<\/h5>\nIn civilised New York, a girl eager to brush-off an insistent admirer does not have to be rude. She slips him a phone number to call, and there a recorded message informs him, \u201cThe person you are calling does not wish to remain in contact with you. If you want to listen to a sad poem, press ONE, if you want to cling to unrealistic dream of reunion, press TWO, if you want to have counselling and advice, press THREE.\u201d<\/h5>\nThe Milne\u2019s article is a rejected lover\u2019s complaint. Apparently, he can\u2019t overcome his rejection by the Daughter of Zion. He laments the glorious days of their alliance: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the Left have been closely intertwined. From the time of Marx, Jews played a central role across all shades of the left.\u201d Mr Milne and the Left are in need of some advice and counselling (press THREE).<\/h5>\nEverything that has a beginning, Mr Milne, has an end as well. Before the French Revolution, the Jewish people supported despotism against the aristocracy, and the Magna Carta was signed by King John despite their opposition. After Napoleon, the Jewish people had had a long alliance with the Left. It was long, but not everlasting. This alliance was severed in the aftermath of the failed 1968 revolution. Since that time the Jewish People have built a new alliance, with Globalisation forces.<\/h5>\nGive it a thought, Mr. Milne: if the Daughter of Zion could ally herself with the Left, why could she not change her partners? Should she be considered a permanently beneficial force, next to God Almighty? Jewish leadership benefited from the union with the Left while it was an aspiring force, struggling with the traditional upper classes. After their aspirations were satisfied, they had no more interest in such an ally.<\/h5>\nWhy should one describe as a \u2018natural bond\u2019 rather than a \u2018marriage of convenience\u2019 this relationship with the rich Jewish bankers and newspaper owners who had supported the Left? It was quite an unnatural bond, formed against the obvious class interests of the involved sides, and its collapse was inevitable. The Left accepted the help of rich Jews, disregarding their motives. It paid a heavy price: alienation from the working classes who had had a long and painful history of Jew-Gentile relations, alienation from the Church, and the uncompromising hostility of the upper classes. The Jews used the energy of the Left until it ran out, and then ditched it. Now, the Left can dial a phone number in New York and listen to the pre-recorded message. (Read this article in full here<\/span><\/a>.)<\/h5>\nSince 2002, the Left didn\u2019t part with Jews; instead, it went to the desert the wealthy Jews wanted to send it, to the desert of identity politics and climate bull, to the desert of accommodating Jews and disregarding Christians. This policy came to the natural end in the 2019 elections. The new leadership of the Labour should learn its lesson and complete the disengagement from the Jews.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThey could learn much from Joseph Stalin, whose 140th<\/sup> anniversary had been celebrated yesterday in Moscow and elsewhere. This great and victorious leader of the Left didn\u2019t stray away from his course of liberating mankind on fashionable nonsense; he had no use for Derrida\u2019s deconstruction; he was a friend and a patron of the Church; he didn\u2019t encourage gender changes and perversions, he developed industry instead of promoting green sources; he banned abortions; immigration was tiny (mainly American workers and engineers fleeing the Great Recession).<\/h5>\nAs for Jews, he was a friend, but not a slave. He didn\u2019t hesitate to jail and execute the treasonous ones, he rewarded the loyal ones, he saved millions of Jews from the Nazi death machine. Jews \u2013 from Tel Aviv to London and from Moscow to New York \u2013 worshipped him. Eventually the fickle Daughter of Zion ditched him, but she always does.<\/h5>\nHis enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
Jonathan Freedland, the Guardian journalist who had worked overtime blowing Corbyn antisemitism hoax into flame, twitted \u201cI predicted Labour would be defeated\u201d. He was corrected: \u201cit was not predicted, it was manufactured by you!\u201d And the Jews responded with \u201cHow do you dare to blame a Jew?\u201d<\/h5>\nAnd now, if you are unhappy with Corbyn\u2019s defeat, should you blame the Jews? Yes and no. No, because whatever Jews say, it is Brits that vote. No, so they won\u2019t think that Jews decide everything. And still, yes. They contributed their energy to his defeat. The Jewish onslaught on Corbyn had one immediate unfortunate consequence: Corbyn have tried to accommodate the attackers and sought a compromise with wealthy Remainers at the expense of the workers. And a politician who accommodates Jews is likely to be defeated twice: once, by a politician who is totally, without reservations, on the Jewish side; and the second time, by your supporters who would leave you. This is what happened to Corbyn. He went towards Jews, away from the British working class; while on the Jewish territory, he was easily defeated by Johnson, the eager friend of Israel.<\/h5>\nCorbyn had a chance: if he would unleash a Night of the Long Knives on Blairites after his victory in the party, if he would allow the party members to deselect the pro-Remain Blairite Jewish MPs, if he would drop silly pseudo-left notions of climate change, green economy, gender discourse, migrants, if he were to stick to the hard left class line, he would surely win. People are sick of fence sitters.<\/h5>\nInstead of being horrified by Jewish fatwa, he could make it his banner. Instead of blessing Jews<\/a><\/span> with the Hanukkah and getting \u201cGo f*ck yourself\u201d in return from Stephen Pollard, editor of the Jewish Chronicle<\/em>, he could bless the British people with coming Christmas. But then, he won\u2019t be Corbyn.<\/h5>\nThis development has a long history. The close aide to Jeremy Corbyn and a leading Labour strategist Seumas Milne had published a piece in the Guardian (he was then the paper\u2019s leading columnist) called \u201cThis slur of anti-semitism is used to defend repression<\/span><\/a>\u201d. That was in 2002, and he wrote: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the left have been closely intertwined. The left\u2019s appeal to social justice and universal rights created a natural bond with a people long persecuted and excluded by the Christian European establishment. Despite the changed class balance of many Jewish communities, Jews remain disproportionately active in progressive political movements throughout the world\u201d but now they accuse the Left of anti-semitism.<\/h5>\nI replied to him<\/span><\/a> then:<\/h5>\nIn civilised New York, a girl eager to brush-off an insistent admirer does not have to be rude. She slips him a phone number to call, and there a recorded message informs him, \u201cThe person you are calling does not wish to remain in contact with you. If you want to listen to a sad poem, press ONE, if you want to cling to unrealistic dream of reunion, press TWO, if you want to have counselling and advice, press THREE.\u201d<\/h5>\nThe Milne\u2019s article is a rejected lover\u2019s complaint. Apparently, he can\u2019t overcome his rejection by the Daughter of Zion. He laments the glorious days of their alliance: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the Left have been closely intertwined. From the time of Marx, Jews played a central role across all shades of the left.\u201d Mr Milne and the Left are in need of some advice and counselling (press THREE).<\/h5>\nEverything that has a beginning, Mr Milne, has an end as well. Before the French Revolution, the Jewish people supported despotism against the aristocracy, and the Magna Carta was signed by King John despite their opposition. After Napoleon, the Jewish people had had a long alliance with the Left. It was long, but not everlasting. This alliance was severed in the aftermath of the failed 1968 revolution. Since that time the Jewish People have built a new alliance, with Globalisation forces.<\/h5>\nGive it a thought, Mr. Milne: if the Daughter of Zion could ally herself with the Left, why could she not change her partners? Should she be considered a permanently beneficial force, next to God Almighty? Jewish leadership benefited from the union with the Left while it was an aspiring force, struggling with the traditional upper classes. After their aspirations were satisfied, they had no more interest in such an ally.<\/h5>\nWhy should one describe as a \u2018natural bond\u2019 rather than a \u2018marriage of convenience\u2019 this relationship with the rich Jewish bankers and newspaper owners who had supported the Left? It was quite an unnatural bond, formed against the obvious class interests of the involved sides, and its collapse was inevitable. The Left accepted the help of rich Jews, disregarding their motives. It paid a heavy price: alienation from the working classes who had had a long and painful history of Jew-Gentile relations, alienation from the Church, and the uncompromising hostility of the upper classes. The Jews used the energy of the Left until it ran out, and then ditched it. Now, the Left can dial a phone number in New York and listen to the pre-recorded message. (Read this article in full here<\/span><\/a>.)<\/h5>\nSince 2002, the Left didn\u2019t part with Jews; instead, it went to the desert the wealthy Jews wanted to send it, to the desert of identity politics and climate bull, to the desert of accommodating Jews and disregarding Christians. This policy came to the natural end in the 2019 elections. The new leadership of the Labour should learn its lesson and complete the disengagement from the Jews.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThey could learn much from Joseph Stalin, whose 140th<\/sup> anniversary had been celebrated yesterday in Moscow and elsewhere. This great and victorious leader of the Left didn\u2019t stray away from his course of liberating mankind on fashionable nonsense; he had no use for Derrida\u2019s deconstruction; he was a friend and a patron of the Church; he didn\u2019t encourage gender changes and perversions, he developed industry instead of promoting green sources; he banned abortions; immigration was tiny (mainly American workers and engineers fleeing the Great Recession).<\/h5>\nAs for Jews, he was a friend, but not a slave. He didn\u2019t hesitate to jail and execute the treasonous ones, he rewarded the loyal ones, he saved millions of Jews from the Nazi death machine. Jews \u2013 from Tel Aviv to London and from Moscow to New York \u2013 worshipped him. Eventually the fickle Daughter of Zion ditched him, but she always does.<\/h5>\nHis enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
Corbyn had a chance: if he would unleash a Night of the Long Knives on Blairites after his victory in the party, if he would allow the party members to deselect the pro-Remain Blairite Jewish MPs, if he would drop silly pseudo-left notions of climate change, green economy, gender discourse, migrants, if he were to stick to the hard left class line, he would surely win. People are sick of fence sitters.<\/h5>\nInstead of being horrified by Jewish fatwa, he could make it his banner. Instead of blessing Jews<\/a><\/span> with the Hanukkah and getting \u201cGo f*ck yourself\u201d in return from Stephen Pollard, editor of the Jewish Chronicle<\/em>, he could bless the British people with coming Christmas. But then, he won\u2019t be Corbyn.<\/h5>\nThis development has a long history. The close aide to Jeremy Corbyn and a leading Labour strategist Seumas Milne had published a piece in the Guardian (he was then the paper\u2019s leading columnist) called \u201cThis slur of anti-semitism is used to defend repression<\/span><\/a>\u201d. That was in 2002, and he wrote: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the left have been closely intertwined. The left\u2019s appeal to social justice and universal rights created a natural bond with a people long persecuted and excluded by the Christian European establishment. Despite the changed class balance of many Jewish communities, Jews remain disproportionately active in progressive political movements throughout the world\u201d but now they accuse the Left of anti-semitism.<\/h5>\nI replied to him<\/span><\/a> then:<\/h5>\nIn civilised New York, a girl eager to brush-off an insistent admirer does not have to be rude. She slips him a phone number to call, and there a recorded message informs him, \u201cThe person you are calling does not wish to remain in contact with you. If you want to listen to a sad poem, press ONE, if you want to cling to unrealistic dream of reunion, press TWO, if you want to have counselling and advice, press THREE.\u201d<\/h5>\nThe Milne\u2019s article is a rejected lover\u2019s complaint. Apparently, he can\u2019t overcome his rejection by the Daughter of Zion. He laments the glorious days of their alliance: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the Left have been closely intertwined. From the time of Marx, Jews played a central role across all shades of the left.\u201d Mr Milne and the Left are in need of some advice and counselling (press THREE).<\/h5>\nEverything that has a beginning, Mr Milne, has an end as well. Before the French Revolution, the Jewish people supported despotism against the aristocracy, and the Magna Carta was signed by King John despite their opposition. After Napoleon, the Jewish people had had a long alliance with the Left. It was long, but not everlasting. This alliance was severed in the aftermath of the failed 1968 revolution. Since that time the Jewish People have built a new alliance, with Globalisation forces.<\/h5>\nGive it a thought, Mr. Milne: if the Daughter of Zion could ally herself with the Left, why could she not change her partners? Should she be considered a permanently beneficial force, next to God Almighty? Jewish leadership benefited from the union with the Left while it was an aspiring force, struggling with the traditional upper classes. After their aspirations were satisfied, they had no more interest in such an ally.<\/h5>\nWhy should one describe as a \u2018natural bond\u2019 rather than a \u2018marriage of convenience\u2019 this relationship with the rich Jewish bankers and newspaper owners who had supported the Left? It was quite an unnatural bond, formed against the obvious class interests of the involved sides, and its collapse was inevitable. The Left accepted the help of rich Jews, disregarding their motives. It paid a heavy price: alienation from the working classes who had had a long and painful history of Jew-Gentile relations, alienation from the Church, and the uncompromising hostility of the upper classes. The Jews used the energy of the Left until it ran out, and then ditched it. Now, the Left can dial a phone number in New York and listen to the pre-recorded message. (Read this article in full here<\/span><\/a>.)<\/h5>\nSince 2002, the Left didn\u2019t part with Jews; instead, it went to the desert the wealthy Jews wanted to send it, to the desert of identity politics and climate bull, to the desert of accommodating Jews and disregarding Christians. This policy came to the natural end in the 2019 elections. The new leadership of the Labour should learn its lesson and complete the disengagement from the Jews.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThey could learn much from Joseph Stalin, whose 140th<\/sup> anniversary had been celebrated yesterday in Moscow and elsewhere. This great and victorious leader of the Left didn\u2019t stray away from his course of liberating mankind on fashionable nonsense; he had no use for Derrida\u2019s deconstruction; he was a friend and a patron of the Church; he didn\u2019t encourage gender changes and perversions, he developed industry instead of promoting green sources; he banned abortions; immigration was tiny (mainly American workers and engineers fleeing the Great Recession).<\/h5>\nAs for Jews, he was a friend, but not a slave. He didn\u2019t hesitate to jail and execute the treasonous ones, he rewarded the loyal ones, he saved millions of Jews from the Nazi death machine. Jews \u2013 from Tel Aviv to London and from Moscow to New York \u2013 worshipped him. Eventually the fickle Daughter of Zion ditched him, but she always does.<\/h5>\nHis enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
This development has a long history. The close aide to Jeremy Corbyn and a leading Labour strategist Seumas Milne had published a piece in the Guardian (he was then the paper\u2019s leading columnist) called \u201cThis slur of anti-semitism is used to defend repression<\/span><\/a>\u201d. That was in 2002, and he wrote: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the left have been closely intertwined. The left\u2019s appeal to social justice and universal rights created a natural bond with a people long persecuted and excluded by the Christian European establishment. Despite the changed class balance of many Jewish communities, Jews remain disproportionately active in progressive political movements throughout the world\u201d but now they accuse the Left of anti-semitism.<\/h5>\nI replied to him<\/span><\/a> then:<\/h5>\nIn civilised New York, a girl eager to brush-off an insistent admirer does not have to be rude. She slips him a phone number to call, and there a recorded message informs him, \u201cThe person you are calling does not wish to remain in contact with you. If you want to listen to a sad poem, press ONE, if you want to cling to unrealistic dream of reunion, press TWO, if you want to have counselling and advice, press THREE.\u201d<\/h5>\nThe Milne\u2019s article is a rejected lover\u2019s complaint. Apparently, he can\u2019t overcome his rejection by the Daughter of Zion. He laments the glorious days of their alliance: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the Left have been closely intertwined. From the time of Marx, Jews played a central role across all shades of the left.\u201d Mr Milne and the Left are in need of some advice and counselling (press THREE).<\/h5>\nEverything that has a beginning, Mr Milne, has an end as well. Before the French Revolution, the Jewish people supported despotism against the aristocracy, and the Magna Carta was signed by King John despite their opposition. After Napoleon, the Jewish people had had a long alliance with the Left. It was long, but not everlasting. This alliance was severed in the aftermath of the failed 1968 revolution. Since that time the Jewish People have built a new alliance, with Globalisation forces.<\/h5>\nGive it a thought, Mr. Milne: if the Daughter of Zion could ally herself with the Left, why could she not change her partners? Should she be considered a permanently beneficial force, next to God Almighty? Jewish leadership benefited from the union with the Left while it was an aspiring force, struggling with the traditional upper classes. After their aspirations were satisfied, they had no more interest in such an ally.<\/h5>\nWhy should one describe as a \u2018natural bond\u2019 rather than a \u2018marriage of convenience\u2019 this relationship with the rich Jewish bankers and newspaper owners who had supported the Left? It was quite an unnatural bond, formed against the obvious class interests of the involved sides, and its collapse was inevitable. The Left accepted the help of rich Jews, disregarding their motives. It paid a heavy price: alienation from the working classes who had had a long and painful history of Jew-Gentile relations, alienation from the Church, and the uncompromising hostility of the upper classes. The Jews used the energy of the Left until it ran out, and then ditched it. Now, the Left can dial a phone number in New York and listen to the pre-recorded message. (Read this article in full here<\/span><\/a>.)<\/h5>\nSince 2002, the Left didn\u2019t part with Jews; instead, it went to the desert the wealthy Jews wanted to send it, to the desert of identity politics and climate bull, to the desert of accommodating Jews and disregarding Christians. This policy came to the natural end in the 2019 elections. The new leadership of the Labour should learn its lesson and complete the disengagement from the Jews.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThey could learn much from Joseph Stalin, whose 140th<\/sup> anniversary had been celebrated yesterday in Moscow and elsewhere. This great and victorious leader of the Left didn\u2019t stray away from his course of liberating mankind on fashionable nonsense; he had no use for Derrida\u2019s deconstruction; he was a friend and a patron of the Church; he didn\u2019t encourage gender changes and perversions, he developed industry instead of promoting green sources; he banned abortions; immigration was tiny (mainly American workers and engineers fleeing the Great Recession).<\/h5>\nAs for Jews, he was a friend, but not a slave. He didn\u2019t hesitate to jail and execute the treasonous ones, he rewarded the loyal ones, he saved millions of Jews from the Nazi death machine. Jews \u2013 from Tel Aviv to London and from Moscow to New York \u2013 worshipped him. Eventually the fickle Daughter of Zion ditched him, but she always does.<\/h5>\nHis enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
In civilised New York, a girl eager to brush-off an insistent admirer does not have to be rude. She slips him a phone number to call, and there a recorded message informs him, \u201cThe person you are calling does not wish to remain in contact with you. If you want to listen to a sad poem, press ONE, if you want to cling to unrealistic dream of reunion, press TWO, if you want to have counselling and advice, press THREE.\u201d<\/h5>\nThe Milne\u2019s article is a rejected lover\u2019s complaint. Apparently, he can\u2019t overcome his rejection by the Daughter of Zion. He laments the glorious days of their alliance: \u201cSince the French revolution, the fates of the Jewish people and the Left have been closely intertwined. From the time of Marx, Jews played a central role across all shades of the left.\u201d Mr Milne and the Left are in need of some advice and counselling (press THREE).<\/h5>\nEverything that has a beginning, Mr Milne, has an end as well. Before the French Revolution, the Jewish people supported despotism against the aristocracy, and the Magna Carta was signed by King John despite their opposition. After Napoleon, the Jewish people had had a long alliance with the Left. It was long, but not everlasting. This alliance was severed in the aftermath of the failed 1968 revolution. Since that time the Jewish People have built a new alliance, with Globalisation forces.<\/h5>\nGive it a thought, Mr. Milne: if the Daughter of Zion could ally herself with the Left, why could she not change her partners? Should she be considered a permanently beneficial force, next to God Almighty? Jewish leadership benefited from the union with the Left while it was an aspiring force, struggling with the traditional upper classes. After their aspirations were satisfied, they had no more interest in such an ally.<\/h5>\nWhy should one describe as a \u2018natural bond\u2019 rather than a \u2018marriage of convenience\u2019 this relationship with the rich Jewish bankers and newspaper owners who had supported the Left? It was quite an unnatural bond, formed against the obvious class interests of the involved sides, and its collapse was inevitable. The Left accepted the help of rich Jews, disregarding their motives. It paid a heavy price: alienation from the working classes who had had a long and painful history of Jew-Gentile relations, alienation from the Church, and the uncompromising hostility of the upper classes. The Jews used the energy of the Left until it ran out, and then ditched it. Now, the Left can dial a phone number in New York and listen to the pre-recorded message. (Read this article in full here<\/span><\/a>.)<\/h5>\nSince 2002, the Left didn\u2019t part with Jews; instead, it went to the desert the wealthy Jews wanted to send it, to the desert of identity politics and climate bull, to the desert of accommodating Jews and disregarding Christians. This policy came to the natural end in the 2019 elections. The new leadership of the Labour should learn its lesson and complete the disengagement from the Jews.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThey could learn much from Joseph Stalin, whose 140th<\/sup> anniversary had been celebrated yesterday in Moscow and elsewhere. This great and victorious leader of the Left didn\u2019t stray away from his course of liberating mankind on fashionable nonsense; he had no use for Derrida\u2019s deconstruction; he was a friend and a patron of the Church; he didn\u2019t encourage gender changes and perversions, he developed industry instead of promoting green sources; he banned abortions; immigration was tiny (mainly American workers and engineers fleeing the Great Recession).<\/h5>\nAs for Jews, he was a friend, but not a slave. He didn\u2019t hesitate to jail and execute the treasonous ones, he rewarded the loyal ones, he saved millions of Jews from the Nazi death machine. Jews \u2013 from Tel Aviv to London and from Moscow to New York \u2013 worshipped him. Eventually the fickle Daughter of Zion ditched him, but she always does.<\/h5>\nHis enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
Everything that has a beginning, Mr Milne, has an end as well. Before the French Revolution, the Jewish people supported despotism against the aristocracy, and the Magna Carta was signed by King John despite their opposition. After Napoleon, the Jewish people had had a long alliance with the Left. It was long, but not everlasting. This alliance was severed in the aftermath of the failed 1968 revolution. Since that time the Jewish People have built a new alliance, with Globalisation forces.<\/h5>\nGive it a thought, Mr. Milne: if the Daughter of Zion could ally herself with the Left, why could she not change her partners? Should she be considered a permanently beneficial force, next to God Almighty? Jewish leadership benefited from the union with the Left while it was an aspiring force, struggling with the traditional upper classes. After their aspirations were satisfied, they had no more interest in such an ally.<\/h5>\nWhy should one describe as a \u2018natural bond\u2019 rather than a \u2018marriage of convenience\u2019 this relationship with the rich Jewish bankers and newspaper owners who had supported the Left? It was quite an unnatural bond, formed against the obvious class interests of the involved sides, and its collapse was inevitable. The Left accepted the help of rich Jews, disregarding their motives. It paid a heavy price: alienation from the working classes who had had a long and painful history of Jew-Gentile relations, alienation from the Church, and the uncompromising hostility of the upper classes. The Jews used the energy of the Left until it ran out, and then ditched it. Now, the Left can dial a phone number in New York and listen to the pre-recorded message. (Read this article in full here<\/span><\/a>.)<\/h5>\nSince 2002, the Left didn\u2019t part with Jews; instead, it went to the desert the wealthy Jews wanted to send it, to the desert of identity politics and climate bull, to the desert of accommodating Jews and disregarding Christians. This policy came to the natural end in the 2019 elections. The new leadership of the Labour should learn its lesson and complete the disengagement from the Jews.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThey could learn much from Joseph Stalin, whose 140th<\/sup> anniversary had been celebrated yesterday in Moscow and elsewhere. This great and victorious leader of the Left didn\u2019t stray away from his course of liberating mankind on fashionable nonsense; he had no use for Derrida\u2019s deconstruction; he was a friend and a patron of the Church; he didn\u2019t encourage gender changes and perversions, he developed industry instead of promoting green sources; he banned abortions; immigration was tiny (mainly American workers and engineers fleeing the Great Recession).<\/h5>\nAs for Jews, he was a friend, but not a slave. He didn\u2019t hesitate to jail and execute the treasonous ones, he rewarded the loyal ones, he saved millions of Jews from the Nazi death machine. Jews \u2013 from Tel Aviv to London and from Moscow to New York \u2013 worshipped him. Eventually the fickle Daughter of Zion ditched him, but she always does.<\/h5>\nHis enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
Why should one describe as a \u2018natural bond\u2019 rather than a \u2018marriage of convenience\u2019 this relationship with the rich Jewish bankers and newspaper owners who had supported the Left? It was quite an unnatural bond, formed against the obvious class interests of the involved sides, and its collapse was inevitable. The Left accepted the help of rich Jews, disregarding their motives. It paid a heavy price: alienation from the working classes who had had a long and painful history of Jew-Gentile relations, alienation from the Church, and the uncompromising hostility of the upper classes. The Jews used the energy of the Left until it ran out, and then ditched it. Now, the Left can dial a phone number in New York and listen to the pre-recorded message. (Read this article in full here<\/span><\/a>.)<\/h5>\nSince 2002, the Left didn\u2019t part with Jews; instead, it went to the desert the wealthy Jews wanted to send it, to the desert of identity politics and climate bull, to the desert of accommodating Jews and disregarding Christians. This policy came to the natural end in the 2019 elections. The new leadership of the Labour should learn its lesson and complete the disengagement from the Jews.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThey could learn much from Joseph Stalin, whose 140th<\/sup> anniversary had been celebrated yesterday in Moscow and elsewhere. This great and victorious leader of the Left didn\u2019t stray away from his course of liberating mankind on fashionable nonsense; he had no use for Derrida\u2019s deconstruction; he was a friend and a patron of the Church; he didn\u2019t encourage gender changes and perversions, he developed industry instead of promoting green sources; he banned abortions; immigration was tiny (mainly American workers and engineers fleeing the Great Recession).<\/h5>\nAs for Jews, he was a friend, but not a slave. He didn\u2019t hesitate to jail and execute the treasonous ones, he rewarded the loyal ones, he saved millions of Jews from the Nazi death machine. Jews \u2013 from Tel Aviv to London and from Moscow to New York \u2013 worshipped him. Eventually the fickle Daughter of Zion ditched him, but she always does.<\/h5>\nHis enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThey could learn much from Joseph Stalin, whose 140th<\/sup> anniversary had been celebrated yesterday in Moscow and elsewhere. This great and victorious leader of the Left didn\u2019t stray away from his course of liberating mankind on fashionable nonsense; he had no use for Derrida\u2019s deconstruction; he was a friend and a patron of the Church; he didn\u2019t encourage gender changes and perversions, he developed industry instead of promoting green sources; he banned abortions; immigration was tiny (mainly American workers and engineers fleeing the Great Recession).<\/h5>\nAs for Jews, he was a friend, but not a slave. He didn\u2019t hesitate to jail and execute the treasonous ones, he rewarded the loyal ones, he saved millions of Jews from the Nazi death machine. Jews \u2013 from Tel Aviv to London and from Moscow to New York \u2013 worshipped him. Eventually the fickle Daughter of Zion ditched him, but she always does.<\/h5>\nHis enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
His enemies accuse him of running the Gulag archipelago of jails and prisons, of harsh prison terms, but now in the age of Totalitarian Liberalism this complain appear jaded somewhat. The US penitentiary system has more prisoners than Stalin\u2019s ever had, in absolute numbers and relative to population. No jail in Stalin\u2019s days could compare with Guantanamo, where untried prisoners pray for death, or with Belmarsh prison where Assange is being kept.<\/h5>\nOr indeed with \u201cthe highest security prison in Rhode Island, where he slept in halls with 50 bunks, shat in door-less toilets next to murderers and human traffickers, took group showers with cannibals and child rapists in the world\u2019s last outpost<\/a><\/span> of legalized slavery<\/span><\/a>, earning ten cents an hour<\/a><\/span>, paying a dollar for a bottle of water in a private prison<\/span><\/a> complex where free cold water no longer exists. To make the maximum off of prisoners, no fresh water is provided, only access to hot water and ice, so that prisoners have to constantly pay for cups. Otherwise they don\u2019t get to drink. Sometimes prisons withhold earnings from hourly wages, reducing them to two cents\u201d \u2013 and that is in the US under Obama, not in Russia under Stalin. Ivan Denisovich of Solzhenitsyn<\/span><\/a> had enough cold water.<\/h5>\nAfter the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
After the last week sentence of Adolfo Martinez<\/span><\/a> (16 years of jail for protesting LGBT flag), I think the myth of \u201ccruel Stalin\u201d may fade into oblivion, with many other myths of the period.<\/h5>\nThe Russian people were invariably anti-Stalin by 1991, as a result of insistent and permeating government propaganda. But now, in 2020, 70 per cent of Russians have a favourite view of this historical personality, a contemporary of Hitler and Churchill. Yesterday, thousands of Russians had brought their red carnations to his tomb at the Red Square. Will the Brits remember their Labour leaders in 70 years?<\/h5>\n(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
(2) Rothschild Leaks<\/strong><\/h2>\n\u2013 \u201cJewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron\u2019s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.\u201d \u2013 told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I\u2019ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account<\/a><\/span> and a blog<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\nI almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
I almost hung up on him. When I see \u2018Rothschild\u2019, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for \u2018reptilians\u2019 or \u2018Rockefellers\u2019 of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th<\/sup> century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\nHe says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is \u201cconsidered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government\u201d. That\u2019s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list<\/a><\/span> of Rothschild alumni in the world\u2019s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian \u2013 the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.<\/h5>\n\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
\u201cAs with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.\u201d<\/h5>\nTheir specialty is hiding wealth<\/a><\/span>, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko<\/a><\/span>) hide and manage<\/span><\/a> their stolen loot with the bank.<\/h5>\nWith offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\nGreenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\nI wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\nOmidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\nAnd now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\nJT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\nIn the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\nMy blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n <\/p>\n
With offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the \u201cRothschild\u201d brand.<\/h5>\nJT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking \u2013 Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks \u2013 but none of them had revealed Rothschild\u2019s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros\u2019s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.<\/h5>\nBut observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
But observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.<\/h5>\nGlenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9\/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people \u2013 and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.<\/h5>\n
<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nThe brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece<\/span><\/a> about Omidyar\u2019s activities:<\/h5>\n
Greenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure \u201creading room\u201d where outside journalists could review files at the publication\u2019s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to \u201clight up\u201d Damascus and \u201cflatten\u201d its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept\u2019s <\/em>founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called \u201cmoderate rebels\u201d were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors \u2013 and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.<\/h5>\n
I wonder what was the reason of Snowden\u2019s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden\u2019s royaltie<\/span>s<\/a> for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.<\/h5>\n
Omidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden\u2019s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump\u2019s links<\/span><\/a> to Putin.<\/h5>\n
And now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb<\/span><\/a>. Omidyar provided<\/a><\/span> the capital to launch the ADL\u2019s \u201cnew Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance\u201d and to team up<\/a><\/span> with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft \u2014 to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab<\/a><\/span> for ultimate censorship.<\/h5>\n
Glenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.<\/h5>\n
JT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein<\/span><\/a> material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as \u201cleak catchers,\u201d a term corroborated by Mintpress\u2019 <\/a><\/span>expose of Omydiar\u2019s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected.<\/h5>\n
In the next issue, we shall continue reading JT\u2019s papers.<\/h5>\n
(3) Christmas<\/strong><\/h2>\n
My blessings to our readers with glorious Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ! As my present to this occasion, I shall send free of charge my e-book Our Lady of Sorrows about the fate of Christianity in Palestine under Israeli occupation. Just send an email with subject Our Lady to adam@israelshamir.net<\/span><\/a> And my e-group had been moved from Yahoogroups to shamireaders@groups.io<\/a><\/span> All are welcome to join<\/h5>\n