{"id":184520,"date":"2019-03-02T07:45:45","date_gmt":"2019-03-02T07:45:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=184520"},"modified":"2019-03-05T08:13:16","modified_gmt":"2019-03-05T08:13:16","slug":"meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-plan-to-raise-their-child-with-a-fluid-approach-to-gender","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=184520","title":{"rendered":"Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘plan to raise their child with a fluid approach to gender’"},"content":{"rendered":"

Erica Tempesta \u2013 Daily Mail Online March 1, 2019<\/h1>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have yet to confirm the sex of their baby but don’t expect the newborn to be wearing blue or pink, as they want to raise their child without gender-stereotyping, a new report claims.<\/span><\/p>\n

The\u00a037-year-old Duchess of Sussex is said to have told her friends that she and Harry, 34, will be avoiding gender-stereotypes with their son or daughter; the revelation comes just a month after it was reported that they had designed a gender-neutral nursery for the unborn child.<\/span><\/p>\n

‘Meghan has been talking to some of her friends about the birth and how she and Harry plan to raise their baby. Her exact word was fluid,’ a source told Vanity Fair<\/strong><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

‘She said they plan to raise their child with a fluid approach to gender and they won\u2019t be imposing any stereotypes,’ the royal insider added to the magazing.<\/span><\/p>\n

It’s unclear what exactly the royal may have meant by the term ‘fluid,’ as there are multiple interpretations of what that might look like.<\/span><\/p>\n

As parents, the royal couple may decide to avoid dressing their firstborn in certain colors that are associated with one gender more than the other and encourage their child to play with a variety of toys that are typically associated with specific sexes, for example dolls and trucks.<\/span><\/p>\n

On the other end of the spectrum, there is a small group of parents who are raising ‘theybies’\u00a0\u2014 children who aren’t identified as male or female.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s\u00a0modern approach to parenting may be a testament to Meghan’s California upbringing, as focusing on more of a gender-fluid upbringing has proven to be a popular view shared by many A-list stars.<\/span><\/p>\n

Continues \u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Comment \u2013 March 1, 2019<\/h1>\n
Together with other celebrities, the Windsor\u2019s “approach to modern parenting” says more about how gender ambivalence is part of the illuminati agenda for humanity rather than good parenting.<\/h5>\n
\"\"

Anglina Jolie addresses the United Nations. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

It also speaks volumes how the illuminati employ celebrities, film stars, cultural icons and in this case British royalty, to promote their plans. For example, think of the way George Clooney or Angelina Jolie front various United Nations campaigns.<\/h5>\n
If the celebrities, film stars etc refused to do this they would soon be removed from the public eye. The film and TV offers would dry up or, like Princess Diana, if they spoke out they might even end up having an \u201caccident\u201d.<\/h5>\n
The illuminati want to break humanity’s identity down so that they can impose their own vision of what they think we should be. To this end they are using anything that might influence us.<\/h5>\n
In effect they want to remake humanity to serve them without any interference from what constitutes our moral, national, spiritual, racial and sexual identities. The fact that this is being done regardless of own innate impulses speaks volumes about their aims.<\/h5>\n
Will they succeed with their plans?<\/h5>\n
Somehow, we don\u2019t think so. Too many people are waking up and questioning what they are told by the Western media. Ed.<\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Like much of the media, British royalty has now given an official seal of approval to gender ambivalence. Meaning it is part of the illuminati agenda for humanity <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-The_Media"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=184520"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184520\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":184525,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184520\/revisions\/184525"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=184520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=184520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=184520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}