![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Tulsi_Gabbard.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Ever since Tulsi Gabbard announced that she will be running for President in 2020 her personality and candidacy have been a subject of heated debates and after I posted a rather small message from her<\/a><\/strong>, I have been getting panicked emails warning me that she is a fake and that I not should \u201cjump on her bandwagon\u201d or otherwise endorse her.<\/span><\/p>\n So, first and foremost, I am not \u2013 repeat NOT \u2013 endorsing her in any way shape or fashion.<\/span><\/p>\n However, I do find her and what is taking place around her extremely interesting and I want to look at it a little closer. This won\u2019t be a review or analysis of her ideas, political platform or chance of getting elected. Neither will I try to read her mind and do what so many other folks are doing and confidently declare that I know what her true values, ideas or plans are. I don\u2019t.<\/span><\/p>\n But there are a few things which can already be observed about her which I want to comment on.<\/span><\/p>\n First, one might imagine that she would be the dream<\/em><\/strong> candidate for the Democratic Party: she is a female, she is not White, she has impeccable \u201cpatriotic\u201d credentials, she is obviously both very good looking and very smart, she does not have any skeletons in her past (at least none that we know of for the time being) and she is not associated with the notorious Clinton gang. So what\u2019s there not to like about her if you are a Democrat?<\/span><\/p>\n Well, as we all saw, the putatively \u201cliberal\u201d legacy Ziomedia hates Tulsi Gabbard with a passion. Maybe not as much as that legacy Ziomedia hates Trump or Putin, but still \u2013 the levels of hostility against her are truly amazing. This may seem bizarre until you realize that, just like Donald Trump, Tulsi Gabbard has said all the right things about Israel, but that this was not nearly \u201cenough\u201d to please the US Ziolobby. Check out the kind of discussions about Gabbard which can be found in the Israeli and pro-Israeli press:<\/span><\/p>\n This is just a small sample of what I found with a quick search. It could be summed up \u201cGabbard is not pro-Israel enough\u201d. But is that really The Main Reason for such a hostility towards her?<\/span><\/p>\n I don\u2019t think so.<\/span><\/p>\n I believe that Gabbard\u2019s real \u201cultimate sin\u201d is that she is against foreign wars of choice. That is really her Crime Of Crimes!<\/span><\/p>\n The AngloZionists wanted to tear Syria apart, break it up into small pieces, most of which would be run by Takfiri crazies and Tulsi Gabbard actually dared to go and speak to \u201canimal Assad\u201d, the (latest) \u201cNew Hitler\u201d, who \u201cgasses his own people\u201d. And this is an even worse crime, if such a thing can even be imagined! She dared to disobey<\/strong> her AngloZionist masters.<\/span><\/p>\n So, apparently, opposing illegal wars and daring to disobey the Neocons are crimes of such magnitude and evil that they deserve the hysterical Gabbard-bashing campaign which we have witnessed in recent times. And even being non-Christian, non-White, non-male and \u201cliberal\u201d does not in any way compensate for the heinous nature of \u201ccrimes\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n What does this tell us about the real nature of the US society?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Appeasing never works with the Neocons. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n It is also interesting to note that the most vicious (and stupid) attacks against Gabbard did not<\/strong> come from \u201cconservative\u201d media outlets or journalists. Not at all! Most of the attacks, especially the more vicious ones, came from supposedly \u201cliberal\u201d sources, which tell us that in 2019 USA \u201cliberals\u201d do not refer to folks with liberal ideas, but to folks who are hell-bent on imperialism and war; folks who don\u2019t care one bit about any real \u201cliberal\u201d values and who use a pseudo-liberal rhetoric to advocate for war outside the USA and for a plutocratic dictatorship inside the USA.<\/span><\/p>\n As for Gabbard herself, she already managed to publicly back-peddle to one obnoxious lobby (the homo lobby) on the issue of marriage (see here<\/a><\/strong>, here<\/strong><\/a>, here<\/a><\/strong> and here<\/a><\/strong>) and I fully expect her to cave in to the Zio-lobby just like Trump has been doing every day since he made it to the White House. Apparently, US public figures like Gabbard and Trump still don\u2019t understand the simple fact that NO amount of grovelling will EVER appease the Neocons or the Ziolobby (see here<\/a> for a perfect example of that attitude from Commentary).<\/span><\/p>\n In fact, one of two things are most likely to happen next:<\/span><\/p>\n Okay, in theory, a third option is possible (never say never!) but I see that as highly unlikely: Tulsi Gabbard follows in the footsteps of Trump and gets elected in spite of a massive media hate-campaign against her and once she makes it to the White House she does what Trump failed to do and appeals directly to the people of the USA to back her in a ruthless campaign to \u201cdrain the swamp\u201d (meaning showing the door to the Neocons and their Deep State). This is what Putin did, at least partially, when he came to power, by the way. Frankly, for all her very real qualities she does not strike me as a \u201cUS Putin\u201d nor does she have the kind of institutional and popular backing Putin had. So while I will never say never, I am not holding my breath on this one\u2026<\/span><\/p>\n Finally, if Gabbard truly is \u201cfor real\u201d then the Deep State will probably \u201cKennedy\u201d her and blame Russia or Iran for it.<\/span><\/p>\n Still, while we try to understand what, if anything, Tulsi Gabbard could do for the world, she does do good posting messages like this one:<\/span><\/p>\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Just-go-away.jpg\")
\n