While doing research for a Newsbud video, I came across the Media Bias\/Fact Check (MBFC) website. This is one of a growing number of \u201cfact checking\u201d websites designed to discredit news websites not following official narratives closely enough.<\/span><\/p>\n Here\u2019s what the site has to say<\/a><\/strong><\/span> about Newsbud and my participation:<\/span><\/p>\n Newsbud (NB) is a right wing, conspiracy and anti-government site founded by, among others, Kurt Nimmo, the former lead editor and writer for Infowars. What sets NB apart from other sites of this type is that the stories are, for the most part, well written and contain numerous sources. The bias of the writing is also more subtle than sites such as Infowars, but just as prevalent. Both as an overtone to all the stories as well as the sometimes questionable sources and \/ or the conclusions drawn from the source material. Additionally, many of their sources are other NB stories, or work the author and editors have done elsewhere.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n MBFC imparts misinformation in the first sentence. If it had done appropriate research, its ideologically driven checkers would have discovered Newsbud was established by Sibel Edmonds. I was invited to participate after the website was established and I am not a founder, as MBFC claims.<\/span><\/p>\n This error\u2014more accurately described as shoddy and careless research\u2014reveals the liberal bias of the site and its proprietor, Dave Van Zandt.<\/span><\/p>\n MBFC\u2019s methodology is admittedly \u201csubjective,\u201d but this is not an issue for those working to destroy alternative media. In fact, it appears such subjectivity and bias are considered a plus in the effort the block sites deemed \u201cdangerous,\u201d as the performance artist Alex Jones and his website Infowars (which I indeed edited for eight years, almost exclusively focusing on geopolitics, neocon wars, and the surveillance-police state).<\/span><\/p>\n From Wikipedia, which MBFC has elevated as a fount of truth and unbiased information (see Wikipedia Is More Biased Than Britannica, but Don\u2019t Blame the Crowd<\/strong><\/span><\/a>), we discover Dave Van Zandt\u2019s project serves as a touchstone for AI \u201csolutions\u201d to \u201cdisinformation,\u201d that is information that does not conform to the various mythologies and half-truths put out by the propaganda media at the behest of a corporate state.<\/span><\/p>\n