{"id":184070,"date":"2019-02-22T09:37:41","date_gmt":"2019-02-22T09:37:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=184070"},"modified":"2019-02-26T08:28:09","modified_gmt":"2019-02-26T08:28:09","slug":"jussie-smollett-and-jewish-hoaxes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=184070","title":{"rendered":"Jussie Smollett and Jewish Hoaxes"},"content":{"rendered":"

Israel Shamir \u2013 The Unz Review Feb 22, 2019<\/h1>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The Jussie Smollett hoax and its debunking may yet change the trend of baseless accusations. God knows, the hoaxers went too far, and it\u2019s high time for correction. The concise list of hoaxes would be too long for this essay, but here<\/span><\/a> is a small list of very recent ones. They were met by public outrage and media indignation<\/a><\/span>, for very little reason, and now we may expect a downward market correction, due to overpriced stock.<\/h5>\n
Some unlikely persons already attempt to capitalise on the expected reaction in order to channel it to the preferred direction \u2013 in a very unlikely medium. Mr Noah Rothman, an editor of Commentary<\/em> magazine, condemned in The New York Times<\/span><\/a><\/em> the imprudent haste of media falling for the hoax. Come on<\/em>, really! The NY Times<\/em> is a leading propagator of similar hoaxes. Whenever there is a story of a suffering diversity person, The New York Times<\/em> usually takes it and plays it to its full extent. And when the hoax is revealed, usually the newspaper mentions it on page 46, at the bottom. So why is this night different, as the Jews ask on Passover night?<\/h5>\n
Mr Rothman is all against hoaxes by coloured and gay persons, that\u2019s why. He mentions a few of them and adds his complaint: \u201cThere have been no similar national paroxysms amid a sharp uptick in violence targeting New York City\u2019s Jewish population\u2026 The real tragedy \u2026 that hate crimes are, in fact, on the rise in the Trump era, particularly against Jews\u201d. He does not mind hoaxes, he minds blacks arousing paroxysms of anguish at the expense of the Jews. The Americans and Europeans should feel sorry for Jews and anger for their adversaries, and every cry and tear for a black is a waste of a good cry and tear.<\/h5>\n
Among hoaxes he mentions, there is not a single one by a Jew, yet Jews are the leading perpetrators of hoaxes. Michael Kade<\/span>r<\/a> of Ashkelon, Israel with over two thousand hoaxes to his account claiming attacks on Jewish community centres and synagogues is the shining example, but there are plenty of them. A Jewish woman<\/a> h<\/span>ad made a hoax bomb threat to a synagogue. A Jewish man<\/a><\/span> spray-painted swastikas on his own house.<\/h5>\n
For Rothman, Jews are always innocent victims, as opposed to uppity blacks, who are guilty. This bias is a hallmark of Commentary<\/em> Magazine, flagship of the Neocons, and the Neocon movement was established with a highly prejudiced attitude towards the blacks. Their open anti-black racism has been their entry card into white society.<\/h5>\n
The very word \u2018racism\u2019 has been grossly devalued, like the word \u2018rape\u2019. Nowadays having mutually consensual sex amounts to rape in case of buyers\u2019 remorse, like in the case of Julian Assange<\/span><\/a>, while standing still in front of a Native American drummer is defined as \u2018racism\u2019 (BTW, Nick Sandmann, the Covington Catholic student, is suing<\/a><\/span> the perpetrator of this hoax, the Washington Post<\/span><\/a>). When everything is \u2018racism\u2019, nothing is. However, racism (and rape) could be a real thing. The most racist anti-black rant you can find on an American internet site is not on a KKK nor a Stormfront nor a Hollywood Nazi page, but on the Commentary<\/em> site. It was written by Norman Podhoretz, its editor-in-chief, and published in 1963, that is, 55 years ago.<\/h5>\n
\"\"

Norman Podhoretz<\/p><\/div>\n

In the article My Negro Problem\u2014And Ours<\/span><\/a> the founder of the Neocon movement admits of \u201chating the Negroes with all my heart\u201d. He tells of his mother who \u201cin Yiddish cursed the goyim<\/em> and the Schwartzes<\/em>, the Schwartzes<\/em> and the goyim<\/em>.\u201d All American whites are sick in their feelings about Negroes, he asserts. He admits that he \u201cgrew up fearing and envying and hating Negroes\u201d and this feeling hasn\u2019t gone. \u201cNow do I fear them and envy them and hate them still? The answer is yes, but not in the same proportions and certainly not in the same way\u2026 I know it from the disgusting prurience that can stir in me at the sight of a mixed couple; If I were to be asked today whether I would like a daughter of mine \u2019to marry one,\u2019 I would have to answer: \u2019No, I wouldn\u2019t like<\/em> it at all. I would rail and rave and rant and tear my hair.\u2019\u201d<\/h5>\n
Disgusting prurience<\/em> \u2013 neither more, nor less! David Duke\u2019s views are moderate compared to Norman Podhoretz\u2019s, but Duke is ostracized while Podhoretz was a leading light of his generation. Podhoretz nursed a special hatred of Black Muslims, while Duke was friendly with them. Despite his admitted hate of the blacks, Podhoretz felt \u201cthe insane rage \u2026 at the thought of Negro anti-Semitism\u201d. It is fine for him to hate them, but if they hate him, it is a reason for \u2018insane rage\u2019.<\/h5>\n
Podhoretz\u2019s views, obnoxious as they were, derive from the traditional Jewish view as stated by Maimonides (Guide for the Perplexed, 3:51), namely \u201cthe Blacks are like dumb animals; they are not fully human; they are positioned below humans, but they are above monkeys for their appearance is like human and their mind is better than that of monkeys\u201d.<\/h5>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

With such views, you understand why some Jewish scribes like Mr Rothman hate Black hoaxes \u2013 and here they find an echo chamber within some White groups. They just do not mention Jewish hoaxes.<\/h5>\n
However, black and gay hoaxes are annoying, that\u2019s all. Jewish hoaxes are very dangerous and expensive. Michael Kader\u2019s hoaxes cost the American taxpayer a great deal, for his bomb threats were translated into hundreds of millions of dollars of grants for Jewish NGOs<\/span><\/a>. These funds were given by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) \u201cbecause the Jews are the most commonly targeted religious group in the United States.\u201d Now we know that the Jews were targeted by their coreligionist from Ashkelon, but the funds have not been returned, with apologies. There are no statistics for the total Jewish share in the DHS\u2019s $50 billion annual budget, but my guess it is a large one.<\/h5>\n
Presenting a frivolous remark of the freshman senator Ilhan Omar as an \u201cantisemitic attack\u201d is another kind of Jewish hoax, or \u201cThe Growing Anti-Semitism Scam\u201d, in words of our colleague Philip Giraldi<\/a><\/span>.<\/h5>\n
Similar scams were practiced this week in England and France with powerful results. In England, seven (now eight) Jewish and Judeophile MPs have stormed out of the Labour Party claiming Labour has been \u2018infected\u2019 with \u2018anti-Jewish racism\u2019. Since Jeremy Corbyn was elected to lead the party, it became the most numerous one in Western Europe. It became popular because it regained its ties with the British worker. And immediately its philosemitic Blairite wing began to campaign against the new leader.<\/h5>\n
Their campaign is based on the Jewish hoax of Corbyn\u2019s alleged antisemitism and racism. This hoax is as baseless as that of Jussie Smollett\u2019s but far more dangerous. You can watch the Al Jazeera<\/em> film The Lobby<\/span><\/em> Part 3<\/span><\/a> and see how an encounter between an elderly lady pro-Palestinian Labour-supporter and the head of Labour Friends of Israel was misrepresented<\/span><\/a> as an \u201cantisemitic onslaught\u201d. Actually, Smollett is a rather innocent bloke; he bayed for sympathy, while Joan Ryan, an MP and the chair of Labour Friends of Israel has collected over million dollars from Israel Embassy\u2019s slush fund.<\/h5>\n
The scammers want to sabotage the British people\u2019s desire to throw off the shackles of Brussels. Their \u201cIndependent [from Brits, not from Israel] Group\u201d is against Brexit, for NATO, for nuclear weapons, for wars overseas, for neoliberalism, and that is quite aside from the Jewish and Israeli issues. They are being joined by a few ex-Tories of similar persuasion. (My British friend heartily approved of this step, for \u201call the rotten apples should be in one basket\u201d).<\/h5>\n
A Labour MP said it was \u201cpossible\u201d that Israel is a financial backer of the breakaway Independent Group of MPs, but almost immediately recanted and apologised for the suggestion.<\/h5>\n
Many reviews of the British Labour split explain it by Corbyn\u2019s pro-Palestinian views. Corbyn and his allies also prefer this explanation.<\/h5>\n
Another, more plausible explanation crosses the bounds of the permissible in civilised society. What the heck, let us cross it.<\/h5>\n
The British Jews overwhelmingly vote for Tories; the Jews are for Remain in the EU; Jews are for banks and international institutions. Corbyn\u2019s Labour stands for its direct opposite. These are words of Jeremy Corbyn<\/a><\/span> just before his election: They, the world\u2019s bankers, International Monetary Fund, European Union, they are utterly united in what they want. Utterly united in deflation, suppressing the economy, and creating unemployment. <\/em>The word \u201cJew\u201d or \u201cIsrael\u201d wasn\u2019t mentioned even once, but British and American Jews think that \u2018bankers\u2019, \u2018IMF\u2019 and \u2018EU\u2019 are them. They are what they are, in the words of Speaker Nancy Pelosi.<\/h5>\n
The State of Israel is important for them, perhaps the Bible, Talmud and talith are precious, but only on Saturdays. While their identification with banks, globalism, neoliberal practice is their daily routine. Marx advised to pay attention to the Weekday Jew, rather than to the Saturday Jew. This advice is still valid.<\/h5>\n
Corbyn has no problem with Jews qua Jews; everybody in the Socialist movement is used to Jews. He is against Israeli anti-Palestinian policies, and there are Jews of such views, too (though we take a lot of beating). But being against Israeli policies AND against bankers, IMF and EU means threatening the Weekday Jew\u2019s bread and butter.<\/h5>\n
Thirty years ago, in the formative years of Jeremy Corbyn, Jews were more to the left, and then such a policy had been possible. But now the Jews have moved to the right, or to the moneyed centre for bankers, and they would have a problem with Corbyn even if he were studying Talmud daily.<\/h5>\n
The struggle of the Seven against \u2018antisemitism\u2019 has nothing to do with their alleged anti-racism. Angela Smith, a UK MP who quit the Labour Party over alleged racism, next day was caught on live TV appearing to refer to people from black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds as having a \u201cfunny tinge\u201d<\/span><\/a>.<\/h5>\n
Our colleague and friend Jonathan Cook of Nazareth noticed<\/span><\/a> that the departing MPs are united not only by their uncritical attitude to Israel, but also by \u201ctheir enthusiasm for foreign wars, for the enrichment of a narrow neo-liberal elite; [they] are ambivalent about austerity policies, and are reticent at returning key utilities to public ownership\u201d. In other words, they are for neo-liberalism, and complaints of antisemitism serve as a cover for it.<\/h5>\n
You can read my piece Love Labours Lost<\/span><\/a> explaining this rightwards shift of Jews and dismay of British Labour at the loss of erstwhile allies.<\/h5>\n
In France, the Jews greatly improved on Smollett. A French Jewish scribe Alain Finkielkraut (let us call him f-Kraut for short) had been insulted by a kuffiyeh-wearing Palestinian who marched with other brave Gilets Jaunes<\/em> along a Parisian street. It was a minor event; the scribe was not beaten or roughly handled in any way; he was called \u2018a dirty Zionist\u2019, not a big deal. He is<\/em> a Zionist, no doubt. Other people in the street even invited f-Kraut to join them. Pretty much a non-event. If I was writing about every occasion I was called an \u2018enemy of Israel\u2019 or \u2018enemy of the Jewish people\u2019, I\u2019d write of nothing else for lack of time. But the reaction in France was like a million Smolletts.<\/h5>\n
\u201cA few insults directed against a certain essayist called \u201cphilosopher\u201d by the media are infinitely more serious than the loss of an eye by a young student in philosophy of twenty years who had done absolutely nothing wrong\u201d \u2013 acerbically commented our friend Jean Bricmont (a partner and co-author<\/span><\/a> of the columnist Diana Johnstone<\/span><\/a>).<\/h5>\n
Indeed, the same day Macron\u2019s henchmen knocked out an eye of a young Gilet Jaune<\/em>; they had left another one lacking an arm; thousands were attacked by gas in what was perhaps the biggest gas assault in Europe since Ypres. But the MSM took up the case of Finkielkraut and made a Kristallnacht<\/a> <\/span>out of it. They claimed f-Kraut was called a \u201cdirty Jew\u201d and that he was almost lynched, but saved by police. (Both claims are not true; though there were cases of journalists being roughed up at the demos, and calling someone a Jew is not an offence at all, but in this case it didn\u2019t even happen).<\/h5>\n
While doing a full Smollett, the media and President Macron went after the Gilets Jaunes<\/em>, describing them as antisemites and Nazis. Thus a non-event was turned into a huge affaire<\/em>; and the first real popular movement in France since 1968 was besmirched. On the same occasion, Macron explicitly equalled anti-Zionism with antisemitism and made it a criminal offence.<\/h5>\n
In addition, some unknown Smolletts painted swastikas on the Jewish cemetery, as is their wont whenever Jews wish to show they are being persecuted. I have little doubt these swastikas are painted by persons hired by this or that Jewish organisation, or by Macron\u2019s men who wanted to amplify the f-kraut non-event.<\/h5>\n
Tens of thousands of gullible French attended a rally for f-Kraut and against antisemitism. \u201cThe fawning eagerness of the political class rushing to demonstrate against something that hardly exists\u201d, \u2013 noted a French writer. The French political class paid no attention when a church was desecrated<\/span><\/a>. But for a Jew whom somebody dissed on a street \u2013 they all marched. Media published denunciations<\/a><\/span> of Yellow Vests, and Macron made a lot of political capital out of it. In purely political terms, the fallout of the f-Kraut affair could be compared to Trump\u2019s impeachment in the wake of the Smollett shenanigans.<\/h5>\n
Mind you, this f-kraut deserved to be insulted all right. He is a French Norman (\u201cI hate Niggers!\u201d) Podhoretz. He spoke<\/span><\/a> of \u201cBlack hatred for France\u201d, said that \u201cGaza has too many children, and they have no place in the world\u201d; ridiculed Black football players of France for being black; he is an enemy of Palestinians and of Muslims, and he does not care much for the French people either. He is known for his claim \u201cWhat is good for the Jews is good for France\u201d, for his call for segregation between Jews and Palestinians. It is amazing that a Jew with such views is considered to be \u201con the left\u201d, and he is invited to TV and newspaper interviews, though he is more racist than French nationalists like Le Pen or Soral. He also wrote a nasty piece against the Gilets Jaunes<\/em>, but the GJs <\/em>have insulted him far less than he deserves.<\/h5>\n
In England and in France, as well as in the US, the Jews became a symbol of the present neo-liberal regime, as the scams and hoaxes make it apparent. This is more important for people here than the issue of Palestine, and unavoidable reaction to neo-liberalism will cause collapse of this Jewish role and incidentally will bring equality of Jew and Gentile to Israel\/Palestine.<\/h5>\n
Israel Shamir can be reached at adam@israelshamir.net<\/a><\/em><\/h5>\n
This article was first published at The Unz Review<\/em><\/a><\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Israel Shamir reflects on the Jussie Smollett hoax , its debunking and the legacy of a founding Neocon, Norman Podhoretz <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":102,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[61,38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Commentary","category-Race"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184070","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/102"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=184070"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184070\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":184078,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184070\/revisions\/184078"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=184070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=184070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=184070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}