{"id":189504,"date":"2019-06-07T08:00:59","date_gmt":"2019-06-07T08:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=189504"},"modified":"2019-06-10T06:53:36","modified_gmt":"2019-06-10T06:53:36","slug":"anne-franks-diary-to-be-read-out-loud-at-all-italian-soccer-matches-this-week","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=189504","title":{"rendered":"Anne Frank\u2019s Diary Read Out Loud at All Italian Soccer Matches"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction \u2013 June 7, 2019<\/h1>\n

We are not posting this because we don\u2019t believe that the Nazis targeted Jews during WWII. It just didn\u2019t happen in the way we have been told by Holocaust Industry and Hollywood.<\/h5>\n
It is an acknowledged fact that Nazi Einsatzgruppen<\/a><\/span> followed in the wake of Hitler’s armies as they advanced east. As they did so they systematically eliminated all those who didn’t fit into the Nazi’s plans. These included Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, communists, the feeble-minded and anyone else who didn’t fit into what Hitler envisioned.<\/h5>\n
Strangley enough, the Holocaust Industry and Hollywood don’t pay too much attention to this particular episode in history. Instead we get endless, and often highly questionable dramas-stories-‘histories’ about Auschwitz and gas-chambers. This includes the Anne Frank Diaries, which many have assumed to be fact but which seems increasingly likely to have been fictional.<\/h5>\n
We would suggest that much else of what we are told by Holocaust Industry has been similarly contrived.<\/h5>\n
So why don\u2019t we hear too much about the real Holocaust committed by the Einsatzgruppen as they advanced east? The answer to that is in the Russian casualty figures. While the Einsatzgruppen are estimated to have slaughtered between 1.5 and 2.5 million, at least 25 million Russians died during WWII.<\/h5>\n
That figure entirely undermines the idea of the primacy of Jewish suffering. Which is the main aim of the Holocaust Industry and why it strives to keep the focus on events, real or contrived, at Auschwitz. Ed.<\/h5>\n

Anne Frank\u2019s Diary to Be Read Out Loud at All Italian Soccer Matches This Week<\/h1>\n

Liel Leibovitz \u2013 The Tablet Oct 24, 2017<\/h2>\n
\"\"<\/a>

Anne Frank. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

Lazio and Roma are two Italian soccer teams that share a stadium, Rome\u2019s Stadio Olimpico. Earlier this week, to taunt their cross-town rivals, Lazio fans littered the stadium with stickers showing Anne Frank wearing a Roma jersey, an allusion to Roma\u2019s fans being left-wing and Jewish.<\/span><\/p>\n

It was a sickening gesture, but nothing, sadly, out of the ordinary in European soccer, where teams are frequently identified<\/strong><\/span><\/a> as \u201cJewish\u201d by fans and foes alike and where Holocaust and other anti-Semitic references are common. What is exceptional is the Italian league\u2019s reaction: Immediately after the offensive stickers were discovered, Italy\u2019s soccer federation announced that portions of Frank\u2019s diary will be read at all league games this week, combined with a minute of silence for the victims of the Holocaust.<\/span><\/p>\n

Continues …<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cNew Pages\u201d of Anne Frank Diary Prove that Her Father Wrote Most of the Book<\/h1>\n

The New Observer \u2013 May 17, 2018<\/h2>\n

Two \u201cnewly discovered\u201d pages from the \u201cDiary of Anne Frank\u201d\u2014which supposedly contain risqu\u00e9 jokes\u2014are in fact further proof that the book attributed to the Jewish teenager was in fact written by her father\u2014because the \u201chidden\u201d writing is, like most of the rest of the \u201cdiary,\u201d in her father Otto Frank\u2019s handwriting.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

The \u201cnewly discovered\u201d writing on show that the hidden writing is that of an older person, and not the teenager Anne. As seen in the image above (taken during a press conference at the Anne Frank house in Amsterdam, where the findings were announced), the contrast between Anne\u2019s writing and that of her father\u2019s is clear and obvious. This fact has been known for several years already, but is routinely ignored by the Jewish lobby controlled media.<\/em>\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

The \u201cnewly-discovered\u201d pages were announced at a press conference<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/a> at the \u201cAnne Frank House\u201d museum in Amsterdam, where researchers apparently were able to remove two brown paper pasted pages and \u201cread\u201d the obscured writing underneath using lamps and optical character recognition technology.<\/span><\/p>\n

The compliant Jewish lobby controlled media focused all its attention<\/strong><\/span><\/a> on the contents of the \u201cnew pages,\u201d but ignored the obvious fact of the difference in handwriting styles on the new pages, with the \u201cnew material\u201d all in her father\u2019s handwriting, which contrasts obviously and strongly with the juvenile scrawl of Anne herself.<\/span><\/p>\n

In fact, as revealed in 2015, most of the diary was written by her father after the war, and who then passed it off as \u201creal\u201d in order to sell it as a \u201cholocaust memoir.<\/strong><\/span><\/a>\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The scam was revealed in an article in the New York Times<\/em> that year, when the copyright holders to the diary admitted Otto Frank\u2019s involvement in an attempt to extend their control of the manuscript.<\/span><\/p>\n

As the\u00a0New York Times<\/em>\u00a0pointed out, when \u201cOtto Frank first published his daughter\u2019s red-checked diary and notebooks, he wrote a prologue assuring readers that the book mostly contained her words, written while hiding from the Nazis in a secret annex of a factory in Amsterdam.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Normal copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author\u2019s death. As Anne Frank died of typhus in Bergen Belsen in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public domain in February 2015.<\/span><\/p>\n

But, as the\u00a0New York Times<\/em>\u00a0went on to say, the\u00a0Anne Frank Fonds\u00a0has now decided to try to extend copyright on the book past the 70 year cut-off period\u2014by admitting that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a \u201cco-author\u201d after all.<\/span><\/p>\n

The implications of this admission are obvious.\u00a0As the\u00a0New York Times<\/em>\u00a0put it<\/strong><\/span>:<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

While the foundation, the\u00a0Anne Frank Fonds, in Basel, signaled its intentions a year ago, warnings about the change have provoked a furor as the deadline approaches. Some people opposed to the move have declared that they would defy the foundation and publish portions of her text.<\/span><\/p>\n

Foundation officials \u201cshould think very carefully about the consequences,\u201d said Agn\u00e8s Tricoire, a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in France, where critics have been the most vociferous and are organizing a challenge. \u201cIf you follow their arguments,\u00a0it means that they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

The latest pages confirm once again that much of what is claimed to be \u201cAnne Frank\u2019s diary\u201d was in fact written by her father after the war\u2014a fact which also explains the use of ball point pen in the \u201cdiary,\u201d a writing device which only became available after 1945.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The irony is that the Anne Frank Diary was NOT written by Anne but by her father, after the war <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":89164,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189504","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Hidden_and_Revisionist_History"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=189504"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189504\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":189539,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189504\/revisions\/189539"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/89164"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=189504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=189504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=189504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}