{"id":197873,"date":"2019-11-15T08:35:45","date_gmt":"2019-11-15T08:35:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=197873"},"modified":"2019-11-17T09:53:32","modified_gmt":"2019-11-17T09:53:32","slug":"inconvenient-truths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=197873","title":{"rendered":"Inconvenient Truths"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Stephen F. Cohen \u2013 paulcraigroberts.org Nov 14, 2019<\/strong><\/h1>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Almost daily for three years, Democrats and their media have told us very bad things about Donald Trump\u2019s life, character, and presidency. Some of them are true. But in the process, we have also learned some lamentable, even alarming, things about the Democratic Party establishment, including self-professed liberals. Consider the following:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">\u2014 The Democratic establishment is deeply and widely imbued with rancid Russophobic attitudes. Most telling was (and remains) a core \u201cRussiagate\u201d allegation that \u201cRussia attacked American democracy during the 2016 presidential election\u201d on Trump\u2019s behalf\u2014an \u201cattack\u201d so nefarious it has often been equated with Pearl Harbor. But there was no \u201cattack\u201d in 2016, only, as I have previously explained, ritualistic \u201cmeddling\u201d of the kind that both Russia and America have undertaken in the other\u2019s elections for decades. Little can be more phobic than the allegation or belief that one has been \u201cattacked by a hostile\u201d entity. And yet, this myth and its false narrative persist in the Democratic Party\u2019s discourse, campaigning, and fund-raising.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">\u2014 We have also learned that the heads of America\u2019s intelligence agencies under President Obama, especially John Brennan of the CIA and James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, felt themselves entitled to try to undermine an American presidential candidacy and subsequent presidency, that of Donald Trump. Early on, I termed this operation \u201cIntelgate,\u201d and it has since been well documented by other writers, including Lee Smith in his new book. Intel officials did so in tacit alliance with certain leading, and equally Russophobic, members of the Democratic Party, which had once opposed such transgressions. This may be the most alarming revelation of the Trump years: Trump will leave power, but these self-aggrandizing intelligence agencies will remain.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">\u2014 We also learned that, contrary to democratic dogma, the mainstream \u201cfree press\u201d cannot be fully trusted to readily expose such abuses of power. Indeed, what the mainstream media\u2014leading national newspapers and two cable news networks, in particular\u2014chose to cover and report, and chose not to cover and report, made the abuses and consequences of Russiagate allegations possible. Even now, exceedingly influential publications such as The New York Times seem eager to delegitimize the investigation by Attorney General William Barr and his appointed special investigator John Durham into the origins of Russiagate. Barr\u2019s critics accuse him of fabricating a \u201cconspiracy theory\u201d on behalf of Trump. But the real, or grandest, conspiracy theory was the Russiagate allegation of \u201ccollusion\u201d between Trump and the Kremlin, an accusation that was\u2014or should have been\u2014discredited by the Robert Mueller report.\u2014 And we have learned, or should have learned, that for all the talk by Democrats about Trump as a danger to U.S. national security, it is their Russiagate allegations that truly endanger it. Consider two examples. Russia\u2019s new \u201chyper-sonic\u201d missiles, which can elude U.S. missile-defense systems, make new nuclear arms negotiations with Moscow imperative and urgent. If only for the sake of his legacy, Trump is likely to want to do so.But even if he is able to, will Trump be entrusted enough to conduct negotiations as successfully as did his predecessors in the White House, given the \u201cPutin puppet\u201d and \u201cKremlin stooge\u201d accusations still being directed at him? Similarly, as I have asked repeatedly, if confronted with a U.S.-Russian Cuban Missile\u2013like crisis\u2014anywhere Washington and Moscow are currently eyeball-to-eyeball militarily, from the Baltic region and Ukraine to Syria\u2014will Trump be as free politically as was President John F. Kennedy to resolve it without war? Here too there is an inconvenient truth: to the extent that Democrats any longer seriously discuss national security in the context of U.S.-Russian relations, it mostly involves vilifying both Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. (Recall also that previous presidents were free to negotiate with Russia\u2019s Soviet communist leaders, even encouraged to do so, whereas the demonized Putin is an anti-communist, post-Soviet leader.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">The current state of U.S.-Russian relations is unprecedentedly dangerous, not only due to reasons cited here\u2014a new cold war fraught with the possibility of hot war. Whether President Trump serves one or two terms, he must be fully empowered to cope with the multiple possibilities of a U.S.-Russian military confrontation. That requires ridding him and our nation of Russiagate allegations\u2014and that in turn requires learning how such allegations originated.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Opponents of Barr\u2019s investigation into the origins of Russiagate say it is impermissible or unprecedented to \u201cinvestigate the investigators.\u201d But the bipartisan Church Committee, based in the U.S. Senate, did so in the mid-1970s. It exposed many abuses by U.S. intelligence agencies, particularly by the CIA, and adopted remedies that it believed would be permanent. Clearly, they have not been.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">However well-intended Barr may be, he is Trump\u2019s Attorney General and therefore not fully credible. As I have also argued repeatedly, a new Church Committee is urgently needed. It\u2019s time for honorable members of the Senate of both parties to do their duty.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\"><a style=\"color: #ccffff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thenation.com\/article\/inconvenient-truths-2\/\">https:\/\/www.thenation.com\/article\/inconvenient-truths-2\/ <\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"color: #ccffff;\">Stephen F. Cohen is a professor emeritus of Russian studies and politics at New York University and Princeton University. A Nation contributing editor, his most recent book War With Russia? From Putin &amp; Ukraine to Trump &amp; Russiagate is available in paperback and in an ebook edition. His weekly conversations with the host of The John Batchelor Show, now in their sixth year, are available at www.thenation.com.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.paulcraigroberts.org\/2019\/11\/14\/stephen-cohen-warns-that-russophoia-sets-us-up-for-nuclear-war\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Stephen Cohen warns that Russophobia sets us up for nuclear war.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,91],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-russia"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=197873"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":197901,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197873\/revisions\/197901"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=197873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=197873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=197873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}