![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Dr-Gail-Bradbrook-arrested.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nThis is part 1 of a series of articles entitled \u2018Astroturfing the way for the Fourth Industrial Revolution\u2019. <\/em> In order to understand an organisation or entity, one must first come to an understanding of its founders. Dr Gail Marie Bradbrook, along with Julian \u2018Roger\u2019 Hallam, appear to be the two primary instigators of the Extinction Rebellion (XR) movement.<\/span><\/p>\n The following is an investigation into Bradbrook, her background, professional associations, ideology and influences.<\/span> <\/strong><\/p>\n Gail and the other budding public figures involved in XR have chosen to enter the public eye by asking millions of people to stand with them in a campaign of non-violent civil disobedience<\/em>, aimed at making profound changes to an economic and political system which millions of people rely on to stay warm, and obtain basic things like food and water. Due to the serious nature of the changes they are proposing (albeit without mentioning that they\u2019re all taken straight from the UN\u2019s \u2018Sustainable Development Goals [1]<\/a>\u2019<\/strong><\/span>), they should welcome criticism and scrutiny of their activities. If they are sincere, they should demonstrate integrity, and not dismiss dissenting voices, but instead engage openly with people who question their motives and stated objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n Often called \u201cthe Mother\u201d by members of Extinction Rebellion, Gail is a molecular biophysicist by training, though she hasn\u2019t worked in that capacity for quite some time. Not long after finishing her post-doctoral research into \u2018protein saccharide interactions\u2019, she became a consultant for several \u2018political charities\u2019 and has, for the past 18 years worked exclusively as a professional campaigner \u2013 a role which, during a talk at Off-Grid Festival, she admits is \u201cmostly about securing your own pay-check.[2]<\/strong><\/span><\/a>\u201d<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Acting through proxy organisations permits these forces to obscure the fact that government policies are being swayed by corporate entities that fund entire networks of charities and non-governmental organisations to interact with government on their behalf. NGOs and charities tend to be seen as more caring and less corrupt than their corporate sponsors; and are presented as such in the media, even when their staff and financials reveal them to be entirely monetarily dependent on the corporate entities and supranational bureaucracies that they covertly campaign on behalf of. There appears to be no remedy or legal redress we can use to reveal the true nature of these NGOs and charities, or hold them to even the most basic ethical and moral standards.<\/span><\/p>\n As described in our introduction, corporate entities have previously paid firms such as Stratfor to disrupt and neutralise inconvenient campaign groups. It would seem that in recent years they\u2019ve increasingly taken to the expedient of simply funding the \u2018right ones\u2019 into existence in the first place, and then nudging less amenable competitors out from (as they no doubt see it) the \u2018marketplace\u2019 of causes. Worse still, these ostensibly \u2018independent\u2019 NGOs, charities and professional \u2018campaign groups\u2019 are increasingly tasked with stewarding government policy and objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n It is unclear precisely when, or more importantly how Gail transitioned from molecular biophysicist to collecting causes like a declining civilisation accumulates laws; but what we do know is that for the past two decades, she has been a favoured \u2018activist\u2019 of the British State, at least when it comes to their \u2018digital inclusion\u2019 and \u2018universal internet access\u2019 agendas. These euphemisms today refer to the 5G \/ Internet of Things roll-out; aimed at making sure that absolutely everybody<\/strong>, without exception, gets plugged-in<\/em> to the emerging smart-grid, which incorporates both military hardware \u2013 used for crowd control [3]<\/strong><\/span>,<\/a> as well as psychological operations[4]<\/a> <\/strong><\/span>with next-generation mind-control, surveillance and communications systems [5]<\/a><\/strong><\/span>. In other words, a full-spectrum cybernetic control apparatus which \u201cif fully exploited could make Orwell\u2019s 1984 seem like a benevolent utopia\u201d (-William Burroughs, \u201cLimits of Control [6]<\/a>\u201c<\/strong><\/span>).<\/span><\/p>\n The 5G network is primary to this apparatus, an essential component for the \u2018scientific management\u2019 global society; as envisioned and now being assembled all around us by an international oligarchy of techno-industrial and financial elites \u2013 the very same people who stand behind the UN [7]<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, and are positioned to become its beneficiaries.<\/span><\/p>\n -Gail Bradbrook; taken from the same speech as her \u2018secret agents\u2019 quote.<\/span> As well as having the ear of government, many of the directors and trustees of Gail\u2019s Citizens Online charity just so happen to be people whose companies stand to make an absolute killing from the 5G roll-out \u2013 which is covertly promoted by Extinction Rebellion, due to its coming under the auspices of the United Nations\u2019 Agenda 2030 (the current rebranding of Agenda 21), which is most often referred to with deceptive simplicity, as \u2018Sustainable Development\u2019 [SD]. Indeed, the smart grid \/ 5G infrastructure roll-out and the United Nation\u2019s \u2018Sustainable Development Goals\u2019 (SDG) are entirely inseparable.<\/span><\/p>\n [SD] When you hear governments or NGOs use the phrase \u2018Sustainable Development\u2019, they do not simply mean development that is sustainable \u2013 they are, in fact, referring to a very specific series of policy documents, all of which were designed by the United Nations. Climate policies are one aspect of the UN\u2019s SD goals.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n
\nHere are the links to the other parts:
\n<\/em>
\nPrevious:<\/em><\/span>
\n1) Introduction:\u00ad Some Inconvenient Truths about Extinction Rebellion and the Climate Mobilisation movement<\/strong> <\/span><\/a><\/span>
\nNext:<\/em><\/span>
\n2) Political Charities and the Brave New World of Professional Activism<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/span>
\n3) Green Gail and the Technocratic Industrialists: Citizens Online\u2019s Digitopian Nightmare<\/a><\/strong><\/span>
\n4) Extinction Rebellion and the Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism<\/a><\/strong><\/span>
\n5) #XRSpaceJunk 5G & Citizens Online: Industry Agents, Digital Acolytes and State Agitators<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\nIntroducing Gail Bradbrook, professional activist<\/strong><\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\nThe Mother of Extinction<\/strong><\/h2>\n
<\/a>Gail epitomises the new generation of \u2018professional activists\u2019, having positioned herself at the epicentre of the revolving door between big business, government bureaucracies and establishment-friendly NGOs, campaign groups and charitable organisations, all of which increasingly function as the public face of international corporate and financial power.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\nStill available (at the time of writing) on the IPPR\u2019s website, here<\/strong><\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n